Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Water Power

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Water power - surely this is some kind of hoax!

Unread postby EndOfSewers » Tue 13 Jun 2006, 20:35:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NeoPeasant', 'c')areful with your quotes please, EOS. I'm not the one who said that.


fixed
User avatar
EndOfSewers
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu 20 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby Dan998 » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 05:01:50

http://www.hasslberger.com/tecno/hydrogen.html
Here is an article I found in a recent issue of Nexus magazine:
A WATER FUELLED CAR
Carl Cella
I am the madman behind the US heavy-metal band, "Rampage", but long before my musical success I was mechanically inclined, and the possibility of running a car on fuel extracted from water intrigued me no end.

After reading all the information >I could find on the subject of hydrogen generators, I built my first actual unit in 1983, mounting it in the trunk of a 1979 Cadillac Coupe de Ville.

I constructed my system from the best of all the other systems I read about, and then went even further, using the strongest materials and cleanest layout possible within reason. All the titanium nuts and bolts were scored from an aircraft salvage supply: they're cheaper, used, and since they'll never wear out that's one way to save some big bucks. Certain head and exhaust system modifications have to be made to expect trouble-free extended use. For one, the combustion of hydrogen results in the rebonding of the previously-separated hydrogen and oxygen molecules, making the engine's exhaust water vapour steam, and nothing else - meaning absolutely no pollution at all!

Most auto makers use cast-iron exhaust manifolds and steel valves. The combined effects of heat and moisture (moisture not being present in the combustion of petroleum-based fuels) cause extremely rapid corrosion of the system. Part of the fix is to install stainless-steel valves and an exhaust system constructed entirely out of stainless steel. Racing shops sell stainless-steel valves and stainless-steel 'turbo' mufflers that all work fine. Since hydrogen does not contain lead as some gasoline does, if you're not using a late-model, no-lead engine, the heads will have to be reworked to include valve seats not needing the lubrification lead provides.

As for building this device to sell as a completed system, that's a dead issue. In 1983, I contacted the Department of Energy to show them that my car actually worked. I was confronted by two very belligerent 'agents of tyrannical oppression' who told me that if I tried to sell pre-built units, I'd have a lot of "problems". I asked zhy, demanding an explanation, asd was told very bluntly, and not in a very nice tone: "Do you have any idea what a device like this, available to the public, would do to the economy?"

This technology is so simple that anyone with over half a brain - and knowledgeable in auto mechanics - can build one of these units. I've included comprehensive, no-bullshit, drafted design layouts, parts lists, maintenance tips, and a whole lot of engine modification concepts to make construction, part fabrication and implementation as easy as reasonably possible.

The unit I built works as great as I claim it to, but I offer only the printed information on how to build your own, and I take no personal responsibility for damage of any kind caused to your vehicle or self.

I have only applied my unit to a carburetted engine; I've never attempted an application to a fuel-injected engine, nor do I make any such claim that an application of that type would be easily performed, if possible at all.

Every cubic foot of water contains about 1,376 cubic feet of hydrogen gas and 680 cubic feet of oxygen. Because there is no pollution produced, all smog devices may be completely removed, legally, and your car exempted from smog checks, as are propane-powered vehicles.

The only maintenance I have encountered is, periodically, to wire-brush mineral deposits off the reaction chamber electrodes and, at longer intervals, to clean out the chamber itself - neither of which is complicated or very time consuming. I've incorporated so many backup electrodes so this job won't be required roadside - as it was for me when I first used only one, not knowing about any deposits entirely covering the electrodes and thus halting the electrical reaction process. When the car dies out, you just flip another switch until you're somewhere able to brush the reactor's electrodes clean in reasonable comfort - and not northbound on Highway 5, halfway between Los Angeles and San Francisco, where my first breakdown was.

Where the steel gasoline tank used to be, a plastic water tank is fitted, along with an electric float sensor that should be attached to the vehicle's existing fuel gauge. If you were to start your engine with no midifications other than the carburettor to accept hydrogen fuel, it will run fine but the exhaust system will corrode in almost no time, and if you leave the engine turned off for an extended period, your stock valves and guides will rust up and seize!

Stainless-steel valves don't cost much and are as trouble-free as the stainless-steel exhaust system, so don't be a fool and try to go cheap because you'll only cause yourself added expense and headaches, and you'll be cursing me for your own stupidity. For the cast-iron combustion chambers and valve ports, there is a high-temperature ceramic coating called "heanium" that can be pre-formed to guard against the same corrosion that affects the valves, guides, exhaust system and also the intake manifold, as moisture down there will also cause corrosion.

Petroleum-based fuels have their own detergent action that protects against corrosion, much like soaking parts in oil prevents corrosion. When using hydrogen as an internal combustion engine fuel, extra precautions must be taken to make extended operation a reality, and not some drive-a-few-thousand-miles-between-fried-engines bullshit.

Don't use sea water! It contains approximately three-fourths of a pound of salt in every gallon. Salt is a material that will coat the electrodes very quickly, just making one big mess. The reason for electrode deposit buildup is that tap water is never 100 per cent pure: it contains mineral contaminants that are drawn to the traction-chamber electrode during the electrically-activated molecular separation process, that results in the hydrogen contained in water being released from the oxygen molecules they are bonded to, making a fuel that can power an internal combustion engine.

I offer no design for an exhaust steam condenser, but I do make the suggestion that one applicable to an automobile can be built to increase the cost-free mileage even further between fill-ups. A concept would include some form of exhaust-fed radiator that could incorporate air ducts, leading from scoops, to direct highway speed airflow across it.

I offer the idea, but not the design, because many aspects must be considered, such as: the least amount of back pressure, unit pressure, unit placement with regard to configuration by the limit or abundance of that space - though this one would be constructed for a stationary, engine-powered electrical generator, where space limitation is of no concern.

Remember, the cylinder walls are cast iron and prone to rust, but they can be kept clean by piston action (as long as it's not left sitting for long periods between use).

An automobile engine could feasibly be constructed with non-corrosive stainless-steel heads and cylinders straight from the factory - a solid reason to justify spending twenty-five grand or more for a car, because the fuel to run it would be free.

There has been much criticism over hydrogen as an auto fuel, most of it coming straight from those who have the most to lose if hydrogen ever achieves widespread use as an automotive fuel.

There are some factory-built high-performance cars on the market that already come with stainless-steel valves, but they are few and far between, and you still have to change the exhaust systems.

For the carburettor to accept vapour-state fuel, it must be converted using the same parts that are used in propane/butane engine fuel systems, such as carburettor kits by "IMPCO", or similar, that do the same thing, i.e. enable your engine to be powered by a vapour-state fuel.

Because no pollution is produced, the engine may be rebuilt 'legally' with higher performance parts, like a camshaft that, in gasoline, would have increased exhaust pollutant emissions, thus making it 'illegal' for highway use. Of course, it's only a 'crime' if you get 'caught', but those pay-again-every-time-your-vehicle-fails smog checks are a pain in the ass, not to mention the wallet.

A similar type of mechanism that opens and closes tretractable headlights could be implemented in a dashboard switch-activated system that could open a trunk lid-mounted scoop that captures rain, with a flexible hose line that directs it into the main tank, either while the vehicle is in motion or parked. Just watch the fuel gauge, and close the scoop when you see "Full"!

While it may be a long time before we are able to purchase an entirely corrosion-resistant, exotic alloy engine, I am offering the complete design for a hydrogen generator that will power a car - but any engine modifications I outline are only given as basic concepts. It's up to you to implement what is applicable to your particular engine. Use some initiative. Don't rely on whether I wrote it or not. If you discover a part or process that I haven't mentioned, that will in any way protect your engine further from the effects of corrosion, use it! I've written this to help people wake up from the big lie of having to depend on oil companies just to drive a car.

Building as many units as I can for personal use only, and writing this booklet, are about the only things I can 'legally' do to try to help the world wake up. A hydrogen generator produces an energy potential in excess of 100 per cent efficiency!!! You read it right: free energy!

A car's battery starts the engine, but once it's running, the alternator takes over to charge the battery and power the ignition system. With an onboard hydrogen generator, that alternator also powers the hydrogen extraction process, producing the energy needed to fuel the engine that runs the alternator. No external power source is needed; so long as there is water available, the entire system is self-sufficient in operation. An estra trunk-mounted battery would provide more current - if ever needed - to run everything at once without overloading the electrical system.

System Operation The dash-mounted switches for turning on the reactor are also wired to activate the chamber feedwater pump at the same time. When the car dies out, that signals to you that an electrode has been totally crusted over with deposits from the impure fuel water. This means the electrically-activated molecular separation process (electrolysis) has halted. These switches should also have indicator lights to let you know which one is on, and flip-up caps to guard against accidental activation.

When the need arises to go to back-up, turn off the switch for the 'dead' electrode, as well as close its electrical shut-off-valve. The purpose of these gas valves is to keep pressurised oxygen from escaping up through the 'off' electrode fittings into the hydrogen lines, possibly resulting in your car becoming a "Highway Hindenburg"!

Hydrogen is separated from its molecular bond with oxygen by exposing the fluid of water to direct-current voltage. Hydrogen is attracted to a negative charge, while oxygen is attracted to a positive charge. This process generates heat in the chamber, so trunk placement is best with an aluminium or plywood wall built between the reactor and the rest of the available trunk space. Small cars are light on gasoline, thus cheaper to operatr, but when all of a sudden the fuel becomes free, the size and weight of the car is of no concern, except for Porsches and similar sportscars, street rods etc.

Water is pumped through the reaction chamber, which itself is positively charged, drawing the oxygen molecules out through the water return line to be vented off through the water tank's cap. The hydrogen-attracting electrode extending into the welded-in pipes (and insulated under the t-fitting) is negatively charged. There is a dash-mounted pressure-gauge that is connected before the regulator and mixer. To gbegin hydrogen generation, flip one of the dash-mounted switches and wait for the gauge to show fuel-line pressure; then start the engine when pressure is shown by the gauge to exist. In mounting the unit, remember that the chamber itself is positive, and most cars use a negative chassis ground, so insulated mounts must be fabricated between the positive chamber and the negative trunk-floor.

As a final note, this unit is not a concept or a theory! It is tried and proven! I designed this system at age 18 in 1983, and built more than one, using Rampage profits for research and development.

I can't sell actual working units, but nothing but death itself can stop me from distributing this information in the hope that people will take the initiative to wake up from the big lie of oil-dependency for auto fuel, and flood the street with hydrogen-powered cars.

If enough people find out how simple it is, public pressure may someday soon be put on the government, resulting in the long overdue media exposure they're all so afraid of. Eyewitness News (Channel 7) in Los Angeles didn't want to let the word out that an actual working vehicle had been built by an 18-year-old metalhead! We're supposed to be stupid in the public's eye, from their point of view!

Hydrogen and oxygen gases do not pollute; they help clean out carbon deposits from the engine for better mileage and less engine wear. You'll notice the improved engine performance immediately.

(Source: Carl Cella, PO Box 8101 (4176-X), San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-0001, USA.
Originally published in
Iron Feather Journal No. 13, PO Box 1905, Boulder, CO 80306, USA, and in
Psychedelic Illuminations VIII, Fall/Winter 1995/96, PO Box 3186, Fullerton, CA 92634, USA)

NOTE: see also two separate pages of line drawings (construction plans)

CONSTRUCTION PLANS (1)
CONSTRUCTION PLANS (2)

In any case, anyone who's really interested should be able to get one of the two publications cited above, or buy the current issue of NEXUS magazine. If you can't find it on a newsstand, here is their address:
PO Box 177, Kempton, IL 60946-0177 USA tel. 815 253 6464 and fax 815 253 6300

(I don't have a deal with that magazine or anyone else for that matter, only want to see the technology applied. For some background information on other systems of hydrogen-fuelled engines, you can find something on my home page - see the technology section).
User avatar
Dan998
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon 07 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby coyotl » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 06:01:31

I can't really get my head round this one.
If this is possible and have been done (and so easily),
why hasn't anyone done it apart from this guy?
Apart from individuals there would be countries that would very much like to get away from the dependence on oil as fuel.
And if this thing has been working for many years why can't we get a picture or some footage to show it actually works, especially if the owner/inventor is so keen on spreading the news??
User avatar
coyotl
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun 02 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Norway

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby diemos » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 06:37:29

You can certainly apply an external power source and separate hydrogen and oxygen onboard to run an internal combustion engine but you will notice the term external power source. What he is describing is perpetual motion and cannot be correct. This text has been floating around the "oil company conspiracy" groups for a long time.
User avatar
diemos
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby coyotl » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 06:42:21

I agree, but can't this be solved using an alternator to keep the electrolysis going --or does this take too much electricity?
User avatar
coyotl
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun 02 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Norway

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby diemos » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 06:56:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyotl', 'I') agree, but can't this be solved using an alternator to keep the electrolysis going --or does this take too much electricity?


No. Every part of the chain is inefficient at some level and you lose energy going through it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled_car
User avatar
diemos
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby Carlhole » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 07:19:41

It's just bullshit. The energy to split the water molecule has got to come from somewhere. And electrolysis is too slow and inefficient even if there were an energy source.

He's long on technical how-to and short on principle (actually non-existent on principle).
Carlhole
 

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby malcomatic_51 » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 07:57:21

The giveaway is here:

"A car's battery starts the engine, but once it's running, the alternator takes over to charge the battery and power the ignition system. With an onboard hydrogen generator, that alternator also powers the hydrogen extraction process, producing the energy needed to fuel the engine that runs the alternator. No external power source is needed; so long as there is water available, the entire system is self-sufficient in operation. An estra trunk-mounted battery would provide more current - if ever needed - to run everything at once without overloading the electrical system. "

Utter thermodynamic illiteracy. What surprises me is that he thinks it is clever trying to pull a stunt like this. It's like a child swiping cookies from the table and thinking the adults won't notice.

Water, as he does correctly point out, is an exhaust product of combustion. You cannot take an exhaust product and use it as a fuel, because the chemical energy has been extracted from it. To get H2 and O2 from water you need to put in a far greater amount of electrical energy than you will get back from the engine, especially a car engine, which has a fairly low thermal efficiency. All this derives from a minor foot not known as the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This scheme is as dumb as opening a coal mine at a big hole in the ground left by open-casting.... it's just stupid beyond belief.

The frightening thing is that this has attracted any attention at all.
User avatar
malcomatic_51
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat 24 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby lys3rg0 » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 09:37:51

the scientific details have already been explaine in the Kanzius thread. plain and simple, this is bullshit. it's like taking CO2 and H2o from the atmosphere, applying power to make it back into gasoline and oxygen, and thinking the whole process somehow has a net energy gain. unless that power is somehow free, it's an energy sink.
User avatar
lys3rg0
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue 15 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 'bout 15 miles from EU's eastern border (thankfully on the inside)

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby Armageddon » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 12:24:32

I had a friend tell me about how you can run your car on salt water, and it's the end of our energy problems. I told him to fill his car up with salt water and see how far it runs and then let me know. I haven't heard back from hm yet.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby Windmills » Sun 28 Oct 2007, 13:40:05

Awesome. This is a great example of "teacher, why do I have to study this science stuff? When are we ever going to need it?"

That attitude has given us a scientifically illiterate populace that can be swindled and manipulated with ease regarding energy issues, among others.
Windmills
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby coyotl » Mon 29 Oct 2007, 18:08:13

well some guys can sell snow to eskimos

but I shouldn't fall for this i guess, my father has a PhD in thermodynamics
:oops: :razz:
User avatar
coyotl
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun 02 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Norway

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby efarmer » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 17:53:35

This water powered car is a recurring favorite of mine and it comes back around every few years. It always has the part about someone threatening the developer to suppress the technology because it is too revolutionary, then it explains the water to hydrogen process in proper simplicity. "The excess power of the alternator is used to run the hydrogen generator ..." Until you do the math and see that this would be like a mouse towing an elephant behind itself on roller skates. Sometimes there is even a demo model where the motor runs on bottled hydrogen or there is a short burst chemical hydrogen generator to pop the engine a few times.

My favorite hydrogen power scheme is a fusion reactor that is 93 million miles from the earth and beams the power to us through
space and alternates power delivery to one side of the planet at a time on a 24 hours basis.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Opinions on Carl Cella's water fuelled car

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 21:25:59

It's a fun paper, displays all the hallmarks of Conspiracy Theory. I like this bit a lot:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s a final note, this unit is not a concept or a theory! It is tried and proven! I designed this system at age 18 in 1983, and built more than one, using Rampage profits for research and development.


Not many of us have Rampage profits to throw around.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')y favorite hydrogen power scheme is a fusion reactor that is 93 million miles from the earth and beams the power to us through
space and alternates power delivery to one side of the planet at a time on a 24 hours basis.


I don't get it, why not build the reactor here? And why alternate power?

Huh?

:roll:

(Seem to remember a jesting proposal for a reactor that duplicated the sun's processes. Probably at the same site that had the Physics of Santa Claus)
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Car/aircraft that run on water!

Unread postby stupidstuff » Mon 19 May 2008, 18:22:57

its funny, seeing how the bashing gets started on an "oil news" website.. again just because there is not a 100% efficency means that it sucks? what is the efficency on oil? i have seen this HH0 product actually working and i can tell you it works better than oxy acetelene. people just dont know how to use it right; But because it is still not 100% efficient means that it should be destroyed and never used.. ever think of helping to preserve our oil resevoirs.. the oil companies will still make the same amount of cash.. but maybe with this new technology we can help concerve the oil resevoirs and help keep oil costs down.. not to mention what all this oil does to the environment..

too many people are single minded.. and things wont change until single minded people are the minority

cant wait to read the replys
User avatar
stupidstuff
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Car/aircraft that run on water!

Unread postby WatchfulEye » Mon 19 May 2008, 18:59:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('stupidstuff', 'i')ts funny, seeing how the bashing gets started on an "oil news" website.. again just because there is not a 100% efficency means that it sucks? what is the efficency on oil? i have seen this HH0 product actually working and i can tell you it works better than oxy acetelene. people just dont know how to use it right; But because it is still not 100% efficient means that it should be destroyed and never used.. ever think of helping to preserve our oil resevoirs.. the oil companies will still make the same amount of cash.. but maybe with this new technology we can help concerve the oil resevoirs and help keep oil costs down.. not to mention what all this oil does to the environment..


No one is saying that the torch is useless.

Oxy-hydrogen torches (which the HHO device is indistinguishable from) have been around for ages - early devices were available before oxy-acetylene. Normally, cylinders of Hydrogen and oxygen are used, but there are plenty of torches available which generate the hydrogen + oxygen from electrolysis.

When I was at high school, we had exactly this type of electrolytic hydrogen torch for doing fine metal work. If you needed to make a tiny weld or braze, then the oxy-hydrogen (or water torch) was excellent for it. It had a tiny flame, unlike the oxy-acetylene torches which were a lot bigger.

There are a lot of problems with oxy-hydrogen, which is why it is rarely used, except for niche uses (the minimum flame size of hydrogen is much smaller than acetylene, here OH wins). Hydrogen flames have a very low energy density, and the majority of the heat is carried off as steam. However, the flame also has an exceedingly high temperature - this makes welds and cutting difficult to control. Too far from the work, and the flame has lost its energy through steam losses. Too close, and the flame is so hot it will lose too much material, or damage it. The presence of unburned hydrogen also makes the OH torches unsuitable for welding steel and iron - the hydrogen is incorporated into the weld, making it exceedingly brittle and liable to fracture.

However, some materials, like aluminium, aren't affected by this - they have good thermal conductivity, so can cope with the high flame temp, and it doesn't incorporate hydrogen into the welds - so you can get acceptable results from hydrogen torches.

Industrial users tend to prefer the more modern plasma torches. These create an ultra-hot gas plasma from a stream of gas (air on cheap models, CO2 or other specialist gas for more powerful or specialised machines), by electrical heating of the gas. Plasma torches are more energy efficient [than electrolytic hydrogen generators] and controllable (you can control temperature and flow rate directly) than oxy-hydrogen, without the problems of introducing impurities, and of variable flame temperature, plus they are can be ultra-portable as air-models are completely fuelless - just supply electricity. No tanks, no liquids or gases to top up.
User avatar
WatchfulEye
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu 07 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

The water car

Unread postby Armageddon » Mon 26 May 2008, 01:51:05

http://gasfreedom.info/


I know hydrogen needs to be cracked from an outside energy source, but this thing claims it uses the cars battery as the energy source to split the hydrogen. Anybody know anything about this ? It claims it converts your car into a hybrid for $300.00
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: The water car

Unread postby perdition79 » Mon 26 May 2008, 02:52:21

A $300 kit will never power a vehicle on hydrogen. All it will do is shorten the life of your alternator. Research oxyhydrogen or Brown's Gas.

A company called United Nuclear is getting ready to sell a hydrogen vehicle conversion kit. From the looks of it, the kit will cost at least ten large, and will require you to install several compressed hydrogen tanks in your trunk. Should make car accidents more interesting.

http://www.switch2hydrogen.com/h2.htm
http://www.thepeoplescube.com/

"We are building a religion; we are building it bigger. We are widening the corridors and adding more lanes."
Cake - Comfort Eagle
User avatar
perdition79
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Babylon

Re: The water car

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 26 May 2008, 03:39:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('perdition79', '
')A company called United Nuclear is getting ready to sell a hydrogen vehicle conversion kit. From the looks of it, the kit will cost at least ten large, and will require you to install several compressed hydrogen tanks in your trunk. Should make car accidents more interesting.

http://www.switch2hydrogen.com/h2.htm


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lazar


United Nuclear is the company headed with Bob Lazar of Area 51 fame. Caveat Emptor.
mos6507
 
Top

The Stanley Meyers story and supposed 'water car'

Unread postby 129shot » Fri 13 Jun 2008, 17:52:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t Runs on Water is a video with Stanley Meyer which purports to show a car powered by this fuel cell.[3] Meyer claimed that he could run a 1.6 liter Volkswagen dune buggy on water instead of gasoline.[1] He replaced the spark plugs with "injectors" to spray a fine mist of water into the engine cylinders, which he claimed were subjected to an resonant frequency. The fuel cell would split the water mist into hydrogen and oxygen gas, which would then be combusted back into water vapor in a conventional internal combustion engine to produce net energy.[1]

Meyer demonstrated his vehicle for his city's local station Action 6 News and estimated that only 22 US gallons (83 liters) of water was required to travel from Los Angeles to New York.[4].

In an article about claims of burning water, Philip Ball wrote:[5]

It's not easy to establish how Meyer's car was meant to work, except that it involved a fuel cell that was able to split water using less energy than was released by recombination of the elements.


None of Meyer's claims about the car have been independently verified.



Wiki Article

Link to newscast Video


i'm getting more information as I can. I think its bogus but i thought i'd share it anyway.
User avatar
129shot
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron