The particular deposit rate is a minor side issue in the broader scale of things. For example total systemic change and major redistribution of wealth and heavily taxing breeding. Globally of course.
From Free Internet Press
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Yet finance is not like any other business. When a bank makes a mistake, the ramifications for the rest of the financial and economic system are so severe that it has to be bailed out - witness Britain's Northern Rock. Because of this truth, financiers have organized themselves so that actual or potential losses are picked up by somebody else - if not their clients, then the state - while profits are kept to themselves. An industry that socializes losses while privatizing profit, and that has the capacity to create booms and busts alike, has to be as closely regulated as any utility.
I was reminded of the system's proclivities by a consultant friend who was hired to arbitrate over a performance bonus between a hedge fund and one of its asset managers. The individual in question was paid a base salary of some $100,000, but the investment funds he managed had done well over 2007, rising in value by more than $500 million. His bonus was $206 million and he felt that to conform to industry norms, his bonus should be nearer $250 million - the cause of the dispute.
What, I asked, would happen in 2008 if the assets he managed fell in value? He would get paid his base salary and no bonus came the reply. And would he be required to repay any of the $250 million he had pocketed this year? Of course not.
This is the one-way, short-term bet that is endemic in the way the financial services industry rewards itself and which incentivizes recklessness