Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

peakoildebunked retires

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby rwwff » Mon 08 May 2006, 22:35:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sameu', '
')I can't see how you could qualify this as a non-event.


Its just a matter of scale.

The hundred years war. That was an event.

Tech bubble bursting... not so much.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby WebHubbleTelescope » Mon 08 May 2006, 22:53:42

What a scam that guy rode, right down to the last day!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')all me crazy, but when I step out my front door, things look EXACTLY like they did when oil was cheap. I mean EXACTLY. The roads are choked and overflowing with cars. The freeways are clogged with traffic jams so long you can't even see the end of them. The shelves in the supermarket still look the same. Same products. Same prices. Tidal waves of plastic junk, curios and fresh vegetables continue to fly in from all corners of the earth. Plastic bags continue to be as plentiful as they've ever been. There's been no perceptible slack-off in junk mail volume.

He never provided any context in anything he wrote. For example, you read the above quote and if you don't realize the guy lived in Japan, you would think it made some sense. But he apparently does live in Japan and so it makes no sense at all!

Everything the guy wrote was utter crap and full of contradictions, and he treated everyone with utter contempt. Kind of like the Matt Drudge of the peak oil sphere.
User avatar
WebHubbleTelescope
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu 08 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 09 May 2006, 01:16:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'W')ell no, JD isn’t wholly objective, who is? I see him no worse than someone like Monte, and for the record I have respect for them both.


The difference is that I never posted anything to just create a stir or to admittedly revel in ad hominem attacks and the misquoting and misconstruing of the facts and people's views.

One can read my views, positions, and predictions going back to Aug of 2004. It all remains consistent and my predictions are becoming real history.

JD is history.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby grabby » Tue 09 May 2006, 02:54:39

Well, we have more expensive gas now, so it doesn't look exactly the same any more.
But the lines are still big and growing daily at the pump. in Portland this weekend I was in an actual line to get gas that was about 20 cars long.

shades of 70's.

We will see the Dems "come to the rescue" when the lady from cal takes the speaker of the house and starts producing biofuels so we can choke on even more fuel production.
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Lighthouse » Tue 09 May 2006, 08:34:39

The definition for a non-event is

An anticipated or highly publicized event that does not occur or proves anticlimactic or boring.

PO fits this description. No one knows exactly if we have already reached the peak or when we will reach it. Not much going on if we at the highest point. Quite boring actually.

The real events following this "non-event", when we are at the down-slope, will proof to be much more interesting.
Last edited by Lighthouse on Tue 09 May 2006, 09:32:08, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Tue 09 May 2006, 08:50:50

all this stuff about peak oil being a non event might actually be true though. i thought everyone on here was familiar with the term 'the long emergency'?

a long emergency isnt an 'event' just like the collapse of rome wasnt an 'event'. it was a long process that was probably not all that apparent to those around at the time - bit by bit the empire started to fade, but with on sudden collapes.

isnt that what peak oil is all about?

barring some unforeseen event such as war in the middle east, i simply do not see peak oil as being an 'event'. it is simply a change in circumstances over an extended period that most people will experience impercetibly, this is all assuming that decline rates arent massive and no disruptions in supply of course - which all might happen.

i can certainly concur that i see no difference outside my window with oil at $70 than when it was $10. there are MORE cars now with oil at that price, and the price of food hasnt skyrocketed. that tends to suggest to me that the 'petrocollapse' idea is nonsense.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby MfromAmsterdam » Tue 09 May 2006, 09:09:01

yeah a big squeeze to bleed the little guy. most profitable.

although the folks in falluja will disagree.
MfromAmsterdam
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Amsterdam, Holland

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 09 May 2006, 18:18:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', 'b')arring some unforeseen event such as war in the middle east, i simply do not see peak oil as being an 'event'. it is simply a change in circumstances over an extended period that most people will experience impercetibly, this is all assuming that decline rates arent massive and no disruptions in supply of course - which all might happen.

i can certainly concur that i see no difference outside my window with oil at $70 than when it was $10. there are MORE cars now with oil at that price, and the price of food hasnt skyrocketed. that tends to suggest to me that the 'petrocollapse' idea is nonsense.


May I suggest a review of basic economics and debt structure?

The stock market correction of 2000 was nonsense?

The double digit inflation of the 70's was nonsense?

Remember the Lily Pond Parable?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby JohnDenver » Tue 09 May 2006, 20:45:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')he stock market correction of 2000 was nonsense?


Yes, it was nonsense. A completely boring non-event which had no lasting consequences of any importance. If that's all you've got, peak oil isn't a threat. I paid no attention whatsoever to the stock market correction of 2000, and suffered no harm.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he double digit inflation of the 70's was nonsense?


Yes. I was there, and it wasn't a big deal. We handled it just fine.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')emember the Lily Pond Parable?


Why do you keep talking about fairy tales? I'm talking about reality -- the reality you can see with your two eyes. The ongoing "energy crisis" isn't threatening at all. At worst, it's just a rerun of the 1970s energy crisis, and that was just another overblown media event which didn't really harm anyone.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby JohnDenver » Tue 09 May 2006, 20:59:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CARVER', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'I') came to the conclusion that peak oil is a non-event, which has no significant impact on my daily life.


Following that reasoning, 9-11, Katrina, the tsunami, the earthquakes, war in Iraq, etc. are non-events to him as well, because those did not have a significant impact on his daily life either (I presume).


Yes, that's correct. Most of you folks are profoundly and sadly addicted to the media news cycle, so it's hard for you to understand... Nevertheless, all the "events" you cite are nothing but media events. They might as well be fictional stories, or movies. I can ignore them with impunity.

Peak oil follows the same pattern. It has no effect at all on any of the parameters of my daily life, so I can ignore it with impunity.

You want to scare me? Don't point to "links" or "stories" or "theories" or "parables". Show me how peak oil is hurting me, right now. (Don't bother citing "gas prices" -- I don't drive.)
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Shadizar » Tue 09 May 2006, 21:00:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')he stock market correction of 2000 was nonsense?


Yes, it was nonsense. A completely boring non-event which had no lasting consequences of any importance. If that's all you've got, peak oil isn't a threat. I paid no attention whatsoever to the stock market correction of 2000, and suffered no harm.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he double digit inflation of the 70's was nonsense?


Yes. I was there, and it wasn't a big deal. We handled it just fine.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')emember the Lily Pond Parable?


Why do you keep talking about fairy tales? I'm talking about reality -- the reality you can see with your two eyes. The ongoing "energy crisis" isn't threatening at all. At worst, it's just a rerun of the 1970s energy crisis, and that was just another overblown media event which didn't really harm anyone.


The reality you see with two eyes? What world are you living in? In the world I live in, the price of gas has gone up inexporably higher. Home heating costs are rising. Oil prices are rising. Heating oil is rising. The price of every and all goods is rising. The world I live in is inflationary.

In the world I live in OPEC is continuously making statements that they cannot raise supplies. The numbers from them (and other reliable sources) support that. There are more and more editorials of people that reconginze this change.

Even the die hards are retreating (in every media I have SEEN) on this issue.

The WHOLE world is moving towards renewable energy (ethanol, wind, solar, nuclear etc...). The only way you can SEE the world not moving towards that is by keeping your eyes closed. You have the perogative of keeping your head in the ground.

My eyes see a world that is moving toward renewable energy slowly (too slowly imo). I simply cannot understand what kind of fogged lenses you are seeing the world from.

Are you so afraid of change that you cannot accept it is coming? The world is a different place than it was. The world will be a different place that it was before (or is now). I simply cannot understand your view that the world will maintain the status quo. NO ONE believes that.

We may, or may not, collapse. The world however will change (because it must, given the new energy reality). To argue against that change is simply foolish. There is no informed country that would support that view (though some of its people would like to believe it).

-Shadizar
User avatar
Shadizar
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun 24 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Novus » Tue 09 May 2006, 21:07:45

JD, if you really beleive that, then why did you close your blog? If PO truely such a non-event and not worth discussing, then why did you create your blog in the first place? Are you afraid to have a blog that still denies PO when the shit hits the fan.

PO is in its early stages so of course it is a current non-event. Cancer is a non-event in its early stages as well. By the time cancer gets bad to really make you sick there is not much that can be done. We peak oilers are like the doctor who just digonosed you with cancer in its earliest stage and your response is: 'it is a non-event, I feel fine.'
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby rwwff » Tue 09 May 2006, 21:14:11

I think the point is that to a large extent, short of the collapse theory, he can ignore all of those things you listed with impunity. I'm not sure he's wrong. In the 70's we had pretty intense inflation, and it made the news, but no one I knew starved to death, there was a bit of car pooling, but in general, it was a nuthin.

So until we have sustained, multiyear inflation exceeding 20% annually, I think a lot of people may very well be able to ignore the issue completely. No one really cares, when they flip the light switch, whether the electricity in question was generated by solar, by nuke, or by coal.

Its this side of the argument that leans me, personally, towards the side of non-event status. All that said, regardless of my opinion at the moment, I ain't buying anybodies book on the subject.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Shadizar » Tue 09 May 2006, 21:29:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'I') think the point is that to a large extent, short of the collapse theory, he can ignore all of those things you listed with impunity. I'm not sure he's wrong. In the 70's we had pretty intense inflation, and it made the news, but no one I knew starved to death, there was a bit of car pooling, but in general, it was a nuthin.

So until we have sustained, multiyear inflation exceeding 20% annually, I think a lot of people may very well be able to ignore the issue completely. No one really cares, when they flip the light switch, whether the electricity in question was generated by solar, by nuke, or by coal.

Its this side of the argument that leans me, personally, towards the side of non-event status. All that said, regardless of my opinion at the moment, I ain't buying anybodies book on the subject.


Take a look at the world "holistically." I think you'll find the U.S. and most western countries are doing O.K. Sooner or later the price of oil will hit the western countries. Now, it is only a nuisance.

If oil is abundant (as it was historically) why can't the third world markets afford it? Cheap and plentiful oil would fuel the growth of third world countries. That is not the case.

Also, consider world events in your evaluation. Politics are tied to energy as much as anything else. Hint: Russia. Do you really think their recent actions (and their being able to get away with them) speak of an abundance of energy?

-Shadizar
User avatar
Shadizar
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun 24 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby PolestaR » Tue 09 May 2006, 21:37:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'Y')es, that's correct. Most of you folks are profoundly and sadly addicted to the media news cycle, so it's hard for you to understand... Nevertheless, all the "events" you cite are nothing but media events. They might as well be fictional stories, or movies. I can ignore them with impunity.

Peak oil follows the same pattern. It has no effect at all on any of the parameters of my daily life, so I can ignore it with impunity.

You want to scare me? Don't point to "links" or "stories" or "theories" or "parables". Show me how peak oil is hurting me, right now. (Don't bother citing "gas prices" -- I don't drive.)


That sounds kinda like someone who has just been infected with HIV and is saying "show me how it's hurting me". I don't think "peak oil" is hurting many of us here on this forum, but in some countries, to some people, it is. No one is saying you should devote your life to thinking about PO, like some of us here do or seem to do. But to deny what PO will bring to society is like denying you have a mother.

I heard rumours you had became a doomer Johnny since closing your "blog", but it took until this post for me to believe it. You're simply pretending to not be one to keep face. You can let it go now, you're among doomer friends here.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 09 May 2006, 22:24:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')he stock market correction of 2000 was nonsense?


Yes, it was nonsense. A completely boring non-event which had no lasting consequences of any importance. If that's all you've got, peak oil isn't a threat. I paid no attention whatsoever to the stock market correction of 2000, and suffered no harm.


No? Just created the housing bubble is all. People all around me are going upside down in the housing market. It will soon snowball. They just announced the bubble pop here in AZ which is the #1 market.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'T')he double digit inflation of the 70's was nonsense?


Yes. I was there, and it wasn't a big deal. We handled it just fine.



Yes, by going deeper into debt and having the oil glut from Alaska and the North Sea.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')emember the Lily Pond Parable?

Why do you keep talking about fairy tales? I'm talking about reality -- the reality you can see with your two eyes. The ongoing "energy crisis" isn't threatening at all. At worst, it's just a rerun of the 1970s energy crisis, and that was just another overblown media event which didn't really harm anyone.

Exponential growth is not a fairy tale. Reality is that things look good until the 29th day. It appears you have time. You don't. Overnight, things go from ok to untenable.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Zardoz » Tue 09 May 2006, 22:45:22

This is really amazing. As of today, supply is still meeting demand, so of course we're continuing to rock along.

Yet JD cites that as proof of some sort that we're going to continue rocking, and nothing is going to change.

Please, JD, explain to us how things will continue to be "non-eventful" when we are deep into the era of demand badly outstripping supply, which could well start this winter, if the IEA supply and demand charts are correct:

World Oil Supply

World Oil Demand

If the projected 4th Quarter 2006 demand figure is correct, yet we are still stuck at the 84 million BPD plateau, then we will officially be into what amounts to everybody's definition of PO, won't we? By this time next year, in that case, you and all the rest of us will be having very different discussions, won't we?

See you then.
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby JohnDenver » Wed 10 May 2006, 01:20:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', 'I')f the projected 4th Quarter 2006 demand figure is correct, yet we are still stuck at the 84 million BPD plateau, then we will officially be into what amounts to everybody's definition of PO, won't we? By this time next year, in that case, you and all the rest of us will be having very different discussions, won't we?

See you then.


Yah, yah... I eat dweebs like you for breakfast. If you want to make a prediction here, then make one. What exactly is going to be happening next year, Zardoz?

I say that because I am going to make an example of you. I am making a note in my calendar right now to meet you here, in one year's time. So put your money where your mouth is, poser. What's going to happen in one years time? How will our discussions be "very different"?
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron