Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 21:10:12

Thanks Shannymara. I started this thread:

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic29504.html

placed it in the energy forums, as that seemed appropriate, and it was moved to Open Discussion, where people already 'get it'. Some of these narrow angle lens energy types should be reading these articles to expand their understanding. The article is very informative, from the New York Times and directly addresses corruption in the oil industry. More to the point it is a current ongoing issue.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 21:32:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I') had always thought that the US planned to reach a point in Iraq where it could pronounce a fait accompli to the rest of the world and be in a position to negotiate a global energy deal.


The fantasy of a US "global energy deal" to take care of Peak Oil never had any basis in reality.

Peak Oil is very real, and fantasies about the US taking care of it with a fait accompli aren't going to make it go away. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Carlhole » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 21:55:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I') had always thought that the US planned to reach a point in Iraq where it could pronounce a fait accompli to the rest of the world and be in a position to negotiate a global energy deal.


The fantasy of a US "global energy deal" to take care of Peak Oil never had any basis in reality.

Peak Oil is very real, and fantasies about the US taking care of it with a fait accompli aren't going to make it go away. 8)


Well, hypotheses about the future and speculations about US foreign policy motives have, by definition, no basis in reality until they have been verified. And everyone has his/her opinion.

But it stands to reason that if the world is approaching peak oil, that whoever controls the distribution of the remaining supply can pretty much dictate how the inevitably worsening crisis will be handled.

Would the US have simply stood by while Saddam Hussein cut deals with China - long-term energy contracts in exchange for advanced weaponry, for example? Not a chance.

So, for defensive reasons (Uncle Sam didn't want anyone holding his balls for ransom) and for offensive reasons (PO is the ideal time for globalist imperialist designs), the US chose to invade Iraq where it could plant it's big, fat American ass for the long term. And that's what MSM articles are writing about now.

Once the US has entrenched itself and secured it's interests(including it's currency) , it will be in a position to make designs about how the world economy is conducted going forward. It will be in a position, possibly, to direct how China's economy develops, how alternative energies are researched and developed, how different countries and regions practice conservation, who lives, who dies, etc.

If you think for one stupid minute, that the ramifications of peaking energy supplies are only known to the geniuses on PeakOil.com, you have another think coming. They've been known and anticipated since M. King Hubbert was proven correct about the US lower 48 supply.

And ever since WWII, when success on the battlefield meant having access to adequate fuel supplies, the military planners at the Pentagon and oil puppets in the White House have known about the strategic value of controlling petroleum.

If you are one who believes that a mass die-off is inevitable, you must agree that it's much better to be in a position to decide how that die-off progresses.
Carlhole
 

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:05:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'W')ould the US have simply stood by while Saddam Hussein cut deals with China - long-term energy contracts in exchange for advanced weaponry, for example? Not a chance.


This is another fantasy without any basis in reality. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:06:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'O')nce you discover about Santa Claus, he stops bringing you presents. the wise kids keep their mouth shut and enjoy the loot.
heh heh. sums it up nicely. my take on the themes of this thread is that paranoia and chaos are rising. Maybe we'll get some leader like Ceasar to try and decree debt forgiveness. Who knows. I don't have any idea if the leaders today even comprehend what's coming. I don't even know if the political class or the corporate class or the Illuminati are running the show. For all I know, Extraterrestrial Lizards are running the show. Here's my guess, for what it's worth: the US Pentagon is getting very nervous. They are releasing reports of South American energy nationalism. When the gasoline shortages become acute and the middle classes are collapsing, they will step in to try and salvage the situation. The US will invade, with massive conscripts, Venezuela, Bolivia and all of South America. My guess is that there is or soon will be a secret rebuilding of neutron bombs to eliminate populations while sparing infrastructure. The military-industrial elites will not go out without a fight. They will fail in the end and the question becomes whether or not the nukes will be unleashed. My guess is they will.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:11:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')he US will invade, with massive conscripts, Venezuela, Bolivia and all of South America. My guess is that there is or soon will be a secret rebuilding of neutron bombs to eliminate populations while sparing infrastructure.



Those are interesting fantasies.

Not very believable but interesting 8)
Last edited by Plantagenet on Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:42:31, edited 1 time in total.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:14:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'O')nce you discover about Santa Claus, he stops bringing you presents. the wise kids keep their mouth shut and enjoy the loot.
heh heh. sums it up nicely. my take on the themes of this thread is that paranoia and chaos are rising. Maybe we'll get some leader like Ceasar to try and decree debt forgiveness. Who knows. I don't have any idea if the leaders today even comprehend what's coming. I don't even know if the political class or the corporate class or the Illuminati are running the show. For all I know, Extraterrestrial Lizards are running the show. Here's my guess, for what it's worth: the US Pentagon is getting very nervous. They are releasing reports of South American energy nationalism. When the gasoline shortages become acute and the middle classes are collapsing, they will step in to try and salvage the situation. The US will invade, with massive conscripts, Venezuela, Bolivia and all of South America. My guess is that there is or soon will be a secret rebuilding of neutron bombs to eliminate populations while sparing infrastructure. The military-industrial elites will not go out without a fight. They will fail in the end and the question becomes whether or not the nukes will be unleashed. My guess is they will.


It is posts like that which have convinced me that most of these conspiracy theories are bogus.

LIHOP looks a lot like negligence if it can't be proved 100%. Negligence in government is common. Given our lack of real security, I'm actually quite surprised that we don't see more terrorism.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby TWilliam » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:20:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he fantasy of a US "global energy deal" to take care of Peak Oil never had any basis in reality.


It may not be realistic, but that doesn't mean TPTB don't retain it as a prime motivation for their actions.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'W')ell, hypotheses about the future and speculations about US foreign policy motives have, by definition, no basis in reality until they have been verified.


Wait a minute Carl. Do you mean to say that what amount to open declarations of intent by people such as Brzezinski, Kissinger, the PNAC crew and the like don't constitute a valid basis for such speculation? Come on...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you think for one stupid minute, that the ramifications of peaking energy supplies are only known to the geniuses on PeakOil.com, you have another think coming. They've been known and anticipated since M. King Hubbert was proven correct about the US lower 48 supply.

And ever since WWII, when success on the battlefield meant having access to adequate fuel supplies, the military planners at the Pentagon and oil puppets in the White House have known about the strategic value of controlling petroleum.


Ab so f*cking lutely. And equally stupid and naive to think they haven't been planning ways to [s]deal with[/s] exploit the situation in as profitable a manner as possible.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Carlhole » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:35:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '.')..It is posts like that which have convinced me that most of these conspiracy theories are bogus.

LIHOP looks a lot like negligence if it can't be proved 100%. Negligence in government is common. Given our lack of real security, I'm actually quite surprised that we don't see more terrorism.


Well, see, then we are back to the way those buildings fell. Very many people simply do not believe that they could fall the way they did without the use of explosives. Hopefully, you have already read and understand the main criticisms with regard to the three collapses. If explosives were used to demolish those buildings, that necessarily precludes LIHOP.

And once you acknowledge that explosives MUST have been used, that necessarily leads to alternate theories about the reasons why.

And then, of course, there were the peculiar Ames Research Labs' Anthrax attacks and the instant Patriot Act, the media blitz of politicians drumbeating WMD ad nauseum, then the already-planned invasion of Afghanistan and the bait-and-switch invasion of Iraq, amid the oil heartlands of the planet.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:42:16

It's an interesting cacophony of opinion we see here. This is why I see chaos coming. The military will try to contain it, but they will explode from the same confusion.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 22:47:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'w')e are back to the way those buildings fell. Very many people simply do not believe that they could fall the way they did without the use of explosives.


Its unfortunate that so many people are scientifically illiterate and don't understand how physical processes operate. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Carlhole » Sun 10 Jun 2007, 23:32:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'w')e are back to the way those buildings fell. Very many people simply do not believe that they could fall the way they did without the use of explosives.


Its unfortunate that so many people are scientifically illiterate and don't understand how physical processes operate. 8)


Perhaps you would like to show everyone where NIST conducted a study of the Total Progressive Collapse of the towers?

Perhaps you could show us another occurence of a Total Progressive Collapse in a steel-frame structure?

Maybe you could explain why NIST has been unable to finalize a report on WTC7 after 6 years?
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 00:49:16

No problemo.

Read the scientific papers of Bazant (MIT), written for recognized peer-reviewed scientific journals.

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/

CHEERS! 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby TWilliam » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 01:08:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')ts unfortunate that so many people are scientifically illiterate and don't understand how physical processes operate.


Oh you mean like those who continue to accept The Official Conspiracy[sup]tm[/sup] on faith, even with it's overwhelming lack of evidence? :lol:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')o problemo.

Read the scientific papers of Bazant (MIT), written for recognized peer-reviewed scientific journals.

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/

CHEERS! 8)


Oops, sorry. Repeatedly cites the discredited NIST report in supporting it's conclusions. Try again...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 01:09:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'I')t's an interesting cacophony of opinion we see here. This is why I see chaos coming. The military will try to contain it, but they will explode from the same confusion.


Lord, why call in the military when you have MonteQueste. :lol:

TWilliams I'm with you about forecasting. The American power elite are going to squeeze oil through as tight an extruder as they can, for as long as it lasts. Fifty years war for 10 years worth of oil also makes sense if the larger reason for entering and occupying the Middle East is to foist your dollar on the area and maintain the dollar hegemon.

The Iraq clusterf**k was preplanned. Negroponte, who presided as ambassador over the creation of death squads in Uruguay, a few decades back, was sent to Iraq as an ambassador, just before death squad activity started there. Familiarize yourselves with the Salvador solution, Nicaragua Iran/Contra and the Iraq Iran situation will become a little clearer.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 01:12:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')o problemo.

Read the scientific papers of Bazant (MIT), written for recognized peer-reviewed scientific journals.

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/

CHEERS! 8)


You really are the narc at a rock concert. I would no more read your govt infested links than accept a "marijuana cigarette" from you.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 01:19:39

MIT stands for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

MIT is a very prestigious university...it's among the very best in the world.

You are quite wrong----MIT is a private university and so is not part of the government.

CHEERS! 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Carlhole » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 01:33:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')o problemo.

Read the scientific papers of Bazant (MIT), written for recognized peer-reviewed scientific journals.

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/

CHEERS! 8)


Bazant isn't NIST.

And I believe I was the first one on these boards to bring Bazant's latest paper to everyone's attention; I asked you to read over the latest Bazant paper and to report back on your findings and you never did. what exactly is Bazant saying in his paper, Plant?

I bet you cannot translate Bazant's mathematical formulae into plain English and come up with anything different than the totally discredited 'Pancake Theory'. Go on, give it a try. In you own words.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 02:53:30

Nope there's no way NIST would fall for this kind of foolishness.

As a tronics geek with a great admiration for standards and calibration, NIST is the Mother Church.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Carlhole » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 03:03:01

I guess Plantagenet's mother must have caught him on the computer past his bedtime again.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', ' ') Collapse Of World Trade Center Towers: What Did And Did Not Cause It?

Well, old friend Bazant has just submitted a new paper to the Journal Of Engineering Mechanics purporting to deal with a few of the collapse anomalies. However, we'll have to wait for the translation. You can follow it a little but it's mostly obfuscated with mathematical formulae and not written for laymen's understanding per se. It was written to show that the total gravitational energy contained in each tower was enough to explain all the observed phenomena, obviating the necessity for explosives to explain the near freefall collapses.

The new paper admits that NIST did not conduct a study of the Total Progressive Collapse of the towers. Again, this is strange since these collapses were the first ever in the 100-year history of steel frame buildings. One would think that immense amounts of engineering expertise would be poured into fully understanding how steel-frame structures could have fallen as these buildings did, that this would have been a highly publicized, big media story for a long time.

Apparently, this new Bazant paper resurrects the Pancake Theory somewhat so that it can suggest that air being forced out of the bottoms of the collapsing buildings reached 460 miles per hour - occasionally supersonic speeds - thus creating sonic booms that people thought were explosions!! Sonic booms!!


Of course, Bazant doesn't mention the many explosions that took place before the towers began their collapses.

Sonic booms. Right! Good one!
Carlhole
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests