by mmasters » Sat 05 May 2007, 17:18:40
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')I was not aware that central banks were allowed to invest in the stock market.
Wouldn't that raise serious red flags from US regulators?
If the Bank of America were to invest its deposits in the NASDAQ, someone would surely intervene.
Central banks are primary government lenders which for the most part puts them above the law. The fed isn't audited, just the banks which serve it, that provides the illusion of regulation going to the top.
Furthermore, banks do much more powerful than invest their deposits in the NASDAQ, they lend out their deposits and create "debt notes" (or new money) in tandem with lending it, then charge interest on it. The trick is having society believe that the banks are deposit safe keepers, that avoids things like "bank runs" where the bank locks up and people can't access their money (due to lack of "on hand" deposits because they were lent out!)
Additionally while these deposits are not being lent out to others (and new money created) they are free to be put into a money market account and invested in the bond market.