by threadbear » Tue 27 Feb 2007, 20:37:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zentric', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'N')oone, at this point, knows whether the fed will lower or raise interest rates in response to a dire economic outlook. If there is any way in hell they can lower, they'll do it, or hold steady. The problem here is the dollar could lose nearly all of it's value. I'm talking half of it's present value against the Euro and a tripling of gold prices. Is this a possibility?
Hey threadbear,
I figure the reason we have carriers in the Persian Gulf is as a threat to GWB's political opponents, as in, "F*ck with me and I push the button, set the Middle East on fire, and destroy the world economy. Heh heh heh." Bushco has been playing his brinksmanship game forever. And he's good at it.
Recognizing the present environment should cast some doubt on your belief that the dollar "could lose nearly all its value." I mean, sure, it could happen. But I think before it does, it is probably more than likely that the dollars out there that survive the contraction (e.g., the ones sitting inside your wallet or unencumbered inside your bank account) are going to get extremely scarce in comparison to, say, stocks, commodities, long-term bonds, and possibly even euros. In other words, if some financial or geophysical calamity occurs that serves to drain liquidity out of the economy, then your horded bags of gold or silver aren't going to be nearly as valuable (or readily-spendable) as your kept stacks of American currency.
Depending how many entitlements that the Administration and Congress strip away and how much buying power or discretionary income can also be stripped from the middle class, and how many peoples' retirement pensions can be eliminated, or Medicare benefits can be cut, and how much pain can be inflicted on the American masses in general while still maintaining the semblance of an orderly society, that's what's going to keep the U.S. dollar valuable.
Nope. Not if they can avoid it. The power elite would be ACTIVELY choosing the guillotine a la French revolution, in that case. No politician will choose an instantaneous deep deflationary depression over a deep inflationary recession.
Inflation's negative effects are more staggered, the full impact can be controlled and put off until the next administration takes over. Inflation's negative effects are also spread out more evenly among classes, lessening the real possibility of a popular rebellion, where the rich and powerful's lives could be at risk.
I worry that they may HAVE to hike interest rates sky high, eventually and plunge us into deflation in order to avoid a complete collapse of the dollar. As long as they hammer the shit out of any country who opposes the dollar's reserve status, this is unlikely to be the case, in the short term. THAT is why they will go after Iran--to set an example. The dollar can weaken considerably, and still retain it's reserve status.