Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby mmasters » Tue 12 Jun 2007, 21:55:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'S')ure even I can joke about schizophrenia, in certain contexts, but in this one....no. This topic is DEAD serious. I'm not insufferably PC by a long shot.

Zyprexa is an anti-psychotic. It is useful for treating paranoid delusions regardless of the specific diagnosis inducing the delusions.

Have anything of substance to add to the thread? Maybe the psychiatric drug rhetoric impresses your friends or got you laid once in a bar, but that doesn't mean it's necessary to take it further.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby davep » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 06:05:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mmasters', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'S')ure even I can joke about schizophrenia, in certain contexts, but in this one....no. This topic is DEAD serious. I'm not insufferably PC by a long shot.

Zyprexa is an anti-psychotic. It is useful for treating paranoid delusions regardless of the specific diagnosis inducing the delusions.

Have anything of substance to add to the thread? Maybe the psychiatric drug rhetoric impresses your friends or got you laid once in a bar, but that doesn't mean it's necessary to take it further.


Funny, I was about to ask you the same thing about 9/11.

It may be LIHOP or MIHOP and it may be historically relevant to peak oil but far too many people are wasting their energy on this. Getting fixated on any conspiracy means you tend not to progress on a personal level. Too much of the big picture isn't necessarily a good thing.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 12:59:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', '
')It may be LIHOP or MIHOP and it may be historically relevant to peak oil but far too many people are wasting their energy on this. Getting fixated on any conspiracy means you tend not to progress on a personal level.

Too much of the big picture isn't necessarily a good thing.


There is something to what you say for some people. But for some people, DaveP, disregarding the deep political realm reflects back on their personal decisions and choices and can hurt them directly. It can also defeat their potential for compassion. The political and psychological are inextricably linked.

I've known people who overly politicize situations which are better seen through the lens of interpersonal relationships. I've lost radical feminist friends, who flat out told me that my refusal to regard my own situation and life, through their fundamentalist perspective would end the friendship. The friendships ended.

Any subject which demands a great deal of energy and devotion CAN become an obstacle to personal growth. Fixation CAN occur with any passion, but it isn't the norm for the 911 movement. Read through the thread carefully and you'll see that the people posting here are pretty well rounded emotionally, spiritually and intellectually.

You have children. Most of us on this thread, don't. We can devote our time to these issues, without it getting in the way. It's a subject that demands out time and attention, and is likely an aid to personal growth.

I note that you are living in Northern Italy, a country that yielded to fascism, just a few decades ago. Had it not been for great international and domestic effort, it would not be as relaxed a place as it is today and you would not enjoy an atmosphere that encouraged the freedom of expression to express your thoughts, or receive others, unimpeded.

People on this thread are well aware that we have our own Mussolini to deal with and a labyrinthine network of fascist sympathy. That network has a political expression and a spiritual one. The spiritual expression is encouraged by philosophies like Social Darwinism.

It is also aided, by default, when people choose to look the other way after accepting the "common wisdom" generated by the powers that be.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 14:49:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'P')erhaps you like to elaborate on your own view of how Peak Oil fits in to the "Bigger Picture". Or maybe you don't think there is a bigger picture?


The bigger picture? Humans, like any other other life form, given a large supply of resource, procreate and feed well past their carrying capacity. The driving force of all human existance, and ultimately all life, is procreation and leisure. Rationality demonstrates that our gluttony is ultimately suicidal, but we are not ultimately rational creatures.

So Carter tried to lead us down the path of rationality. Reduce, reuse, recycle. After some consideration, we resoundingly chose the suicidally of Reaganomics over the rationality of Carter.

Reagan clearly and indisputably funded and founded the radical Islamic movement in Afganistan which ultimately gave rise to Al Queda. I think it is only rational to infer that the CIA probably has had informants in Al Queda since it was founded. I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption that Reagan offered the Saudis protection from their own people in exchange for driving down the price of oil and bankrupting the USSR.

I think that Bush Sr. probably figured out a priori the importance of Iraq as an oil reserve and decided to set it aside back in the early 90's. By leaving Sadam in power, he created an excuse for a decade long embargo of Iraq that kept Iraqi oil in the ground.

The PNAC documents clearly lay out the utility of a 911 type attack. Given the amount of information from around the world that was given to the US government, I think it's only reasonable to infer that the US government knew that 911 was coming and intentionally failed to act. Whether some CIA operative initially whispered the idea to Osama, I have no idea.

The Afghanistan invasion served a couple of purposes. It gave Bush some believability as attacking Osama. It also provided a strategic point from which to later menace Iran. The Iraq invasion, I believe, was planned out long before Bush was even elected. It was a pretty obvious oil grab and also a handy presence in the middle east especially from which to menace Iran.

Right now today, I think that our high gasoline prices are caused indirectly by peak oil. While the immediate problem is a lack of refining capacity, the fact that no more is being built is, IMHO an acknowledgement of peak oil. Obviously you wouldn't build more refineries if there wasn't going to be adequate feedstock in a few years.

So yeah...in terms of geopoltical world view, I don't think I'm that far from the rest of you. Where you absolutely loose me is with hundreds of black bag assassins trying to plant thousands of pound of explosives in occupied buildings without being detected. Jet airliners full of people being disappeared. Cruise missiles crashing into buildings in front of hundreds of thousands of witnesses and being mistaken for jet airliners. I know it's politically workable, but practically, it's just loony toons and the "evidence" for it is completely juvenile.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby mmasters » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 14:50:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ferrelgiraffe', 'P')eak oil is the big hammer that will remove the bad and leave the good. All force will be eliminated because all power base will be eliminated,and no more control.

Pretty naive.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby mmasters » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 14:58:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ferrelgiraffe', 'H')as there EVER been a conspiracy that has been proven to be a conspiracy in the history of the US?

I can think of a few off the top of my head: S&L, Enron, Iraq war

As far a bigger ones, if it isn't proven in US history it doesn't exist? Sheltered much?

Um and what constitutes "proof"? That the majority opinion and media are in consensus? :roll:
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 15:20:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
') Where you absolutely loose me is with hundreds of black bag assassins trying to plant thousands of pound of explosives in occupied buildings without being detected. Jet airliners full of people being disappeared. Cruise missiles crashing into buildings in front of hundreds of thousands of witnesses and being mistaken for jet airliners. I know it's politically workable, but practically, it's just loony toons and the "evidence" for it is completely juvenile.


There is no clear consensus on Open Discussion regarding the pentagon crash, hundreds of black bag assasins, etc... I think with the exception of a few who have contributed to that thread, most are pretty agnostic about more extreme claims, unless and until some indisputable evidence comes along.

Had the exact conspiratorial machinations of Enron not been uncovered in a court of law, those trying to create a logical framework to describe what might be going on could have been called conspiracy nuts--and some theories would be lame and unworkable. But in the end, it turned out that it WAS a conspiracy.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 15:38:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'H')ad the exact conspiratorial machinations of Enron not been uncovered in a court of law, those trying to create a logical framework to describe what might be going on could have been called conspiracy nuts--and some theories would be lame and unworkable. But in the end, it turned out that it WAS a conspiracy.

Accounting fraud vs. wiring three occupied buildings with tons of explosives - these things are not even remotely comparable. Maybe two dozen people were involved in the Enron fraud. Their acts mostly involved writing the wrong number in a leger, and guess what, they got caught. The conspiracy proposed by the 911 Kookers would involve hundred if not thousands of people doing really overt observable physical acts. It's really just silliness.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby mmasters » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 16:03:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he conspiracy proposed by the 911 Kookers would involve hundred if not thousands of people doing really overt observable physical acts. It's really just silliness.

For president, look at the manhattan or stealth project. Those projects were successfully kept secret and envolved hundreds of people. Add to that war games going on that day, some concerning hypothetical scenarios no different than the reality of the situation. Also consider the hiararchial structure of nearly all public and public-private secret agencies that operate on a "need to know" basis. And again note that that day was a special security day and all other government agencies were required to subordinate to the secret service.

Sure it's easy to endulge in one's emotional instinct and blow it off as a "conspiracy theory" or "silliness". A true understanding is threatening to anyone's worldview.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 16:12:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'H')ad the exact conspiratorial machinations of Enron not been uncovered in a court of law, those trying to create a logical framework to describe what might be going on could have been called conspiracy nuts--and some theories would be lame and unworkable. But in the end, it turned out that it WAS a conspiracy.

Accounting fraud vs. wiring three occupied buildings with tons of explosives - these things are not even remotely comparable. Maybe two dozen people were involved in the Enron fraud. Their acts mostly involved writing the wrong number in a leger, and guess what, they got caught. The conspiracy proposed by the 911 Kookers would involve hundred if not thousands of people doing really overt observable physical acts. It's really just silliness.


SPG, The way you have the conspiracy configured in your own mind, based on the theories of SOME of those who propose it, you find amusing.

Enron involved far more than numbers in a ledger. It was a Byzantine labyrinth of innumerable mutual backscratching relationships. It went on for as long as it did, because of political support. There were hundreds directly and knowingly involved. Thousands more involved were likely suspicious of wrong doing.

It was only because the ratio of republican to independant to democrat altered in the congress that the necessary investigation took place, that led to criminal charges.

Acquiesance to authority and capitalizing on what authority supports played a large part in the Enron scandal. There are many such scandals operating at the present time, that have not been caught. They hide in the opaque world of derivatives, hedge funds. Read up on the issue. You'll be shocked at the sheer magnitude and organized nature of the opportunism. Is it a conspiracy---- It's a matter of semantics.

This aquiescance to authority, by those directly involved or peripherally involved explains most of what likely went on in 911. Conspiracies are more likely to take place in an atmosphere of complacency where the intellectual class refutes their possibility.

An investigation by an independant authority is absolutely needed and warranted.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby TheTurtle » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 19:41:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'A')n investigation by an independant authority is absolutely needed and warranted.


"Which guarantees that it will never happen," says the cynic in me. :x
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby TWilliam » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 21:31:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he conspiracy proposed by the 911 Kookers would involve hundred if not thousands of people doing really overt observable physical acts. It's really just silliness.


Why do people insist on continuing to parrot this absurd assertion? First off, it would not "require" "hundreds if not thousands of people" to have rigged the buildings. A crew of a couple of dozen men would have been sufficient.

As for "overt observable physical acts", it has been reported more than once that there were crews of workers in the towers in the months prior to the attacks, purportedly engaged in "wiring upgrades" for the computer networks in the buildings. How many people do you think can honestly say they can distinguish a spool of CAT5 network cable from a spool of DET cord with just a cursory glance? This could easily have served as cover for such an operation, and I guarantee you that given such an explanation, 99% of any occupants subsequently witnessing these crews would not have given their activities a second thought.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'A')n investigation by an independant authority is absolutely needed and warranted.


Without any doubt whatsoever. I'm presently about 2/3 of the way through Griffin's new book, and I have to say that in my eyes at least, he has thoroughly demolished the credibility of the 911 Commission Report, the NIST report, the Vanity Fair essay from Michael Bronner regarding the NORAD tapes, the recent book from Kean and Hamilton, the chair and vice chair respectively of the 911 Commission and the book that is an elaboration on the Popular Mechanics article purporting to "debunk" 911 truthers. He has also demonstrated that there is clearly sufficient evidence to indicate culpability on the part of TPTB. I challenge anyone to read his book with an open mind, then come back here and with a straight face try to convince any of us that the above named documents should ever be cited again as justification for dismissal of these issues.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Carlhole » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:08:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'P')erhaps you like to elaborate on your own view of how Peak Oil fits in to the "Bigger Picture". Or maybe you don't think there is a bigger picture?


So yeah...in terms of geopoltical world view, I don't think I'm that far from the rest of you. Where you absolutely lose me is with hundreds of black bag assassins trying to plant thousands of pound of explosives in occupied buildings without being detected. Jet airliners full of people being disappeared. Cruise missiles crashing into buildings in front of hundreds of thousands of witnesses and being mistaken for jet airliners. I know it's politically workable, but practically, it's just loony toons and the "evidence" for it is completely juvenile.


Well, the only difference between you and me is that I simply do not believe that the Twin Towers could have collapsed the way that they did without the use of explosives.

Your argument that the buildings MUST have only the appearance of violating the Law of Conservation of Momentum and othe laws of physics because it would be difficult for perpetrators to plant explosives and hide the organized operation to do so:

(1) Is an a priori argument

(2) Does not resolve the near-freefall collapse times or resolve other observed phenomena like molten metal, the high temperatures of the rubble piles, the powderized remains, etc.

For the sake of brevity, I'm focusing on the Towers. But, of course, there is WTC7 with it's own, perhaps even more blatant, unexplained collapse phenomena. There is the Pentagon with it's mysteries. The lack of fighter interceptions. The strange wreckage of flight 93, etc.

I'm not nearly so willing to let the government off the hook as you are with this stuff. I think it is possible to prove that the towers could NOT have collapsed without the removal of the supporting structure ahead of the collapse wave.

And things look awfully suspicious when The 911 Commission Report itself failed to address the collapse sequence, failed to mention WTC7, failed to mention the many witnesses testifying to explosions going off around them. I was very disappointed and disgusted by the report. In fact, it served only to raise my suspicions about government involvement, hard as it may be to believe.

So I want a decent investigation that does not rely on a priori judgement - which precludes the necessity of resolving things like the near freefall collapses, molten metal, powderized concrete, witnesses claiming multiple explosions, etc.

It's like being caught between a rock and a hard place. In this case, the rock is the 10 - 12 (or even 15) second collapse time of the towers. The hard place is that the government is incompetent.
Last edited by Carlhole on Wed 13 Jun 2007, 23:21:51, edited 4 times in total.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:08:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 'W')hy do people insist on continuing to parrot this absurd assertion? First off, it would not "require" "hundreds if not thousands of people" to have rigged the buildings. A crew of a couple of dozen men would have been sufficient.


Ohh please! A couple of dozen men....planned the three largest controlled demolitions ever in history, simultaneously planted thousands of pounds of explosives and miles of det cord in the three buildings without being detected, rigged the airliners for remote control, stole a cruise missle, abducted flight 77 and all it's passengers, redirected the Air Force, and orchestrated the red herring war games. Not outside of a mission impossible movie.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')How many people do you think can honestly say they can distinguish a spool of CAT5 network cable from a spool of DET cord with just a cursory glance?


I'd say they could damn well tell that all the walls had been ripped out to expose the thousands of steel girders that had to be rigged.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') challenge anyone to read his book with an open mind


Ahh...and there's the standard 911 Kooker dismissal. Unless your willing to spend three years of your life listening to one ridiculous lie after another, then you obviously have no interest in knowing the truth. EVERY shred of "evidence" you people have pulled out has been laughably contrived. But now I'm supposed to drop money and spend my time reading more of it? Get a life man.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:42:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 'W')hy do people insist on continuing to parrot this absurd assertion? First off, it would not "require" "hundreds if not thousands of people" to have rigged the buildings. A crew of a couple of dozen men would have been sufficient.


Ohh please! A couple of dozen men....planned the three largest controlled demolitions ever in history, simultaneously planted thousands of pounds of explosives and miles of det cord in the three buildings without being detected, rigged the airliners for remote control, stole a cruise missle, abducted flight 77 and all it's passengers, redirected the Air Force, and orchestrated the red herring war games. Not outside of a mission impossible movie.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')How many people do you think can honestly say they can distinguish a spool of CAT5 network cable from a spool of DET cord with just a cursory glance?


I'd say they could damn well tell that all the walls had been ripped out to expose the thousands of steel girders that had to be rigged.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') challenge anyone to read his book with an open mind


Ahh...and there's the standard 911 Kooker dismissal. Unless your willing to spend three years of your life listening to one ridiculous lie after another, then you obviously have no interest in knowing the truth. EVERY shred of "evidence" you people have pulled out has been laughably contrived. But now I'm supposed to drop money and spend my time reading more of it? Get a life man.


Please raise the level of your style of discourse, SPG. It's unbecoming.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby Carlhole » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 23:13:06

Open Letters to Greg Palast

The debate that I tried to put into perpective in my last post is not only taking place here but is also taking place in a larger forum as well. And I'm glad of it because controversy is attention-getting.

Proponents of the Peak Oil Theory know Greg Palast as someone who has trashed the theory, saying that PO is another conspiracy, along with the War in Iraq, to create constrained supply and high oil prices.

He has also mocked the 911 Truth debate using the same logical analysis and contemptuous tone that smallpoxgirl uses. Recently, he made some very derogatory comments about Dr. Steven Jones who has been one of the foremost proponents of the controlled demolition theory of the towers and WTC7.

Below is an excerpt of Palast's recent interview which you can watch at the link, followed by Jones reply:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Palast', '[')i]...And the... so the information that was given out... I haven't seen any engineer... it takes two years to wire a building for controlled demolition, and that's an awful lot of people. You'd have to snuff a lot of people... it's Occam's Razor, if you're gonna take out a building, and you could do it by... look, let's remember something, the US government hired bin Laden... to kill people in Afghanistan. Why can't they hire bin Laden for something else? I mean, that's another theory, if you're gonna take out the buildings, you're not gonna do it with dynamite. It's just not gonna happen.

And there's zero evidence, I mean there's absolutely stone cold nothing-nothing there. I'm sorry, Lenny, but that's what I gotta tell ya...

...There's no engineer! You can have ballroom dancers, you can have great actors, you can have poets, you can have physicists, there's a guy, Dr. Jones, his last big theory was that Jesus met with the Mayans after the resurrection. He's a complete fruitcake, and a complete, utter fraud. Mr. Jones, come at me!..



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jones', 'D')ear Mr. Palast,

On May 10, 2007, in an INN TV interview, you made statements which were blatantly defamatory when you called me, by name, a "complete and utter fraud" and a "fruitcake." I demand either a retraction or substantiation of your accusations -- publicly.

A lawyer friend affirms that your statements, available here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=r2oFTiEpIBQ , constitute "malicious defamation."

You taunted: "Mr. Jones, come at me!"

Here I am.

I am ready to respond to your specific objections to my papers, or issues you wish to raise which support the "official story" of the Bush/Cheney administration, after you have first verified that you have actually read what I have written on the subject of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center:

http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2 ... Method.pdf

http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2 ... WTC_Buil...

I will respond then to your statements which support the Bush/Cheney or "official story" for 9/11 events, and I will assure that the exchange will be made public. I propose publication of our exchange in the letters section of the Journalof911Studies.com, but you may choose another venue which is open to the public. Be sure to include your explanation of the iron-aluminum-rich microspheres which I discovered in the WTC dust if your explanation differs from mine, as well as the rapid straight-down collapse of WTC 7.

Again, my lawyer friend describes your public remarks on INN on May 10, 2007, as "malicious defamation" and I think he is correct. Do you? You called me a "complete and utter fraud" and a "fruitcake." I maintain that I am of sound mind and not a fraud. However, I invite you to present your substantiation of these claims -- or retract your egregious defamations.

Sincerely,

Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.

PS -- If you do not respond by July 25, 2007, I will consider other options. Thank you.

Note that there are over one hundred engineers and architects listed in the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth web site, www.ae911truth.org , along with many at the www.stj911.org site, so you may wish to correct your mis-statement of last month that there are "no engineers" who challenge the official story.

Carlhole
 
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby TWilliam » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 23:26:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'O')hh please! A couple of dozen men....planned the three largest controlled demolitions ever in history, simultaneously planted thousands of pounds of explosives and miles of det cord in the three buildings without being detected, rigged the airliners for remote control, stole a cruise missle, abducted flight 77 and all it's passengers, redirected the Air Force, and orchestrated the red herring war games.


That is neither what I said nor what I implied. I was speaking only about the rigging of the buildings. Stop playing "guilt by association".

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')VERY shred of "evidence" you people have pulled out has been laughably contrived.


That is precisely the description that applies to the pathetically paltry "evidence" that has been offered in support of The Official Conspiracy[sup]tm[/sup].

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut now I'm supposed to drop money and spend my time reading more of it?


Why of course not. I would never expect you to spend any time reading something that would so clearly demonstrate the untenableness of your position.

As for the rest of your post, your appeal to ridicule disproves nothing, apart from any possible assertion you may otherwise make about being informed regarding facts surrounding 911.

Just one small example of how NIST, in this case, omitted information from it's report: of 503 oral histories given by New York City Fire Department workers, 118 of them report hearing and/or seeing multiple explosions in the towers immediately prior to collapse. Additionally, many of them commented that these explosions were consistent with the type of explosions seen during a demolition operation.

This is not speculation, this is documented fact that these people testified that they heard or saw these explosions. That's fully 23% of the firefighters whose depositions are available. There are also depositions from other witnesses as well that explosions were heard and/or seen.

What did NIST do about this large amount of testimony that clearly casts serious doubt upon the official version of events? Why, it ignored it. It's not even mentioned in the final report.

How in god's name can anyone look at facts such as these and still consider NIST's report to be anything even approaching complete and impartial?
Last edited by TWilliam on Thu 14 Jun 2007, 01:09:03, edited 1 time in total.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO.com Denial Towards the "Bigger Picture"

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 14 Jun 2007, 00:25:04

Interesting about Palast. You know, I really enjoy reading his ideas but he's so self promoting it's a bit obnoxious. He also gushes with unconstrained glee about how great and open BBC is, (his employer)

BBC may be a bit more open than the American media, but not by much. The Andrew Gilligan affair, and subsequent gutting of the staff and board after David Kelly was assassinated, indicate the BBC is in a compromised submissive postion in relation to the state---Oh oh, what a mental image. That would make Palast the lapdog's lapdog's lapdog. Kind of like a nest of Russian dolls, or an Escher print in the Norman Rockwell style.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests