by Pondman » Tue 11 Apr 2006, 14:46:40
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')he most dependent countries on oil will be the most affected, and the least affluent countries will bear the first wave of economic onslaught as they will be the least able to afford the higher prices. Affluent countries like the US will have conservation and energy efficiency to initially fall back upon, followed by a decline in the standard of living. The poorer countries will just do without, having no huge gluttonous fat belly to sustain them for the harsh winter of oil decline.
A billion people living in mega-slums around the world (none in the U.S) will face starvation long before the U.S. population. The poorest of the poor are at risk today. The U.S. is currently feeding much of the world. And there might come a time, when the rest of the world will not survive, because the U.S. can not keep up with their demands.
If there is a country I would want to be in during the last days of fossil fuels, it would be in the U.S. Sixteen year olds may not get cars for birthday presents, and sitting in your car waiting for a Big Mac may soon be a thing of the past. However by that time much of humanity around the world will be dead, because it lost it's supply of U.S. grown grain.
In my opinion the only weak point in Kunstlers 'The Long Emergency' is his lack of knowledge regarding farming. A free market economy has driven ingenuity on the farm. In the last day of fossil fuels, U.S. farmers will be wealthy, not stooped over hand weeding in a potatoes field, because of market demand. And if left alone, without government interference, the farm community will develop it's own form of biodiesel-- not enough so people in L.A. can live their current lives of multiple level marketing and cocaine addiction, but commerce will exist. Kunstler is also not correct when valuing farming methods. I hate to say it, but if anything, the largest waste of fossil fuels in the U.S. today is organic farming.
Shortages don't cause economic depressions. It the opposites. Surpluses cause depressions. And unless a communist regime from Mexico should rise to the point where it can confiscate U.S. territories, I don't think there will be any poor farmers during the coming depletion of fossil fuels. But Mexico, which in near future is going to strip individual of their rights to be a member of humanity, as a whole will have starved by then.
Shortages cause economic creativity and ingenuity, if humanity doesn't take a shortcut and go to war against it's neighbor. I do not think humanity in the U.S. is doomed. I think they will wake up after one or two seasons of rolling black outs.
The biggest problem facing the world is still communism and the lack of individual freedom. If you take away the will of the individual to form individual relationships, not many social problem will be solved. Don't make the mistake of blaming the U.S. for future food problems. China has nitrification, yet it's poor are some of the poorest of the slum dwellers.