Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Ford Motor Company Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 20 Jul 2006, 23:40:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '2') out of every 3 people on GM's payroll don't even work. That's a glimpse of what the baby boomer's retiring will do to this country. Where do you get all the money you promised them? Print it.

Ah yes, the Boomer's. Probably the last generation to collect SS & company pensions. Thank goodness I'm already buried into the system.
vision-master
 

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby WisJim » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 10:17:17

let's see....Ford wants to sell more vehicles, people are interested in smaller more fuel efficient vehicles (but I'm not sure they are actually buying), so Ford advertises the full size F150F250 line of trucks, ignores the smaller Ranger pickup trucks, and will discontinue making the smaller Ranger (which has been getting bigger over the years.) So, if people, like myself and my friends, want to buy a smaller pickup truck, we will no longer have a Ford option, unless they sell an even larger Ranger-model truck which may be made in Indonesia or some other place outside of the USA or Canada.
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 10:35:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('WisJim', 'l')et's see....Ford wants to sell more vehicles, people are interested in smaller more fuel efficient vehicles (but I'm not sure they are actually buying), so Ford advertises the full size F150F250 line of trucks, ignores the smaller Ranger pickup trucks, and will discontinue making the smaller Ranger (which has been getting bigger over the years.) So, if people, like myself and my friends, want to buy a smaller pickup truck, we will no longer have a Ford option, unless they sell an even larger Ranger-model truck which may be made in Indonesia or some other place outside of the USA or Canada.

Could be replacing it with a "mid-size" like Dodge did with the Dakota or Chevy with the Colorado. The Ranger is a tired platform, and dates to the mid-80s, I believe. You can still buy the Mazda equivalent, I think.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby frankthetank » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 11:19:01

I owned a '85 Ranger 4x4 with the 2.3lt 4cyl EFI, lockout hubs, 5speed, and NO power steering. Talk about a simple truck to work on! You always see these ads @ places that sell auto parts advertising a price..say a starter...starting @ $90-$200...my Ranger was always the $90 (the parts were dirt cheap!). Fun truck to own and it ALWAYS got 25mpg, except when i used the 4 wheel drive.

Swap out the gas for a diesel, update the suspension and the looks and you've got a buyer! Not everyone needs a F150 with a 5.4liter V8....
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 14:42:22

25mpg is crap! There's no reason why a small truck can't get 35-40mpg.
vision-master
 

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby WisJim » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 16:41:19

It is interesting that none of the current "small" pickup trucks are considered to be "small" by the EPA or whoever it is that puts vehicles in classes according to size. They are all at least mid-sized or bigger. I would like to see a smaller truck, something that 2 people can ride in, in reasonable comfort, and carry a stack of 2x4s or sheets of plywood when necessary, with a bed big enough to sleep in if you put a topper on it, and that gets 35 to 40mpg. I know of a number of 2 wheel drive 4 cylinder 5 speed Ford Rangers or Toyota T100s (or whatever their smallest truck is), models in the early to late 1990s, that get 30mpg when driven reasonably. So why not better mileage in a small truck?
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby mekrob » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 17:08:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o why not better mileage in a small truck?

Because that's not MAN
Image

Are you a wimp? Go buy a Hummer, right now!
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby strider3700 » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 18:05:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('WisJim', 'I')t is interesting that none of the current "small" pickup trucks are considered to be "small" by the EPA or whoever it is that puts vehicles in classes according to size. They are all at least mid-sized or bigger. I would like to see a smaller truck, something that 2 people can ride in, in reasonable comfort, and carry a stack of 2x4s or sheets of plywood when necessary, with a bed big enough to sleep in if you put a topper on it, and that gets 35 to 40mpg. I know of a number of 2 wheel drive 4 cylinder 5 speed Ford Rangers or Toyota T100s (or whatever their smallest truck is), models in the early to late 1990s, that get 30mpg when driven reasonably. So why not better mileage in a small truck?

Back in the late 80's early 90's my dad parked his F250 and drove a beat to hell little datsun pickup. It fit 3 if 2 of them where kids, got good mileage and eventually rusted to nothing. There is nothing like this on the market today.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby abelardlindsay » Fri 21 Jul 2006, 23:20:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Euric', 'A')merica's big three is the suffering the effects of having to support the tens of thousands of former workers via pensions and benefits some 25 or more years after they have retired. This is taking a big bite out of the operating capital.

This is kind of like retired farmworkers raiding the younger sharecropper's henhouse, pulling out the timbers 1 by 1 and telling them that they'll be able to keep warm in the winter by doing this to those currently working when they retire. The kids threaten to strike if the plantation owner stops them from letting the retirees tear up the henhouse. After all, they'll freeze to death in winter. Meanwhile there's a big hole in the henhouse and the fox is going in every night, slowly eating all the chickens. The landlord is going broke, but the farmworkers don't care because that's the way they've always done it. Meanwhile the farmers next door keep building additions to their henhouses and upgrading them, slowly taking market share away from the farmworkers by not only keeping their chickens from being eaten but improving the quality of their products.
User avatar
abelardlindsay
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Northern California, USA
Top

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby Euric » Sun 23 Jul 2006, 13:34:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o why not better mileage in a small truck?

Because that's not MAN
Image
Are you a wimp? Go buy a Hummer, right now!

Have you seen some of those "manly" types that drive those trucks? They don't come even close to those in the image. Some have bigger bellies then a pregnant woman.

If they were really manly, they would be doing the physical work with their own muscle and at the same time developing muscles such that they would make Arnold Schwarzenegger look puny.

In reality they use the truck to compensate for their lack of manliness, that which is both seen and unseen, versteh?
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby mekrob » Sun 23 Jul 2006, 13:56:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'v')ersteh?
Yup, everything except the versteh part.
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Ford Motor Company = Hurting!

Unread postby Euric » Sun 23 Jul 2006, 20:26:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'v')ersteh?
Yup, everything except the versteh part.
It is a German word meaning "do you understand?." It is a short form of Verstehen Sie (formal) or Verstehst du (informal).
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Permanent'

Unread postby clueless » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 13:42:22

Ya Think ???

Link Here

I used to think our CEO's had a clue, but I stand corrected.

These guys need to be fired and forced to work on the assembly line (in China)...
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place

Re: Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Perman

Unread postby Pablo2079 » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 14:23:41

I'm sure they're just using it as a scapegoat.... Fields hasn't been in his position too long, so he's just looking for ways to cut and blame it on something else.
User avatar
Pablo2079
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Cascadia

Re: Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Perman

Unread postby Eli » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 14:56:26

Well that is better than what Richard Wagoner is saying over at GM.

I just read an article in USA Today that quotes him as saying he is not worried about 4 dollar gas. He sites some stupid study that says people plan on keeping their current life style even if there is an economic downturn. He also says how they have been surprised at well their truck sales have been over the past year,but says nothing about their large SUVs.

Things must be so bad over at GM that they are in mass denial.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Perman

Unread postby kuatolives » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 15:09:28

and in other news, Toyota breaks all sales records?

Will be fun to watch GM and Ford ask the US public for a government bailout.

"Well how come Toyota is making money?"
"ummm....."
User avatar
kuatolives
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Perman

Unread postby Pablo2079 » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 15:20:31

Toyota doesn't have to deal with the UAW like Ford and GM.

Ford is supposedly planning to have 5 hybrid models available next year, so that should be interesting.
User avatar
Pablo2079
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Cascadia

Re: Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Perman

Unread postby WisJim » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 15:21:03

It's all our fault, we're not buying the increasingly larger and less fuel efficient trucks and SUVs, even when they discontinue the economical vehicles. We aren't paying attention to the advertising, too many of us must be thinking. Ought to be unAmerican if it is hurting Ford or GM.

Stupid bozo executives.
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin

Re: Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Perman

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 15:38:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..people plan on keeping their current life style even if there is an economic downturn.


LOL - people "planning" on keeping their current lifestyle in a downturn, as if that will be a decision of choice. These people are "planning" alright, but it looks more like "hoping" to me...

:roll:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Ford May Deepen Job Cuts Plan as Fuel Concern Is `Perman

Unread postby Torion » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 17:23:48

People I know in daily life, who I 've never talked to about peak oil concepts, know that the price of gas and generally everything is going to go up more. Many of them know that there is more to the gas/oil/energy problem than *big oil profitting*. They just haven't absolutely had to change anything yet but they know it's coming. They're disposible cash is shrinking and they sound like they expect it to shrink more.

as for the car company execs, they can never say everything they really know. They know damn well about the energy problems we face!
There is no where to go but Earth!
Except for space ......
User avatar
Torion
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron