by Pops » Mon 30 Apr 2007, 15:27:21
I agree, people expect things to right themselves whenever they go wrong – if, in fact, they have ever experienced things going wrong at all.
Too, the folks in the upper half of the economic spectrum are more likely to have less hardship at least in the middle term. Of course the bottom quarter will have the most trouble either pulling up stakes or making any real change in their situation.
Some people in there, those with fewer hard assets but some type of practical skill will be the ones attempting relocation from bigger towns to (in my estimation) less tumultuous environs - my bet is they will not be a hazard as much as an asset should they relocate near me.
As far as being worried about safety, for my taste, I am too close (about an hour) from two sorta big towns and about 7 miles from the interstate - but Hey, you can’t have everything! The local matinee-rowdies will stick around town and prey on the above mentioned upper-class and each other, unfortunately there will certainly be the bad boys out for a last hurrah – one does need to watch for them. But overall my thought is most folks will stay with where and what they know until the bitter end, whether dealing furniture or dealing crank.
Which is fine with me.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)