Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE International Energy Agency (IEA) Thread pt 2 (merged) A

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby idiom » Sat 05 Jul 2008, 23:20:40

Also Oil is way to freaking cool. It is still seriously undervalued for what it allows.
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby yesplease » Sat 05 Jul 2008, 23:24:28

Oil's long term elasticity isn't anywhere near it's long term elasticity.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby yesplease » Sat 05 Jul 2008, 23:49:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hogan', '?')?? [smilie=XXeyeslam.gif]
Nice to see another PO member interested in a discussion of the very subject they raised instead of fear mongering! :lol:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby yesplease » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 00:19:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hogan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hogan', '?')?? [smilie=XXeyeslam.gif]
Nice to see another PO member interested in a discussion of the very subject they raised instead of fear mongering! :lol:


I wasn't sure how to respond to an incoherent post.

Fear mongering, huh? Since when is telling people the truth about reality fear mongering?
FTW! :oops:

Oil's long term elasticity isn't anywhere it's short term elasticity. :lol: Anyway, saying oil's just too inelastic w/o looking at it's long-term elasticity is still fear mongering IMO. :-D
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby yesplease » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 00:36:51

Nope, that's not what I meant. The long-run and short-run elasticities of oil are different. For instance, if the short-run elasticity of oil results in a 3-5% drop in consumption after a doubling of price, the long run drop in consumption would be much larger, probably 4-6 times that. It isn't about economic collapse, or whatever doomcopian notion people wanna use ;), it's about people choosing to spend less on fuel and more on other things. Here's a good read. Check out table four to see the difference between short run and long run elasticities.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby mrobert » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 02:16:24

Why don't they tax fuels differently? One tax for fuel used for public transport, trucks, ships, etc, and another tax for fuel used for "personal entertainment".

It's not a solution, but could make things slightly better.
User avatar
mrobert
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby yesplease » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 02:33:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hogan', 'I') hate to break it to you, but without cheap oil and gasoline, world economic growth cannot continue. And without growth, the system collapses. Modern societies were built upon and are heavily dependent on the availability of cheap and plentiful energy. I shouldn't even have to mention this, because you already know this. This argument has been done a million times on this board, and has now become a total waste of time and energy. I won't get into any more debates or arguments with cornucopians here over the basics of ecology and geology. All I have to say is anyone here who still has doubts is they should read 2 books: The Collapse of Complex Societies, and Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. The argument and debate about these very basic and proven concepts is over as far as I'm concerned.
So you say. Around these parts proof for the most part comes via an ad hominem attack, followed by a barrage of Groupthink until the individual who had the audacity to question anything in the first place is put on everyone's ignore list so they don't have to even worry about the possibility of reading a different opinion compared to the doomcopianism smeared all over the forum. It's awful you know, questioning an article of faith everyone clings to. ;)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hogan', 'I') honestly have to say that I have had my fill of cornucopian thinking on this site. Ignore button clicked.
Yet again, another member of PO interested in discussing the issues at hand. :lol:
Last edited by yesplease on Sun 06 Jul 2008, 04:53:13, edited 2 times in total.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA: Stop keeping gasoline prices artificially low

Unread postby thor » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 03:45:55

Emerging markets are soon to be dissapearing markets. Their inflation rates are destructive by themselves.
User avatar
thor
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

July 2008 OMR from the IEA

Unread postby TonyPrep » Thu 10 Jul 2008, 05:24:42

Unusually, the latest OMR highlights (PDF) from the IEA does not give a global production figure, though it estimates a 350 kbpd increase in OPEC production and a meagre stock build for the 2nd quarter.

The highlights invariably include an overall production figure, and change from last month. Probably an oversight. Does anyone subscribe to the full report, and can post those figures here?
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

IEA: Production up 890,000 bbl in July to 87.8 million bpd

Unread postby copious.abundance » Tue 12 Aug 2008, 12:49:59

--> Marketwatch <--
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')...]Global oil demand for this year is expected to stand at 86.9 million barrels a day, unchanged from the previous month's forecasts, the IEA said in an August monthly report. Oil supplies, on the other hand, are expected to remain strong. The world produced 87.8 million barrels of oil in July, up 890,000 barrels from the previous month, the IEA said. [...]
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: IEA: Production up 890,000 bbl in July to 87.8 million b

Unread postby bkwillia » Tue 12 Aug 2008, 13:22:06

The IEA is a bears squeaky toy. They make the noises the bears need for better shorting conditions, but their reporting is wildly out of sync with the EIA, and shipping data.
User avatar
bkwillia
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon 20 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: IEA: Production up 890,000 bbl in July to 87.8 million b

Unread postby Cashmere » Tue 12 Aug 2008, 13:37:26

It's all about the crude oil.

Watch crude oil, not "total liquids".

When they are burning massive amounts of NG and Oil to extract tar sands and biofuels, the "total liquids" number becomes misleading.

So you suck 100 barrels out of the ground.
Then you burn all 100 barrels to produce 40 barrel equivalents of ethanol.

The "total liquids" reported is 140, but the actual net is 40.

Same deal here.

Watch crude. Crude is at 74. Same number as it was in 05.

When crude starts falling off, it's game over, regardless of the rest of the "liquid fuels" contingent.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: IEA: Production up 890,000 bbl in July to 87.8 million b

Unread postby TWilliam » Tue 12 Aug 2008, 15:33:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '-')->Marketwatch <--
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')...]Global oil demand for this year is expected to stand at 86.9 million barrels a day, unchanged from the previous month's forecasts, the IEA said in an August monthly report. Oil supplies, on the other hand, are expected to remain strong. The world produced 87.8 million barrels of oil in July, up 890,000 barrels from the previous month, the IEA said. [...]

Maybe just a coincidence (mmm hmm), but isn't that number for reported increase around the same that was reported as the amount of 'demand decrease' in the U.S. last month?
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IEA: Production up 890,000 bbl in July to 87.8 million b

Unread postby burtonridr » Tue 12 Aug 2008, 15:49:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'I')t's all about the crude oil. Watch crude oil, not "total liquids".
When they are burning massive amounts of NG and Oil to extract tar sands and biofuels, the "total liquids" number becomes misleading.
So you suck 100 barrels out of the ground. Then you burn all 100 barrels to produce 40 barrel equivalents of ethanol.
The "total liquids" reported is 140, but the actual net is 40.
Same deal here. Watch crude. Crude is at 74. Same number as it was in 05.
When crude starts falling off, it's game over, regardless of the rest of the "liquid fuels" contingent.

Has it really been flat lining that long?
Do you have links to any related articles or information?
Tired of high gas prices? [smilie=BangHead.gif] Then stop driving to work, duh..... Learn to Work from home

Peak Oil Blog = http://getroasted.wordpress.com
User avatar
burtonridr
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri 03 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA: Production up 890,000 bbl in July to 87.8 million b

Unread postby copious.abundance » Tue 12 Aug 2008, 15:51:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 'M')aybe just a coincidence (mmm hmm), but isn't that number for reported increase around the same that was reported as the amount of 'demand decrease' in the U.S. last month?

Ummm . . . not consuming 890K bpd does not make 890K bpd magically flow out of the ground.
The additional 890K bpd is production, not inventories.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest