by MonteQuest » Sun 15 Jun 2008, 15:53:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ')We will probably get there, but I think that carpooling will be an intermediate mitigation effort that will probably relieve some of the gas price tension that would otherwise translate into social unrest.
Mitigate the gas price tension but increase the unemployment tension.
Carpooling is reduced economic activity.
Let's say 4 drivers decide to carpool.
3 cars sit still at home.
Those 3 cars no longer buy gas, tires, oil, batteries, fan belts, car washes, need new brakes, etc...nor have accidents.
The demand for these things fall off. And, as in any recession, jobs are cut.
The unemployed now stop buying everything else and more jobs are lost.
To counter this, more energy use is required to stimulate economic growth.
So, the choice may be: pay the price of gas or no job.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
-

MonteQuest
- Expert

-
- Posts: 16593
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Westboro, MO
-
by bl00k » Sun 15 Jun 2008, 17:23:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'C')arpooling is reduced economic activity.
[...]
So, the choice may be: pay the price of gas or no job.
So what you're saying is that the only way to cut oil usage is economic recession?
The man who moves a mountain begins by carrying away small stones.
-

bl00k
- Peat

-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sat 17 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: The Netherlands
-
by Heineken » Sun 15 Jun 2008, 21:58:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ')We will probably get there, but I think that carpooling will be an intermediate mitigation effort that will probably relieve some of the gas price tension that would otherwise translate into social unrest.
Mitigate the gas price tension but increase the unemployment tension.
Carpooling is reduced economic activity.
Let's say 4 drivers decide to carpool.
3 cars sit still at home.
Those 3 cars no longer buy gas, tires, oil, batteries, fan belts, car washes, need new brakes, etc...nor have accidents.
The demand for these things fall off. And, as in any recession, jobs are cut.
The unemployed now stop buying everything else and more jobs are lost.
To counter this, more energy use is required to stimulate economic growth.
So, the choice may be: pay the price of gas or no job.
I said something similar earlier.
Big Tex is a smart guy, but he's absolutely wrong on this one, in my view.
$25 gas would result in a sort of nationwide Katrina.
It's hard for Americans in general (and perhaps Texans in particular) to grasp just how organically the country is organized around the private automobile and affordable fuel. To us it all seems natural. We were born into things being this way, and we grew up with the absolute expectation that they would always remain this way. And sure enough, as we grew older, the country continued to evolve around the car as though no alternative future would ever be possible. Almost every development dollar has been invested, directly or indirectly, in the private automobile for over a century.
We're only at $4, less than half the price in Europe, and already we're in big and growing trouble. Even if the price stayed at just $4, the echoes would continue to ring through the economy for years to come.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
by Heineken » Sun 15 Jun 2008, 22:04:11
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('zzzpeakoil', 'I') am sorry to spoil the fun, apocophilic mates, but nothing of the sort you're all envisioning will happen until gas reaches +20$ gas or so..
I live in Romania and even if this country is not considered amongst the rich, people are used to paying something like 10$/gallon. It all seems normal. And we are poor. Of course the poorest people are the first to complain. Why on earth everybody is seeing doom everywhere if gas reaches 4, or 5 or 6$?? How silly!
Somebody mentioned it on a topic, and i'll second to that: people would much rather starve then stop buying gasoline.
Most gasoline consumers are addicted to oil like a drug . The only notable difference is that they inject it in their car instead of body.
Even Bush knows : "America is addicted to oil". (and not only america).
You do not understand the United States or North America. At all.
(I don't claim to understand Romania.)
Just bear in mind that our problem could become your problem. Our death agonies could cause considerable discomfort elsewhere.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
-

Heineken
- Expert

-
- Posts: 7051
- Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Rural Virginia
-
by BigTex » Sun 15 Jun 2008, 22:43:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'B')ig Tex is a smart guy...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..but he's absolutely wrong on this one, in my view.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '$')25 gas would result in a sort of nationwide Katrina.
It's hard for Americans in general (and perhaps Texans in particular) to grasp just how organically the country is organized around the private automobile and affordable fuel. To us it all seems natural. We were born into things being this way, and we grew up with the absolute expectation that they would always remain this way. And sure enough, as we grew older, the country continued to evolve around the car as though no alternative future would ever be possible. Almost every development dollar has been invested, directly or indirectly, in the private automobile for over a century.
We're only at $4, less than half the price in Europe, and already we're in big and growing trouble. Even if the price stayed at just $4, the echoes would continue to ring through the economy for years to come.
I don't disagree that we are on a steep slope headed into a valley of doom, I'm just suggesting that there may be some less steep spots on the way down.
My playbook is what actually happened in the 1970s. The mitigation efforts didn't really fix the problem, but they did slow the economic damage being caused by high fuel prices.
People are set in their ways, but they are capable of more flexibility than one would imagine when faced with bad and worse choices.
But as I often say, no one knows what the future holds, and I can see the American people snapping like a twig at a certain price point, but I can also see alternate scenarios.
Monte's point is dead on, of course, that conservation suffocates economic activity, which most people have trouble fully appreciating.
As Monte has often noted, too, I don't think people typically appreciate the full extent to which the automobile is a major driver of economic activity. Here are a few examples of businesses and governmental entities that would suffer with fewer miles being driven and fewer cars on the road:
1. Revenue from traffic tickets would decline, putting pressure on public safety agencies
2. Lost revenue from fewer vehicles being registered would put pressure on state governments
3. Fewer vehicle sales would translate into a loss of sales tax revenue in many states
4. Reduced transport fuel consumption would reduce state and federal fuel tax receipts
5. Parking garages
6. Auto repair and maintenance facilties
7. Auto rental
8. Auto sales
9. Auto manufacturers
10. Car Washes
11. Road maintenance contractors
12. Auto parts stores
13. Gas stations
14. Oil companies
15. Auto parts manufacturers
16. Tire companies
17. Oil refiners/fuel producers
18. Auto insurance companies
19. Steel and other materials producers
20. Companies providing transportation from manufacturers to dealers
There are, of course, a lot more, but that's just what pops to mind right now.
by MonteQuest » Sun 15 Jun 2008, 23:10:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ') My playbook is what actually happened in the 1970s. The mitigation efforts didn't really fix the problem, but they did slow the economic damage being caused by high fuel prices.
How so?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
-

MonteQuest
- Expert

-
- Posts: 16593
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Westboro, MO
-
by BigTex » Sun 15 Jun 2008, 23:21:25
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ') My playbook is what actually happened in the 1970s. The mitigation efforts didn't really fix the problem, but they did slow the economic damage being caused by high fuel prices.
How so?
Well, when gas prices began to rise, people began implementing conservation efforts at the individual and government level. Speed limits were lowered, building codes changed, people changed their thermostat settings, people carpooled. Things like that.
It seems reasonable to assume that similar steps will be taken this time around as well.
But, of course, I don't believe there will be anything like the oil glut that followed the 1970s, so the same mitigation steps that were used then will likely have a far different long term impact (as in no impact).
All I'm really saying, I suppose, is that if we are trying to predict how people will react to rapidly rising gas prices, it's reasonable to look to see how the same society reacted last time the same thing happened. I'm not really commenting on how useful those steps may be in the long run.
It's just that I believe that the social unrest in the 1970s as a result of the energy crisis was driven more by fuel shortages resulting from price controls than from high fuel prices resulting from tight supplies.

by Cashmere » Mon 16 Jun 2008, 02:01:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e can still experience zombie hordes and die offs but pass through transitional stages along the way.
Mos, you're right, of course.
But what the hell, the one guy who did live through Night of the Living Dead got shot in the head.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
-

Cashmere
- Heavy Crude

-
- Posts: 1882
- Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
-
by cube » Mon 16 Jun 2008, 04:18:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'D')ecimation of a single industry has happened before. What happened to the buggy whip makers when cars took over in the first place?
ohh they still make whips but it's for a very "specialized" application these days.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '.')...
How about the makers of typewriters when computers took over? What tends to happen is the jobs lost in one sector pop up in a new or growing sector. There are going to be jobs for mechanics converting cars to electric, jobs for solar panel installers, jobs for people putting up windmills, jobs for people laying down tracks to restore rail lines, construction jobs lost to the housing crunch may be restored with people needing to retrofit their shoddy homes for energy efficiency. People just have to adapt. I went to college studying film production but I wound up making a career in the dot com space. I had to change with the times even without peakoil. That's the way it's been for a while now. It's generally expected that people have to be able to shift careers once or twice in their lifetimes.
Sometimes people just have such a negative vibe about peakoil that they can't comprehend the idea that the downward trajectory might not be as steep or as universal as their internal vision. It's not mutually exclusive. We can still experience zombie hordes and die offs but pass through transitional stages along the way.
Every time I read the news it seems there's a lot more jobs being lost than created. Multiply this out over time and you'll eventually get your zombie hoards.
by Heineken » Mon 16 Jun 2008, 08:24:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e can still experience zombie hordes and die offs but pass through transitional stages along the way.
Mos, you're right, of course.
But what the hell, the one guy who did live through Night of the Living Dead got shot in the head.
Wasn't his name Obama?
Oh, never mind.

"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.