by jbeckton » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 13:09:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')You like most clueless Americans do not understand the energy history of the seemingly lightweight, efficient, trival little toys you use and dispose of on a daily basis. You Ipod requires gigawatts of energy to produce.
Common you know better than that.....
Do you even understand what a GW is? There can be no doubt that it takes energy to produce a Ipod but to claim that it takes GW's to produce a ipod is just dumb. I bet all of the resources and energy invested in the entire Ipod business doesn't come even close to a "GW".
A GW is not energy by the way, its power, which is energy over time. If you want to claim that it takes a lot of energy to produce a Ipod you need to use joules or gigajoules if you insist, not GW's.
Talking about not understanding energy history.........
Wasn't it you that I had to explain how Hubberts model was was developed and used? You have posted nearly 4000 times without even understanding the fundementals of this sites domain. Funny I think.
Yes....it was you,........I thought I blocked you since you only irrationally rant and rave about the shortcummings of things you don't understand and are usually the first to make a dumb comment on an otherwise good discussion.
I should start charging you tuition for all of the explining I have to do for you.
I'll get back to you with my rates.