by MrBill » Tue 30 Sep 2008, 08:02:43
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gerben', 'N')ot sure who can be held responsible, but the top villains are the idiots who thought it would be a good idea to deregulate the markets. It was nice while it lasted.
A common complaint, but here is another point of view.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he credibility of the charge depends on ignoring several important facts:
-- There has been a great deal of deregulation in our economy over the last 30 years, but none of it has been in the financial sector or has had anything to do with the current crisis. Almost all financial legislation, such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Improvement Act of 1991, adopted after the savings and loan collapse in the late 1980s, significantly tightened the regulation of banks.
-- The repeal of portions of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 -- often cited by people who know nothing about that law -- has no relevance whatsoever to the financial crisis, with one major exception: it permitted banks to be affiliated with firms that underwrite securities, and thus allowed Bank of America Corp. to acquire Merrill Lynch & Co. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. to buy Bear Stearns Cos. Both transactions saved the government the costs of a rescue and spared the market substantial additional turmoil.
None of the investment banks that got into financial trouble, specifically Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., were affiliated with commercial banks, and none were affected in any way by the repeal of Glass-Steagall.
It is correct to say that there has been significant deregulation in the U.S. over the last 30 years, most of it under Republican auspices. But this deregulation -- in long-distance telephone rates, air fares, securities-brokerage commissions, and trucking, to name just a few sectors of the economy where it occurred -- has produced substantial competition and innovation, driving down consumer costs and producing vast improvements and efficiencies in our economy.
The Internet, for example, wouldn't have been economically possible without the deregulation of data-transfer rates. Amazon.com Inc., one of the most popular Internet vendors, wouldn't have been viable without trucking deregulation
This is a partisan piece written by a Republican, but still we have to check the facts before reaching conclusions. Or rather populist conclusions. Never the less, global financial imbalances that start and end with the US' massive current account deficit - budget and trade deficits - are the real reason behind this financial crisis.
The specific set of events that triggered this implosion - like subprime mortgages or how they were sold and repackaged - matter very little. Without the initial deficits that created the imbalances there would not have been an explosion in credit - nor low real interest rates that sparked the rush into complicated financial products using securitization and over-leverage to boost returns.