Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trader's Corner 2007

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will WTI crude be on DEC 31st 2007?

Poll ended at Thu 19 Apr 2007, 04:20:21

under $50 per barrel
5
No votes
around $55
0
0%
around $60
5
No votes
around $65
12
No votes
around $70
11
No votes
around $75
28
No votes
 
Total votes : 61

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 11:25:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', 'M')r Bill,

Do you see a dollar depreciation inflection point whereby other CB's will act (cut)?

Also, it looks as if subsequent to BB's cut on Tuesday, real interest rates are up big. As of now the 10 yr note is yielding 4.6%, which is almost 15bp's above its Tuesday am yield.


RE Areva. Thanks again Rostov and Mockba.

RE inflection point. Well, let's not get over melodramatic and make a tempest out of some follow through US dollar selling, but if I was to pick an inflection point then, yes, this would be it.

We are now well through any support for the US dollar at $1.4000 against the euro, and below 80% on the US dollar basket.

Interestingly enough the yen seems to be decoupling from the US dollar, where in the past months we saw a weaker EURJPY translate into a stronger USD against EUR and vice versa, and now the yen is also stronger against the USD below 115 yen. So this is definitely a weaker USD move and not anything else.

Take a look at the ruble? It has gained dramatically on the back of USD weakness. By the time RUB hits 25 against the USD the Loonie will already be at par to the Greenback. We have not seen that since Diefenbaeker was PM of Canada, eh?

10Y UST yields are 4.60% (as mentioned). Not back up above 5% where they were, but with a weaker USD and higher inflation expectations it is likely just a matter of time. Of course, there are those that are arguing that the USD is oversold. Perhaps, maybe on a PPP basis or something, but not in light of US fundamentals like gaping holes in the current account deficit. I am afraid this rout has legs still.

As a round number I would suggest $1.5000 against the euro as well as 110 yen. That is 165 on the EURJPY cross that is well within defined ranges of the past months. From there we will have to see whether further weakness in the real economy brings further cuts from Helicopter Ben. The odds are favorable. This is not a good time to be paid in US dollar! : - (
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby Doly » Fri 21 Sep 2007, 12:37:44

Let's summarize the current state of the American economy:
1) Falling dollar
2) Rising price of oil (even more with the dollar pegs from oil-producing countries removed), combined with the highest oil dependency of any country.
3) Enormous credit bubble bursting as we speak
4) Huge trade deficit

(1)+(2) > (a) Oil will be more and more expensive for the Americans
(2)+(3) > (b) The average American won't be able to make ends meet.
(1)+(3) > (c) Other countries will lose all interest in American debt and start dumping dollars like they aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
(2)+(4) > (d) The trade deficit will keep widening

(a)+(b) > (I) The American economy will grind to a halt. Literally. A likely scenario in my opinion is rampant inflation happening to transport, food and imported products, deflation to most other stuff. The average will be whatever the Fed wants to publish as an average.
(c)+(d) > (II) America, as a country, is going to be bankrupt. The dollar will devalue into nothing, but worse still, nobody will be interested in doing business with America.
(III) America is a very big portion of international trade.

(II)+(III) Houston, we all have a problem.

Is there anything wrong with my analysis?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby drew » Fri 21 Sep 2007, 16:08:12

A very scary analysis indeed!

But, on the flip side, assuming that the US of A doesn't go 'tits up' first, there has to be a point where buying the greenback has to be a good idea.

Two of my coworkers want to do such a thing. One wants to buy 20k in US$ and the other is shopping stateside next week and wants to keep an extra 1k in US funds.

I wonder how long the canuck buck can stay at or above parity. Certainly money can be made or lost on the gamble.

Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MOCKBA » Fri 21 Sep 2007, 17:47:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('drew', 'I') wonder how long the canuck buck can stay at or above parity. Certainly money can be made or lost on the gamble.


No longer than October 18 or the day of the next BoC meeting.
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby grillzilla » Fri 21 Sep 2007, 20:34:04

a lot has been posted here concerning what Helicopter Ben knew, and why he did what he did..

I realize this is a day or two past the immediate discussion, but here is the best analysis of the Feds action that I have read:

Sudden Debt
The difference between Genius and Stupidity is that Genius has its limits.
User avatar
grillzilla
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed 15 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby sparky » Sat 22 Sep 2007, 20:42:28

.

Love it, it make perfect sense !

the 29 crash was caused by the wholesale dumping of good stocks to pay the margins ,
it got ugly when there was no buyers for overpriced stocks or dud ones
Still the greenback is worth less everyday , the aussiebuck is going up and up

The Chinese and Japanese , Korean , Saudis and other sheicks holding vast amounts of green are royaly screwed ,
the Chinese rattle money sabers but cannot have the greenback melting ,
it would destroy their best market and evaporate most of their savings
there is no present alternative but to grind teeth , bang their chest and get some pound of flesh , Japan and Korea are in the same situation .
however ,worst case, if one of them move to dump a selling avalanche might happen


cheers up stateside , it might seems all doom and gloom but it will give your manufacturers a bit of oxygen ,
cure your ridiculous trade imbalance ,
and make sure ( fingers crossed ) you can't afford expensive stupid wars for a while , only little cheap ones

in the link ,the analogy of financial markets as being the economy power plant is nearly perfect , I would have put it as the electricity grid of the real economy as closer still

P.S oil at 100$ for Xmas ??

.






.
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby seahorse » Sun 23 Sep 2007, 23:24:41

Looks like BHP just struck gold, the largest gold mine in the world that is, and, right next to their uranium and silver mines.

[url=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/bhp-billiton-strikes-gold-olympic/story.aspx?guid={C5A0E8CD-67F5-4DE1-9495-E055A7423750}&siteid=yahoomy]BHP strikes gold[/url]
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby sparky » Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:41:40

.
The real gold is iron ore ,of witch there is not much around and steaming coal
Around Gladstone ( Queensland ) they have open cut mines with cliff faces of it
it's not mining as such , they blast half a klik of it and dump it in the waiting ships
lowest cost in the world

.
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Mon 24 Sep 2007, 05:55:35

Thanks for the comments over the weekend. Not much new to add here. Amid the cheerleading for lower rates to support the stock market were some sober commentaries about their inflationary impact, but, in summary, no one it seems wants to know. Party on, dude!

Mr. Sarkozy is becoming a real pain in Mr. Trichet's and the ECB's butt to be honest. At first I thought it was just playing to the home audience when he stormed the EU finance minister's meeting and called for a loosening of the Maastricht Criteria, and then more of the same when he publicly called for a lower euro. But now he is at it again. The French it seems will never learn that they need to reform their own economy, and not rely on the charity of others or a weak franc to get the job done for them. Italy can only hope Mr. Sarkozy succeeds, while the rest of us that like our inflation in the low single digits can only hope he fails le miserable.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Commodities Weekly

Gold and soybean price risk remains skewed to the upside

Dollar weakness has helped push gold sharply higher, while strong Chinese demand is providing support for soybeans.

Gold continues to shine -- raising our price forecasts

As expected, gold prices have rallied sharply and have already reached our previous price target of $725/toz, leaving our gold trade initiated on September 6 substantially in the money. We are further upgrading our gold price outlook based largely on the further weakening in the US dollar, and now expect gold to trade up to $775/toz on a 3m horizon and $800/toz on a 6m horizon. As a result, we are leaving our long gold trade open despite recent
gains.

Despite fresh highs, beans in the teens is still a risk

Since mid-August, soybean prices have appreciated by over 20% and are now approaching our 3 month forecast of 990 cents/bu. As a result, our long soybeans trade initiated on March 30 is substantially in the money. Nonetheless, we believe soybean price risk remains skewed to the upside in the near term and therefore recommend maintaining the position. In particular, demand from China, the world's largest importer of soybeans, remains strong amidst a backdrop of declining inventories.

Source: Goldman Sachs Commodities Research
September 21, 2007

Emerging markets ain't what they used to be it seems. Upgrades to market economy status for some, while others have earned the right to be finally called 'emerging' as opposed to 'submerging'.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')TSE upgraded Israel to Developed Market status...
...but against expectations did not announce an upgrade of Korea and Taiwan from emerging to developed market status.

Impact of a future Korea/Taiwan/Israel MSCI upgrade

The EM index would become dominated by the BRIC markets (their weight would potentially increase to 61%) and four sectors (financials, energy, materials, and telecom) could potentially account for 75% of market capitalization in the benchmark EM index. The sector contrast with the tech- and consumer-heavy Developed Markets would be great (see Table 1).

Possible "Frontier" market upgrades to EM status

To partially replace the lost market cap of Korea/Taiwan/Israel, MSCI or FTSE would likely upgrade some "frontier markets" to Emerging Market status. China A-shares, Vietnam and the Gulf markets are all possible candidates.

Source: Merill Lynch,
GEM Strategy
EM Index Rebalancing
September 24, 2007

Many fear that an EM bubble might be the likely outcome of this collective round of central bank inflation amnesty. That is not quite easing monetary policy, but just turning a blind eye to the long-term creeping normalcy of global imbalances and ever higher core commodity prices.

The problem perhaps being that in a narrower EM world that certain large cap stocks in some markets will be overly represented in total return and global fund portfolios all out of proportion to their true economic weight. Benchmark inflation where too many investment dollars are chasing too few genuine gems in the EM rough.

This will tend to over flatter these stocks' returns on the way in and certainly punish them on the way out if there is a market pullback as fund managers tend to sell what they can to meet margin calls on less liquid EM stocks. There is not a lot of diversification in BRIC, commodities, energy and metals. They will all tend to rise and fall in together. And now that some manufacturers have graduated from the class even less diversification.

A Russian case in point...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')iquidity concerns hit the headlines

Reports of increased liquidity stress at certain Russian financials have increased in frequency and have now made the headlines in the Financial Times on Friday and over the weekend.

Externally caused, but Russian financials look vulnerable

While Russian macro fundamentals remain exceptionally healthy, we believe the financial system is not immune to the current global funding situation. Russian banks have borrowed heavily in the foreign debt markets and now stand on $124bn of external debt (vs $51bn only 18 months ago). Bond markets provided
most of the new financing, and they remain currently shut to new issuance.

Bond financing will unlikely be easily replaced with foreign bank lending. Western banks provided $1trillion of financing to the EMEA space ($120bn to Russia alone, $37bn of which to Russian banks). A few large European banks’ Chief Risk Officers are reportedly not lending longer than a few days to other European counterparts, and profess considerable cautiousness over offering
longer term funding to financials further East. If global liquidity conditions remain tight, it is only a matter of time before other developed market banks will take a similar stance.

In such extreme external conditions, banks need to turn to local liquidity, - the Central Bank is publicly supporting the banking system; yet reports that large banks are reducing repo lines to smaller players are not to be taken lightly, & tax payments due over the next few months may cause further short-lived disruptions.


I am just sort of rambling here as there is not much to talk about. So perhaps I will just leave it at that. Have a good week ahead. Cheers.

UPDATE: some interesting statistics that many may find counter-intuitive.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')any will make the point that the rich make all the money, why shouldn't they pay all the taxes? The problem with that kind of attitude is that rich people become rich by knowing the score and putting their money where it is treated the best.

One of the reasons Francois Sarkozy won the French presidency was the shocking revelation to the citizens of France that many of their wealthiest and most prominent families were moving to Belgium to avoid the high taxes in France. Soaking the rich can not go on indefinitely. It has its costs. The wealthy can vote with their feet.

Source: Soaking the Rich Will Backfire on the Politicians
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Tue 25 Sep 2007, 05:09:31

In response of a PM I received. Edited and updated adding quotes. Thanks.


Hello,

I think gold should be part of your portfolio as protection against a depreciating US dollar. But only one part of a balanced one. By the way, my salary is also tied to the US dollar, so I am not that happy with the dollar's decline either. I have to constantly exchange dollars for euros to stay ahead of (or at least keep up to) the free fall in the dollar.

If you care what ‘the investment biker’ thinks…
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The Federal Reserve's interest rate cut was a mistake that will prompt ``skyrocketing'' agricultural prices worldwide, exacerbate a decline in the dollar and quicken inflation, investor Jim Rogers said.

The ``clowns in Washington'' have ``signaled to the world they don't care about the U.S. dollar,'' Rogers said in an interview from Singapore. The Fed reduced its benchmark rate by half a percentage point to 4.75 percent last week.

The commodities rally, which Rogers correctly predicted in 1999, may last 15 more years, he said. Oil may reach $150 a barrel during that time, he said.

Source: Sept. 24 (Bloomberg)

My point about gold is that, yes, it is a hedge against inflation, but it has not over time outperformed other assets, and with an implied P/E of 24 it is not particularly cheap seeing that it is at 28-year highs (not adjusted for inflation).

It would appear to me that the central banks of the world have sacrificed inflation fighting in search of growth. I think this is a real mistake. They are punishing savers and bond investors, who finance debt markets, to help equity and real estate speculators.

Then the Fed has the gall to criticize investors for being complacent about risk. Risk adverse investors that have taken money out of the stock market have been rewarded with a stock market appreciating new highs. Up +10% since the Fed started cutting rates. Meanwhile investors that went into US treasuries have been rewarded with a lower US dollar and rising yields. The Fed is rewarding risk taking, while punishing those investors who are not complacent about risk. It makes my blood boil. Sorry.

Greenspan comes clean (10-years too late)…
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said he's ``convinced'' that inflation pressures will increase in the world's largest economy in coming years, Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung reported citing an interview.

The Fed ``will react with a more restrictive monetary policy'' and ``nominal rates will rise,'' Greenspan said, according to the newspaper. This ``leads me to the conclusion that asset prices, such as share prices, will rise at a slower pace over the next 25 years than over the past 25 years.''

Greenspan said that there's still ``no end in sight'' to turbulence on financial markets and a ``considerable drop'' in U.S. real-estate prices is likely, which could hurt consumer demand. Still, if the economy is flexible enough, the ``bubble'' will deflate with only limited economic impact, he told the newspaper.
Source: Sept. 24 (Bloomberg)

In any case, I feel the central banks have lost control of the market and squandered any reputation that they had. No wonder that gold becomes an attractive alternative investment for many. I still like commodities, energy and base metals as general hedges against a weak dollar, higher inflation or both. However, I think you have to wary of entry levels. I have not given up on the idea that this may still be a bull trap. My conviction is a lot weaker than it was in August, but I still think the chances of a recession are quite high going forward.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')A boom in commodities has bid up costs of mining operations. The cost of labor, engineering equipment as well as materials such as steel and copper used to build mines has risen sharply in the last few years.
Yet, gold companies are also facing the challenge of replacing existing reserves. The low gold price in the 1990s had forced many miners to cut exploration expenses, resulting in falling production now, experts said.
"I would say that the pace of discovery has been quite disappointing. There's been several big discoveries. But in general, we are still suffering with 10 years of under-investment and under-exploration," Citigroup's Hill said.
Foster also said that it was more difficult to get mining permits and to bring new discoveries into production these days.

Source: [url=http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSN2140192120070924?sp=true]Bullion rise, reserves in focus as gold miners meet
[/url]

Basically, when the Fed started cutting in mid-August was the time to start buying, and it was the wrong decision to take profit despite public statements that central bankers were not going to bail-out investors because they have. However, having made one timing mistake I am hesitant to make another by buying into markets that are at or near their peaks.

I would sooner buy euros and other currencies as a dollar hedge even if I do not know where I want to park that money as an investment, yet. First get my money out of the US dollar and then decide where to deploy it. I hope that helps? Thanks.

MrBill.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby Concerned » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 03:30:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')One of the reasons Francois Sarkozy won the French presidency was the shocking revelation to the citizens of France that many of their wealthiest and most prominent families were moving to Belgium to avoid the high taxes in France. Soaking the rich can not go on indefinitely. It has its costs. The wealthy can vote with their feet.


We live in a globalized world.

We need global labor unions and global re-clamation of unearned wealth. (or the more dramatic sounding soaking the rich as if somehow they earned their billions, 2% global population owning 80% of the planets wealth sounds just about time for a decent redistribution and we start again)

In todays current system the rich play us off against each other.
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 06:00:41

Concerned, never the less within three generations the distribution of wealth would probably look very similar once again. Given post peak oil depletion probably more of a smaller economic pie.

If you did have globalized labor unions then jobs would flow to only those countries that possess sustainable competitive advantages. That would impoverish those that do not. Forget Africa or Latin America with their lack of infrastructure, or even France with its adversion to hardwork, you would only want your factory in Germany where labor productivity is its highest.

If income was taxed worldwide at one uniform rate then investment would gravitate only to those countries with the absolute lowest costs. Again forget France or even America you would only locate your factories in low cost countries like Chindia. A level playing field is exactly that, but what do under-performers do when they are up against a superior team? They lose.

The only reason some companies might have operations in high cost, high tax regimes is if they can offset those higher costs by booking profits elsewhere either through subsidiaries or internal pricing. And tax competition between countries keeps tax and spend politicians honest. This tends to lower the rate for all rather than clustering at the top marginal rate where the incentive to innovate or invest is blunted by punitively high tax rates.

Governments need on average taxes of approximately 25-percent, which is still three working months out of each year per citizen, to fund basic infrastructure and social spending. Anything over and above 25-percent is just a tax grab and is a wealth transfer from its most to its least productive citizens. The rest is just wasted on big government and pork barrel politics.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')There seems to be almost universal agreement that one of the great ills of the United States is that wealthy people do not pay enough taxes. The facts, however, suggest that higher income people in the US are anything but under taxed.

According to an Op/Ed piece in the April 2007 Wall Street Journal, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reports that in 2004, people making more than $43,000 (the upper 40%) pay 99.1% of all taxes. That, of course, means that the lower 60% of the American population pay under 1% of federal taxes.

But there is more. The top 10% earners in the United States, those families making more than $87,300, pay almost 71% of all federal taxes. What makes this so remarkable is that in 1979 the top 10% paid only 48%.

Heaven forbid that a person be in the top one percent of earners in this country; according to the same CBO report, their part of the total federal tax bill was 37%.

Source: Soaking the Rich Will Backfire on the Politicians

Now I do not know about you, but I do not consider $43.000 a year gross, what approximately $25.800 or just $2150 per month net, a great deal of take home pay for my hardwork everyday. And neither should anyone else that studied, works hard, pays their taxes and tries to build a life for themselves and their families. Why would I want some parasitic politician or world labor congress trying to get an even bigger slice of my sweat equity?

A flat-tax for all with no exceptions and no deductions is the fairest, easiest and cheapest to collect tax regime, but it remains unpopular amoung the closet socialist crowd. Unfortunately, as along with mandatory balanced budgets it would unlock a lot of productivity and wealth creation, while draining funds away from inefficient, big government machines.

If we are all going to be paid the same for our efforts then I want to work as a ski patroller in the winter, and maybe in summer I can paint socialist realism paintings glorifying our benevolent leaders who make us all equal, just some more equal than others. Oh yah, and I want to live & work somewhere nice. Not too cold, not too hot, temperate and close to the mountains. No Kruchev era apartment block and 10-hour shift at the tractor factory in Norilsk for me thank you very much, comrade.

But as I said, within three generations all that collective wealth would probably all end up back in the hands of the quick, clever and most industrious. Well, those and our 'new' corrupt elites. Read Ayn Rand's 'Atlas Shrugged' for a good primer on grabbing for a larger share of a shrinking economic pie.

Speaking of financial innovation you just cannot stop it can you? Find a niche and fill it. Or create a new one. That is the market economy at work. New ideas. More innovation.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Barclays Capital, the investment banking unit of Barclays Plc, created the European Borrowing Unit, or Ebu, based on a portfolio of 10 major currencies and aimed above all at corporate and institutional borrowers, the Financial Times reported.

It's a basket of long and short currency positions against the euro; weightings within the portfolio will be generated monthly using a statistical technique aimed at minimizing volatility for a given level of return, the newspaper said.

The Ebu is intended to be an alternative to low-yielding currencies such as the Yen and the Swiss franc, the FT said.

Phillipos Kassimatis, Barclays Capital's co-chief of foreign-exchange structuring, told the newspaper that the Ebu is designed to optimize clients' funding costs on foreign-exchange loans.
Source: Sept. 24 (Bloomberg)

And...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Foreign-exchange trading rose 65 percent to a record $3.2 trillion a day on average, led by growth in hedge funds and foreign investors, the Bank for International Settlements said in its triennial survey.

The increase in the value of transactions from 2004 was the biggest in the survey's 18-year history, the Basel, Switzerland-
based BIS said today. At current exchange rates, turnover rose
71 percent. The Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and
Derivatives Market Activity is based on data from 54 of the
world's central banks and monetary authorities.
Source: Sept. 25 (Bloomberg)

The world is becoming more globalized and markets interconnected. That is good news. That efficiency generates wealth. You will eventually get your global labor market. However, be careful what you wish for. They probably will not be paying GM wages & benefits for shoddy workmanship and an early retirement package with comprehensive healthcare and perscription drugs. You might just find yourself working harder for less in a crowded market where labor is worth less than capital, and is less mobile.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby sparky » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 07:27:01

.

Don't forget the cost of security , :roll:
what 's the point of being rich if everyone's hand is up to get to your wealth over your dead body ?
The rich pay taxes to be left in peace to enjoy it ,
the poor have no particular reason no to go on a rampage , except fear
...a very short term commodity , cheaper to buy them off !
move to a small unimportant country and you can see your wealth disappear with no recourse ,
there too you have to buy protection .

.
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby Concerned » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 09:25:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'C')oncerned, never the less within three generations the distribution of wealth would probably look very similar once again. Given post peak oil depletion probably more of a smaller economic pie.

If you did have globalized labor unions then jobs would flow to only those countries that possess sustainable competitive advantages. That would impoverish those that do not. Forget Africa or Latin America with their lack of infrastructure, or even France with its adversion to hardwork, you would only want your factory in Germany where labor productivity is its highest.

If income was taxed worldwide at one uniform rate then investment would gravitate only to those countries with the absolute lowest costs. Again forget France or even America you would only locate your factories in low cost countries like Chindia. A level playing field is exactly that, but what do under-performers do when they are up against a superior team? They lose.


Of course the other side of classical economics which advocates free movement of capital also advocates free movement of labor. So someone in Sudan or Palestine should be "free" to move to Germany, the UK or USA (or even on a more local and regional level). Can't have that can we too interested in maintaining nation states. What a terrible world without defining boundaries of a Russia, China or USA.

We could have a much better fairer world and I am very left wing or alternate and work damn hard for my own benefit and make lots of added value for my employer too.

What irks me most is not someone getting paid more than me it's two things.

1. Those that don't want to work and expect a free ride.
2. The blackberry brigade that pretend to work and demand a free ride. The one million plus brigade that attend meetings.

I have no problem with you or anyone earning more than me with what I believe to be real genuine honest work. If you do an extra shift or plant a second field then you should be rewarded. If you pay yourself $20 million a year because you are a gatekeeper to power and influence then Im sorry time for you to be taken out back and shot in the head.

I am praying to be alive to see this bullshit planet and so called "economy" unravel and hopefully move towards a more equitable and sustainable model. Whats my chances? LOL Probably I'll be the one to get taken out back and shot.

OH. One last thing people have to stop god damn breeding!! Jesus can we reduce our numbers to 500 million or one billion. Why can't multiple parents be responsible for each others children so you can really have one child and feel you have ownership of a small community of son's and daughters. (Celestine Prophecy)

Ranted have a few drinks under the belt. Thank you for humoring me and reading.

Peace to all. (except the rapacious Chicago school, shock therapy free market apologists)
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby gswarriors4life » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 10:39:50

I realize this is a little off topic, but I found out that the deep water drillers RIG and GlobalSantaFe are going to merge and become a new company as a result.

My question is how I can calculate the Price Per Share(PPS) of the new company once its merged. Sorry, can't seem to figure it out
myself :(

Here are the terms:(http://biz.yahoo.com/bizj/070723/1495058.html?.v=3):
"Terms of the agreement include Transocean shareholders receiving $33.03 and 0.7 shares of the combined company for each share of Transocean.

GlobalSanteFe (NYSE: GSF - News) shareholders will received $22.46 and 0.5 shares of the combined company for each GlobalSanteFe share." The merger will create a $53 billion company and 318 million shares outstanding.

___
Thanks so much!
User avatar
gswarriors4life
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 10:43:59

Just a few observations, some of which I have said before, in response to Comrade Concerned's remarks.

Yes, if you live on a finite planet, and breed like out of control rats that have discovered how to prolong lifespans, then eventually no matter what your income or lifestyle you will quickly outlive your resources. The definition of unsustainable growth.

Secondly, why should I volunteer to give up any of my wealth, not even 5-10%, to support others? Do I have a say in what they do all the days of their lives? Do I even have a say whether or not they are born? No. We live in an age where everyone has rights, but no one wants obligations.

It is true that we voluntarily choose to belong to a community. We may collectively pay income tax, even up to 50% (and more), which represents up to six months a year of our own labor and talents, so as to ensure 'equity' in our chosen community. But when the demands on our resources are all out of proportion to any perceived benefits then it is 'if you don't like it, leave', right?

Well, many choose gated communities or to change countries of residence and even nationalities because they cannot live with it any longer. They vote with their capital and eventually with their feet. Economic migration in reverse.

If you cannot control your borders and stop illegal immigration then how do you stop your best and brightest as well as those with capital from just getting up and moving voluntarily?

Alternatively, why would I stay in a war torn country with extreme poverty and a perrennially corrupt government if I had a choice?

When I think of the millions of dollars in taxable revenue and thousands of jobs that I have created for foreign countries as well as transferring knowledge and skills then I think of Canada's tax policies and Canadian businesses' narrow mindedness and have only them to thank for that loss. They create the brain drain. It does not invent itself. I am only one of thousands that were part of an exodus for twenty years or longer. Do I feel guilty? No, but resentful is a good word.

The free movement of capital and labor bring many economic benefits to host countries. Cyprus is a perfect example. Foreign firms like mine pay 75% of all taxes here, plus we create many other 'clean' high value white collar jobs for locals. However, it is true that there is a natural limit to how many unskilled laborers or ethnic groups not schooled in local culture and common values (Leitkultur) can be effectively absorbed into a community or nation.

One example is not whether 'gastarbeiters' from Turkey that helped fill labor shortages during Germany's 'wirtschaftswunder' played a positive role or not - they certainly did - but they were not successfully integrated into German society. Why? Because one they were not sent home after they finished their short-term job and secondly they were never offered permanent citizenship either. Now you have third generation Turks in Germany that are still not German citizens.

Canada is also grappling with this issue with short-term work permits. Canadian laws are somewhat different as Canada allows dual citizenship, but Germany does not. However, it is a public policy choice. How much immigration do you allow (legal) or tolerate (illegal), and how do you fill short-term job vacancies without triggering massive inflows of permanent workers. If only temporary, what incentive do they have to be good citizens or to integrate?

And in the post peak oil depletion context how do you enforce such trade-offs in the future as other countries go down the proverbial toilet, and Canada as such a large country seems to offer such potential (not that a lot of immigrants seem to want to live in Moosejaw or Thunder Bay and seem to prefer Vancouver or Toronto that are already over-crowded)? Do we need them? Can we (ethically or by force) keep them out? How many can we realistically integrate? Do they have core Canadian values? More importantly, can they leave their greavances and prejudices where they came from? All good questions and I am sorry far away from Trader's Corner.

We have a trade-off between events we can and cannot control. We have a trade-off between our duty to ourselves and our families and our obligation to greater society. Quite often there are compromizes that have to be made. This is not a civics class. I prefer to concentrate on concrete measures that we can control, like our investment decisions. Hey, if you get rich and want to give away all your money to worthy causes then good on you! ; - )

Sorry if I got a bit off topic. Cheers.
Last edited by MrBill on Wed 26 Sep 2007, 11:34:39, edited 2 times in total.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 11:04:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gswarriors4life', 'I') realize this is a little off topic, but I found out that the deep water drillers RIG and GlobalSantaFe are going to merge and become a new company as a result.

My question is how I can calculate the Price Per Share(PPS) of the new company once its merged. Sorry, can't seem to figure it out
myself :(

Here are the terms:(http://biz.yahoo.com/bizj/070723/1495058.html?.v=3):
"Terms of the agreement include Transocean shareholders receiving $33.03 and 0.7 shares of the combined company for each share of Transocean.

GlobalSanteFe (NYSE: GSF - News) shareholders will received $22.46 and 0.5 shares of the combined company for each GlobalSanteFe share." The merger will create a $53 billion company and 318 million shares outstanding.

___
Thanks so much!


I am no expert, but this is how I would calculate the value of the merged company using ficticuous numbers because I am too lazy and its easier to understand.

Company A
market cap = $200 million
outstanding common shares = 2 million
price per share = $100

Company B
market cap = $100 million
outstanding common shares = 2 million shares
price per share = $50

Merged Company AB
market cap = $300 million
outstanding common shares = 4 million
price per share = $75

Now you just have to substitute in one share of Company B for 0.5 shares of the new Merged Company AB plus a cash payment of $22.46 in this example.

While Company A shareholders get 0.7 shares of Merged AB plus $33.03 in cash.

$53 billion divided by 318 million shares equals $166.67 per share for Merged Company AB.

UPDATED: to include corrections

GSF = $75.20 (current market price, not when merger announced)
RIG = $111.52 (ditto)

Therefore,

(0.5 x $166.67) + $22.46 = $105.80 per share for GSF
the cash + shares offer of $105.80 versus current price of $75.20 represents a 40% premium

and

(0.7 x $166.67) + $33.03 = $149.70 per share for RIG
the cash + shares offer of $149.70 versus current price of $111.52 represents a 34% premium

That assumes that the combined firm is really worth $53 billion making the 318 million shares also worth $166.67 each. In which case the shares still look undervalued? So I would question the assumption of the value of the overall firm otherwise there is a risk free arbitrage here.
Last edited by MrBill on Thu 27 Sep 2007, 03:53:57, edited 1 time in total.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 16:33:27

RE GlobalSanteFe pricing

yes, yes, I know I have made a mistake! As soon as I left the office and sat down at the beach bar to wait for friends from Germany I realized I had not compared the offer to existing share prices. I will fix that tomorrow as soon as I have Bloomie in front of me. In the meantime sorry.

Like a Carpenter, measure twice, cut once. Think twice, edit, then hit send. Doh!
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby gswarriors4life » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 18:00:22

Thanks MrBill! Really appreciate your help.
User avatar
gswarriors4life
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Thu 27 Sep 2007, 04:07:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gswarriors4life', 'T')hanks MrBill! Really appreciate your help.


So according the Market Watch data here is the deal.

RIG
market cap = $32.36 billion
shares = 290.2 million
share price = $111.51

GSF
market cap = $16.95 billion
shares = 225.32 million
share price = $75.23

GSF/RIG (diluted)
market cap = $49.31 billion
shares = 515.52 million
share price = $95.65

GSF post merger (undiluted)
market cap = $49.31 billion (at market prices)
shares = (290.20 x 0.7) + (225.32 x 0.5) = 315.80 million
share price = $156.14

So the market is valuing the combined firm somewhere between $95.65 and $156.14 based on existing shares in both firms and not at $166.67 based on a market cap of $53 billion and 318 million shares.

A typical case of journalistic 'garbage in, garbage out' from yahoo biz dot com. But regardless the shares still look like an attractive buy unless it is a value destroying merger.

I still may have made an error because as I said I am not an equity analyst, so I do not know exactly how they value merged firms, but this seems intuitively correct? Thanks.
Last edited by MrBill on Thu 27 Sep 2007, 04:15:28, edited 1 time in total.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron