by ccpo » Mon 26 May 2008, 09:44:00
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'T')he zealots at TOD are playing with y'all. EIA clarified at the April convention that it does not include non--conventional tar sands in its C&C figures.
Bitumen & syncrude are rightfully included in "other liquids"
People don't "play" with anyone. These are serious issues with serious people talking about them. To imply that "theoildrum" is a set of people of like minds setting out an agenda is just foolish. You can't have spent much, if any time there, to imply otherwise. Discussion is healthy, and frequently a tad, shall we say, spirited?
If the EIA is not including tar sands in C&C, can you point to anything besides your saying so to back it up? I hope they aren't, actually, so this is not a jab, but assertion without back-up means exactly squat.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he TOD graph is mislabeled. The 74.8-mbd Conv figure includes Conv, Condensates & Refinery Gains (2.8-mbd).