by Carlhole » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 23:13:06
Open Letters to Greg Palast
The debate that I tried to put into perpective in my last post is not only taking place here but is also taking place in a larger forum as well. And I'm glad of it because controversy is attention-getting.
Proponents of the Peak Oil Theory know Greg Palast as someone who has trashed the theory, saying that PO is another conspiracy, along with the War in Iraq, to create constrained supply and high oil prices.
He has also mocked the 911 Truth debate using the same logical analysis and contemptuous tone that smallpoxgirl uses. Recently, he made some very derogatory comments about Dr. Steven Jones who has been one of the foremost proponents of the controlled demolition theory of the towers and WTC7.
Below is an excerpt of Palast's recent interview which you can watch at the link, followed by Jones reply:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Palast', '[')i]...And the... so the information that was given out... I haven't seen any engineer... it takes two years to wire a building for controlled demolition, and that's an awful lot of people. You'd have to snuff a lot of people... it's Occam's Razor, if you're gonna take out a building, and you could do it by... look, let's remember something, the US government hired bin Laden... to kill people in Afghanistan. Why can't they hire bin Laden for something else? I mean, that's another theory, if you're gonna take out the buildings, you're not gonna do it with dynamite. It's just not gonna happen.
And there's zero evidence, I mean there's absolutely stone cold nothing-nothing there. I'm sorry, Lenny, but that's what I gotta tell ya...
...There's no engineer! You can have ballroom dancers, you can have great actors, you can have poets, you can have physicists, there's a guy, Dr. Jones, his last big theory was that Jesus met with the Mayans after the resurrection. He's a complete fruitcake, and a complete, utter fraud. Mr. Jones, come at me!..
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jones', 'D')ear Mr. Palast,
On May 10, 2007, in an INN TV interview, you made statements which were blatantly defamatory when you called me, by name, a "complete and utter fraud" and a "fruitcake." I demand either a retraction or substantiation of your accusations -- publicly.
A lawyer friend affirms that your statements, available here:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=r2oFTiEpIBQ , constitute "malicious defamation."
You taunted: "Mr. Jones, come at me!"
Here I am.
I am ready to respond to your specific objections to my papers, or issues you wish to raise which support the "official story" of the Bush/Cheney administration, after you have first verified that you have actually read what I have written on the subject of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center:
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2 ... Method.pdfhttp://journalof911studies.com/volume/2 ... WTC_Buil...
I will respond then to your statements which support the Bush/Cheney or "official story" for 9/11 events, and I will assure that the exchange will be made public. I propose publication of our exchange in the letters section of the Journalof911Studies.com, but you may choose another venue which is open to the public. Be sure to include your explanation of the iron-aluminum-rich microspheres which I discovered in the WTC dust if your explanation differs from mine, as well as the rapid straight-down collapse of WTC 7.
Again, my lawyer friend describes your public remarks on INN on May 10, 2007, as "malicious defamation" and I think he is correct. Do you? You called me a "complete and utter fraud" and a "fruitcake." I maintain that I am of sound mind and not a fraud. However, I invite you to present your substantiation of these claims -- or retract your egregious defamations.
Sincerely,
Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
PS -- If you do not respond by July 25, 2007, I will consider other options. Thank you.
Note that there are over one hundred engineers and architects listed in the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth web site,
www.ae911truth.org , along with many at the
www.stj911.org site, so you may wish to correct your mis-statement of last month that there are "no engineers" who challenge the official story.