by zeke » Fri 11 Jul 2008, 12:34:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'T')hat presupposes a collapse of our civilization, right?
"Other ways to live" have never, to my knowledge, developed within a declining civilization as a means of preserving the civilization.
The "other ways to live" come into play after the current system completely falls apart.
Part of this particular conversation might be a matter of perception. "Other ways to live," as in "some alternative way of eating, living and getting around" can imply some extra-societal, out-on-the-frontier methodology, and for some, living without oil certainly represents that.
But before all this craziness happened, food used to come out of the ground, or from the water, and it actually WAS food, and not, as Michael Pollen puts it, simply "edible food-like substances."
These days, "food" is often squirted out of a nozzle, shaped, formed, extruded, painted, injected with "flavorings" and hosed down with "nutrients," heavily marketed, aggressively advertised, and sold at an egregious price far above the true cost of the original main ingredient, which may have been something like, "oats."
Whether they want to or not, people WILL turn their backs on the way we do things now, because that whole activity will no longer be possible, mercifully.
the idea of "having a job," and "living in a condo" and "going shopping" and "reaching for your potential" will become either meaningless, or will shift dramatically.
We might be pretty happy to have food to eat, a safe, dry place to sleep, and some clothes on our back.
That certainly is way different than "shop 'til you drop!"
zeke