by threadbear » Wed 27 Aug 2008, 13:36:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'P')lantagenet, You very likely know this already, but I'm going to spell it out really clearly for you:
John Edwards was the only candidate who was a slam dunk to win as president, demographically. He had across the board appeal to the disenfranchised in both parties. He was slimed by the New York Times, ages ago, in favour of a mixed race candidate with a funny name and a she monster loathed by most republicans, certainly the ones who vote as a block, the Christian right wing. Guess who provided a lot of funding for Hillary? Republicans...Who remains a reliably obstructive force in the Democratic party....Yes, the she monster it is!!!Ding ding ding.
This is the most manufactured pile of sh**, I've ever seen, blown out of proportion by media shills, at the precise time Obama was looking for a running mate. Edwards would have been the obvious choice. An Obama Edwards ticket would have been pretty much unbeatable.
But no...most democrats don't quite get what's going on either. I basically don't give a hoot. I dislike nearly all pols equally, including Edwards. I'm just looking at the demographics and marvelling at how the mass of Americans could be so freaking dumb.
I think you are ignoring Edward's own stupidity. Edwards has acted like a silly teenager.....doesn't he even know about birth control?
Edwards is to blame for his own poor decisions and Edwards is to blame for the lies and cover-up he created to hide his own stupidity and Edwards is to blame for not providing for his own child.
I just hope the vile Leiberman, recieves the same kind of vetting through the court of retard public opinion.
But wait...Like the other neo-cons, Leiberman is probably suppressing orgasm until missiles rain down on the innocent, in yet another war.