Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Recession or Depression (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby LateGreatPlanetEarth » Mon 05 Feb 2007, 01:11:42

let's be sensible about this. for talking purposes, there's 20% less economic activity in the the usa. now wouldn't it be a better country than with all the unnecessary spending activity. for example, sears stays, hot topic goes; eight car trips a day, not ten; 2000 calories per day, not 2500; clothes for warmth, not style, 20% reduction in sporting and entertainment, etc.
the people then temporarily unemployed would not be any less useful than when employed doing their nonessential job...quality of life is the issue.
LateGreatPlanetEarth
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue 13 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cypress, CA

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 05 Feb 2007, 03:43:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LateGreatPlanetEarth', 'l')et's be sensible about this. for talking purposes, there's 20% less economic activity in the the usa. now wouldn't it be a better country than with all the unnecessary spending activity. for example, sears stays, hot topic goes; eight car trips a day, not ten; 2000 calories per day, not 2500; clothes for warmth, not style, 20% reduction in sporting and entertainment, etc.
the people then temporarily unemployed would not be any less useful than when employed doing their nonessential job...quality of life is the issue.


LGPE, I do not disagree with you. In many ways 20% less economic activity in many spheres would be preferable and more sustainable. However, there are many ways to attain this level of lower, sustainable activity. But first society has to create an economic surplus. That means jobs and output.

Then 'society' and its stakeholders - individuals, communities, companies, governments - can choose to invest that surplus responsibly in sustainable development projects and that benefit the environment and the community as a whole.

However, what is lacking in any kind of political consensus to do just that. Some here on peak oil dot com who applaud state sponsored capitalismm, say in Asia, and its results would abhor subjugating their own individual rights and freedoms to the planned policies of the state. Wouldn't they? They would then be complaining about living in a fascist country. Many already do.

So I completely agree that much of our current wealth is squandered on meaningless consumerism that brings no long-term benefit, and quite the opposite we are blowing the chance to prepare for post peak oil resources depletion while we have it while be spoiling our planet at the same time. That is bad.

For lack of a wide consensus we can only act as individuals and small groups or communities and lead by example. At the moment no one is listening. But it is all we can do.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby LateGreatPlanetEarth » Fri 09 Feb 2007, 01:28:34

the mean avg for peak is around 2010, then according to the party book, it bobbles on the plateau for 4 years; so just a possible recession but not much more until sometime after 2013.
LateGreatPlanetEarth
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue 13 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cypress, CA

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby threadbear » Fri 09 Feb 2007, 02:24:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LateGreatPlanetEarth', 'l')et's be sensible about this. for talking purposes, there's 20% less economic activity in the the usa. now wouldn't it be a better country than with all the unnecessary spending activity. for example, sears stays, hot topic goes; eight car trips a day, not ten; 2000 calories per day, not 2500; clothes for warmth, not style, 20% reduction in sporting and entertainment, etc.
the people then temporarily unemployed would not be any less useful than when employed doing their nonessential job...quality of life is the issue.


You think this will be a symmetrical downturn, balanced among classes? If that was the case, it wouldn't be as frightening. Unfortunately, the middle class, or what's left of it, will bear the brunt of it. Even 20% less economic activity means many lose their homes and some lose homes and jobs. Those who keep their jobs could have rising income taxes to manage as their purchasing power erodes.

For the poor, already on minimum wage in the service sector, unemployment is virtually guaranteed, swelling the ranks of the homeless.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Fri 09 Feb 2007, 10:35:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LateGreatPlanetEarth', 't')he mean avg for peak is around 2010, then according to the party book, it bobbles on the plateau for 4 years; so just a possible recession but not much more until sometime after 2013.


This holds true only If we have no major oil infrastructure terror, major oil infrastructure is NOT impacted by global warming, and we dont start another war with anyone on a larger scale than we have now. I think to assume any of these factors will remain benign over the next 5 years or so is at best overly optimistic.

Real crisis in production and supply could be just around the corner at the drop of a hat....or bomb....or Hurricane...you get the drift. I hold out little hope that we dodge all of these bullets (and some others) over the next 3-5 years.

History does not support it.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby threadbear » Fri 09 Feb 2007, 14:01:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LateGreatPlanetEarth', 't')he mean avg for peak is around 2010, then according to the party book, it bobbles on the plateau for 4 years; so just a possible recession but not much more until sometime after 2013.


This holds true only If we have no major oil infrastructure terror, major oil infrastructure is NOT impacted by global warming, and we dont start another war with anyone on a larger scale than we have now. I think to assume any of these factors will remain benign over the next 5 years or so is at best overly optimistic.

Real crisis in production and supply could be just around the corner at the drop of a hat....or bomb....or Hurricane...you get the drift. I hold out little hope that we dodge all of these bullets (and some others) over the next 3-5 years.

History does not support it.


Well said, Airline Pilot. You forgot the other potential catastrophe looming--the effects of a false flag operation to trigger said war. :lol: Other than that, a throughly admirable, agreeable post. Ahem.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby grabby » Mon 12 Feb 2007, 03:49:02

The next round of energy-shortage-induced stagflation will leave central bankers helpless and they will seek military solutions to their economic problems. This certainly isn't the first time that faith in the Market god has led to military solutions.

Our fearless leader has said we have to stay in the mideast with our wrriors until mid 2008

Now, can anyone guess why?
See, when it comes down and we have a fuel shortage we have to be in the area to protect interests or we won't get any.

1+1=2


What is going to happen within a year and 3 months??
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby RonMN » Mon 12 Feb 2007, 11:28:18

Foreclosures Increase 19% in January

Quote:

the leading online marketplace for foreclosure
properties, today released its January 2007 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report,
which shows that 130,511 new foreclosure filings were reported during the
month, an increase of 19 percent from the previous month and an increase of
25 percent from January 2006.
The report also shows a national foreclosure
rate of one new foreclosure filing for every 886 U.S. households.
RealtyTrac publishes the largest and most comprehensive national
database of pre-foreclosure and foreclosure properties, with over 800,000
properties from nearly 2,500 counties across the country, and is the
foreclosure data provider to MSN Real Estate, Yahoo! Real Estate and The
Wall Street Journal's Real Estate Journal.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby seahorse » Tue 13 Feb 2007, 23:54:33

Here's an article reporting S&P 500 earnings show downward trend. Most interesting to me were comments that its not the "double digit" profits that are the issue, but the lack of optimism in various companies forward looking statements.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')tandard & Poor's 500 companies that failed to achieve double-digit profit growth for the first time since 2002 have another dubious accomplishment. S&P says the companies are falling short of earnings expectations at a pace not seen in more than two years.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nalysts seemed more concerned about companies' forecasts for the future rather than how many missed or beat estimates.

"We're not seeing all that much difference in the number of companies that are missing expectation, but guidance on the other hand, nobody was being optimistic," said David Dropsey, a research analyst with Thomson. "It isn't that there's more negative outlooks out there, but a total lack of positive guidance. Very few companies are sticking their necks out."


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')till, for U.S. companies, missing Wall Street's expectations can spell disaster for stock prices. Chief financial officers are using better accounting methods to predict profitability during a quarter, and sometimes low-ball that number to analysts so their companies can beat expectations.


Star Ledger
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby eXpat » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 17:30:11

Looks that the piper is coming to get paid, see this article of today in CounterPunch, link here

From the article above:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')reenspan successfully piloted the nation into virtual insolvency. In fact, the parallels between our present situation and the period preceding the Great Depression are striking. Just as massive debt was accumulating in the market from the purchase of stocks "on margin", so too, mortgage debt between 2000 and 2006 soared from $4.8 trillion to $9.5 trillion. In both cases the "wealth effect" spawned a spending spree which looked like growth but was really the steady, insidious expansion of debt which generated economic activity. In both periods wages were either flat or declining and the gap between rich and working class was growing more extreme by the year.
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby AFO » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 18:22:17

Recession will be official in April 2007.
Depression is Officially considered when wallstreet crashes down at least 10%. This one is harder to guess, depending on how serious Iran/U.S. war will be.

Europe 2020
User avatar
AFO
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 20:26:00

Thanks so much for that link, Afo. Very helpful

Expat--Here's another bit from the counterpunch article that compares the 1920's economic environment with our recent past/present?


Mike Whitney--Counterpunch:


"(The income disparity) between the rich and the middle class grew throughout the 1920's. While the disposable income per capita rose 9% from 1920 to 1929, those with income within the top 1% enjoyed a stupendous 75% increase in per capita disposable incomeA major reason for this large and growing gap between the rich and the working-class people was the increased manufacturing output throughout this period. From 1923-1929 the average output per worker increased 32% in manufacturing8. During that same period of time average wages for manufacturing jobs increased only 8%

http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney02212007.html
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby ColossalContrarian » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 20:59:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AFO', 'R')ecession will be official in April 2007.
Depression is Officially considered when wallstreet crashes down at least 10%. This one is harder to guess, depending on how serious Iran/U.S. war will be.

Europe 2020


From the reading, I only disagree with:

"5. Precipitous rate cut by the US Federal Reserve "

I thought the fed was going to raise intrest rates, espessially if inflation is increasing.

all of the other points I agree with.
ColossalContrarian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1374
Joined: Tue 20 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 21:04:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sabibaby', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AFO', 'R')ecession will be official in April 2007.
Depression is Officially considered when wallstreet crashes down at least 10%. This one is harder to guess, depending on how serious Iran/U.S. war will be.

Europe 2020


From the reading, I only disagree with:

"5. Precipitous rate cut by the US Federal Reserve "

I thought the fed was going to raise intrest rates, espessially if inflation is increasing.

all of the other points I agree with.


The dollar is headed for a downward spiral, rate cut or no. The fed may HAVE to raise rates to stem a Weimer like devaluation. They will only do it if they have no other choice.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby eXpat » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 08:30:25

threadbear, yes the similarities are quite worring, i just wonder for how long the economic inertia will sustain the current situation. It strikes me the forecast in the "GEAB N°12 is available! Global systemic crisis - April 2007", article:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n April 2007, nine practical consequences of the unfolding crisis will converge:

1. Acceleration of the pace and size of bankruptcies among US financial organisations: from one per week today to one per day in April
2. Spectacular rise of US home foreclosures: 10 million Americans out on the street
3. Accelerating collapse of housing prices in the US: - 25%
4. Entry into recession of the US economy in April 2007
5. Precipitous rate cut by the US Federal Reserve
6. Growing importance of China-USA trade conflicts
7. China's shift out of US dollars / Yen carry trade reversal
8. Sudden drop of US dollar value against Euro, Yuan and Yen
9. Tumble of Sterling Pound

I'm not the economic type, i just keep my eyes wide open to ty to guess where to jump when TSHTF, any thoughts anyone about the above points? Is it time to start stocking up food?
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby bshirt » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 08:45:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'A') Canadian with an American obsession? I happen to think that personal bankruptcy means exactly that. You lose your assets. Period. You can start over. But from scratch. Bankruptcy should never be an easy out. Period.


Well said, MrBill.

Fat, dumb and lazy Americans think it's their birthright to be able to run up credit cards endlessly and then sign a few papers, erase their debt, keep their house and toys and then start all over again.

Now that bankruptcy isn't the welfare project it was for decades (where the responsible members of society were forced to pay for the scum), many whine and moan that the "middle class" is being destroyed.

Total bullshit.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 09:12:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bshirt', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'A') Canadian with an American obsession? I happen to think that personal bankruptcy means exactly that. You lose your assets. Period. You can start over. But from scratch. Bankruptcy should never be an easy out. Period.


Well said, MrBill.

Fat, dumb and lazy Americans think it's their birthright to be able to run up credit cards endlessly and then sign a few papers, erase their debt, keep their house and toys and then start all over again.

Now that bankruptcy isn't the welfare project it was for decades (where the responsible members of society were forced to pay for the scum), many whine and moan that the "middle class" is being destroyed.

Total bullshit.


To be fair there are a few caveats. One, many personal bankruptcies are caused by health related problems and lack of adequate medical insurance.

America is one of the only countries where you can pay into your medical plan your entire working life, but lose your job, and then be denied medical coverage because you do not have a job and you have a pre-existing medical problem. That ain't right either.

The solution is mandatory, universal medical insurance with automatic payroll deductions that is portable from job to job. Premiums based on your age and level of health & fitness. No opt-outs.

It will be a risk based assessment the same as automobile or life insurance. The higher the risk, the higher the premium. And it should be a self-financing insurance scheme, not a government subsidized programme.

Of course, no one is asking me. I am just a dumb Canadian! ; - )

UPDATE: for anyone interested
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')et, in Canada, we don't even know how many people actually have diabetes. The best guess is around two million.

We do know, however, that diabetes is one of the leading causes of death and disability, and that it costs around $13-billion a year to treat.

That we are doing so little to prevent this kind of suffering and expense speaks volumes about how our health system has gone astray in the setting of priorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Yes, we should be doing this kind of thing routinely," he says.

"But the reason we don't do it is we have an illness-care system, not a health-care system."

In our illness-care system, almost two in every three dollars are gobbled up with the treatment of chronic conditions -- conditions that are largely preventable, including diabetes, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and most cancers.

Dr. Lewanczuk notes that car owners do all kinds of little things to keep their vehicles running smoothly such as changing the spark plugs and the oil. They don't wait until the engine seizes up and major repairs are required.

Yet, that is the way we treat our bodies. Worse yet, that is how the health system is designed -- to deal with a massive breakdown such as a heart attack, stroke, kidney failure, blindness and circulation problems that require amputation of a limb. (All of these are common symptoms of diabetes.)
health census a bold example of modern care
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby Baldwin » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 23:21:53

I have 60k of stock on the line. I wouldn't be surprised with an april 2007 collapse. I have been reading too many well-put together "doomer" pieces of mail to believe that the good times (if you can call them that) will last forever.
User avatar
Baldwin
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon 05 Feb 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby MrBill » Sat 24 Feb 2007, 20:46:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Baldwin', 'I') have 60k of stock on the line. I wouldn't be surprised with an april 2007 collapse. I have been reading too many well-put together "doomer" pieces of mail to believe that the good times (if you can call them that) will last forever.


The difference for me personally between success and failure is a little bit more than $60k. That is why I take our little chats very seriously. I am not here for fun! ; - )

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ust sort of out of curiosity...

Your arguments seem sound and you seem pretty confident in them. But why are you in such a minority in your viewpoint? I mean, running a yahoo search of the dollar's fate yields about a 30 to 1 slant against your argument. Not that I disagree with you. But given your expertise in finances and energy, why do you think your viewpoint is in such a frightening minority?


The majority of socialists think they can tax & spend their way to prosperity, while a very small minority that understand how wealth creation works get richer. Not the majority who are ultimately poorer because wealth transfers from the rich to the poor just makes everyone poorer because it slows down wealth creation. Think about it.

I have always argued that the USA has serious fiscal problems including a huge trade deficit, which can be explained, but also debts, deficits and unfunded future liabilities that are inexcusable. There is no reason that a wealthy nation like the USA should be running debts and deficits funded by foreign nations and unborn generations. It is simply wrong and all Americans will eventually be much poorer for bad decisions taken today.

However, I take exception to peak oil dot com posters who do not understand how things actually work in reality and therefore embrace explanations that are wrong. And then they get defensive when you try to set them right. As if you are the cause of the problem and not the debts and deficits that are causing the problem in the first place.

Actually, I am getting quite tired of it. I want people 'to get it', but if not, it really does not affect me personally. I would sooner be right in the minority than wrong in the majority.

Think about this. Most journalists studied English not Finance. Many writers lean to the Left. They have a hard time understanding that economic growth pays for social programs and not the government. Give me a strong economy and I can pay for the less fortunate. Destroy the competitive environment and you take away the wealth that pays for those income transfers to the less fortunate.

The Soviet communists seized the means of production, just like Chavez today in Venezuela, but they do not know how to run it or make it grow. Now, ironically, the Chinese are getting wealthy not because they are turning to failed Marxist-Leninist planned economy policies, but because they have embraced market economy policies.

However, we live in such a decadent age of plenty that we can actually afford many dissenters sniping at the wealth creators from the sidelines. It does not make it pleasant. To be always under attack for earning the money that pays for the programs supported by those who are attacking you in the first place. Companies like mine pay 75% of all the taxes in Cyprus. That means every Cypriots' tax bill is lower due to my company's profits. No profits, no taxes. No social services or pensions. Who is evil and who is naive?

I appreciate your email. This is something I have been thinking about this weekend in response to many of the high priests at peak oil who see the world through their scripture instead of how the world really works. I went to great lengths to explain in detail how money creation and credit expansion works in practice. Many simply did not even bother to read my answers. Then they go right back to believing that banks can create money out of thin air. It is very difficult and sometimes I wonder, why bother, the more stupid people in the world the easier it is for me? But I try.

If you really want to understand more about everything to do with economics, finance and political decisions with economic consequences then I would urge you to read The Economist. Not everything they say is 'right', but it is a good place to start to balance out what you read elsewhere. I learned more from reading The Economist than I did at university for sure!

Take care and have a nice weekend. Cheers.

MrBill.

Last edited by MrBill on Mon 26 Feb 2007, 10:59:45, edited 1 time in total.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Depression 2007?

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 25 Feb 2007, 11:38:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'N')ew documentary, "maxed out".


Finally, Maxed Out explores the financial industry's influence over the President and Congress. When you are the largest contributor to a President's re-election campaign, you can not only write laws but you can eliminate one of the oldest federal rights: bankruptcy. The industry gets whatever it wants. The result? Traditional protections disappear. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. The situation becomes even more absurd as George W. Bush implores Congress not to leave Iraqis with debt at the same time National Guardsmen are forced to declare bankruptcy in Baghdad and the average American household's share of the national debt rockets to nearly $90,000.

At times hilarious, at times deeply disturbing, Maxed Out forces us to face the consequences of our national debt addiction: the suicides, the ruined lives and, ultimately, the disappearance of the American middle class.
http://www.maxedoutmovie.com/syn/index.html


A Canadian with an American obsession? I happen to think that personal bankruptcy means exactly that. You lose your assets. Period. You can start over. But from scratch. Bankruptcy should never be an easy out. Period.


Same with businesses, right?
vision-master
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron