Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

What would you do with: Absolute power?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby Hawkcreek » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 15:34:34

--
Last edited by Hawkcreek on Sun 19 Aug 2007, 22:29:56, edited 1 time in total.
Hawkcreek
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 16:14:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('highlander', 'M')onte:
There are instances in the past of overshoot in human populations where the result was mass migration.


Yes, it is called colonization. A certain ecological niche was overshot. This time it is the entire earth with nowhere to go. No place to practise the age-old takeover method, although we certainly are giving it a shot in Iraq.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile I don't (can't?) share your gloomy prospect of a diedown to ~1.5 bln,


We don't know what the carrying capacity post-fossil fuels will be.

We don't know sustainable practices will be in place.

If we destroy the environment by burning anything that moves or grows, we may reduce the carrying capacity to much less than what it was pre-fossil fuels.

All we know for sure is that we need to start reducing the existing population or it will be reduced for us.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ongrats on your 10K+ thoughtful posts. Keep up the good work.


Thank you. :)
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 16:35:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'A')ll I'm saying is that there may be forms of society and forms of food production that are sustainable for a population of 6.5 billion.


Show me any other form of agriculture other than totalitarian that could produce the food to support 6.7 billion people an counting.

Please provide links to the studies.

This isn't about what I believe.

This is about biological reality.

We are indoctrinated with the Great Forgetting.

We forget that before the advent of agriculture and village life, we lived in a profoundly different way.

The Green Revolution didn't come about to fight famine, it came about to provide for growth for those already well fed.

Why does man need to grow crops?

All other animals don't.

Nature provides for them.

We grow crops for power and control and to make a futile attempt to enlarge our carrying capacity beyond sustainable limits.

About ten thousand years ago we decided to ignore the laws of limited competition and chose to wage war on all other life in order to produce food for humans.

No conceivable society or form of food production could ever compete with totalitarian agriculture.

What else would you kill?
Last edited by MonteQuest on Mon 23 Jul 2007, 18:06:42, edited 1 time in total.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 16:44:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hawkcreek', ' ')More opinion given as an absolute truth. And I have never said that we could continue to double in population. That would be acting like bacteria.


But we are continuing to grow exponentially.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') see evidence of population reduction efforts (and results)already. If you refuse to look, you won't see.


Fertility declines due to demograhic transition fostered by overshoot via fossil fuels.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow did I attack the messenger? I just said to not classify all theories as "laws".


It sure doesn't address the merits of the law, nor make it less of one. What makes Liebig's law not absolute?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ho is talking about living without air.


You said the law of the miniimum wasn't a law. Air would be that minimum.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')nce again, you want to give your opinions as gospel.

More ad hominem. Stop attacking me and refute the merits of the science I present.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hich leads to another question -- just why are the doomers so commited to certain death and destruction?

We aren't in denial of reality and science. We recognize that there are limits and that we have exceeded them. We realize that our way of life is unsustainable.

We recognize that die-off following overshoot is the way the world works.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 17:02:20

And you notice that people are railing against the notion that there are limits or that we must accept a die-off.

They rail against the idea that someone even mentions it.

They rail against what they perceive as my opinions.

I am not offering my opinion, I am offering solid science.

Those not ignorant of basic biology know what I mean.

I am data driven and I believe in the science behind the studies I cite to support what I write.

Show me how Catton is so wrong. So me why science is so wrong.

Refute the science, don't use the "stupid doomer" card and attacks at me.

I'm just the messenger.

Attack the message.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby holmes » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 17:44:41

The truly horrifying part also is that they rant against "death and destruction" while residing in the biggest ponzi scam death cult known in the history of mankind. A largest suicide cult. Members number in the billions. That is horrifying that it isnt even known that this death cult system is responsible for so much death. The connections are not know. It is really murder by proxi. Out of site out of mind i suppose. But to maintain status quo and continue this charade they will wipe out far more "life" than these so called "doomers". However we are in orwell world now. life is death. death is life. o how deep we are in....sigh
well we did say the ponzi death cult will be defended to the bitter end did we not...even by the unexpected....
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby holmes » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 17:50:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'A')ll I'm saying is that there may be forms of society and forms of food production that are sustainable for a population of 6.5 billion.


Show me any other form of agriculture other than totalitarian that could produce the food to support 6.7 billion people an counting.

Please provide links to the studies.

This isn't about what I believe.

This is about biological reality.

We are indoctrinated with the Great Forgetting.

We forget that before the advent of agriculture and village life, we lived in a profoundly different way.

The Green Revolution didn't come about to fight famine, it came about to provide for growth for those already well fed.

Why does man need to grow crops?

All other animals don't.

Nature provides for them.

We grow crops for power and control and to make a futile attempt to enlarge our carrying capacity beyond sustainable limits.

About ten thousand years ago we decided to ignore the laws of limited competition and chose to wage war on all other life in order to produce food for humans.

No conceivable society or form of food production could ever compete with totalarian agriculture.

What else would you kill?

excellent post! It is ALL about power and a fuedal slave peasant serf system. I am at wits end on how many humans are just herding beasts. the stampede to the trough and their different forms of "cells"(prisons) is mind numbing. truly stuff of horror shows when the black smack dries up.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby Pops » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 18:20:32

Have there been any new ideas for steps to take for the last 5 pages?

No

Same ole same old.

Guess I will quit looking at this thread too; just another: I said, you said, nobody does crap but talk, thread.

Good luck talking folks.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 18:25:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ' ')Guess I will quit looking at this thread too; just another: I said, you said, nobody does crap but talk, thread.



No, just more denial of reality.

Rather hard to find steps when you refuse to recognize the ground before you exists.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby holmes » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 19:13:59

power down. The solution. it covers all of the bases.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 19:31:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')Same ole same old.
that's what I was saying, Pops. Plus I find it absurd to try and fine-tune the difference between being a doomer and saying we are in overshoot and a die-off is coming. They both amount to the same thing.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby Pops » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 21:55:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')hey both amount to the same thing.

Taking the time to try to convince the rest of us we are Doomed seems a big waste of time if one truly believes in Doom.

I guess my question is why waste the time tapping keys if one truly believes such?

Nothing better to do till the inevitable, can’t afford an I-Phone, nothing on cable?

What do you think PMS??
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby TonyPrep » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 22:12:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'S')how me any other form of agriculture other than totalitarian that could produce the food to support 6.7 billion people an counting.
Methods propounded by Ecology Action, show excellent yields whilst building the soil. Small scale is probably needed, but this is a perfect fit for a post peak sustainable way of life. The work involved isn't excessive, either. There is enough arable land for such techniques to feed the current population. Sorry, I don't have links at the moment, will try to find them later.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')his isn't about what I believe.
I know you base that on studies but there is no proof that bio-intensive methods could never sustain the current population.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'W')e forget that before the advent of agriculture and village life, we lived in a profoundly different way.
I can conceive of ways to live that haven't been tried before on a societal scale.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'W')hy does man need to grow crops?

All other animals don't.

Nature provides for them.
And bio-intensive methods try to mimic nature as much as possible; that's what makes them effective. What other animals do is irrelevant. Not all animals have identical methods of obtaining food. We do not need to act exactly like any other particular species. Evolution has given species unique traits that serve them well and allow them to thrive. We have unique behavioural traits also. They have enabled us to figure out alternative ways to obtain food.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'W')e grow crops for power and control and to make a futile attempt to enlarge our carrying capacity beyond sustainable limits.We are not deliberately making that attempt - though it may sometimes seem like that. But such behaviour doesn't mean alternative behaviour is not possible - just unlikely.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'N')o conceivable society or form of food production could ever compete with totalitarian agriculture.Except, maybe, small scale bio-intensive horticulture.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby PrairieMule » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 22:44:02

I'm 50/50 on all the doom scenarios. As in 50% chance maybe we have no hope or 50% everything will shake out. I can play from either side of the deck.

That being said, a week ago I got to test drive a 2008 BMW 650i coupe at work. Granted if I had the 80k plus tax to drop I'd spend it on land instead.

Holy crap it was fun!

"Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth and danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings;

Sunward I've climbed, and joined the tumbling mirth of sun-split clouds-
and done a hundred things you have not dreamed of-
wheeled and soared and swung high in the sunlit silence.

Hov'ring there, I've chased the shouting wind along,
and flung my eager craft through footless halls of air.

Up, up the long delirious, burning blue I've topped the windswept heights with easy grace,
where never lark, or even eagle flew.

And, while with silent, lifting mind I've trod the high untresspassed sanctity of space,
Put out my hand,
and touched the face of God




So maybe the lights will go off or maybe not. Make preparations but for the love of Mike, if heaven drops a plum-open your mouth. Go get some sunshine and enjoy our technology while it's still here.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 23:06:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')hey both amount to the same thing.

Taking the time to try to convince the rest of us we are Doomed seems a big waste of time if one truly believes in Doom.

I guess my question is why waste the time tapping keys if one truly believes such?


More personal attacks.

Is that the best you got?

I am no more trying to convince people we are doomed than the man in the moon. Dismantling an unsustainable mindset and paradigm is the key to turning this around.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 23:19:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', ' ')I know you base that on studies but there is no proof that bio-intensive methods could never sustain the current population.


Tony, you are grasping at straws and you know it. No studies exist that say it can.

What else would bio-intensive methods kill to increase produciton?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e have unique behavioural traits also. They have enabled us to figure out alternative ways to obtain food.


Yes, all unsustainable. Totaliatarian agriculture kills everything but human food.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby HEADER_RACK » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 23:27:57

I hate to jump in the middle of a discussion,but something struck me as being odd in what tony prep said. That there is enough arable land to feed the current population.
Wouldn't it matter more that there is enough arable land where it needs to be to support the current population levels? Having plenty of land in Brazil and not enough in China doesn't do the chinese much good.
New York City has a population density of 26,720 per sq mile. To me thats WAY out of WHACK for sustainablity without fossil fuels. There just isn't enough arable land around them to support their population levels.
Nothing is more dangerous than a man with nothing left to lose but has everything left to gain.
User avatar
HEADER_RACK
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 24 Jul 2007, 00:04:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HEADER_RACK', 'I') hate to jump in the middle of a discussion,but something struck me as being odd in what tony prep said. That there is enough arable land to feed the current population.
Wouldn't it matter more that there is enough arable land where it needs to be to support the current population levels?


Yes, but the bigger question is whether or not producing that much food by any means is sustainable or even desirable.

As people just seem to refuse to grasp, carrying capacity isn't about just feeding people.

Carrying capacity is determined by the least abundant necessity relative to per capita requirements.

You could have zero hunger with surplus food and still be in overshoot.

Look outside your window. There are 6.7 billion people on the planet. If we have exceed the carrying capacity of the earth, why aren't they dying off?

The definition of overshoot is when a population continues to grow beyond the carrying capacity fueled by a windfall of food/energy that causes a population bloom. For us, that windfall was fossil fuels.

Nature's feedback mechanisms are not immediate. The resultant overshoot degrades the real carrying capacity over time through environmental pollution, loss of biodiversity, habitat loss, loss of topsoil, potable water, and climate change.

Eventually, you reach a tipping point that triggers the collapse.

Peak oil may well be the tipping point and the "least abundant necessity" if climate change doesn't beat it to the punch with a demise of temperate climate in the food producing areas.

One of the rules of ecology is if you notice something is wrong, it is usually much too late to do anything about it.

Global climate change and a human die-off are two of these.

And die-off means the death rate will exceed the birth rate.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby firestarter » Tue 24 Jul 2007, 00:19:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
And die-off means the death rate will exceed the birth rate.



Could that possibly portend a slow burn?
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Steps to take

Unread postby HEADER_RACK » Tue 24 Jul 2007, 00:45:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HEADER_RACK', 'I') hate to jump in the middle of a discussion,but something struck me as being odd in what tony prep said. That there is enough arable land to feed the current population.
Wouldn't it matter more that there is enough arable land where it needs to be to support the current population levels?


Yes, but the bigger question is whether or not producing that much food by any means is sustainable or even desirable.

As people just seem to refuse to grasp, carrying capacity isn't about just feeding people.

Carrying capacity is determined by the least abundant necessity relative to per capita requirements.


I agree with you and understand.
A man needs four things to live on this earth, basic necessities. Air, Food, Water and shelter.
Now if I need a shovel to get to the water I need to survive and I don't have one. I'm going to die. A shovel just became a necessity for my survival.
If I need oil to bring to me my food and I don't have any. I won't survive. Oil just became a necessity for my survival.
Whats not to understand? If you need a certain amount of something to be able to reach all the four basic necessities of life you are dead. 3 out of 4 just don't cut it.
Nothing is more dangerous than a man with nothing left to lose but has everything left to gain.
User avatar
HEADER_RACK
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron