Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby roccman » Mon 26 May 2008, 00:26:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KillTheHumans', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', ' ')I'm proud to say that in one recent year (2006) I've came very close to predicting exactly how oil high would go during the year, and I didn't do so bad in other years either.



I say we need to put you in charge of the EIA, ASPO, CERA and the IEA IMMEDIATELY!!

I mean really, considering how poorly everyone else does this forecasting thing, I think you need to put it in a book, get it documented, and start the book selling circuit like Simmons and the rest of the gang.


DP - KTH is a troll.

It has attempted to snipe me on dozens of occassions.

Pay it no mind.

Moderators: Please remove this post. I've asked KTH to stop attacking me three seperate times now, and he/she continues to do so.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 26 May 2008, 01:44:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'A')t TrendLines Research, we track the Peak Oil forecasts of 24 practitioners. Only two see peak prior to 2010. One is an investment banker and the other has called "this year" THE PEAK virtually every year since 1989. Sorry MQ, but your musings are baseless and really just wishful thinking ....


Tell that to the futures market. They have oil at $140/barrel through 2016. My musings in my initial post will come to past.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby ccpo » Mon 26 May 2008, 02:06:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KillTheHumans', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('zensui', '
')
Light Sweet Crude Oil peaked in 2005 and we're in a plateau since then. The production may increase, but it's a lie that we "peaked again".


I don't know about that. I always thought peaking was peaking, and I saw this neat graph over at TOD which sure looked like the plateau had turned into another peak!

Am I missing some piece of the game now? We subdivide all the fluid types, see which one follows our preconceived notions and proclaim THAT one to be relevant?



Crude (C+C) peak is still 2005, like it or not:
image too big ~jato

EDIT: anyone know how to make that display smaller? Sheesh! yes, link the url instead of displaying the image ~jato

If you saw a graph over at TOD that showed a sharp peak, then you you are misinterpreting the chart. For illustative purposes, charts are manipulated depending on the particular point they are addressing. You must keep this in mind.

Any change in peak that is within 1 to 2 mb/d (some even say 4mb/d is within a narrow enough statistical band to be a plateau) is not a break out of the plateau - particulalry if production falls back toward the plateau soon after.

In the above chart you can see Tar Sands are broken out from C+C in shading. It clearly shows C+C peak is still 2005. This is utterly acceptable as tar sands are not equal to C+C in any way other than final use. They are produced differently, processed differently and, most importantly, provide very, very different net energy totals.

The different kinds of "oil" don't matter? Ridiculous.

Quibble if you will that there is a new peak, but doing so marks you as one who doesn't undestand the depth and breadth of the problems of Peak Oil.

Cheers
User avatar
ccpo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby FreddyH » Mon 26 May 2008, 03:46:07

The zealots at TOD are playing with y'all. EIA clarified at the April convention that it does not include non--conventional tar sands in its C&C figures.

Bitumen & syncrude are rightfully included in "other liquids"

The TOD graph is mislabeled. The 74.8-mbd Conv figure includes Conv, Condensates & Refinery Gains (2.8-mbd).
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby FreddyH » Mon 26 May 2008, 05:08:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', '
')You have failed to note that it was my 2005 PO.com postings that the Peak of regular conventional crude had "unceremoniously" passed. At the time, Campbell was looking forward to a Peak of both All Liquids and reg conv in 2006. Admittedly, i was harsh in my criticism of ASPO data and conclusions at that time.


Please provide link where you said that.

Frankly I don't believe you said anything like that, but I would happy to be proven wrong if you can just show us.


Don't be silly, DP. You are aware that all my 2004/2005 posts have been deleted from PO.com

Here's a link i found on google, but most here remember the controversy:

see "Critique" "Another controversy was the status of the Hubbert Peak of conventional oil. Hutter claimed throughout 2004 that Campbell's own data illustrated that the Peak had passed unceremoniously in the Spring of 2004. The ASPO Newsletter continued to show the extraction peak in 2005 and/or 2006. Finally in August of 2005, Campbell again relented and began publishing that indeed the Peak had passed in 2004."

Ecozine link


Everytime someone here wants you to show us your record, you say you don't have one to show.


Unlike the many here and at other forums who choose to hide their past bad forecasts by changing their alias from time to time, most of my posts have been in my real name. My record is an open book...

Even the lunatic fringe aka Yahoo EnergyResources talked about this episode in 2005. Here they discuss ASPO's featuring of our website in their newsletter as we made peace:

"And then there's Freddy...

<http://www.peakoil.ie/downloads/newsletters/newsletter58_200510.pdf>

623. Trend-lines
An interesting website (www.trendlines.ca), produced in the Yukon,
includes a comparison of different oil depletion models, illustrating
ASPO's evolving evaluations.


<http://www.trendlines.ca/#Oil>
TrendLines Oil Depletion Scenarios 2005:
<http://www.trendlines.ca/TrendlinesPeakOilDepletionScenariosGraph.gif>

"Oct 4th, 2005 - Colin Campbell has today announced his postponement of ASPO's peak oil target from 2007 to 2010, thus ending our year-long controversy.

Likewise, ASPO has adopted our position that the Hubbert Peak for Conventional Oil (not "all oils") passed by unceremoniously in the Spring of 2004.

TrendLines is honoured and humbled that our collaboration has influenced some of the respected Depletion models. It is our goal that shared data and enlightenment will bring cause many of the scenarios to coalesce. That is very much in the interest of better planning by stakeholders."
"

Yahoo EnergyResources link
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby ccpo » Mon 26 May 2008, 09:44:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'T')he zealots at TOD are playing with y'all. EIA clarified at the April convention that it does not include non--conventional tar sands in its C&C figures.

Bitumen & syncrude are rightfully included in "other liquids"


People don't "play" with anyone. These are serious issues with serious people talking about them. To imply that "theoildrum" is a set of people of like minds setting out an agenda is just foolish. You can't have spent much, if any time there, to imply otherwise. Discussion is healthy, and frequently a tad, shall we say, spirited?

If the EIA is not including tar sands in C&C, can you point to anything besides your saying so to back it up? I hope they aren't, actually, so this is not a jab, but assertion without back-up means exactly squat.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he TOD graph is mislabeled. The 74.8-mbd Conv figure includes Conv, Condensates & Refinery Gains (2.8-mbd).


Citation? Source data?

Cheers
User avatar
ccpo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby FreddyH » Mon 26 May 2008, 15:13:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ccpo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'T')he zealots at TOD are playing with y'all. EIA clarified at the April convention that it does not include non--conventional tar sands in its C&C figures.

Bitumen & syncrude are rightfully included in "other liquids"


If the EIA is not including tar sands in C&C, can you point to anything besides your saying so to back it up?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he TOD graph is mislabeled. The 74.8-mbd Conv figure includes Conv, Condensates & Refinery Gains (2.8-mbd).


Citation? Source data?

Cheers


All EIA monthly tables incl a "definitions" tab. Consistent with those are the most recent All Liquids components of Conv & Non-Conv tabled on pg 3:

EIA pdf All Liquids defined april 2008 pg3

Unlike EIA, both my Scenario-2300 & Colin Campbell's Depletion Model do not incl polar, deep sea or refinery gains in the definition of Regular Conventional Crude. None of the three incl x-Heavy (API>10<20) or Bitumen (API<10).

Thus presently, EIA defines 75-mbd of conv crude, Scenario-2300 defines 64 & Campbell 66. Campbell includes Heavy crude (API>20<25) with Reg Conv Crude. EIA & myself incl Heavy with the Non-conventionals.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby ccpo » Tue 27 May 2008, 00:18:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ccpo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'T')he zealots at TOD are playing with y'all. EIA clarified at the April convention that it does not include non--conventional tar sands in its C&C figures.

Bitumen & syncrude are rightfully included in "other liquids"


If the EIA is not including tar sands in C&C, can you point to anything besides your saying so to back it up?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he TOD graph is mislabeled. The 74.8-mbd Conv figure includes Conv, Condensates & Refinery Gains (2.8-mbd).


Citation? Source data?

Cheers


All EIA monthly tables incl a "definitions" tab. Consistent with those are the most recent All Liquids components of Conv & Non-Conv tabled on pg 3:

EIA pdf All Liquids defined april 2008 pg3

Unlike EIA, both my Scenario-2300 & Colin Campbell's Depletion Model do not incl polar, deep sea or refinery gains in the definition of Regular Conventional Crude. None of the three incl x-Heavy (API>10<20) or Bitumen (API<10).

Thus presently, EIA defines 75-mbd of conv crude, Scenario-2300 defines 64 & Campbell 66. Campbell includes Heavy crude (API>20<25) with Reg Conv Crude. EIA & myself incl Heavy with the Non-conventionals.


Thanks for the answer. I'll check it out or bring it up with the person who made the graph. They may be using different methods than you are talking about.

Cheers

EDIT: I checked. You ar being disingenuous. The EIA data on page three goes to 2006 only, so doesn't address the current peak.

As you said, this is a new document. I'd be willing to be they weren't breaking it out before, and the chart above would have been based on the old data. Don't know this for sure. I will have to check.

BTW, That guy is full of it. Talk about Pollyanna!!

Cheers again.
User avatar
ccpo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby FreddyH » Tue 27 May 2008, 01:44:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ccpo', 'A')s you said, this is a new document. I'd be willing to be they weren't breaking it out before, and the chart above would have been based on the old data. Don't know this for sure. I will have to check.


I have no knowledge of any change in their methodology since 2003 ... except perhaps the netting out of biofuels.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 04 Jun 2008, 00:25:32

I wrote this thread in 2004.

I think I called it pretty well.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'S')ince virtually all commodities use petroleum fuel to move from production to consumption, as fuel prices rise whether by market forces or by currency decisions by OPEC to offset the loss in revenue as the dollar declines due to our trade imbalance, all commodity prices must also rise. Whew! What a mouthful! This will create inflation. To curb the inflation, the Fed will raise interest rates. And as the price of food and other essential commodities rise--along with house payments tied to variable rate mortgages--luxuries and dispensable goods and services will drop out of the family budgets and the standard of living will decline and unemployment will rise.

When energy costs escalate, there will be a period in which an emphasis on conservation & energy efficiency will occur. This will be like the early 1980s when the price of oil caused the world to become more energy efficient. Smaller cars were purchased, insulation put into houses and lighting changed to efficient bulbs. That will occur again putting off some of the worst problems and again push the dawn of peak oil into the future. The demand destruction will create a new buffer of energy supply upon which we will try to grow again. The system will initially appear to rebalance. There will be a dash for more fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment. The poor and many of the over-leveraged middle class will not be able to afford the investment or the fuel. The rich will outbid the poor for available supplies of energy and conservation methods. Unemployment will increase. People will lose their homes. There will be a major transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich, much like what took place in the 1930's. Stagflation will occur where you have an inability to grow the economy in the face of rising inflation and interest rates driven by a declining dollar or a rise in energy prices. And then the cycle repeats. There may come a time when hyperinflation steps in. This will occur when everyone knows everything they buy will be selling at a higher price very soon (within days or weeks); therefore everyone spends the cash as soon as possible to beat the price increases. And all of this can or will occur without peak oil.


All, on the anticipation of the oil peak in production..

Now comes the actual decline. Will the FED wait until after the election to raise interest rates to curb inflation?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby roccman » Wed 04 Jun 2008, 00:30:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
Now comes the actual decline. Will the FED wait until after the election to raise interest rates to curb inflation?


The fed will not raise rates.

Hyperstagflation is what is in store.

The dollar will be trashed and the Amero will be rolled out.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 08 Jul 2008, 01:16:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'T')he call for more exploration and exploitation of oil and gas will become a media event.


Drill, drill, drill!
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby Peleg » Tue 08 Jul 2008, 02:29:46

A good risk assessment realizes that there are many possible post peak scenarios. However, I am now of the opinion that within the next decade peak oil will take on the worst of those possible scenarios. After a major economic meltdown in the US within the next two years the world economy will sputter along getting smaller each year while poorer countries will feel the full force of disease unleashed, food shortages, extreme weather, and war over dwindling resources. By no later than 2019 around 25% of the world's population will have died, while at the same time those at the top will have been working very hard to secure their hegemony against the troubles. A world plutocracy will run most of the major powers from behind the scenes and through the proxy of major corporations. The next President will be the last President of the United States of America as we know it today, as peak oil takes the US from the global superpower, to a global player with a regional economy, and then eventually to relocalized economies. All the problems we face will accelerate on the retirement of the baby boomers, peak infrastructure, peak labor, peak oil and natural gas, peak finance. The whole edifice will have crumbled away within three decades.

I hope someone bookmarks this so that we can revisit my prediction in years to come. ;-)

Remember there are only three centers of power in the universe: God, the devil, and you. Choose well.
User avatar
Peleg
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby TonyPrep » Tue 08 Jul 2008, 06:25:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peleg', 'R')emember there are only three centers of power in the universe: God, the devil, and you. Choose well.
And two of those are doubtful.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 17 Jan 2009, 01:07:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', ' ') Like I have said before, it's all about rate and magnitude. But I think the scenario will be a long drawn out affair due to our precarious economic climate which will induce some major demand destruction long before peak oil hits. One caveat; if peak oil is already here, Katy bar the door.


I think it can be said I got that one right. What didn't playout was the rise in interest rates I predicted to fight inflation. Perhaps that horseman of the apocalypse will come riding in when all this new liquidity spills into the economy or the dollar goes under the bus.

Maybe I should have titled this Pre-Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 17 Jan 2009, 02:13:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ') Monte you done good!. You done real good! You showed them tinhorns a thing or two about peak decline[with an appropriate colloquial accent on the second syllable, for effect.]

No really. Very prescient. I read that initial post and yes, in fact, the only thing you go wrong, so far, was the interest rate. And the pre-peak addendum. Didn't conventional petroleum peak March 2006?


How about Pre-Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 17 Jan 2009, 02:23:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Free', ' ') This is the most rational, most realistic scenario I have so far read about Peak Oil!

It's only logical to put demand destruction into the equation, and as I said before I think it wont be one rough ride downhill but rather a rollercoaster ride of uphill and downhill. I even think that Peak Oil will never be "realized" until it already happened, because there will always be periods of cheaper energy, which will support the denial of the reality of peak oil. We see it now, as soon as the oil prizes decline everybody is interpreting it as a relief signal, even if the new price level has doubled from about 20$ to about 40 dollar! The same will happen when the price declines from 100$ to 50$ and so on....

A new great depression could well postpone peak oil for another 20 years...


Free posted this on Dec 13, 2004. It was really spot on.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 17 Jan 2009, 02:32:47

Is this the future?


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ' ') Or (this just dawned on me) maybe the period between economic peaks progressively extends out so far that there is just never another peak. IOW, there is still oil in the ground but the traditional economy is so weakened it can't revive enough to bump up against capacity. The current "bubbles" in the US economy make for a BIG problem, perhaps The Second Great Depression could make the EIA's prediction of Peak in 2030 turn out to be overly pessimistic, I'll have to meditate on that further after I go turn the thermostat up, LOL.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron