Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Middle ground between believers & deniers

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 20:33:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'T')here you go, proof positive that suburbia can feed itself. By the way Narz, why don't you post some pictures of your garden? The rest of us would love to see the results of your efforts.

I live in a apartment complex, all the land is landscaped. I just have some tomatoes growing in a pot. Next year get back to me.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 20:36:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '
')I live in a apartment complex, all the land is landscaped.


Oh dang!

So much for just grow your own food when you're hungry, huh?
Ludi
 

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Homesteader » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 20:49:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'T')here you go, proof positive that suburbia can feed itself. By the way Narz, why don't you post some pictures of your garden? The rest of us would love to see the results of your efforts.

I live in a apartment complex, all the land is landscaped. I just have some tomatoes growing in a pot. Next year get back to me.


I look forward to next years report. I'm sure the tomatoes will be much bigger by then.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 20:54:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '
')You should move then while you can.


So your solution is a massive upheaval of populations from harsh climates to climates conducive to growing one's own food?

Who is going to pay for that? How will the new populations be accommodated in the new locations?

Don't worry about that. Just take care of yourself.

That's your problem Ludi, you take the weight of the world on your back. People will adapt, or they won't, meanwhile you're unhappy cause your crops are dead.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'m not saying it can't be done, I'm just trying to show that glib answers such as "grow your own food when you get hungry!" and "move to where you can easily grow your own food" are just that - glib. They offer easy answers to very difficult problems.

I don't think most people will need to grow their own food but if it's a concern for you, move to somewhere you can do it. I'd be depressed as hell if I lived in a drought prone area.
Last edited by Narz on Fri 25 Jul 2008, 21:01:52, edited 1 time in total.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 20:58:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '
')I live in a apartment complex, all the land is landscaped.


Oh dang!

So much for just grow your own food when you're hungry, huh?

I don't plan to be here for very long.

I'm not the one who thinks Americans will be starving to death any time soon.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'I') look forward to next years report. I'm sure the tomatoes will be much bigger by then.

Next year I'll have many more crops, hopefully. Money is a concern you know. We'll see. It's not top priority right now.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 21:00:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'T')he Last Middle Grounder.

I'm sure plenty more will reply.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'W')elcome Narz. You are doomed :)

We're all doomed. Some of us just like to entertain fantasies about being some sort of "last man standing". :roll:
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby patience » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 21:27:43

I don't have a clue whether I am a moderate or what. Don't know the definitions. I do think the US is going to crash pretty hard, and the financial portion of that seems to be leading the way. I expect that our govt will muck up whatever problems come along, favor their banking buddies, corporate donaters, etc., to the detriment of everyone else. If credit for business goes down, we have a big problem, and soon. I expect that to lead to govt's inflating away all they can, making us all poorer. I expect to work as long as I live, since the Social Security I just signed up for will probably be inflated away.

I think we'll have petroleum products, at constantly increasing prices, for a long time yet. As a mechanical engineer who has delved into alternatives, I'm certain there are no techno-fixes for depleting oil, gas, and minerals. Anybody know what happens when we run short of easily obtainable tungsten, cobalt, vanadium, etc.? Well, it gets more difficult to make and machine the steel and other metals we are so used to being really cheap. And as the cost of energy goes up, the cost of producing those metals, even from recyclables, goes up dramatically. Think manufacturing costs doubling with some regularity, relative to incomes. There's a big gotcha waiting in this area.

Plastics are made from oil and NG, so they are going way the heck up in price to the point of not being economical for a lot of present uses. Think plastic bags, food wrap, appliance parts, on and on. Our disposable lifestyle is going to change soon.

I think we will regress from our present lifestyle on a continuum of change from the present back through history to the point that we can be sustainable. I don't think the planet can support nearly as many people as exist now, and even less as climate worsens. How long this takes is a complex question I can't answer, but being at retirement age, I think it will be in my lifetime. I don't see major cities as sustainable very many years into the future without major changes that will be traumatic. From what I've seen of city people, they will mostly stay where they are, with some wandering away and causing trouble. I don't see Mad Max as happening soon without something like all out nuclear war.

Am I doomer? Moderate? Not a cornucopian, for certain. And My crystal ball just shows reflections.

edit: When I got a driver's license in 1963, I would never have believed that a gas fill-up would cost more now than a skilled tradesman made then all week. Thus, as the situation changes and plays out, I reserve the right to change my mind. Adaptability is a virtue, I think.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 22:17:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', ' ')People will adapt, or they won't


Yep, that's pretty much what I think too. So we're not so different in our positions. Except I spend too much time worrying about other people, I guess. :)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 22:31:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'A')daptability is a virtue, I think.

Definitely! :)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattS', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattS', 'A')nd cheap energy? That disappeared YEARS ago! Where have you been?

You kiddin'? Energy is still damn cheap!


Not according to the people who keep doing the follow calculation...."Look! Peak Oil was right! Prices have skyrocketed 1200% in just 10 years! It must be so!!"

Cheap being a relative concept, crude today certainly ain't cheap compared to "the good ol' days!".

I agree but it's still cheap enough that the average person isn't changing their lifestyle much. When 10% of suburbanites are biking to work then we can safely say it's expensive.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', ' ')People will adapt, or they won't

Yep, that's pretty much what I think too. So we're not so different in our positions. Except I spend too much time worrying about other people, I guess. :)
I don't think we're that different in our positions. I can't think too much about others, it's too stressful. People who cannot or refuse to adapt, well, they won't adapt. Many will know better but end up suffering because of financial reasons (and many young ones simply because their parents are stupid), I feel for them :( but I can't do anything about it.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 22:34:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Narz', ' ')I can't think too much about others, it's too stressful.


I can't help it. Maybe it's my latent "mother instinct." :) It's the reason I'm on this board, to try to help other people.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 22:43:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') can't help it. Maybe it's my latent "mother instinct." :) It's the reason I'm on this board, to try to help other people.

When I was a boy I always tried to help others. I used to always lend out pens & pencils. I would lend everyone my Nintendo games. When I didn't get my pens & pencils back and had to buy new Nintendo games I started to learn.

I'm happy if my presence & commentary helps people & I'm happy to help those I love & respect. But helping strangers is not my priority.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Canuk » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 00:24:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'I') don't have a clue whether I am a moderate or what. Don't know the definitions. I do think the US is going to crash pretty hard, and the financial portion of that seems to be leading the way. I expect that our govt will muck up whatever problems come along, favor their banking buddies, corporate donaters, etc., to the detriment of everyone else. If credit for business goes down, we have a big problem, and soon. I expect that to lead to govt's inflating away all they can, making us all poorer. I expect to work as long as I live, since the Social Security I just signed up for will probably be inflated away.


Unfortunately as goes the US so goes the world. Its unfortunate that from Reagan on they did not continue on with the work started by Nixon, Ford and Carter. They did a good job on making people feel good but not at the long term planning that used to be part of governing. Instead of slowing down for the red light ahead they hit the gas...

You are likely right about Social Security - it is a concern - rates should have been increased years ago to build up the fund - the system was unfortunately created when population growth rates were higher in the US and it was never corrected to reflect the new reality of less workers per pensioner. Also, 65 was picked as a retirement age by Otto Von Bismark as a reward for being long lived - only 1% of the male population (women did not work then) made it to that age in Germany so he set retirement up as a reward for longevity. This date was taken by most other industrial countries but the current trend of people living well into there 80's and 90's was never considered.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', '
')Anybody know what happens when we run short of easily obtainable tungsten, cobalt, vanadium, etc.? Well, it gets more difficult to make and machine the steel and other metals we are so used to being really cheap. And as the cost of energy goes up, the cost of producing those metals, even from recyclables, goes up dramatically. Think manufacturing costs doubling with some regularity, relative to incomes.


Also a mechanical engineer - I suspect that technology levels will revert to previous levels as energy and other materials become scarce. I suspect that there will be a big market for repairing items again - hopefully the new items we make will actually be repairable.
Maybe a little less insert molding, ultrasonic welding, etc. and more screws so things can be disassembled and fixed - unfortunately more expensive as well. A more long term prediction is smaller factories making greater varieties of parts in smaller batches for regional or national markets with less choice and variety. Kind of back to the 1920's...
User avatar
Canuk
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri 04 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby jtmorgan61 » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 01:39:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PStarr', 'W')hen 100 million Indians/Bangladeshis deplete their shallow water wells and run out of irrigation diesel will that affect your next meal out? How about that Chilean phospate mine? Will it operate when the Chileans are hungry and angry.


I model relatively similar declines for most developed nations but more modest declines in less developed countries because I think they have less fat to cut, and some are generally in a much stronger growth position, while others have low requirements and probably won't be allowed to fall into disarray by the international community. Disagree? Spreadsheets available on request.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PStarr', ' ')What fraction of national our petroleum use does not support your dinner? Can you quantify that?


Sure, let's discuss individual sector cuts. I'll use the most pessimistic model, Ace/Simmons with no 2G biofuels. On a 2020 timeline, global usage declines to 58% of current value and I've modeled the U.S. to absorb a much steeper decline to 48% of current value. Pretty gut-wrenching stuff. That's basically what we produce now (with emergency drilling more or less counteracting depletion) plus a few mbd of XTL plus a few mbd of tarsands. Very close to a no-import situation for the Canada-U.S. bloc, which is as bad as it gets.

Some of the key cuts by sector, and analysis:

(41%) Personal transportation, cut to 30%. 10% relocalization, 30% telecommuting/carpooling/public transit, 40% increased vehicle efficiency.

(13%) Trucks, cut to 47%. 30% improved efficiency (electric trucks for local routes, aerodynamics), 20% replacement with rail, 15% sector destruction (longest-distance routes eliminated).

(10%) Plastics, Fertilizer, etc., cut to 64%. 20% Improved Efficiency (smaller bottles etc.), 15% Recycling, 15% substitution with other feedstocks (depending on item)

(7%) Air Travel, cut to 50%. Enough said.

(5%) Process heat, cut to 20%. It seems like it would be very easy to substitute a point heat source in most processes, but I'm open to correction on this point.

(5%) Heat and hot water, 55%. Reduced usage (20%), alt-technology substitution, 30% (gas, electric, solar thermal, heat well, etc.)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PStarr', '
')Electrified farms? You're kidding me. Have you ever been on a farm? Who and when will purchase the electric dryers, augers, tractors, harvesters, bailers, loaders, Rails from where to who? What grid? What powerplants?


(2%) Agriculture, 85%. Equipment efficiency gains, 10%. Reduction in tillage 7% (marginal beef feed land mostly, meat is an easy thing to cut back on and it is going to be very expensive.)

(1.2%) Rail, 200%. The rail industry is booming, already expects to double capacity between 2030, so this seems well within scale if oil prices spiral upwards.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PStarr', 'Y')ou seem to be a techtopian in a simple virtual world. I live in a complex interconnected and very fragile system dependent completely on cheap petroleum.


I don't think these projections are overly optimistic. People are starting to really respond. Demand is down by 5% this year, and it wouldn't even be a recession without the housing crisis. VC funding is exploding in the alternative energy sector, and it is now tied for most invested sector at a rate of almost $5 billion/year. Just about every major player save Exxon Mobil has taken a serious stake in one or more companies. We won't be able to pick winners until 2011 or so, which is a dangerous gap in the process. But I'm optimistic that one of the designs will come through with oil at $80-$90/barrel - heck, the failed TDP technology came in at $80/barrel.

The public is also waking up and starting to take this matter quite seriously right now, as I expected but few doomers did. According to voters the economy is the top issue in the election, and the top economic issue is energy. If Obama wins, he has said that if he could accomplish one thing, it would be a bold energy policy. Yes, he really picked that above all other options at a roundtable last December. It would make a pretty interesting thread to discuss whether a $15b/year plan starting in 2010 along with a doubling of funding for basic science research ($20b) will have any impact. Because there's a good chance that that's what we're going to get. Worth thinking about if you have a vote in this fall's elections.
Last edited by jtmorgan61 on Sat 26 Jul 2008, 02:10:57, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jtmorgan61
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby davep » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 05:20:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', 'T')he question then becomes "Can we produce a given quantity of food without recourse to as much energy as we do now?" and the answer is obviously yes. So Liebig's Law is incorrectly appropriated in his argument. It's not as simple as saying that we used a phantom energy source and therefore we are in overshoot.
It is certainly not obvious we can produce our food without petroleum. On the contrary it is virtually impossible to do so. I challenge you to name one agriculture system in the world today that is not utterly dependent on fossil fuels, primarily diesel. I will not consider exceptions such as permaculture gardens, bio-intensive communes, or science fiction hydroponic gadgets. These exist only as experiments or isolated prototypes.

It is up to you to describe a agroeconomic example, model, or theory that will feed a modern industrial society, living beyond a neolithic or paleolithic state (in a condition known as civilized) without petroleum.

Now in the absence of such example it becomes true then that Liebig's Law is in fact "correctly appropriated," that we do use "a phantom energy source," and "therefore we are in overshoot."



You missed my point entirely. In the past we have used zero oil to farm. We are now using a huge amount of energy to create our crops. Therefore, if we could scale non-petroleum based techniques (I'm not saying we can) then we could produce enough for the world's population (this could include stopping the majority of corn etc going to feed cattle etc).

The reason why I'm talking about these hypotheticals is purely to show that the argument that we are in overshoot due to Liebig's Law is incorrect. I don't need to show potential solutions for this to be the case. It suffices to know that we can hypothetically produce food using less energy, and the argument is proven to be logically fallacious.

I'm not going to get bogged down in the details of real-world agricultural systems. The point of my remarks here is purely to show that we are not necessarily in overshoot because we got to where we are using the phantom energy source that is oil.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')y your reasoning DaveP

furthermore you ask for mathematic proof of overshoot. That is simple. The exponential growth function applied to the biologic imperative to leave more offspring then oneself.


That was the same even 100 000 years ago. We weren't in overshoot then, so your point is without merit (concerning current population levels).
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 08:00:04

As Monte has pointed out a gazillion times, we need more than just food to survive. We don't in fact know if there is enough fresh water available to 6 billion people without the benefit of petroleum products. We don't know if there are sufficient biological waste sinks for 6 billion people. It's not just about feeding people!
Ludi
 

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby cube » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 08:09:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'H')ere's my garden in the current drought:

Image

Where's the food?


Do you see why I'm a little doomy lately?

The next time there's a city vs. rural debate and somebody says, "we're all going to run out of the city and grow our own food."
I'm going to show them this picture!
//
I don't plan on growing a garden ever.
cube's "food strategy" ---> cannibalism.
I'll NEVER run out of food. :twisted:

BTW I'm a doomer in case anybody hasn't noticed.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 08:19:27

Here's my other garden, the one that survived the drought (so far) just so folks don't get too discouraged! :P

Image

I do have to admit I was literally crying over the big garden, when I finally had to give up the losing battle.
Ludi
 

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Unread postby lper100km » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 11:10:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')I don't plan on growing a garden ever.
cube's "food strategy" ---> cannibalism.
I'll NEVER run out of food. :twisted:

BTW I'm a doomer in case anybody hasn't noticed.



Not great strategy, Cube. Cannibalism is proven to cause C-J disease (mad cow in humans) So you'll lose your mind if you haven't already done so by then! :P
User avatar
lper100km
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Over the tracks, left under the overpass, right, third boxcar on the left, ask for Jack
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests