by ReverseEngineer » Mon 04 Aug 2008, 03:51:27
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nicholai', 'R')everse Engineer, What do you think about Canada's situation? In my case, I live in the suburbs of Alberta. I'm looking at visiting an ecovillage in Quebec (about 90km south of Quebec City) and, if this ecovillage isn't to my liking, I'll be visiting various other ecovillages throughout Europe.
When I came to my conclusions that society was in the deep doo-doo about 3 years ago, I started to look at all sorts of possibilities to position myself well for survival. I even toyed with trading in my house for a sailboat and taking up residence on a deserted island in the South Pacific. Nixed that one because I really didn't think such an existence would be all that great, and so I started to look at the North American continent, which has been my home since birth. Great place North America, oddly developed though because of its colonization period followed by the Industrial era.
Canada overall is a great location, it has a relatively low population for the land mass, and good resources overall. So count yourself lucky to live in Canada to begin with. However, it still does depend currently on the same type of industrialized agriculture the US does, and it still has central cities that won't fare well when TSHTF. What you want to look for in survivability in my estimation is how defensible an area is that you will move to. I examined the history of civilizations and from this I determined that it was necessary to be in a location surrounded by mountains to have any type of independence. Most of central Canada, like the central US is pretty flat. Its good agriculturally, its bad from a defense point of view.
British Columbia around Prince George would be one of the best areas I think. In the thick of the Mountains. Quebec has some areas that are good because of so many lakes and swamps, and working toward Newfoundland you definitely have some decent cover.
The toughest part about moving outward to a place where the population density is low is current economics. In other words, you can pick a nice place to go, but is there a Job there for you? Unless you have a big bankroll (and I do not), you can't simply place yourself down in the ideal location without some means of producing income in the current economy. I don't know what you do for a living, and this impacts on the decision of where to go.
One thing to be careful about is actually BUYING property. Unless you can do most of it on Credit, spending your money on property in a given area is a waste IMHO. If your budget is small, you rent in an area that you want to live, and wait for the property values to crash. Around here, houses are going vacant right and left, I rent my place. I figure that all property is not really the belonging of anyone once TSHTF, so why should I spend my money on land? Rather, I spent it on goods I think will help me survive. Plenty of vacant houses around, I can find some place to park myself when it goes south, and why should I take on a mortgage? I operate day to day, and I can pack myself up and move even further out in an instant if need be. I have a couple of small house size tents and I keep my truck filled with fuel to drive 200 miles further out into the wilderness if need be. Don't think that will be necessary though, the area is overbuilt for the population and there are plenty of vacant properties to take over. Mostly owned as Vacation Homes by rich folks who hardly ever get here now, and when the airlines go belly up they won't EVER be coming back.
I operate on the principle that the monetary system is already toast. Nobody REALLY owns anything. I only spend my money on stuff I need for survival. I can survive a good year or more in the woods with my stockpile of food and my tents and the wood surrounding me for fuel. I don't think that will be necessary though, and that is not what I will try to engineer. When the SHTF, I will get together with my friends, and they will finally LISTEN to me, and stop denying the truth.
Reverse Engineer