by ashurbanipal » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 16:04:02
Everyone,Since no one knows who I really am, I thought I would butt in and offer my perspective on a few of the points in this thread. I happen to be a member of one of those societies that was driven underground but that nevertheless carried on the purpose of Adam Weishaupt. There are quite a few misunderstandings about what we do and why, some of which have cropped up in this thread.
Let me first bring up a pretty simple point. There are two entirely separate types of organization that evolved from the original Illuminati. The first were those who were interested in the social engineering aspects of the Illuminati. The second were those who were interested in the spiritual aspects-and there are several occult orders in existence today that can trace their lineage back to Adam Weishaupt in one way or another. I belong to a group in the second class, though of course the line isn't completely rigid. We're interested in some social engineering. But our purpose isn't to dominate all life (in the grand style of Sauron or Darth Vader). Our purpose is simply to ensure freedom.
It's pretty easy for someone who doesn't have an understanding of history, especially of the mid eighteenth century, to misunderstand what the Illuminati were up to. It is even easier to confuse the two types of groups that descended from them.
As someone pointed out, the eighteenth century was dominated by the enlightenment. It began to be obvious, as science advanced, that religion had had a strangle-hold on Europe in an entirely undue fashion. There was, therefore, a fairly large movement towards Atheism, or at least the trivialization of religion. There was also a smaller movement towards mysticism and occultism--the Illuminati were among those who stood in this latter camp; they were descended from the Rosicrucians (who actually existed). The goal of the Illuminati was originally to free mankind--to do this, they had to both rebel against the church and the various monarchies in Europe.
Now, where they got this ideal of Freedom is itself pretty interesting; it seems to me that they derived it from the earlier occult traditions on which they were built. Freedom is a pretty common theme in some of the genuine occult literature available from the time of the Crusades onward. It may seem perfectly clear and natural to us today that people should be free, but that was not clear at that time--this was actually a very heretical belief to hold.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('End Days', 'T')he Bible teaches us clearly that Lucifer (Satan) is simply a created angel who has fallen but deceives the whole world. He even masquardes as an angel of light to deceive many. The masons have bought his lie.
Does it? I don't think so. And even if it does, keep in mind that the Bible is a rather eclectic collection of books written by diverse authors. The books themselves, on any non-contrived reading, are not consistent.
As to whether the Masons have bought his lie--I'm afraid that quite a lot surrounding that statement is not at all clear.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('End Days', 'M')aybe its time people start asking questions, because no matter who you are, these people are not on your side.
This is a pretty bizarre statement. For myself, I consider myself a servant of God and therefore a servant of mankind. I am often shocked at the extent to which ideology can screw up clear thinking. I once had occasion to speak with a follower of Bob Larsen, who was after a number of occult organizations at the time, accusing us of a variety of heinous crimes. It turns out that he couldn't substantiate any of his claims because they were false. It also turns out that apparently he was accused of rape. His answer to the charge was that Satan had impersonated him bodily and raped his accuser--but it wasn't him.
Now, while sex is one of the primary topics of study for my Order, I can state categorically that we do not countenance rape. Rape is a violation of all our teachings, and is completely despicable. We cannot sanction it, and if one of our members turns out to have raped someone, we expell that person and cooperate with the appropriate authorities in their prosecution. The reason it's so bad is because we recognize that a person's sexuality is theirs alone, and is worthy of the utmost respect from all others. Despite these facts, this particular person justified Larsen's actions and continued to believe, because of his ideology, that we were evil.
Now, I'm not accusing anyone of being in league with Bob Larsen--it's just an example. But very often, occultism gets a bad name because of a very simple ideology that it's suppposed to be evil. Most people have absolutely no concept of what occultists do (most occult orders derive in some way from the Illuminati). On investigation, however, the alleged evil usually tends to evaporate. There may be some deranged individuals out there using the trappings of occultism to justify their own evil impulses. But they're not really occultists. Occult studies demand a desire to become better, to champion truth and light over darkness and deception.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('End Days', 'T')hat would be the average person's perception. I have no doubt there are many in Masonry who are clueless what it is all about because they are in the lower degrees. The issue is that the higher degrees are very powerful people in high positions. They have alot of control, power and influence.