by Carlhole » Sat 07 Oct 2006, 15:01:42
The Emerging Russian Giant Plays its Cards Strategically
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Engdahl', '.')..Following the Cheney meeting, Khodorkovsky began talks with ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco, Condi Rice’s old firm, about taking a major state in Yukos, said to have been between 25% and 40%. That was intended to give Khodorkovsky de facto immunity from possible Putin government interference by tying Yukos to the big US oil giants and, hence, to Washington. It would also have given Washington, via the US oil giants, a de facto veto power over future Russian oil and gas pipelines and oil deals. Days before his October 2003 arrest on tax fraud charges, Khodorkovsky had entertained George H.W. Bush, the representative of the powerful and secretive Washington Carlyle Group in Moscow. They were discussing the final details of the US oil company share buy-in of Yukos.
Yukos had also just made a bid to acquire rival Sibneft from Boris Berezovsky, another Yeltsin-era Oligarch. YukosSibneft, with 19.5 billion barrels of oil and gas, would then own the second-largest oil and gas reserves in the world after ExxonMobil. YukosSibneft would be the fourth largest in the world in terms of production, pumping 2.3 million barrels of crude oil a day. The Exxon or Chevron buy-up of YukosSibneft would have been a literal energy coup d’etat. Cheney knew it; Bush knew it; Khodorkovsky knew it.
Above all, Vladimir Putin knew it and moved decisively to block it...
F. William Endahl is the author of
A Century Of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order
His website is at:
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/
He is one of the foremost expositors of the fascinating drama that is oil geopolitics.
Much as Daniel Yergin is disliked here at PO.com, you could read his book "The Prize" (which is very good history indeed) and then read Engdahl's immediately afterwards to get a first-rate historical perspective on the fundamental industry driving most major events in our present world. Engdahl admits to the critical importance of peak oil while, of course, Yergin does not.
However good his historical work, it would be very out of character for Daniel Yergin (pretty much a company man) to paint the US oil interests in any sort of Machiavellian light. However, this is not a constraint that Engdahl places on himself!
So don't be a redneck. Read them both!