by Plantagenet » Tue 06 Nov 2007, 15:03:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('inculcated', ' ')All neolithic societies had a range of productivity depending upon the individual. All incorporated a behavioral norm that freely and willingly re-allocated resources from over productive members to unproductive members; freely, willingly and without a trace of resent causing violence.
Neolithic people warred on each other all the time, and had interpersonal conflicts all the time, just like modern people. Check out the archeological evidence rather then making up fantasies.
"There is good evidence for fortified settlements at Linearbandkeramik sites along the Rhine, as well as evidence for inter-group conflict from Neolithic sites in Britain. Control of labour and inter-group conflict is characteristic of corporate-level or 'tribal' groups, headed by a charismatic individual, whether a 'big man', or proto-chief or a matriarch, functioning as a lineage-group head. These sociopolitical entities later developed into the chiefdoms of the European Early Bronze Age. In the New world, the Iroquois, Pueblo people, Maya civilization and in Oceania the M?ori are all examples of stone-tool-dependent cultures with complex social and political systems who conquered and enslaved other tribal groups, and fought within their own groups."
from Wikipedia.
Stone age human beings were just human beings, and they inevitably were subject to human emotions like anger, jealousy, etc..
