Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Al Gore Thread pt 2 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Mesuge » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 10:10:16

Someone on that TOD forum thread dug out Gore's transcript from Larry King (2006), where he speaks briefly about peak oil. So, obviously he is very well versed in that for some time. The other issue is that for some reason/strategy/timing he has not taken this into forefront on other occasions.

Speaking of the 2020-30 time frame, the real-life test will be if any of the top tier countries will make any significant progress on renewables. I doubt that with the possible exception of small Iceland anybody will score 51% and up in the sector of renewable electricity not to speak about the entire energy mix..

Even taking into account the possibility of some massive demand destruction, if you don't perform well in this renewables direction, the outlook for 2030 is very bleak.

So, this tip toe dancing by Gore can bee seen as very cowardish,
unless he plans to go massively public with the peak oil theme by this years Q3 and "Die-off" by Q4.. hah
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby joelcolorado » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 10:26:17

While he spoke, two limos and a hummer sat outside with engines running so the air conditioners were working so Gore and wife and daughter didnt have to get in a hot car after the speech.

Video on FOX news this morning. What an asshole. Do as I say, not as I do. Same ole shit outta the rich elitist.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby retiredguy » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 10:48:43

I didn't see any mention of the need to reduce per capita power consumption in Gore's proposal. Nor did he mention the need to control population growth.

Any serious proposal to eliminate FF usage has to address these issues, IMHO.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 12:17:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'I') loathe the "Man on the Moon" comparison.
....

Even the "technology will save the day" Trolls on this forum wouldn't even have the gall to spout such nonsense. :roll:

Cornucopians, like all good forecasters, tend to avoid making predictions that are demonstrably wrong in the present. Anyone can overplay their card - Gore, Simmons, anyone - if they push their sales pitch past the point of credibility. This is one such lapse, and a real shark-jump where I'm sitting.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Cashmere » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 12:50:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', '
')Most of the rest of you have your heads so far up your asses you think sh*t is sunshine.
. . .

Some one starts to propose a program that approaches what our extremely severe crisis calls for


What is it with the Goraphilics? Or is it the Goraholics?

It's like these people so desperately need a leader, a hero, who will parade their pet cause, that they are willing to ignore the most profound hypocrisy to create and maintain that leader.

Try this Doh Boi, the "program" that Gore has "proposed" would be

<i><b>an unmitagated disaster</i></b>.

Ok?

If you don't understand why that is, then you don't understand the problem.

Gore's "proposal" has, at its base, the concept that we can <i>continue to use as much energy as we are currently using</i>.

Gore just wants to supplant X with Y.

Even if we can ignore the hole in his "plan" . . .

Wait. That's not fair.

Saying that his plan has a "hole" in it doesn't quite capture it.

His "plan" <i><b>IS</i></b> a hole, and there's a tiny rim of substance around it to differentiate it from the surrounding area.

His hole suffers from many maladies.

The most egregious is that it ignores the fundamental problem - that we are running out of Fossil Fuels.

That, in itself, is an unforgivable failure of the hole.

But it gets worse.

Instead of leaving it at that, Gore has done far worse.

His hole, in effect, is worse than a "plan" to "do nothing." At least if we do nothing, we won't piss away billions of dollars and millions of barrels of oil pursuing . . .

. . . PV and wind and tide and horse farts.

Gore, not content with a quick slam into the concrete after a 300 foot drop, wants to accelerate us prior to impact by blowing a substantial amount of available resources on ridiculous things like "tide power."

Yes folks, tide power.

And between Al the faker and Bush the idiot, I'd say it would be a close tossup at this juncture.

So, Alaholics, take a deep breath and take a step back -

Your man's hole of a solution, if implemented, would doom us more completely, because when the liquid fuels are gone, the miles of tide power and square miles of PV and cubic miles of wind farms WILL NOT help us.

In fact, they will be nothing more than ridiculous memorials to the foolishness inherent in a HOLE that ignores the problem -

The problem, Al et al., is that we are running out of FFs.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 13:24:40

Ten years is absurd.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Bas » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 13:38:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'T')en years is absurd.

it is in TWAWKI.....but......it would be possible if there's political unanimity on it.....which....is.....unlikely. But then again, stranger things have happened.
Bas
 

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Kingcoal » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 13:42:13

Actually, while I disagree with Al on global warming being settled science, I agree with the idea of spending trillions on wind, solar, hydro and geothermal systems. These projects require huge capital investment and the return may take a while, but they are well worth the initial investment. For example, I doubt that the Hover Dam could have been built with the current political mentality. Huge projects such as the Apollo program, require vision, a can-do spirit and willingness to take on risk.

In order to make these systems worthwhile, we will need to update and upgrade much of the electrical grid. We have the means, using existing technology, to make electricity virtually abundant and very cheap, which would help out a great deal with maintaining civilization in lieu of PO. In other words, we need all the help we can get. Cheap, abundant electricity will make it much easier on us. Electric resistance heat, for example, would become practical.

My Utopian idea for dealing with PO involves spending all our remaining money and fuel on building a brand new electrical grid based on renewables and massive expansion of electric powered public transit. The chances of that actually happening are about zero, but it's fun to dream.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby rdsaltpower » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 13:43:58

right on cashmere!
User avatar
rdsaltpower
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed 30 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Maddog78 » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 13:44:49

I could be wrong but aren't there days when the wind doesn't blow?
This is going to take one hell of a battery system.
I did notice it said in the article that he offered no specifics on this trillion dollar plan. Not surprising.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Bas » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 13:48:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'A')ctually, while I disagree with Al on global warming being settled science, I agree with the idea of spending trillions on wind, solar, hydro and geothermal systems.


Isn't it great how these different sets of problems point to the same solutions; our concern about climate change might yet save our asses from the wrath of resource depletion...
Bas
 
Top

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Bas » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 13:55:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', 'I') could be wrong but aren't there days when the wind doesn't blow?
This is going to take one hell of a battery system.
I did notice it said in the article that he offered no specifics on this trillion dollar plan. Not surprising.


or we need superconductive connections to reach from one windy place to one that's not. Or from one sunny place to one that's not. Or we could have a superconductive marketplace that would make electricity more expensive when the wind's not blowing. You can also shut off hydropower when it's windy and on when it's not windy, in fact you can combine the too by using wind to pump water up mechanically etc.....lots of solutions and more probable than not it will take a combination of a great many of them to make an all-renewable system work. :)
Bas
 
Top

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 14:05:14

I would have said misallocation of resources or stranding capital, but that is one way of putting it.

I think the biggest reason people expect a free lunch now is they think they got one before, back in the 60s. In fact at the time, they simply did not see the hard work a whole army of people put in the kitchen to prepare that meal. Well in that kitchen today there are a couple of guys who could maybe rustle up a cheese sandwich and there is some lasagna in the fridge which might still be good after a microwave. That is what the world is going to get when it next yells "Cake!" Exactly the kind of lunch they planned for.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Is Gore's 10 year goal of converting the US to 100% renewabl

Unread postby allenwrench » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 15:20:04

{thread merged by emersonbiggins}

Is Gore's 10 year goal of converting the US to 100% renewables realistic?

Both in time frame to complete and the practical aspects of getting 100% of the US of A's power from solar, wind and other renewables?

One other thing.

I am not talking about reducing the 'American Dream' by all that much. Sure we can use renewables and cut way back from how we live. But how will Gore's plan fair if we do not wish to 'reduce complexity' as one famous hydrogen power devotee wrote in his book on the coming economic collapse.
User avatar
allenwrench
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Wed 23 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Kingcoal » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 15:26:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'A')ctually, while I disagree with Al on global warming being settled science, I agree with the idea of spending trillions on wind, solar, hydro and geothermal systems.
Isn't it great how these different sets of problems point to the same solutions; our concern about climate change might yet save our asses from the wrath of resource depletion...

Yes, I like Al Gore and I voted for him in 2000. I think that we would be in a vastly different situation today (for the better) had he won the election.

The only alternatives that are worth anything are renewables. Hydro power not only works, but is very cheap after the initial investment. Most plants aren't even staffed, they are just visited periodically by maintenance personnel. I think the same can be true of solar and wind power. Once installed, they are relatively autonomous.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Top

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby darwinsdog » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 15:46:45

Where's the energy for producing all that cement, mining & smelting all that iron & copper, supposed to come from? Get real big Al. There's not going to be much more energy than your own muscles can provide, provided you have anything to eat, in the near future. We're going to be lucky if we can even score wood to burn. All the techno-fix visionaries are full of shit. Denial motivated by fear, is all they're spewing.
User avatar
darwinsdog
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri 27 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby joelcolorado » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 16:40:36

WE CAN do it but do we have the WILL to do it.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby joelcolorado » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 16:42:55

One problem is peoples reluctance to do it. Where I live, the town and county pushed out the Wind Farm development. Testimony from locals included such things as it will pollute the ground water to it blocks the view....of WHAT i dont know in Kansas.

I would have a tower on every corner in the USA to save one soldiers life over the oil issues. Dumb asses here. I cant believe it. Of course the filthy oil wells here are GOOD for us.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 16:51:52

We HABITUATE our environment. Have you ever walked down the street and really paid attention to what you see? One thing that really stands out the most are the telephone/power lines. I mean, what is more in your face than these dead tree masts stuck in the ground every 20 feet or so with ugly wires running into the distance as far as the eye can see. But we're used to them. That's what needs to happen with wind turbines.
mos6507
 

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Maddog78 » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 16:57:09

Kingcoal,

I would not say windmills are anywhere near maintenance free.
I know from working in Denmark that many of them are down for maintenance quite often. I saw workmen hanging around them quite regularly and trucks and or boats hauling parts out to them. I don't have any stats it's just an observation.


Edit: You can find anything on the net, lol.
Maintenance in Denmark is around 600 bucks/yr. per windmill. and they are expected to last 20 yrs. Not too bad but nevertheless a cost to consider.


http://www.starch.dk/isi/energy/wind.htm
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron