Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Middle ground between believers & deniers

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby davep » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 11:10:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ORNUCOPIAN PARADIGM: A view of past and future human progress that disregards the carrying capacity concept, pays no attention to the finiteness of the world or to differences between takeover and drawdown, and accepts uncritically the myth of limitlessness. (Catton)
The science of ecology is more threatening to the reigning paradigm then even evolution. It suggests that our very success is a threat to the natural world that harbors us. Evolution only tells us we come from animals. Ecology informs us that we will return there.


Oi! This is a middle ground thread, not a cornucopian one. :P
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby Toploader » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 12:02:18

My views make even the most hardened doomers seem moderate.

So I tend not to bother posting them, there is not point in bringing people around to hopelessness when there is nothing they can do about it. The party’s not quite over yet after all.

And as the saying goes, those that believe it can't be done should not get in the way of those actually trying to do it.
User avatar
Toploader
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun 30 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby roccman » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 12:28:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Interfector', 'B')y that I mean, anyone who believes that the era of cheap oil is over, and that life will probably get steadily tougher for the majority of people, but doesn't think that we'll be resorting to cannibalism to survive within a decade, but that could be a potential scenario in the future if the right action isn't taken now.



6 Billion or more dieing in under 20 years is a stark cold fact.

However - the illusion is powerful.

Thus you have "middlegrounders"...or those who believe in a god that will save them.

Oh well - so it goes.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby benzoil » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 12:41:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '6') Billion or more dieing in under 20 years is a stark cold fact.


Actually, that'd be an opinion. *shrug*

Oh well - so it goes. :-D
TANSTAAFL
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby roccman » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 12:47:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '6') Billion or more dieing in under 20 years is a stark cold fact.


Actually, that'd be an opinion. *shrug*

Oh well - so it goes. :-D


Have you read any of Monte's post?

Catton's Overshoot?

Hanson' DieOff?

It is also a fact that all banks are insolvent and are failed currently.

You gonna stand in the blast zone just to be sure it's a fact rather than opinion?

Great !!
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby jtmorgan61 » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:07:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', 'T')here will be a long series of financial crises. The current one will be fairly mild, comparatively. The big one will come in a couple years. I haven't figured out when/how the urban/rural dynamic will play out yet though.


I missed this one last night, but yeah, I agree. I think we might see as good as 1% GDP growth in the U.S. next year as the oil price stabilizes around $120/barrel for a bit and the financial crisis works its way through the system. Of course that growth would be enough to push the oil price through the roof, putting us into another (worse?) recession in the 2010-11 timeframe.

I don't think your average person is going to give up on technological society until after 2015. That means urban life is a good place to make money though 2012 or so. Personally my canary in the coal mine is the urban poor in developing countries with decent government stability (so no, Zimbabwe doesn't count.) The life expectancy is probably going to go down a bit due to increased senior and infant mortality no matter what, but if healthy adults start starving, and the feedback from 2-G biofuel plants is uniformly bad, then it's time to start making bugout plans.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', 'Y')ou gonna stand in the blast zone...?


For me it is a calculated risk. It's my assessment that if gentler decline rates prevail or non-food biofuel works out there won't be a total collapse. Heck, if both happen we might even see tepid economic growth in the 2020-2030 time frame. I'm young and I don't really have the money to get out easily now. Going rural early would involve abandoning my career just as I'm starting to make useful contributions to my field and would significantly lower my chances of getting married to a suitable partner. I'm also well connected, fit and useful as field labor, and arguably smart enough to stick with any organizations that survive any crash. You better believe I'm trying to figure out how to stockpile more food and water in my tiny apartment, though.

As for the main doomer texts, I don't really want to derail what has been a productive thread too much. I wonder if Monte and Matt Savinar remember the arguments I got into with them a few years ago. After about 20-30 pages each of those discussions pretty much boiled down to the "view of humanity" posted above. (Back in those days there were a lot more believers in the idea of "TPTB" gearing up to kill off the population with oil as an excuse, though.) I never got Monte or Savinar to add up the numbers to produce mass die-off from depletion alone in the 2010-2030 time frame; the conversation would always shift to resource wars, ecological destruction, carrying capacity, limits to growth, etc.
Last edited by jtmorgan61 on Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:26:19, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
jtmorgan61
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby benzoil » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:14:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '6') Billion or more dieing in under 20 years is a stark cold fact.


Actually, that'd be an opinion. *shrug*

Oh well - so it goes. :-D


Have you read any of Monte's post?

Catton's Overshoot?

Hanson' DieOff?

It is also a fact that all banks are insolvent and are failed currently.

You gonna stand in the blast zone just to be sure it's a fact rather than opinion?

Great !!


I've read it. It's pretty scary stuff. Plenty of people are going to die in the next half century. 6 billion (the entire current population of the planet) dying off in the next 20 years is still an opinion. It might EVEN be a strong theory with tons of support...but it's not a fact yet.

Thus, maybe there is room for a middle ground between "technology will save us" and a complete extinction of the human race within 2 decades. It's going to suck...a lot, but if even if we roll back the last 500 years of progress - or the last 2000 years - it's not the end of mankind.

And no, I'm not gonna stand in the blast zone. Check my Location. Plan for the worst. Hope for the best. And keep a good sense of humor.
TANSTAAFL
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby roccman » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:20:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '6') Billion or more dieing in under 20 years is a stark cold fact.


Actually, that'd be an opinion. *shrug*

Oh well - so it goes. :-D


Have you read any of Monte's post?

Catton's Overshoot?

Hanson' DieOff?

It is also a fact that all banks are insolvent and are failed currently.

You gonna stand in the blast zone just to be sure it's a fact rather than opinion?

Great !!


I've read it. It's pretty scary stuff. Plenty of people are going to die in the next half century. 6 billion (the entire current population of the planet) dying off in the next 20 years is still an opinion. It might EVEN be a strong theory with tons of support...but it's not a fact yet.

Thus, maybe there is room for a middle ground between "technology will save us" and a complete extinction of the human race within 2 decades. It's going to suck...a lot, but if even if we roll back the last 500 years of progress - or the last 2000 years - it's not the end of mankind.

And no, I'm not gonna stand in the blast zone. Check my Location. Plan for the worst. Hope for the best. And keep a good sense of humor.


Ok - I will agree that it is opinion...because it is.

I just wish the english language had a word that was between opinion and fact.

Standing in the blast zone to prove one is right is not a good survival plan.

Sounds like your head is screwed on fairly tightly.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby Canuk » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:23:17

More of a moderate myself I hope the doomsday prophets are wrong.

If a major resource war breaks (beyond the current Iraw debacle) out all bets are off but there is hope for a middle ground.

Any type of controlled (soft) landing would need serious reductions and perhaps even rationing similar to WWI and eventual abandonment of personal transport for the majority (cars). The current subsidies in much of our system need to be removed to make costs more transparent - a greater user pay system for infrastructure and energy would significantly reduce consumption instead of using the general tax pool to subsidise daily living.
User avatar
Canuk
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri 04 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby benzoil » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:42:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jtmorgan61', 'I') don't think your average person is going to give up on technological society until after 2015. That means urban life is a good place to make money though 2012 or so. Personally my canary in the coal mine is the urban poor in developing countries with decent government stability (so no, Zimbabwe doesn't count.) The life expectancy is probably going to go down a bit due to increased senior and infant mortality no matter what, but if healthy adults start starving, and the feedback from 2-G biofuel plants is uniformly bad, then it's time to start making bugout plans.


The cities will always be better places to make money unless there is a complete collapse and then agricultural land will be where the money is. I figured it'd take me 10 years to get established though. Combine that with the peak of the housing bubble and it was a good time for me to move. Like I said, plan for the worst, hope for the best. I make less money out here in the schtix (and thank ja I'm already married! Slim pickin's!), but I'm able to deal with either contingency. If they perfect cold fusion tomorrow, then great! My kids get to grow up in the country. OTOH, if oil disappears tomorrow I've got a remote chance of getting by.

I haven't thought about a personal canary in a coalmine though. Partly because I'm already in my "bugout" location and partly because I do think it will be a long, bumpy slide. There might never be a singular last stop on the collective trolley, but I figured I'd rather get off a little early and walk a few blocks than miss my stop.
TANSTAAFL
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby cube » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 18:16:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Toploader', '.')..
And as the saying goes, those that believe it can't be done should not get in the way of those actually trying to do it.
Unfortunately people with grand visions often try to use OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY to fund their pet project. :roll:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby jbeckton » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 20:19:58

I'd say the sudden onslaught of media coverage and corresponding public outrage about energy prices have started the discussion that will do much to soften the eventual blow. And by "blow" I don't mean die-off (at least in developed nations), I mean transitional period. The sooner they start building the nukes (people are changing their opinions after paying the bills) the better off we will be.
Those that cannot do..... teach. Those that cannot teach......teach gym.-Jack black
User avatar
jbeckton
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Fri 05 Jan 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby Typo » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 22:28:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '6') Billion or more dieing in under 20 years is a stark cold fact.

However - the illusion is powerful.

Thus you have "middlegrounders"...or those who believe in a god that will save them.

Oh well - so it goes.

Oh geezzz . . . thank you, Nostradamus. Also, thank you for providing the perfect example of my observation that the most extreme doomers only write in "one-line zingers," as if every sentence they were laying down in print on an anonymous Internet forum was mana from heaven. I suggest giving paragraphs a try; they will do wonders for making your thoughts more cohesive.

Furthermore, I'm about as agnostic as they come, and I'm an optimist. I am not a "cornucopian," because I believe there is a carrying capacity. I just don't think we've reached it yet, nor will we for some time.
User avatar
Typo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue 01 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby timmac » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 22:52:02

[smilie=4robot.gif] [6 billion will not be dieing off, that is way to doom for me]
User avatar
timmac
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby HEADER_RACK » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 01:04:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Toploader', 'M')y views make even the most hardened doomers seem moderate


I won't bet on that with me.
Nothing is more dangerous than a man with nothing left to lose but has everything left to gain.
User avatar
HEADER_RACK
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 01:41:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '6') Billion or more dieing in under 20 years is a stark cold fact.


Actually, that'd be an opinion. *shrug*

Oh well - so it goes. :-D


Have you read any of Monte's post?

Yeah. I wish I could have that time back. :roll:

Monte, Cashmere and the like are suicidal. And they want me to be too. Fuck that.

Monte's like a fucking robot. Lacking the freedom of thought to imagine any opinion or scenario than the one cattle-prodded into his brain. If everyone thought like him we certainly might as well all commit mass-suicide. He seems to have had the creativity and innovation that makes a person human surgically removed from his brain.

Guys like Monte have been mouthing off since Malthus. Maybe someday they'll be right but I certainly wouldn't bet on their timeframe.

Hey Rocc, did you read the "Population Bomb" back in the 70's? Weren't we all supposed to be dead 30 years ago?
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby Narz » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 01:49:16

Oh yeah, and I'm a moderate. When I first joined I was a bit of a scared doomer but the more I read on this site the more I tend to swing to the moderate side. The doomers are sound-biters with suicide complexes mostly. They have a few good points but rarely provide any data to support their arguments and, in general, give this forum & other similar sites a bad name.

Kind of like the boy who cried wolf. Maybe if the lad had actually studied patterns of wolf attacks and presented a plan to the local town consul about how best to protect the town he would have been listened to. Likewise, if the doomers provided some viable alternate plans for society instead of yelling "It's all over after next Tuesday" (Rocc), trying to profit off scared newbies (Savinar) and beating people over the head with a book (Monte) they might actually have some use (no offense Rocc, I like you personally).

Besides the flaming, one of the reasons I put Monte on ignore is due to his inability to respond to the concept that we might find a similar resource to oil. Had Monte been alive 300 years ago he never would have believed oil could possibly exist. He simply would have called me "in denial" had I told him civilization could go on without wood power. Life is too short to waste talking to a robot.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: Any middle grounders here?

Postby TheDude » Fri 25 Jul 2008, 01:53:21

You know what Monte would/will say to that, of course. Six letters, begins with H ends with s has "ubri" in the middle...

Monte has a noble message to convey, but I don't see it ever gaining traction. I've always been puzzled by the cornucopians' dreams of hundreds of billions standing shoulder-to-shoulder - that some kind of kneejerk response?

I'd much rather read Jack's posts. Humour so black your eyes water. These 65 page threads on the precise scope of inevitable death are like turgid theological debates on the structure of Hell.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests