by nth » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 19:48:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')
The people who appoint/confirm the ECB president, on the other hand, are not directly accountable to the people.
I do not agree with that statement, but I guess it is an opinion on how accountable is ECB vs US Fed Bank.
Just to point out one problem with your comparison:
ECB President is appointed with unanimous consent. It requires every head of state to agree. This is a higher standard than US where you need one President to appoint you and half plus 1 (could be VP) in the senate to consent. But that is my opinion.
As for US elections, do you think they are more accountable than European governments? The EU has many different forms, but are more or less parliamentary in nature. Some heads of state are directly elected, though.
If I were you, I would have pointed out that ECB executive members only get one 8 year term, while US has no term limits. This probably bolster your argument than talking about misinformation about ECB Presidents not having to talk to politicans and the people. But, I guess this is not your expertise.