Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Satellite operated listening devices

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby BigTex » Mon 05 May 2008, 20:09:26

Wait a second, isn't it a classic symptom of mental illness to believe that the government may be spying on you as part of a much larger conspiracy that is targeting people JUST LIKE YOU because of the unusual or especially insightful nature of your beliefs?

I know, I know, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they not after you. But if the only evidence you have that they are after you is a device that many people have implanted in their nose, but about which no one knows (is that alliteration?) anything, and that are being monitored by satellites, at what point does it become appropriate to say "proof please"?
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby BigTex » Mon 05 May 2008, 20:17:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'H')ow funny would it be for some kid get getting his/her nose pierced to inadvertently discover one.

I SO hope such a person would be a redneck from some country ghetto trailer park. The news coverage would be amazing.

"Well, mama said don't get your nose pierced, and I see now why. I never knew I had nothing like that in my nose. I thought it was just boogers and snot and those big scabs you get when you snort crank--"

That's the point at which the news footage would end.


Sigh.


Sorry, please humor me. I am given to fits of reasonableness.

***

Okay, so the argument is that this idea is so ridiculous that no one would ever believe it, therefore, it must be true?

But isn't that the classic crazy person argument for everything?

Why is the fact that you are making the argument not evidence that you are crazy?

Maybe you should re-post the proof of the Maxillary implants.

What happens when a person with one dies? What keeps the funeral home people from discovering it when preparing the body?

What about when people are in terrible accidents where their faces are all messed up? Wouldn't the device be visible during reconstructive surgery?

What about MRIs and CT scans? Are you saying that this thing won't show up in a scan like this, even though such a scan shows EVERYTHING that is there?

If a person were prepared to accept your argument, what would they tell the next guy with a crazy theory, if the argument is that the crazy element is what makes it true?

It reminds me of a buddy who told me one time that he had been "camping in the city."

I said "oh, you mean like a bum?"

He said "well, the bums do it too."
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby eric_b » Wed 07 May 2008, 23:10:59

I've updated this and small page for it. If interested, here:
http://www.fractalfreak.com/wx/satfucked/index.html

The reason I know there are implants involved is I retained some memories of having these things jammed up my nose.

The only motive behind all this is to f*ck people up.
Last edited by eric_b on Wed 07 May 2008, 23:19:35, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby eric_b » Wed 07 May 2008, 23:19:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')Okay, so the argument is that this idea is so ridiculous that no one would ever believe it, therefore, it must be true?

But isn't that the classic crazy person argument for everything?

Why is the fact that you are making the argument not evidence that you are crazy?

Maybe you should re-post the proof of the Maxillary implants.

What happens when a person with one dies? What keeps the funeral home people from discovering it when preparing the body?

What about when people are in terrible accidents where their faces are all messed up? Wouldn't the device be visible during reconstructive surgery?

What about MRIs and CT scans? Are you saying that this thing won't show up in a scan like this, even though such a scan shows EVERYTHING that is there?

If a person were prepared to accept your argument, what would they tell the next guy with a crazy theory, if the argument is that the crazy element is what makes it true?

It reminds me of a buddy who told me one time that he had been "camping in the city."

I said "oh, you mean like a bum?"

He said "well, the bums do it too."


One more time. No one is ever going to find these things when you die. It's a secret people will take to their grave. You can't just look up your nose and see these things. A tiny labyrinth passage, about the size of a pinhead, connects the maxillary to the main sinus passage. Getting these things into your sinuses is a one way ticket. No coroner is ever likely to look up there. They will not come out short of surgery.

Since the number of people that have these is a minute fraction of the population, and any surgery involving the Maxillaries is rare, it's very unlikely these things will ever be found. Even if they are nothing would come of it.

An MRI would likely spot these, but not many people are aware they have these things - they are not going to look.

Simply put people that are really mentally ill provide a perfect cover for this crime.

It's a sport, the only motive is to f*ck people up. You're just a phone call away. Look at the page I put together, above.

Later.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 07 May 2008, 23:54:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', 'A')nother part of the reason this is doen is the entire concept is so ridiculous, so tin-foil, that no one will ever believe it. Exactly why it's done. People will not consider the idea - self censorship.
Of course we consider the idea, and find it utterly idiotic and nonsensical.

To make an absolute statement of that nature, Ludi, implies that you have absolute knowledge of what is going on outside of your area of focus. In truth, our minds focus on an area of illumination provided by a spotlight created by our own minds, interacting with others in a general consensus way. That spotlight encompasses small regions of information we need to see in order to survive. But seeing as we are social animals, much of our survival depends on consensus approval, which bends the spotlight into safe areas, firmly outside of the "silly zone".

Those who dare venture beyond the spotlight and past the giggle curtain, under the big top of life, are escorted by clowns, crazy people, the fantasy prone, to the bigger picture. Eric B, has obviously had the humility to take the small steps necessary to walk with those in size 15's. :lol:
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 08 May 2008, 00:21:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'W')ait a second, isn't it a classic symptom of mental illness to believe that the government may be spying on you as part of a much larger conspiracy that is targeting people JUST LIKE YOU because of the unusual or especially insightful nature of your beliefs?
I know, I know, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they not after you. But if the only evidence you have that they are after you is a device that many people have implanted in their nose, but about which no one knows (is that alliteration?) anything, and that are being monitored by satellites, at what point does it become appropriate to say "proof please"?

You are entering a realm that is by it's very nature, "crazy". You can neither prove or disprove it, there are no parameters, no collective mental maps to navigate it. You get an uncanny sense of this when you watch shows, like the Twilight zone.

If a sane man enters he becomes indistinguishable from the insane, when he describes his experience. Any objective evidence that can be brought to the table is summarily dismissed, not because it is necessarily wrong, but because it doesn't have the texture or flavour of what we narrowly call the truth.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby BigTex » Thu 08 May 2008, 01:05:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'W')ait a second, isn't it a classic symptom of mental illness to believe that the government may be spying on you as part of a much larger conspiracy that is targeting people JUST LIKE YOU because of the unusual or especially insightful nature of your beliefs?
I know, I know, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they not after you. But if the only evidence you have that they are after you is a device that many people have implanted in their nose, but about which no one knows (is that alliteration?) anything, and that are being monitored by satellites, at what point does it become appropriate to say "proof please"?
You are entering a realm that is by it's very nature, "crazy". You can neither prove or disprove it, there are no parameters, no collective mental maps to navigate it. You get an uncanny sense of this when you watch shows, like the Twilight zone.
If a sane man enters he becomes indistinguishable from the insane, when he describes his experience. Any objective evidence that can be brought to the table is summarily dismissed, not because it is necessarily wrong, but because it doesn't have the texture or flavour of what we narrowly call the truth.

But let's assume we have one of two paths to explain something that sounds crazy.

Path one is something crazy is happening that no one would ever believe, but that's how whoever is doing it is getting away with it--i.e., it's too crazy to be believed.

Path two is someone believes something crazy is happening that no one would ever believe and there is a good reason that no one believes it--i.e., it's crazy and the only reason the one person believes it is because he/she is crazy.

It seems to me that we ought not put something in the Path one category just because someone claims that they believe it's true. Surely it's reasonable to ask for some proof, or something beyond just a proclamation. Also, if these things would show up on an MRI, someone would have seen them by now. The people who read those are looking for ANYTHING that doesn't look right. An electronic device right in the middle of the face is going to be noticed.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby ugh » Thu 08 May 2008, 01:24:56

My super collander metal hat shorted out from reading this crap.
User avatar
ugh
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat 03 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 08 May 2008, 02:03:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'B')ut let's assume we have one of two paths to explain something that sounds crazy.
Path one is something crazy is happening that no one would ever believe, but that's how whoever is doing it is getting away with it--i.e., it's too crazy to be believed.
Path two is someone believes something crazy is happening that no one would ever believe and there is a good reason that no one believes it--i.e., it's crazy and the only reason the one person believes it is because he/she is crazy.
It seems to me that we ought not put something in the Path one category just because someone claims that they believe it's true. Surely it's reasonable to ask for some proof, or something beyond just a proclamation. Also, if these things would show up on an MRI, someone would have seen them by now. The people who read those are looking for ANYTHING that doesn't look right. An electronic device right in the middle of the face is going to be noticed.

Agreed, but people tend to shove everything into the type two category preferentially, usually based on a simple sniff test, that is scented by how they feel others will react to the information.

Gandalph's experiences, for example, could be unfolding exactly as he is describing them. They could also be an over interpreted series of coincidences, synchronicities, etc....that have their own curious hyper focus or spotlighting feature, highlighting data that supports his subjective reality, while ignoring information that doesn't fit the pattern.

Robert Anton Wilson called this entering the chapel perilous, in The Cosmic Trigger, and says, curiously that we all do this, to some degree. It seems that the hyperfocus, the fixations, the spotlighting of some information that occurs in the mainstream collective, is indistinguishable from what crazy people do alone, and it may turn out that most of our preoccupations that have been granted a kind of exclusivity as "relevant" and "true" are internally consistent, within our society, but pretty untrue, and crazy, nevertheless.

I would say a very tiny implanted electronic device could easily be dismissed as an irrelevant nasal artefact, piece of dirt, whatever, and tossed out, if it didn't conform to what was expected to be discovered.

Not saying I believe Eric B's story is wholly true, but I seriously can't condemn him as being a fool or psychotic based on a cursory glance of his material. It's important to be able to delay judgement before dismissing people's stories. The general audience feels a need to do this in the interest of expediency, as we are deluged with information of all sorts. We have to remember that we are usually prejudging when we do this, though. We should at least grant people's strange experiences with the same seriousness and suspension of culturally based prejudices as we do when watching foreign films.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 08 May 2008, 10:25:47

In general I try to evaluate what people say, and take a look to see if they have what looks like proof or a reasonable argument. To me, the arguments in this thread don't seem reasonable -"it's so crazy no one would believe it and that's why it's true!"
What part of the argument do you find reasonable, threadbear? I'm not very good at evaluating things (ask anyone on this board!)
Ludi
 

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby BigTex » Thu 08 May 2008, 11:32:43

threadbear, if anything I try to always keep my eye out for out of the way ideas and I'm usually willing to listen to any story until it just gets too fantastic.

Good thoughts, though, on what I might call the "momentum of conformity" or something like that. It's a lot of work to continually be questioning your assumptions about everything.

Being ready to believe something if provided with good evidence is different, however, from being ready to believe anything just because someone tells you they think it's true.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 08 May 2008, 13:13:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ')It's a lot of work to continually be questioning your assumptions about everything.

As a loon, I spend most of my time questioning my assumptions. If I believed everything just because I experience it, or think it, or someone else tells me about it, I would probably need to be heavily medicated. As it is, I get so wound up with these various ideas (here at po.com and elsewhere on the internet), I become extremely anxious and need to take a sedative.

My husband tells me "If you can't make sense of it, it probably doesn't make any sense" but I have trouble believing that a lot of the time, because other loons are often very persuasive about their ideas and experiences. I doubt myself constantly. It's extremely tiring.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby Gandalf_the_White » Thu 08 May 2008, 13:30:23

You people don't really know anything about the Stasi do you? You know, the East German Police who once employed up to 10% of the East German population just to spy on others?

Listen, psyops is not a game. It is a purposeful military attack, often upon a civilian population. The whole purpose is to play with your head until you are not certain what is true anymore. The CIA knows how to mess with your mind.

Some of you in this thread are new to Peak Oil, but we have seen it all come through here. From malicious teens who have nothing better to do then place strobe videos on epilepsy sites, to people who demonstrated every motive to evidence they were purposely hanging around and planting dis- and misinformation about peak oil.

Do any of you realize that in Britain, you are on camera all the time? Any public place you go to, you are under surveillence. What do they need to do that for? It really does not matter. What matters is whether citizens in a democracy should submit themselves to such things. It is a matter of right and no government has the right to surveillence law abiding citizens. First of all it is a waste of tax payer dollars.

I think Eric is either delusional and off his meds or he is being very facetious (waggish.)

I am not joking about the things I have experienced. I do believe that some of the people who post here (probably many we do not suspect) are either citizens keeping watch on the peak oil loonies or actual government agents being paid to do so. If they watchd the greens in the 60's over agent orange protests, you better believe they take peak oil seriously, even if they think the issue is bunk (which they don't BTW.)

As for the American Stasi, well I gave you guys links above, apparently none of you looked into them. You should not doubt that the government does psyops on it's own citizens. It might be as apparently vindictive as stealing Daniel Ellsburg's mental history records to get information to discredit him, or it could go into the level of trying to use the media to keep a lid on peak oil. Controlling the masses has been the aim of alot of things (mass consumerism itself is a type of happiness machine designed to placate the masses so that an enlightened few can make the 'right' decisions.)

This stuff all sounds ridiculous until you start reading some of the books that are out there about the CIA. They are able to do what they do because people never take it seriously enough.

I have to admit that Eric's statements have me worried about him. Livning out in a tent somewhere to avoid surveillence is probably an overreaction.

However I can't deny that I think there will come a time when TPTB will try to silence the peak oil message. If it ever comes ot the point where peak oil seems likely to causes civil unrest you will see alot of interest in it and you by the government.

Psyops has weaknesses and limitations. It can't get you if you are marginalized within the culture, if you are a free thinker, if you have the ability to see things outside the box. If you allow your sense of self to be given to you by the culture, they can pepper the culture with disinformation and affect your thought life pretty heavily. It' s hard to do alot of things when you are thinking about things you would not otherwise have considered.

Look at the 20 million Oprah-ites who are now walking right into a New Age Religious perspective on life that has slowly been cultivated in them. They faithfully make any book she recommends a best seller, not matter the content. The gospel acording to Oprah has been understood for a long time, but still she has dedicated soccer moms all over the country dancing to her beat, and she loves it that way. Now the old girl does'nt even pretend, she very plainly says Christianity is not the only way. Well fine for her right? But the Bible and the accepted faith of millions says otherwise. Why did Oprah need to get into the business of faith to begin with?

I'm surprised so many of you question the status quo at all, since you seem to have so little ability to face an altered reality, it must all be a sick game for you. I'm laughing to myself as I write this. You talk all big and theorize on this board and others, but what are you going to do if any of the things we talk about come to pass?

Most of you will start working for the first person who shoves their hand toward you with some money in it. And some of you already are working for TPTB. You integrity is impressive.

Oh, and just to add another element, the Presidential race is another reason why some people are getting psyop'ed. Rove was using data mining and some psyop techniques years ago. Clinton is probably using some now. There are no scruples that restrain them if they think they can win. There is a flaming culture war going on with many people who agree to sort of play by the rules only because the alternative is worse. Make no mistake in each of the major ideological camps there are whackos who under the veneer would be happy to take out anyone who opposes them if they could get away with it. Tell me that there is really a difference in intent between destroying the career of someone who opposes you and murdering them? Those who can destroy a lifetime's work with a smile on their face and a friendly handshake are Lucifer's prodigies.

Oh, America, America, you who reject the prophets and stone those who are sent to you. If even now you understood what was necessary for peace. It is hidden from your eyes.

Enjoy that extra fifty bucks on your SSI check! I hope it is worth your friendly participation in voiding the Constitution! You know who you are.
Last edited by Gandalf_the_White on Thu 08 May 2008, 13:36:21, edited 1 time in total.
I return to you now at the turning of the tide.
User avatar
Gandalf_the_White
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed 21 Nov 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 08 May 2008, 13:36:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gandalf_the_White', 'I') think Eric is either delusional and off his meds or he is being very facetious (waggish.)

Do you understand that Eric's experiences are every bit as real to him as your experiences are to you?
Do you understand that you seem just exactly as delusional to onlookers as he does?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby Ferretlover » Thu 08 May 2008, 15:37:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gandalf_the_White', 'O')h, America, America, you who reject the prophets and stone those who are sent to you. If even now you understood what was necessary for peace. It is hidden from your eyes.

Talk about psyops! Religion is the biggest offender.
FWIIW: Yes, I am quite aware that pysops is an ongoing discipline within every government-I have even known two (that I know of) "I could tell you what I do, but then I'd have to kill you" people.
Part of the game is to figure out what they are doing, what they could be doing, what they don't do and what they can't yet do, but are getting there.
Knowledge and the ability to manipulate are quite an aphrodisiac to the power hungry.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 05 Nov 2008, 14:57:03, edited 1 time in total.
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 08 May 2008, 15:49:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'B')eing ready to believe something if provided with good evidence is different, however, from being ready to believe anything just because someone tells you they think it's true.

I live in a sea of uncertainty, with fewer "beliefs" than most people. I have many unconscious beliefs, certainly, that will remain obscure to me, until they are challenged.

Everyone should try to reduce the pile of detritus, in their "for sure" file and reexamine it a little more closely. If they did this, they'd find their "maybe" pile growing larger, by the day.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby Gandalf_the_White » Thu 08 May 2008, 16:10:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gandalf_the_White', 'I') think Eric is either delusional and off his meds or he is being very facetious (waggish.)
Do you understand that Eric's experiences are every bit as real to him as your experiences are to you?
Do you understand that you seem just exactly as delusional to onlookers as he does?

Ludi,
Rather than say something to you that will be unnecessarily hurtful, I am going to choose to place you on my ignore list. The faith I hold is the same as that of millions of other Christians and lines up with the Bible which we have as an inheritance from men like Paul the Apostle. As for whether I am being watched or not for various reasons, you should have no way of knowing that either. If you are not capable of accepting that you are living in a surveillence society that is heading toward a police state I feel sorry for you. The writing has been on the wall for a very long time. I think your husband is right. You need to take a long break from this stuff.
Enjoy the silence.
I return to you now at the turning of the tide.
User avatar
Gandalf_the_White
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed 21 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 08 May 2008, 16:14:56

Wow, way to misunderstand me! I wasn't talking about Gandalf's religious ideas, but about his fear of being watched.
But at least I know he loves me! :)
Ludi
 

Re: Satellite harassment

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 08 May 2008, 16:18:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 't')hreadbear, if anything I try to always keep my eye out for out of the way ideas and I'm usually willing to listen to any story until it just gets too fantastic.
Good thoughts, though, on what I might call the "momentum of conformity" or something like that. It's a lot of work to continually be questioning your assumptions about everything.
Being ready to believe something if provided with good evidence is different, however, from being ready to believe anything just because someone tells you they think it's true.

The most important thing about this whole discussion, for me, was coming up with a sophisticated name for booger. An "irrelevant nasal artifact". :lol:
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests