Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Credit: Moral Issues (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Miki » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 04:48:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'T')ime to stop hosting Hezbollah in your country it looks like.


Time for you stop talking about what you don't know.

Did you read the articles above? Your government is guilty of state terrorism, along with the Israeli government. They are much worse than Hisballah and have provoked much more destruction and killing of civilians than Hisballah has.

Let's put it this way dude: I'd rather have Lebanese terrorists protecting my country than to have Israeli/American terrorists invading my land and slaughtering my people. Got it?
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby seldom_seen » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 05:09:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'L')et's put it this way dude: I'd rather have Lebanese terrorists protecting my country than to have Israeli/American terrorists invading my land and slaughtering my people. Got it?

Got it. I respect your willingness to state what side you're on. Most people will keep sneaking through the grass like a snake without ever stating where they stand.

I have no qualms to say that I'm on the side of Israel against Hezbollah.

I got in to a private debate with a guy from Lebanon once on IRC. We were totally going off on each other to the point that it was so ridiculous we started laughing at each other and then basically left in peace with a smile on our faces.

Life is a game. Too bad real lives are at stake. You're side may win or lose. They may die or you may die. The war may spread all over, but at the end of the day I and I is I and I.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Jack » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 07:43:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Magus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')The report also recommended that the FBI and CIA be better able to hire criminals and suspected criminals. Responding to the charge that the CIA shouldn’t hire thugs or other "unsavoury sources", Bremer said "We feel that ‘unsavoury sources’ and ‘thugs’ does these folks a disservice. We prefer to think of these job applicants as simply good kids gone bad. We feel that the CIA can play a rehabilative role in American society."


Why does this statement somehow alarm me? :doubt:


If one is going to cleanse the sewers, one must plunge into the heart of the filth. Choir boys aren't useful. Those willing to get their hands dirty, right up to the elbows, can be very helpful. They just need to be kept within certain bounds.

By the way - criminals and suspected criminals already make important contributions to law enforcement. So this isn't really a change - rather, it will mark a change in how they're paid. Plus they'll get health insurance. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Miki » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 08:38:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f one is going to cleanse the sewers, one must plunge into the heart of the filth. Choir boys aren't useful. Those willing to get their hands dirty, right up to the elbows, can be very helpful. They just need to be kept within certain bounds.

By the way - criminals and suspected criminals already make important contributions to law enforcement. So this isn't really a change - rather, it will mark a change in how they're paid. Plus they'll get health insurance. 8)


Jack,

Every time I read a new post from you, I worry more about you real identity :)

Are you sure you're not mixing the strawberry incense with something a bit "stronger"?
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Miki » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 08:46:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', '
')
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')ot it. I respect your willingness to state what side you're on. Most people will keep sneaking through the grass like a snake without ever stating where they stand.


Now, your attitude here is something I respect *a lot*. It takes a lot of courage and wisdom to acknowledge that you can agree with someone whose views differ widely from yours. Thanks Seldom_Seen. You're an example for all of us.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') got in to a private debate with a guy from Lebanon once on IRC. We were totally going off on each other to the point that it was so ridiculous we started laughing at each other and then basically left in peace with a smile on our faces.


Ahhh, those Lebanese. They can be hard-headed, can't they? We can all be, I guess.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ife is a game. Too bad real lives are at stake. You're side may win or lose. They may die or you may die. The war may spread all over, but at the end of the day I and I is I and I.


True. But I refuse to stay passive while the corrupt governments of the world play chess with us, especially when I'm witnessing war crimes with my own eyes everyday. The only lost battle is the one that is not fought.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby nazman » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 08:54:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f one is going to cleanse the sewers, one must plunge into the heart of the filth. Choir boys aren't useful. Those willing to get their hands dirty, right up to the elbows, can be very helpful. They just need to be kept within certain bounds.

By the way - criminals and suspected criminals already make important contributions to law enforcement. So this isn't really a change - rather, it will mark a change in how they're paid. Plus they'll get health insurance. 8)


Jack,

Every time I read a new post from you, I worry more about you real identity :)

Are you sure you're not mixing the strawberry incense with something a bit "stronger"?


It's fantasism. I feel kinda sorry for people like that.
User avatar
nazman
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri 28 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Novus » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 10:38:59

I have long stopped referring to this conflict between the West and Middle East as the War on Terror. I simply call the it 'The Terror War' or the 'War of Terror.' I hear other people around me call it WWIII or a Crusade.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Zardoz » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 11:46:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'J')ack, every time I read a new post from you, I worry more about your real identity.

It's a hobby

You need to learn to take Jack with a grain of salt.

Make that a shaker full of salt.

Hell, you really need a 50-pound bag of the stuff...
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Jack » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 12:41:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')Are you sure you're not mixing the strawberry incense with something a bit "stronger"?


Nope, never touch the stuff. But then, I don't have a need to use strawberry incense either. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Miki » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 12:57:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')Are you sure you're not mixing the strawberry incense with something a bit "stronger"?


Nope, never touch the stuff. But then, I don't have a need to use strawberry incense either. 8)


You never know....
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Bas » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 13:04:23

Noam Chomsky

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky

I knew that name rang a bell somewhere....and they don't come much more credible than that, well done Miki! :)
Bas
 

Re: Distorted Morality: America's War on Terror?

Unread postby Miki » Sat 29 Jul 2006, 13:23:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('azreal60', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think what more they want to know is a more personal look at things. If your in Lebanon, I'm genuinely curious, what parts can you personally confirm as hit? I ask because my brother only just got back from there, and we have pictures of him standing next to things that I just saw on CNN as completely destroyed. Kinda depressing, the buildings in the pictures where really beautiful.


I think you're right. I thought no one here was interested in the human or personal side of things, as every time I'd refer to anything like that, they'd jump on me. But I will try to gather some stuff for those of you who are interested. Here's some stuff in advance:

Here's a blog of a Lebanese young woman talking about her experiences:

From Beirut with Love-Blog

Here's an aerial view of Southern Beirut before and after the attacks. Please nothe that the pictures are reversed: the one that says "before" is actually the pic for "after".

[web]http://www.12manypeaches.com/2006/07/27/before-and-after/[/web]
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Moral Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby Fergus » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 09:43:31

Something has been bothering me about all the issues coming together there. We (think we) know that we aree headed for dire straits here soon. The oil companies and country governments I would assume also are acutely aware of coming issues.

But yet you read oil is everywhere, easy to get and nothing to worry about. When your dealing with intelligent pple that does not wash. Sheeple are fine. But wether we know it or not, do the companies have a moral obligation to warn us and let us prepare NOW. Does our Government have the moral obligation of preparing us for the impending disater.

By telling us nothing is wrong and its just the storm that pushed the price up of gas and bread and milk and....... they are setting us up to fall (are they not).

I think this is the thing that really throws me for a loop. While we understand something negitive is happening, the pple that do know and should know are telling us everythings fine. That blows my mind.

I understand the pursuit of a dollar takes prescident over informing the public your going out of business. I understand the political implications of spilling the beans. I understand greed only too well.

But is there not a point that moral obligation to your fellow man takes top priority? Does there not come a time when you are duty bound to tell the public they are screwed and their is a really nothing they can do about it.

I understand many pple would not even want to know. Do we have an obligation to tell pple that dont want to know? Wether they are willing to find out avbout it or not, they are involved and will suffer right along side the prepared pple. Does the fact they dont want to know obsolve companies/governments from telling us.

I dont have answers, only more questions. I know telling pple the world is over is a bad thing as you induce panic and more greed and even more panic, but we have to know at some point. When you have cancer the doctor does not tell you that 'you are fine, might wanna get the partying out of your system, but dont worry bout anything'. Is this any different from a human body having cancer. Does not the Human Being have cancers (PO, GW, OS). DO we not get to know we are terminal till were bed redden and can no longer enjoy anything?

Is there a moral obligation on anyone/anywhere that is in the know officially. Do we as a public dserve to know now, while we can do somethings still to prevent a total collapse of everything.

Your thoughts on this would be welcome as I have wrangled round with this issue for quite sometime and have come to the conclussion that we do have the right to know. But I am not sure I want the public to know just yet, as I am not finished with my prep. I do feel quilty preparing behind the back of society, and also for not wanting them to know till I am finished. These thoughts have placed me in a moral delema as well. I get racked wioth guilt when I consider that I know a terrible secret that you dont even want to know. So even deciding we have the right, I dont know if its still right to tell us or not. Your thoughts on this cunundrum.
User avatar
Fergus
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Moarl Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby zberry » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 10:15:47

Great subject. I personally feel the moral implications are very strong to change our behavior. Is it moral to continue using resources at our present rate when we know it will result in shortages for children, grandchildren, and when we know consuming those resources will place their food, air, and water in jeapordy? I say no.
Ironically, some of the new "mega" churches with huge video screens, massive air-conditioned structures, are just huge energy hogs.
Mega Church in Stadium
User avatar
zberry
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue 21 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Moral Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 11:37:02

Fergus, you write this as if it is something new.

We have known since the times of Malthus and Darwin that:

"The cumulative biotic potential of any given species always exceeds the carrying capacity of it's environment."

Yet, we never made moves to limit our population.

Since the first grasp of exponential growth mathematics, we have known our future with regard to population and resources.

Yet, we have made no moves to conserve.

Since the first grasp of entropy and the laws of thermodynamics we have known that there are limits and no free lunches.

Yet, we build and consume like there is no tomorrow.

We have know for years that fossil fuels are finite and becoming harder to find and obtain ( we peaked in oil production in 1970).

Yet, we have made no significant moves to use our fossil fuel platform to build renewable/sustainable energy sources.

We have just shrugged...

We have known we were headed for dire straits for over 100 years.

We are very short-sighted as humans.
Last edited by MonteQuest on Thu 03 Aug 2006, 11:37:52, edited 1 time in total.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Moral Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby kjmclark » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 11:37:48

You know, the real problem is that the "ultimate" moral authorities, in western countries at least, are the churches. Unfortunately, for the most part, what was moral 1000-2000 years ago, when the various holy books were written, is the problem today. "Go forth and multiply", "dominion over the earth", and "birth control is a sin" are all examples of the problem.

There was certainly a time when these made a great deal of sense. Dominion over the earth gave us moral absolution in anything humans would do that didn't harm other humans. That was very valuable for expanding humanity, since it means you aren't doing anything wrong unless it harms other people. This gave us lots of resources to fulfill the old testament command to "Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth." When humans were a small population and the world was full of dangers, the best security was usually in having more humans.

Do we need a new bible, for a small world? The old testament was for the immense world that we have now subdued and filled with humans. Think about how immense a task it is to ask humanity to throw away the old bibles and write new ones to deal with these problems. Does "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" even apply to people not yet born?

Or to turn the whole thing around, if we master fusion in the next 5 years, we have the energy available to solve every problem. If the ITER in France manages sustained fusion, we might have time to build others like it, and use excess energy from the plants to remove carbon from the air. Then we may be able to continue going forth and multiplying for another thousand years, without it being necessarily immoral after all.
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Moral Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby mjdlight » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 11:54:55

Excellent post, Kjmclark. I never thought of it that way, but that makes perfect sense. Everything must evolve, even religions.

However, given that religions deal in dogma, moral absolutes, and rigid heiarchies, I'm not holding my breath. :)
User avatar
mjdlight
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed 22 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Moral Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby kjmclark » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 11:59:46

Of course, 5 years isn't likely to happen, since ITER isn't supposed to be operational until 2016 at the earliest. :oops:
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Moral Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby Fergus » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 17:39:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'F')ergus, you write this as if it is something new.

We have known since the times of Malthus and Darwin that:

"The cumulative biotic potential of any given species always exceeds the carrying capacity of it's environment."

Yet, we never made moves to limit our population.

Since the first grasp of exponential growth mathematics, we have known our future with regard to population and resources.

Yet, we have made no moves to conserve.

Since the first grasp of entropy and the laws of thermodynamics we have known that there are limits and no free lunches.

Yet, we build and consume like there is no tomorrow.

We have know for years that fossil fuels are finite and becoming harder to find and obtain ( we peaked in oil production in 1970).

Yet, we have made no significant moves to use our fossil fuel platform to build renewable/sustainable energy sources.

We have just shrugged...

We have known we were headed for dire straits for over 100 years.

We are very short-sighted as humans.


Good points Monte. But this sorta plays into my arguement does it not.

The government says I can not kill you because thats morally wrong and against "the law". The law is a man made restriction placed on the constituants of that government, with the ability to enforce and punish.

So if I can not keep population in check, even though we both know its needs to be done, is it not the governments responsibility to keep think the population. Since we obviously failed at this, does not the government have the moral obligation to inform us that 5-6 of the 6+ billion pple onthe earth need to be 'put down'.

Since the government restricts us as citizens of that government from culling the herd and allows corporations to pillage environments for resources that we can not get to ourselves, is it not there responsibility to prepare us for the next stage of evolution without oil? Since we are not allowed to concern ourselves with these issues directly, we can not be held accountable for the mess the world is in. The governments of the world allowed and encouraged us to build an economy and a life style that was not sustainable. You cant blame a child for playing with a gun when you are the one that gave him that gun.

Does this make any sense at all?

Granted we failed as individuals as stewards of our planet. But by being hoodwinked into acepting this lie of a lifestyle, does that absolve the responsible parties from the least, informing us we are on a collision course with doom.

It just blows my mind that there are offical, informed pple adamant that oil is of no concern to the average every day joe, yet its plain as day that this iisue is one that needs to be looked at by EVERY average joe as it impacts him tremendously. Idont know, maybe its all a moot point anyways, but I feel as though someone or someones are just flat out lieing to us in an attempt to get the last dollar we have and to hell with the future. I really have a probelm with morals this weak that they could prey upon a person knowing tomorrow theres no way that person can meet his obligations due tothe one selling the lie. I would have such a problem living with myself knowing I contributed to his fall.

Now in 10 years when the cats out of the bag and I haven't eaten in 3 days, then I can see conscience going out the window, but in todays America that crap should just not fly. I have been discontent with the moral values of America for a long time so this is nothing new, but it still just blows my mind pple can be so mean and dishonest with their fellow man. Humans are indeed the evilest creature ever to evolve.

Thanks for taking the time to try and explain it. I understand what you were saying Monte. I agree with you too. I just dont get the morals that drive some pple. Thats all I guess I am saying.
User avatar
Fergus
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Moral Implications of PO/GW/OS

Unread postby ohanian » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 18:29:26

If you define STUPIDITY as acting against your own self interest, then




HUMANITY IS STUPID!
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron