Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE McMansion Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby pea-jay » Thu 10 Feb 2005, 19:14:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')I mean, build a burgeoning suburb with a tiny 3-lane connecting it to the workplaces?!


Yet another good example how unplanned our planning process is. The starting point in your situation was the construction of subdivisions. This then triggered the need for highway improvements. Ten dollars will say that once the highway is built and congestion is relieved, additional construction will commence. Before long, you are back where you started at. This is not planning; it's reacting.

Even if the highway was truly planned for by county or state officials years before its construction, the fact that those same officials permitted the commencement of those initial developments is not really considered planning intelligently.

But as long as we consider individual property rights sacrosanct and the protection of one's property values paramount, any attempts to plan for the long term greater good will always be subverted by those seeking short term gains.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Unread postby PhilBiker » Fri 11 Feb 2005, 09:52:10

lotrfan55345, those are suburban houses not McMansions. McMansions are generally the very large 4000sq feet houses going up now with impressive brick facades and "North Dallas Special" rooflines. Like this:

Image

Go to www.tollbrothers.com , one of the worst offenders to see the problem, and look around.

Also, the Subaru Forester is a "car-based SUV" that gets reasonable mileage. These are cars that are jacked up a little bit, given "truckish" styling, and sold as "light trucks". Cars like this, the Toyota Highlander and RAV-4, Honda CR-V, Ford Escape, make a lot of sense in a relative way. They are not unstable not especially gas-guzzling, and have loads of seating and luggage space. They get mid-20s gas mileage and serve the purpose of the old "station wagon" (what a quaint concept - I love mine!).
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 11 Feb 2005, 10:09:14

Image
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby pea-jay » Fri 11 Feb 2005, 12:39:32

I'd love to see someone try that. Watch the Home owners association go apeshit.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Green mansions of the millionaires

Unread postby JayHMorrison » Sat 12 Feb 2005, 12:35:34

This should be interesting... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6954665/

Green mansions of the millionaires Eco-friendly dwellings also offer independence for the rich
By Sara Clemence Updated: 5:48 p.m. ET Feb. 11, 2005
These days, it's a lot easier being green. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')olar power is cheaper than ever for homes, American families are using geothermal heating and cooling systems, and efficient wind turbines make it a breeze to generate electricity without using polluting fossil fuels.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 11 Mar 2009, 22:00:25, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE McMansion Thread.
Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
JayHMorrison
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu 17 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Unknown

Unread postby Grimnir » Sat 12 Feb 2005, 14:29:40

[quote]
“Some of our high-end clients literally never see their energy bills,â€
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA

Unread postby Phil » Sat 12 Feb 2005, 15:52:06

We'll see a lot more of this as things become progressively worse and more 'uncertain.'

We'll also see a lot more hoarding by the rich. Imagine in a time of crisis when there's a whiff of desperation and anarchy in the streets. What's to stop some fearful multi-millionaire from buying an armored car and hiring an armed cohort, and then buying up the entire contents of a gun store, or a supermarket?

Being a rich person's gardener might not be a bad career path...
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX

Unread postby lotrfan55345 » Sat 12 Feb 2005, 18:02:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'l')otrfan55345, those are suburban houses not McMansions. McMansions are generally the very large 4000sq feet houses going up now with impressive brick facades and "North Dallas Special" rooflines. Like this:


Whew...
lotrfan55345
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis / Pittsburgh

Unread postby Jack » Sat 12 Feb 2005, 19:00:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Phil', 'W')e'll see a lot more of this as things become progressively worse and more 'uncertain.'


Just look south, to Mexico and beyond. Public utilities don't work, so those who can afford to do so insulate themselves.

And you'll find that the armed cohorts you refer to are commonplace in the above referenced venues. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby ararboin » Sat 12 Feb 2005, 22:13:07

Monthly payments on a $700,000 30 year loan at 7% fixed: $4,657.12
User avatar
ararboin
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby mgibbons19 » Sun 13 Feb 2005, 00:04:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lotrfan55345', 'I')t makes for HORRABLE commute (whats wrong with these people?!) I mean, build a burgeoning suburb with a tiny 3-lane connecting it to the workplaces?! Commute length is not too bad, only 27-30miles though:


Easy. The developer is not responsible for the highway connecting it, onlythe roadways inside the development. So the city or the state or the county picks up the cost of the road expansion which will be necessary in five years.
mgibbons19
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Sun 13 Feb 2005, 00:09:43

BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby TrueKaiser » Sun 13 Feb 2005, 00:17:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '[')img]http://peakoil.com/images/mcmansion.jpg[/img]

lol
that is funny
User avatar
TrueKaiser
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby pea-jay » Sun 13 Feb 2005, 02:29:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BabyPeanut', 'h')ttp://www.notsobighouse.com/


I really like the craftsman architectural details of that house, but really, the two and three car garages now are even more dominating of that house.

Now these are some tiny houses:

ImageConvential design, under 1000 sq feet.


ImageEven smaller

For that truly small experience try this for the ultimate in SMALL living.

http://www.abito.co.uk

Not a free standing house per say, but definately not a McMansion. More like a McBox
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal
Top

Unread postby ararboin » Sun 13 Feb 2005, 12:28:18

This is my future remodel job. Would it qualify as a McBox?

Image
User avatar
ararboin
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

U.S. GDP now consists of 5.8% McMansion building

Unread postby jaws » Thu 26 May 2005, 16:06:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url=http://biz.yahoo.com/bizwk/050526/nf200505269898_db042.html]
The Cost of All Those McMansions[/url]
Thursday May 26, 8:19 am ET
By Michael Mandel

It's like living in a parallel universe. Surprising most economists, mortgage rates have gone down in recent weeks rather than up. The housing market, instead of cooling, has stayed hot, with record sales of existing homes in April. And prices are up 15% over a year ago. Even Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who has regularly dismissed the possibility of a housing bubble, is worrying that current trends are "unsustainable."

ADVERTISEMENT
click here
But whether prices level out, crash, or even keep going up, the housing boom is already having pernicious economic effects. The real problem: the incredible amount of resources -- workers, materials, and money -- being sucked into home construction and renovation.

EVER UPWARD. Residential investment has become a black hole, absorbing a staggering 5.8% of gross domestic product. That's the highest level since the late 1940s and early '50s, when an entire generation of returning soldiers was setting up families and expanding into newly built suburbs. This time, Americans are building second homes and enlarging current ones at a record pace.


By comparison, the tech boom of the '90s was at worst a baby bubble. Starting in 1991, business investment in information technology and communications gear began a steady climb, going from 3.1% to a peak of 4.8% in 2000 before collapsing.

Without much fanfare, residential construction basically followed the same path in the 1990s. Starting at 3.4% of GDP in 1991, it rose to 4.6% in 2000. But rather than turn down, as tech did, spending on housing just kept climbing, fueled by low interest rates. Measured by the increase in its share of GDP, the housing boom so far is about 40% larger than the tech boom.

LOW-TECH. Is the housing boom a bubble? As Greenspan has said, it's hard to tell. But what's certain is that housing-driven growth, while creating jobs and lifting wealth, is also distorting the economy, benefiting low-tech commodity sectors rather than the high-tech industries at the heart of America's competitive strength.

New homes are built mainly out of materials, such as wood for the frame and floors, plasterboard for the walls, and fabricated metal parts for plumbing fixtures. High-tech equipment plays a very small role. Even when new homes include cable for broadband -- so-called structured wiring -- the high-tech component accounts for at most 1% or 2% of the entire cost of the home.

Calculations by BusinessWeek show that construction is among the least info-tech-intensive of all industries. In 2003, the latest data available, only 1.6 cents of every construction dollar was used for info-related products and services, such as computer gear, data-processing services, and telecom services. This includes both the tech-related products used in the building process and tech investment by construction companies. Most other industries -- including retailing, manufacturing, education, and health care -- are much heavier users of info tech.

FEELING THE PINCH. Astonishingly, the entire construction industry invested only $1.2 billion in information-processing equipment in 2003, according to new data. Thus, an industry with about 6% of private employment had only 0.7% of private IT investment.

What happens when the housing boom finally slows? The share of GDP going into housing construction will fall sharply, hurting construction workers, architects, and homebuilders. Homeowners will no longer be able to draw on rising home equity. And what about Americans who borrowed heavily to buy properties for investment, expecting prices to keep climbing? Much like the companies who built miles of now-unused fiber-optic cable during the 1990s, they will be in deep trouble.

Yet even if there are temporary disruptions, the end of the housing boom may be good news for the overall economy. The U.S. doesn't need to drive growth with ornate new homes and elaborate kitchens with expensive marble counters. Instead, a shift away from housing could free up hundreds of billions of dollars for other, more productive investments.

This is the biggest rollout of suburban sprawl in history. No problem though, we needed some economic growth, thank you Greenspan and Fannie Mae.

And the OECD dares to lecture central Europe on its lagging growth.
User avatar
jaws
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun 24 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby RiverRat » Thu 26 May 2005, 16:48:09

I work in the real estate appraisal and title business. I see dozens and dozens of appraisals on a daily basis.

I’ve said this before … the real estates wealth in the US is astronomical!!!

$700k appraisal … yawn
$1 mil appraisal … borrrrrring
$2 mil appraisal … been there – done that

I saw an appraisal the other day on a $4 mil property and the report had 6 similar sales.

Heck … I’ve seen subdivisions with over 800 homes in it all valued at or over $750k! And this ain’t in Cali either. 8O

$300k - $400k - $500k … SECOND mortgages …… ho hum

The home equity and refi industry will go down in history as the greatest money grab EVER. :!:
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby smiley » Thu 26 May 2005, 17:09:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Heck … I’ve seen subdivisions with over 800 homes in it all valued at or over $750k! And this ain’t in Cali either.

$300k - $400k - $500k … SECOND mortgages …… ho hum


8O

How can people afford that? We are earning pretty well and with our shared income we could probably afford a pretty high mortgage, but the banks will not allow us to take out a loan which is more than 5 times our salary. I estimate the percentage of people which are allowed to take out a loan higher than $750k is less than 0.1%.

Are the banks more lenient over there or are the top salaries just so much higher than here?
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Unread postby some_guy282 » Thu 26 May 2005, 18:13:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', ' ')Are the banks more lenient over there or are the top salaries just so much higher than here?


Yes. This is part of the problem. The banks are lending out way more money than they should be, to people who have no business taking out loans in the first place.
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Nietzsche

Time makes more converts than reason. – Thomas Paine

History is a set of lies agreed upon. – Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
some_guy282
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby jaws » Thu 26 May 2005, 19:15:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', '
')
Yes. This is part of the problem. The banks are lending out way more money than they should be, to people who have no business taking out loans in the first place.
The banks don't care about lending since they don't assume the risk. To paraphrase a banker, they don't let the ink dry before selling the mortgage to the street. The street being mortgage wholesalers like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who are unaware of the risk they are assuming and don't wish to be as they then sell the mortgages back as government-grade bonds that investors feel safe buying. It's a giant sleight-of-hand trick that's been played on the international bond market. Even Greenspan is worried about the size of Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac.
User avatar
jaws
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun 24 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron