by skateari » Sun 07 Nov 2004, 19:17:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')kateari
Proof proof proof. You make as many claims as the next fool. Seperate yourself.
I'm not trying to write a report or book here, or write an essay, thats why I did not include sources, its just my opinion. It however is based on fact, and truth that I have learned and connected to make me feel this way. I might not be able to pick out specific cases and items to prove my view, but they are backed up, and you can find the truth if you want. A simple reading of "Crossing the Rubicon" will open your eyes and provided more then enough proof to prove my theory, as well as prove our government is indeed a corrupt and fascist regime. But as far as this goes, its up to you to do the reading, but i'll try to produce as much proof of hand as I can right now, to back up my post.
Supressing Opposistion: It has always been widely known of CIA coverups and illegal activities to hind their real intentions. This has been uncoved in many drug smuggling cases, usualy involving money laundering and drug running. Many of these cases may not have been proven in the court of law, due to prevention from the CIA. The CIA runs a lot more then just an itelligence agency, they run a lot of core aspects in our government, including wall street, major investments and money laundering, without CIA involvement in this our government could not preform how it does today. To understand the CIA's involement with our economic system, you have to look at key players in the CIA and where and what they invest in.
Lets take a look at Clark Clifford, for example. He was a democractic powerhouse, former secretary of defense and one time presidental advisor to president Harry Truman. He was a key player in the founding of the BCCI bank in the US, this is a known corrupt CIA drug bank, which was first started in Pakastan. He was a prominent member of the CIA, and his day job was a Wall street lawyer and banker. You will find many strong investments that are tied to top members in the CIA.
John Foster and Allen Dulles; these two men were strong CIA members, both were active in itelligence operations durring WW2, Allen had been America's top OSS spy in switzerland, where he met frequently with Nazi leaders and looked after US investments in Germany. He was also a head member of Standard Oil. John Foster was secretary of state under Dwight Eisenhower, and Aleen served as a CIA director. There professions: they are partners in one of todays more powerful wall street law firms - called Sullivan and Cromwell. There investments included Enron, AIG, Imclone, and the Harvard Endowment.
Many cases that I wont name here are similar, many corperation leaders work closesly with the CIA, or have been appointed possitions in the CIA. It includes Maurice Greenburg, the CEO of AIG, the third largest pool of investment capitol in the world, AB. Krongard, who joined the CIA in 1998, and was the CEO of the investment bank Alex Brown. He is also a close personal friend with CIA director George Tenet. You can find strong investment ties in every realm of the CIA, which are involved in the largest banks, energy corperations, and are some of the most influencial members in wall street. The CIA is a crucial part of running our government, not in just itelligence, but also in the financail sector.
Now that we can see who is in charge of the CIA, and where their interests are, we can understand their motives for operation. Protect their investments, at any cost.
It has also been proven, and also suppressed by the CIA of their involvement in the drug trade. All corperations need capital to make investments, and what a better way to get capital then from money laundering. Where does the laundered money come from? Drugs. The CIA is also the biggest transporter of cocaine and herion in the world. It has been proven, but disproven by the CIA and our government under some shady court rulings. It can all be found, if you chose to look, but Im not writing a book here, im proving my point, and heres a good example:
Lets look at the case of ABC news. In 1984 ABC was devoting serious attention to a CIA scandal in Hawaii, connected to the investments of the firm BBRDW. It was a case connected to money laundering, drugs, and the failed CIA drug bank named NuganHand. CIA director Bill Casey and general counsel Stanly Sporking put extereme pressure on ABC to suppress the news coverage. Durring the public battle, ABC's stock dropped by about 20%, and was proceded by a buyout from a firm called Capitol Cities in 1985, which resulted in the CIA dropping their case against ABC. Whats intersting to note is that Capitol Cities, which bought ABC if founded by Bill Casey, the CIA director. Afterwards ABC became known as "the CIA network". This is just one of many cases in which the CIA has been involved with the supression of truth, and created lies to protect the truth. Many more instances of CIA's involement in the drug trade, money laundering, and illegal activity has all come about, but yet has never showed up on major news outlets. You can find all this information yourself if you look.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he 9/11 Attacks
Now theres also been proof that the CIA has been involved with the 9/11 attacks, in a attempt to protect national security. Not only is their reason to believe that the CIA was involved with the planning, and funding of the attacks, but there is also proof that they suppressed warnings given before the attacks.
Lets take the case of Micheal Vreeland, who worked in the CIA, and gave specific warnings to both the Canadian and American governments of the 9/11 attacks. His forwarnings resulted in him being jailed, under false accusisions of "fraud". He took his case to court, still before the 9/11 attacks, warning the US, and was concerned why his case was not gaining attention, and being ignored, and suppressed, by major members in the government. He wrote a letter while in jail, in August, describing the attacks, including information on the World trade center, pentagon, Bin Ladin, and many other key planners in the attack. This letter was held by the prison until September 14th, when it was opened. There is proof that this letter was written a month before hand, in an attempt to show evidence of his knowledge, after being denied meetings with US and Canadian officails to warn them of the attacks. He is still in jail, and has had many of his documents destroyed, after a CIA raid of his mother's business. If this does not strike you as illegal, and an attempt to hide the truth, and their involvement with 9/11, then you can look at many other cases and find information for yourself. Look into the cases of Gary Eitel, John McCarthy, Terry Reed, Brad Ayers, Scott Barns, etc, just to name a few. These men all forwarned of CIA corruption, drug trade, terrorist ties, money laundering, and attempted to investigate and present the truth to the American people. All these people either ended up dead, or are now in bankrupcy fighting court cases. The CIA has indeed been sucessful in silencing the truth, and there is plenty of proof behind it.
Now, back to the 9/11 attacks. As we are all aware of the connections between Bush, his administration, and the Bin Ladin family. If you investigate this issue for yourself you find it almost unbelievable. The Bin Ladin family (the SBG, Saudi Binladin Group), has billions in investments in the Crylyle group, and stakes in Halliburten and other US investments. They have essinsialy invested in the American dream, and even they are concered about the continuation of America, and their investments.
So Osama bin Ladin, the single most wanted man in the world, who we are now waging war against, has ties to the CIA, and American investments. Is this a coincident? I dont think so. Its suspisious to have the worlds largest terrorist, also be family of one of the richest and powerful companies in Saudi Arabia, and also be a large investor in the US. Is it suspisous that our government says Osama has no ties to his family, but yet meet up with them when in a hospitle before 9/11? Is it suspsious to think why CIA members have meet with Osama before the attacks? Is is suspisous that the ISI (The pakastan version of the CIA) sent $100,000 to the frontman in the 9/11 attacks? Is it also a conincident that the ISI has strong backing from the CIA, and really does all the CIA wants them to do? No, its not coincident, its proof that the CIA has conections with Al Quida, Osama, and the Bin Ladin family.
Im not going to name sources, I dont have time for that, but there are thousands around, and if you just read "Crossing the Rubicon" you will become aware of all the proof and can research it for yourself. This book will open your eyes to the fascism that is taking place in America today, you will understand the corrupt, economic intentions of the CIA, and why its not strange to think why they were behind the 9/11 attacks. By simpily reading one book, Crossing the Rubicon, you will have all the proof you have ever wanted to know in your hands. Its not up to me to prove this for you, its up to yourself to learn and base your foundation of evidence on the proof presented and the proof that you can find.
If you can understand Peak Oil, it is much easier to understand the motives behind 9/11, and the wars that ensued as a response to them. If you understand Peak Oil, you may understand why our government would do such a thing in the wake of the largest economic desaster to ever hit humankind. Peak Oil is the underlying foundation of the corrput, fascist regime that has taken hold in America, and the only thing to stop it is to uncover the truth.
PS. Sorry for the mis-spellings! My darned spellcheck wont work for some odd reason, and im not going back threw that book I just wrote to correct my lazyness!
