Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Titan Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 09 May 2007, 01:28:44

Purcatty's post estimates how many barrels of oil it would take to put a man in orbit or send a ship to Mars.

Most illogical.

Spaceships don't run on oil.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby Judgie » Wed 09 May 2007, 03:05:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('basil_hayden', '[')url=http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic28813.html]read purcatty's posts on this thread[/url]

Eloquently presented, me thinks.


Ok, cheers for that :)
Judgie
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 07 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby manu » Wed 09 May 2007, 05:46:55

Yes, they can start to do that, right after they start to import all that green cheese from the moon.
User avatar
manu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby Newsseeker » Wed 09 May 2007, 08:45:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('manu', 'Y')es, they can start to do that, right after they start to import all that green cheese from the moon.


Remember we can't start doing anything until the monoliths appear and turn Jupiter into a second sun.
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 09 May 2007, 13:04:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', 't')he monoliths appear and turn Jupiter into a second sun.


Great idea! That would really help with solar power generation.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 09 May 2007, 17:53:24

[web]http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/cassini_huygens/PIA06240_H.jpg[/web]


It rains methane on Titan. The ESA pic shows a lake of liquid hydrocarbon (probably methane or ethane) on Titan.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby Tyler_JC » Thu 10 May 2007, 16:20:40

Can I just say that this is my FAVORITE thread?

Methane from Jupiter...LOL.

Hell, even if the moon was a Cadbury Egg full of gasoline, it still wouldn't matter.

If there EROEI is negative, it's a waste of time.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Import methane from Jupiter?

Postby Plantagenet » Thu 10 May 2007, 17:22:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I')f there EROEI is negative, it's a waste of time.


If you are looking at methane from Jupiter purely as an economic replacement for earth after Peak Oil, I agree it doesn't make sense to import methane from Jupiter.

But for scientific reasons it would be fascinating to look for life in the Jupiter system and sample the abundant hydrocarbons there. It might even make sense to mine hydrocarbons on Titan for local use if earth colonies are ever established in the distant future within the Jupiter system.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby OilIsMastery » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 22:36:16

Image

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=47675

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]'Fossil fuel' theory takes hit with NASA finding

New study shows methane on Saturn's moon Titan not biological

NASA scientists are about to publish conclusive studies showing abundant methane of a non-biologic nature is found on Saturn's giant moon Titan, a finding that validates a new book's contention that oil is not a fossil fuel.

"We have determined that Titan's methane is not of biologic origin," reports Hasso Niemann of the Goddard Space Flight Center, a principal NASA investigator responsible for the Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer aboard the Cassini-Huygens probe that landed on Titan Jan. 14.

Niemann concludes the methane "must be replenished by geologic processes on Titan, perhaps venting from a supply in the interior that could have been trapped there as the moon formed."

The studies announced by NASA yesterday will be reported in the Dec. 8 issue of the scientific journal Nature.

"This finding confirms one of the key arguments in 'Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil,'" claims co-author Jerome R. Corsi. "We argue that oil and natural gas are abiotic products, not 'fossil fuels' that are biologically created by the debris of dead dinosaurs and ancient forests."

Methane has been synthetically created in the laboratory, Corsi points out, "and now NASA confirms that abiotic methane is abundantly found on Titan."

The realization that hydrocarbons are produced inorganically throughout our solar system was a key insight that led Cornell University astronomer Thomas Gold to write his 1998 book, "The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels." Gold wrote:

It would be surprising indeed if the earth had obtained its hydrocarbons only from a source that biology had taken from another carbon-bearing gas – carbon dioxide – which would have been collected from the atmosphere by photo-synthesizing organisms for manufacture into carbohydrates and then somehow reworked by geology into hydrocarbons. All this, while the planetary bodies bereft of surface life would have received their hydrocarbon gifts by purely abiogenic causes.

Gold wryly noted that he was sure there had not been any "big stagnant swamps on Titan" to produce the biological debris that conventionally trained geologists think was required on Earth to produce oil and natural gas as a "fossil fuel."

"If petroleum and natural gas are abiotic as we maintain in 'Black Gold Stranglehold,'" Corsi commented, "then the 'peak oil' fear that we are going to run out of oil may have been based on a giant misconception."

Paradigms in science change slowly and with great resistance, he noted, "But NASA has given us today incontrovertible evidence that Titan has abundant inorganic methane."

"If the scientists have ruled out that biological processes created methane on Titan, why do petro-geologists still argue that natural gas on Earth is of biological origin?" Corsi asked.
User avatar
OilIsMastery
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 507
Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Manhattan - U.N. Occupied
Top

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby TheDude » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 00:26:08

You again!

List of molecules in interstellar space.

Acetone, Propanal, Benzene among them. Yeah, methane too. Up to ten or more atoms. What, do you think it's Wookie pee or something?
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby Plantagenet » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 01:23:47

Clearly there is some abiotic methane and clearly there is some biogas and organically produced methane.

The two hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. Methane can form in various ways.

Titan has 100% abiotic methane. The earth is a rather different place. 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby OilIsMastery » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 14:52:49

Is there any evidence at all that shows hydrocarbons are so-called "fossil" fuels?

If natural gas is abiogenic, what makes us think petroleum isn't abiogenic?

And if hydrocarbons are biogenic, is there life on Saturn VI aka Titan?
User avatar
OilIsMastery
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 507
Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Manhattan - U.N. Occupied

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby BigTex » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 15:02:28

If oil is abiotic, aren't we still in trouble, since apparently the abiotic underground oil fountains are replenishing the oil deposits more slowly than we are draining them?

[Tongue in cheek]

If something is running out faster than it is being replenished the fact that there may be an infinite supply is not the least bit helpful.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby Kingcoal » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 16:06:44

Methane is very common in the solar system. The earth probably contained an enormous amount of it in its early life. Then the moon formed. The moon was formed out of a cataclysmic collision between the earth and a similar sized planet in the same orbit. Both planets were destroyed and the result was the earth and the moon. After the collision, the earth remained completely molten for a long time. During that time, the moon was so close it blanked out 1/3 of the sky causing huge tides that acted as a "blender," stirring the pot molten of materials in the earth. This process caused the earth to slowly stratify; that is, the heavy elements sunk to the core and the lighter elements (methane for one) rose to the surface. Methane slowly out gassed over the millennia. It's a good thing for us that this collision happened, otherwise we probably wouldn't be here. Without a magnetic field to deflect the solar wind, the earth's atmosphere would have "blown away" a long time ago.

This process didn't happen on Mars, that's why mars doesn't have a magnetic field and is covered in iron oxide. When the planets first formed, they were nothing but rubble piles that compressed into solid spheres. The elements were randomly spread out though the body. On earth, the heavy elements are found in veins left over from volcanic vents. If it weren't for volcanism, we probably wouldn't have any heavy metals to play with - they would be trapped in the molten core.

The fact that Titan has a lot of methane constantly out gassing does not prove abiotic theory. The Earth is a different kind of body, with a different history. I don't doubt that primordial methane does outgas from earth, but the evidence is overwhelming that the natural gas that we find under salt domes was created from organic debris.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby mekrob » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 17:18:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f natural gas is abiogenic, what makes us think petroleum isn't abiogenic?


Let's suppose that ALL oil on the planet really is abiotic. Well then. Since the Earth is 4 billion years old and we've got about 3 trillion barrels of oil originally in place that is recoverable (let's just imagine it is that high), then that means that oil is produced by the Earth abiotically at a rate of less than 1000 barrels per year. We burn 1000 barrels just about every second.

That means that in the entire time of human existence, say 1 million years, the Earth would have produced roughly a billion barrels, or enough for the world to use in less than 2 weeks at current rates!

So how's it gonna save us exactly? What's your point?
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby eastbay » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 17:31:08

...then that means that oil is produced by the Earth abiotically at a rate of less than 1000 barrels per year. We burn 1000 barrels just about every second.

Ok, let me see if I follow you. If we cut our worldwide petroleum use to about 1,000 bp year everything should work out just fine. Everyone will then agree that peak oil is a myth and we can all move on to something else.

Is that correct?
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby mekrob » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 17:54:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')s that correct?


Are you serious? Reread the first two words of my post:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')et's suppose


"Let's suppose" as in "This is utter BS, but I'll entertain this jackass idea just to make a point that even if this BS is true, it doesn't mean a damn thing to our current and future situation."
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby BigTex » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 18:03:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f natural gas is abiogenic, what makes us think petroleum isn't abiogenic?


Let's suppose that ALL oil on the planet really is abiotic. Well then. Since the Earth is 4 billion years old and we've got about 3 trillion barrels of oil originally in place that is recoverable (let's just imagine it is that high), then that means that oil is produced by the Earth abiotically at a rate of less than 1000 barrels per year. We burn 1000 barrels just about every second.

That means that in the entire time of human existence, say 1 million years, the Earth would have produced roughly a billion barrels, or enough for the world to use in less than 2 weeks at current rates!

So how's it gonna save us exactly? What's your point?


Actually, there is a gigantic pressure release valve down in Hell that maintains a constant PSI for the underground oil reservoirs. When the pressure gets low the abiotic flux capacitor turns on and produces more. When the desired PSI is reached, the abiotic flux capacitor switches off....and that's how it works.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Hydrocarbon Moon: The Myth Of Fossil Fuel

Postby eastbay » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 19:40:19

Are you serious

Of course not you silly rabbit.... but then again, we're getting older and our 'humors' are getting scrambled up.

Maybe we should do this: (joke) when we joke to make it clearer for everyone.

:-D
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest