Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Energy & Meat Thread (merged)

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

Do you think meat consumption reduction could save oil and delay peak oil problems?

Poll ended at Sat 11 Mar 2006, 01:27:27

Yes, I'm a vegan and if everyone was, the world would be a more peaceful place.
14
No votes
Yes, but I eat meat. It doesn't matter what I do. It's what everyone does that matters.
6
No votes
No, Jevon's Paradox still applies.
9
No votes
No, there are other ways to reduce oil consumption than to deny people an essential food group.
14
No votes
No, I deny the facts presented in this post.
5
No votes
Yes, but the MEAT lobby will never let that happen.
7
No votes
No, it's too late to implement anything to stave off any peak oil effects.
6
No votes
No, it is a cultural possibility for people to stop eating something that has been the centerpiece of their meals.
2
No votes
No, meat will get more expensive as oil gets more expensive and the market will handle it.
18
No votes
 
Total votes : 81

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby nwildmand » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 19:07:42

i will not give up meat. i dont care if i have to kill your dog to get it.

sure a person can live as a vegetarian in this world, but in one with a lack of resources and food options, its just a slow suicide.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby rogerhb » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 19:12:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nwildmand', 's')ure a person can live as a vegetarian in this world, but in one with a lack of resources and food options, its just a slow suicide.


Life is a slow suicide.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby nwildmand » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 22:23:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nwildmand', 's')ure a person can live as a vegetarian in this world, but in one with a lack of resources and food options, its just a slow suicide.


Life is a slow suicide.


you should speed yours up then.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby oowolf » Thu 14 Dec 2006, 18:20:52

(Pardon me if I interrupt this thread on its way to the HOF) but
what about insects?
Can veg-a-whatevers eat insects? I mean intentionally, as we all eat them inadvertently. They're a good source of B12, and a valuable part of the Paleo diet.
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby billg » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 12:51:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('oowolf', '(')Pardon me if I interrupt this thread on its way to the HOF) but
what about insects?
Can veg-a-whatevers eat insects? I mean intentionally, as we all eat them inadvertently. They're a good source of B12, and a valuable part of the Paleo diet.


THANKS FOR THE TIP!

Well vegans and vegetarians come in all shapes and flavors. I'm vegan now but I would definitely consider eating insects for B12 or fish for omega 3 if I had to, but of course that would make me non-vegan. I learned a little about insect feasting from that reality television show Fear Factor.

Ok....time to digress

Diet is such a complicated issue...On an ethical level, I really don't see much difference between killing your neighbor or killing your neighbor's dog for food if you were starving. Society calls the killing of humans murder but condones the killing of highly conscious animals like pigs, dolphins, and dogs (in various parts of the world). On the other hand, I do see a big difference ethically between taking the life of a grasshopper or a trout and taking the life of one of the formentioned animals.

In my experience, vegans are not always the most compassionate people. They sometimes miss the big picture. For example, Ingrid Newkirk, the founder of PETA, is a big NASCAR fan. That's insane. If you care about animal welfare, why would you support the glamorization of the automobile, the asphalting and greenhouse gassing of America, and needless motoring around in circles for entertainment's sake.

However, there are a lot of vegans who live in ecovillages like Dancing Rabbit in MO and see the big picture....DR has an interesting mix of vegan and hunter/gatherer permaculturist types who eat limited amounts of meat.

I believe that vegans, vegetarians, and omnivores can live together harmoniously in a small community, but it is certainly a very tricky issue as i discovered from my 4 years living at ecovillages in VA. Some meateaters are total whores and don't care at all about the source of their meat, and this can really disturb vegan/vegetarians. But then some meat eaters are much more conscious, they care about the source, and they try not to be wasteful (they eat or utilize the whole animal)

After my experience in a highly self-sufficient community (www.twinoaks.org) with 55% omnivore, 35% vegetarian, and 10% vegan, I would probably decide to opt for a community that was more vegetarian just because the omnivores dominated the food politics to an unfair degree. For example, the community was pouring an enormous amount of resources into raising cattle for beef and dairy and processing it, and yet they were buying a lot of cheap non-organic GMO transfatty stuff from Sysco and Costco. It just didn't seem rational to me. And that shit made me sick.

Bill G.

_______________________________________________

"It is no measure of health to be deemed sane in an insane society". J. Krishnamurti
billg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun 17 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: No man's land

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby seldom_seen » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 16:45:28

when I hear talk of 'dancing rabbit eco villages' and 'food politics' I reach for my sixgun.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby TheTurtle » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 17:35:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('billg', ' ') On the other hand, I do see a big difference ethically between taking the life of a grasshopper or a trout and taking the life of one of the formentioned animals.


So basically, you won't eat mammals? How about chicken and other fowl?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'w')hen I hear talk of 'dancing rabbit eco villages' and 'food politics' I reach for my sixgun.


8O

Dancing Rabbit isn't that bad. I have a couple of friends (hunter/gatherer types) who spent some time there and they speak well of it.
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 17:42:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'S')o basically, you won't eat mammals? How about chicken and other fowl?


I think this means "I won't eat that because it's cuddly", which is a very modern viewpoint because people are remote from food production.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 18:03:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'S')o basically, you won't eat mammals? How about chicken and other fowl?


I think this means "I won't eat that because it's cuddly", which is a very modern viewpoint because people are remote from food production.


Chickens are very cuddly, but I still eat them.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 18:06:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'C')hickens are very cuddly


I must admit I did not have a "teddy chicken" when I was kid.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby zoidberg » Sun 17 Dec 2006, 14:02:01

Since when did we become so disassociated with the rest of life on earth that eating meat is somehow distasteful? We're designed to have some meat in our diet, and life eats other life on Earth. Its ok, morally, to eat animals, and to raise them so we can harvest their flesh. I personally wouldn't want to work in a slaughterhouse, but I dont think we shouldn't have them.

Maybe that strikes you as callous, and it is I suppose, but welcome to reality baby!

Top of the food chain! BOOYAH!

It wasn't that long ago those damned sabre tooth tigers were eating our babies. If you ask me vegans and their dietary brothers suffer from a sort of human exceptionalism that would disappear pretty quickly when food got short, and hunger compels you to kill that chicken with your bare hands and cook it.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby rdberg1957 » Sun 17 Dec 2006, 15:37:48

The question about whether or not to give up meat is not trivial and does involve ethical as well as health issues. Humans cannot long eat a diet entirely of meat because our organs will not tolerate the stress of processing the proteins. We are not carnivores. Nor are we herbivores by nature, but that is a more viable option for humans that becoming carniverous.

The ethical issues involved will become more serious as resources become depleted. Will I countenance the inability of some to eat at all so I can continue eating meat the way I always have? Traditionally, during the period of most recorded history, meat has been a luxury, afforded only by those with wealth or the ability to hunt and trap. Because of cheap energy, growth in the production and consumption of relatively inexpensive meat has been possible. When that cheap energy is no longer there, I expect the price of meat will rise beyond the means of most, save the wealthiest among us. Some ethical questions will be answered by economics.

Personally, I am an omnivore, with a penchant for dairy, meat, eggs, fish and fowl. It has not always served me well, as I am definitely among the very overweight. I have not suffered from binges of great amounts of food with much frequency. Nor do I eat huge portions by oversized American standards. I start to lose weight when I change the balance away from flesh and dairy toward more fruits and vegetables and small amounts of grain. I try to do this with only limited success as i am greatly drawn to high-fat flesh, char-broiled.

When I eat more vegetables, soy, beans, fruits, fish, whole grains, nuts, I am most satisfied with small portions of meat (3-4 oz) and dairy, a few times a week, and my body thanks me.

Personally, I am willing to adapt my diet so that more people can be well-fed or so that fewer will starve. As much as I pursue the pleasures of the flesh (in this context, I am only referring to its consumption as food), I am quite capable of enjoying well-prepared vegetarian fare.

I am uncertain of the economics around meat consumption vis a vis peak oil. I'm assuming that the prices of all commodities will rise as oil is involved in the production and transport of all agricultural products. I'm also believing that the price of meat will rise at a higher rate due to larger energy inputs into raising cattle, pigs, and fowl.

I certainly don't wish for the elimination of meat from the food supply, but I will not fight tooth and nail as would some, to keep meat's central role in the American diet. However, I am certain of this: it will be economics, not ethics, which will produce the greatest changes in the consumption of meat all around the world.
User avatar
rdberg1957
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri 28 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby WisJim » Mon 18 Dec 2006, 10:31:11

I don't object to eating meat, but I prefer it in moderation, for my own diet. I try not to eat products imported from great distances, or raised or grown by industrial methods. Our beef is raised by people we know, as is our milk, pork, buffalo, and other meats. Our chicken and eggs are our own for the most part, and supplemented at times by purchased chicken, again locally, from people we know. We also eat venison from our property, and I would eat our wild turkeys, too, but we live in town and they are a difficult target with a bow. (We can bow hunt but no guns in the city limits.)

Even though we buy most of the meat we eat now, I have butchered every kind of animal that we eat, and think that I have a better feeling for what is involved in making the choice to eat meat.
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby billg » Mon 18 Dec 2006, 12:34:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')
Why would a compassionate person spare the lobster, stomp on the ant, and devour the brocolli? Compassion is universal, selective, personal, and political. All else is taboo.



One could take that statement a little further and say "why would a compassionate person spare the human, trap the lobster, and devour the ant?".

From the perspective of protecting the earth's biosphere and biodiversity, killing other humans for your meat is probably the most compassionate thing you could do.

So is the moral distinction between consuming cows and humans simply a result of political and societal considerations?

Is there anything else to it?
billg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun 17 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: No man's land
Top

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby billg » Mon 18 Dec 2006, 13:27:14

Pertinent to this thread, I think it is interesting to note that our closest genetic relative, the chimpanzee, has a diet that is primarily vegan.

Genetic similarity

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')cientists from the Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, US, examined key genes in humans and several ape species and found our "life code" to be 99.4% the same as chimps.
They propose moving common chimps and another very closely related ape, bonobos, into the genus, Homo, the taxonomic grouping researchers use to classify people in the animal kingdom.


Meat and insects only account for 5% of the diet of the typical chimp in the wild.
Chimp diet

After the chimp and the bonobus, the next closest genetic relative is the gorilla. Gorillas have a diet that is about 97% vegetable matter and 3% insects or snails.
Gorilla diet

In a post peak energy/climate change devastated world, humans may have to return to their genetic past and start eating more like chimps and gorillas. There is simply not enough land for raising animals and habitat for wild game to satisfy the meaty appetites of billions of people.

I would hope to take the path of the peaceful gorilla (a gorilla that knows a little about permaculture) rather than the sometimes aggressive chimpanzee who will not stop short of killing other monkeys to satisfy his meaty appetite.

But, I may become a diminishing minority in a monkey eat monkey world.

Bill G.
billg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun 17 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: No man's land
Top

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby grabby » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 05:51:35

In truth, the arms race has not produced a clear winner, and that is excellent news so far, BUT because Mutual Assured Destruction remains in effect AND Russia still has more nuclear warheads than the US, and has supersonic cruise missile technology that can penetrate any missile shield, especially a nonexistent one. We seem to conveniently ignore this, when it is actually the most important fact we need to remember. ALL the governments are itching for a way to drastically cut out population, and it may even be entertained if most of the population cut will be "the other guy", does this make sense? And with GPS, the one who SHOOTS FIRST may actually win all the Bananas. It is certain it is coming and it will most likely be peak oil related, good probability. Soon...


I advise all who want to survive to learn to eat vegan and get to like it. When the stored jerky runs out, you won't have meat. It would be too dangerous. Animals are concentrators for nuclear radiation, and it would be the last food to eat after the "disagreement" that could present.

Cover the veges with a tarp cloth the first few days when dark clouds are rolling and before eating peal them and wash them well. Potatoes and root vegetables will be the majority of our food for months. Best to plant lots of potatoes and root crops the first season after the exchanges.
But meat, that will be the last thing you will eat, and milk would be for the suicidal.
Radiation ingestion: ugly way to die, takes several months and the last few weeks they scream constantly in pain. You also turn yellow like a pumkin and itch until you bleed. Your sweat is radioactive and is actually dangerous for your family to touch. Nasty. (The hospitals won't have morphine, it will all be gone. )
Its easy to get used to vegan, and it isn't so bad, we are practicing already, you will be healthier for it anyway. One of my assiciates who kept making fun of me and tempting me with his high protein diet (takes the buns off his big macs, Just bacon and scrambled eggs please) just had Quintuple bypass surgery. Stubborn guy though, still eats meat.
Vegan eating is much cheaper.

Open range animals could be dead anyway, after the change-time, so eventually you would have to go vegan. Course you could wait till then... Vegan diet is basic survival for post holo scenario for those who were not living in a city at the moment of change-time who did not take the easy way out.
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 07:14:13

Anyone who can't stomach disciplined veganism is toast in a post-nuclear world.

Sounds true enough.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby frankthetank » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 16:19:30

I just tried a couple boca burgers last night. Actually there pretty good smoothered in ketchup or A1 or something. Top them with some onion or tomato...not bad substitute. I eat meat rarely, and only pork when i do. I don't really care for chicken anymore, and turkey is only good cooked whole in the oven like during thanksgiving. Herd of deer here in WI is infected with cwd, with no answers on if or if it doesn't harm humans, so thats good to know! Oh well, i like root crops.

African's avg almost 500 pounds of bananas a year per person (including plantains)...
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

PreviousNext

Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron