by Sixstrings » Tue 12 May 2015, 13:25:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'B')AU is the US military enforcing "democracy" which allows US based supra-national corporations to invade, call it Corporate Colonialism. That is exactly what happened in Iraq, the oil was "privatized" by the military and put out to bid.
Just one thing to remember though, is that the Chinese are out building their own colonial empire right now too. Everybody does this crap. Poor egypt tried to raise its minimum wage, then got sued by a big French company, in a trade tribunal.
Maybe those perfect Scandinavians, the Swedes, have poor conditions in their overseas Ikea factories.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ur militarism will continue just exactly as long as Uncle Sugar is indebted to
US based supra-national corps for campaign finance and, more importantly, for post civil service employment (bribery).
Very few mainstream politicians can or will exist outside that system. Well maybe we're being too cynical.. public opinion actually does matter..
If John McCain had been in the WH, he would not have pulled out of Iraq.
If Mitt Romney were in the WH, odds are we'd be back in Iraq and dealing with ISIS. This is what Republicans have been hollering for, no? Going after Syria, get back in Iraq? Yet we have not done that, well that's because there's a war-hesitant POTUS in the WH.
So it does make a difference, actually, who is in that WH. Put a Republican in the WH, and you're going to get Republican interventionism.
Put a corporate Democrat in there, and you're gonna get the same thing.
Objectively -- Obama really has been non-interventionist, compared to what a R or Hillary would have been.
So I think it does matter, if all the people are saying "hell no we don't want another war right now" then it really does prevent a war.
And, again, having a war reticent POTUS also prevents wars.
But you're right, in that nobody is going to be a perfect peace candidate. We're bashing our corporations right now, but business interests actually matter and always have, since the beginning of time. (the 99% needs a bigger share of these profits, is the issue)
I don't know what the answer is. In the absence of a one world order, a globalist "g8" club ruling together, then what you have instead is back to realpolitk and yes that means trade wars and resource wars and feuds and fights.
As for who I'm voting for, I'm happy to vote for the least war-likely candidate possible; if we've got to have a war, it will find us, we don't need to go looking for it too much. Neocons will say you can PREVENT a big war, by handling it early, but I'm just leaning the other way now.
(and, as I've been saying lately, and sort of what you said up there Pops -- our corporations and rich have actually become too disconnected from those of us on the homefront, so ergo these wars don't even benefit us.
This is all very very difficult stuff -- because if you do want peace then that brings you right back around to globalism and these trade deals, yet those are going to level us out with the rest of the world and make us poorer / you'll have China making the rules more, on environment, on labor, on everything.)
edit: just to add and clarify, these issues actually are very complex --
it's why those senators have such a hard time with these decisions.But anyhow, I do feel embarassed for that period of time where I was going on about red lines. It has genuinely been dawning on me lately that we shouldn't be world cop anymore. And that corporations' interests are not necessarily the country's interests. Or mine.
Others in the world can step up for once, instead of us, let's take a break. It actually doesn't have to be us, all the time. Yet -- if some dictator is rolling over places and gobbling places up, then at some point of course we have to respond to that. Short of that though,
don't go lookin' for trouble unless it's extremely obvious we have no other choice.So that's some progress for me anyhow, ***that I won't be responding to Republican campaign this year when they do right wing populism -- military involvement, red lines talk, "America not retreating anymore" talk.***And, regardless of whatever I say on this forum, as far as my votes go -- I've voted straight D ever since Obama's first election. Voted Bush twice, before that, and that second term was enough for me.