by Fergus » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 17:39:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'F')ergus, you write this as if it is something new.
We have known since the times of Malthus and Darwin that:
"The cumulative biotic potential of any given species always exceeds the carrying capacity of it's environment."
Yet, we never made moves to limit our population.
Since the first grasp of exponential growth mathematics, we have known our future with regard to population and resources.
Yet, we have made no moves to conserve.
Since the first grasp of entropy and the laws of thermodynamics we have known that there are limits and no free lunches.
Yet, we build and consume like there is no tomorrow.
We have know for years that fossil fuels are finite and becoming harder to find and obtain ( we peaked in oil production in 1970).
Yet, we have made no significant moves to use our fossil fuel platform to build renewable/sustainable energy sources.
We have just shrugged...
We have known we were headed for dire straits for over 100 years.
We are very short-sighted as humans.
Good points Monte. But this sorta plays into my arguement does it not.
The government says I can not kill you because thats morally wrong and against "the law". The law is a man made restriction placed on the constituants of that government, with the ability to enforce and punish.
So if I can not keep population in check, even though we both know its needs to be done, is it not the governments responsibility to keep think the population. Since we obviously failed at this, does not the government have the moral obligation to inform us that 5-6 of the 6+ billion pple onthe earth need to be 'put down'.
Since the government restricts us as citizens of that government from culling the herd and allows corporations to pillage environments for resources that we can not get to ourselves, is it not there responsibility to prepare us for the next stage of evolution without oil? Since we are not allowed to concern ourselves with these issues directly, we can not be held accountable for the mess the world is in. The governments of the world allowed and encouraged us to build an economy and a life style that was not sustainable. You cant blame a child for playing with a gun when you are the one that gave him that gun.
Does this make any sense at all?
Granted we failed as individuals as stewards of our planet. But by being hoodwinked into acepting this lie of a lifestyle, does that absolve the responsible parties from the least, informing us we are on a collision course with doom.
It just blows my mind that there are offical, informed pple adamant that oil is of no concern to the average every day joe, yet its plain as day that this iisue is one that needs to be looked at by EVERY average joe as it impacts him tremendously. Idont know, maybe its all a moot point anyways, but I feel as though someone or someones are just flat out lieing to us in an attempt to get the last dollar we have and to hell with the future. I really have a probelm with morals this weak that they could prey upon a person knowing tomorrow theres no way that person can meet his obligations due tothe one selling the lie. I would have such a problem living with myself knowing I contributed to his fall.
Now in 10 years when the cats out of the bag and I haven't eaten in 3 days, then I can see conscience going out the window, but in todays America that crap should just not fly. I have been discontent with the moral values of America for a long time so this is nothing new, but it still just blows my mind pple can be so mean and dishonest with their fellow man. Humans are indeed the evilest creature ever to evolve.
Thanks for taking the time to try and explain it. I understand what you were saying Monte. I agree with you too. I just dont get the morals that drive some pple. Thats all I guess I am saying.