by bobcousins » Sun 27 May 2007, 14:18:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DavidFolks', 'I') simply posit that oil and oil based technology is not the only way to do things. I also believe that if we make an effort to find the ways to the ends without relying on oil, the crash will be easier to bear.
Doomer 101 says that oil <b>is</b> the only to do things, and therefore without oil, our society will immediately collapse.
An intelligent person like you can see the flaws in that proposition. The people here can't see the flaws in that proposition. Believe me, many people have tried pointing out the flaws, but to no avail. If you love whack-a-mole, have a go, if you like, but I guarantee you will get nowhere! Every time you addresss a problem, another problem will be brought out (nuclear power? Peak Uranium!), until finally the joker is played "we have exceeded our carrying capacity! We're all going to dieoff!".
You will also find that a lot of people here don't actually want to "solve" PO, so will argue against any and all "solutions", contrary to what Aaron might think. They would really prefer a die-off.