by pup55 » Thu 13 Mar 2008, 19:47:54
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ate Price 8-wk cts 8-wk chg cons change
Sep 05, 2005 311.7 74.8 24% -6.48% Katrina/Rita
Apr 24, 2006 296 66.2 22% 0.83%
Apr 08, 2002 145.4 30.6 21% 4.76%
Apr 16, 2007 292.2 58.1 20% 1.88%
Apr 19, 1999 117.5 22.6 19% 9.92%
May 08, 2006 295.5 54.7 19% 0.63%
Apr 26, 1999 117.1 21.6 18% -4.46%
May 14, 2001 174.8 30.4 17% 6.05%
Apr 11, 2005 232.1 38 16% 2.20%
Mar 13, 2000 156.6 24.8 16% -1.98%
Feb 17, 2003 170.1 25.8 15% -4.11% GWII
Here is a list of the top 10 "gasoline shocks" of all time back to 1994 or however long the records are kept. The columns are: date, unleaded price, 8-week change in cents, 8-week change in percent. So, for this exercise I have defined "gas shock" as a big increase in price over an 8-week period. I have grouped these into "events" so a lot of times the week before and after have reflected the same price spike.
It should really worry us a little that 6 of the 10 occurrences of this have been in April, and five of the last 7 years.
The final column is the change in products supplied over the previous year, that is to say, what effect did this have on consumption, corrected roughly for seasonality.
In only three cases did the oil shock result in a decrease in consumption: the Katrina/Rita gas shock, the 2003 Gulf War oil shock, and a decline in 1999, for some reason that I frankly do not know.
So I am ready to say that unless there is an emotional element, the gas shock in and of itself appears to have little or no effect on consumption, and in fact iconsumption is just as likely to go up.
Note:
Looks like the April seasonal price increase has been about 16% on average for the last few years. Are you ready for the price to go up another 45 cents?