Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trader's Corner 2006

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will the price of WTIC oil be on December 29, 2006?

Less than $50
3
No votes
Around $55
4
No votes
Around $60
7
No votes
Around $65
15
No votes
Around $70
58
No votes
More than $80
101
No votes
 
Total votes : 188

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Chaparral » Thu 04 May 2006, 12:15:39

BOOM! HU-M06 punches through the 20000 line and was last seen cratering towards.....what i don't know at 19930.

I calculated 19900ish as a first Fib # and I've set my stops behind it at 20something. Maybe 18100 is next? I figured that as the 50% number.

Crude punched through the 7050 mark with just a bit of a scuffle and has how dipped as low as 6930.

This is some seriously violent chart action: the sort that just blows past stop loss orders and leaves them unfilled.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Typhoon » Thu 04 May 2006, 12:24:36

Today's price action leaves me speechless. I never imagined that any correction would be this violent. It's hard to believe that crude can continue to fall past $69, but who wants to get in the way of a falling knife? The weeks ahead should be interesting.
User avatar
Typhoon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Chaparral » Thu 04 May 2006, 12:24:47

shat! I ratched my stop down to 19900 and got limited almost as fast as I clicked the button! Time to set buy orders at 19950-19990. Unleaded hit 19770 before bouncing so well see if there's more potential for downwards action today.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby cube » Thu 04 May 2006, 12:39:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Typhoon', 'I') never imagined that any correction would be this violent. It's hard to believe that crude can continue to fall past $69, but who wants to get in the way of a falling knife?
I think the phrase "falling battle ax" would be more accurate. :P
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby CARVER » Thu 04 May 2006, 18:32:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'T')o be honest, I think that is a load of crap. Most countries are simply a mess because of corruption with or without any outside help. Clans, tribes, family politics, call it what you want. You never saw someone screw a Native Indian like another Native Indian over tribal politics and dividing the spoils of office. They do not need any outside help, they are pretty good at it themselves. Ditto for most politicians. Even where there are no differences to exploit, we seem to invent them. Take Republicans and Democrats for want of a better example. Basically both parties are tax & spend and while the voters get worked up about the differences between them, the politicians themselves are busy helping themselves to the pork. And politics in Canada or Japan or anywhere else does not get any better, just worse in some places like Italy for example. So take most poor countries and you will just find a lot of corruption with or without foreign companies. Guess I will just link this article on the Salomon Islands as an example. Too tired to fight much about this issue. So take it for what it is worth.

Just a bunch of locals fighting for control over the spoils even if that means less for everyone. Even if a foreign company comes in and improves the situation for a while, it just leaves more for them to fight over later. You cannot win. If you do nothing, you're ignoring the plight of the poor. If you try to help them, you're exploiting them.

Nothing to do with protecting the rights of the wealthy or the elite. Which in my mind is some sort of empty strawman argument. On one hand we are supposed to respect other countries sovereignty even if they engage in genocide and ethnic cleansing. On the otherhand, if we do business with their elected leaders (rightly, wrongly, with or without corruption and vote rigging) we are somehow propping up puppet regimes?


(Maybe we should split this discussion to a separate thread, so it won't mess up this one?)

I'm not claiming that none of the locals are corrupt (bad), and that all would be fine when we would not intervene, when we would not support and promote corruption. But that there might still be corruption if we would not do that, doesn't justify doing it ourselves. "It's okay for us to do it, otherwise someone else would have done it anyway." It is not our goal to support and protect the (corrupt) elite, we are just trying to line our own pockets, if we need to line the pockets of those in power as well to achieve that, then so be it. If we think we could gain more by supporting the poor, we would do that instead. But how sustainable is this? Will it likely result in an uprising, terrorism, nationalization, and the destruction of wealth? If that is likely and we have grown to depend on their resources, is it smart to support/cause the corruption? Would it not be in our interest to help the poor and keep them happy, and to fight corruption? Or do we just blame them for making these 'mistakes' (from our point of view), taking back what they believe belongs to them. Getting rid off those who they can't trust, and thus getting rid off know-how and skilled people.

Let's say we have another Einstein, but one that has a habit of stealing and destroying property of (innocent) people. What do we do with him? He can bring us great steps in science, that will be of great benefit to a lot of us, if we let him go his way. Do we allow him that, or do we stop him and as result suffer the consequences of not having the progress in science he would have given us? When those (possible) victims rise up and stop him, do we blame them for this expensive experiment that they are trying? We would have been better of if they hadn't done that. Would we have been better off if we would have compensated them for their loss of property instead?

Let's say we have a group of kids and a bowl of candy. One of them grabs the entire bowl. The others also want the candy but he doesn't give it to them. A few of the kids would be powerfull enough to take some by force, so he shares some of the candy with them, but he does not want to share with all the kids. The other kids are getting angry. How long do you think it will take before the other kids try to take it by force? They fight over it and in the fight the bowl of candy drops on the floor and a lot of candy will be spoiled. Then they all go like: "look what you did". None of them is happy with this outcome. They either work out how to share it or they keep fighting over it and destroy a lot of candy in the process. I think most parents must have told their kids that they should share. And who still remembers the: take a piece of pie, let one child cut the pie in two pieces and let the other pick first. Or let two people choose a number between say 0 - 10 (they are not allowed to negotiate or tell the other), which is the amount they will receive if the total of both is not more than 10, otherwise they both get nothing.

Game theory is interesting, but the game we play is very complex. In my opinion however both sides we mentioned are not using the 'best' strategy. There is no point in blaming one side, because both are to blame. Both sides keep repeating the same mistakes over and over again. Maybe both need new strategies, need to find a balance? But we could also decide to keep this up forever, to stick with our strategies even though they don't give the results we expect them to give, and thus live with the consequences of our actions. Somehow we seem to have convinced ourselves that our current strategy is sound. And another problem is that even when one side changes its strategies, the other side immedeately jumps to the conclusion that they are using their same old 'wrong' strategies again, so we don't even listen to what they are saying this time, or take a good look what they are actually doing, and thus both sides keep undermining eachother. I think we know where this is going. Destruction is a lot easier and cheaper than defense, protection and construction. And it is within everyone's ability. And making enemies is a lot easier than making friends. It's easy to turn a friend into an enemy, once you've created an enemy it is very difficult to turn them into a friend. We are making enemies faster then we can kill them, and we have been making enemies for decades.
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 05 May 2006, 02:21:39

I had a blasted important meeting yesterday afternoon in Nicosia to bring some big fund distributors on board for the launch of my commodity & energy fund, so as a result I refrained from taking a large short position despite my models turning increasingly bearish with an unambiguous sell signal. Heart breaking to see us plumbing $70 from my initial sell-off points of $7460-7475-7500 ($7499 was the high). I just cannot afford to miss moves of that magnitude (track record)! Oops.

So in any case, short covering aside ahead of the weekend, this correction still has a way to go. The hourly and daily charts are both in full short positions and the weekly charts have taken out last week's lows as well as the previous week's, so although above its moving averages, it looks like it would test lower first before finding any technical support.

I calculate my .382R fibs on the continuation charts as being $68.50 on the daily chart from $58 to $75 (Brent) and $67 on the weekly chart from $54 to $75. If you look at WTI you may get slightly different levels, but they have tracked one another relatively close lately, and in any case the direction is clear, so no use picking bottoms so far ahead of time.

My floor broker on the NYMEX was hearing of some fund liquidation yesterday at the close. Of course, expect to see some natural buying interest (even if to close shorts) at or near $70 as it is a nice round number. But without fresh inputs (read bad geopolical news) I think this rally was getting overdone and in need of some house cleaning.

Would look to sell into a re-test of $7150 now (yesterday's support is today's resistance), but realistically we may not see it higher than $7085/7130 on any bounce unless a headline comes out of left field and surprises us. We came a long way in a very short time on the back of Iran and other bad news, so we can claw back some of those gains quite easily as well. Good luck.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')OUSTON (MarketWatch) -- Brazil's state-owned oil company said Wednesday it was suspending new investments in Bolivia and blocking funds to expand a gas pipeline between the two neighbors following Bolivia's recent move to nationalize its oil and gas fields
[url=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={55C3CBDD-9204-4E5F-B275-752F3B7811CE}&siteid=mktw&dist=nbi]Brazil's Petrobras suspends Bolivian investments[/url]
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 05 May 2006, 07:44:45

Tested lower here this morning to $7014 in the Brent ($6971 in the WTI) before up on short covering. No comments or news that I am aware of? Was enough to flip the short-term hourly charts from short to long. Took profit on my short, sold again on the bounce, stopped out and went long, but square now. We'll see if it is legitimate buying to go long or what here this afternoon? Just maybe profit from a little short covering ahead of the weekend? Must be a holiday in parts of the Spanish speaking world, so volumes might be light?

Here are some metals comments from DRKW
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') Market comment
Gold: It seems that a day’s pause was enough to reinvigorate the gold market after the retreat to 660 on Wednesday. Thursday opened a little more quietly with Japanese holidays continuing, and the price ranged between 660 and 667. Again the afternoon’s trading was livelier as speculative money came into the market aided by expectations of de-hedging to continue, particularly
from Barrick, and by ongoing Iran tensions. A high of 677.40 was reached before further selling was found and gold eased back to close 674.60 amid gains across most commodities again. EUR has held near its recent peaks with ECB rate hikes expected in June and attention moves now to NFP to see whether any stronger numbers here can take the shine off EUR and gold and focus attention back on USD.

Silver: Another choppy day as silver started at 13.65, dipped to 13.55, rallied to 14.25 yo-yo’d to 13.70 before rebounding to close at 13.83. Demand and trading volume for the ETF remains positive, and at approximately 10mmoz per day according to BGI, the volumes are 7.50% of those seen on Comex on average this year. 14.70 highs from April and 15.00 remain upside targets, with ranges quite likely to extend on the downside to 13.20 and 12.20 as volatility persists.

Platinum: Trading continues to be more subdued in platinum with Asian markets closed in the second half of this week. Narrow ranges between 1,165 and 1,180 have failed to give further direction despite dramatic rallies in copper and recovery after Wednesday in gold and silver. The market seems undecided at these levels, closing mid range around 1,175 for the past 3 sessions. Near term direction may be given by the performance of other commodities and the risks of liquidation.

Palladium: Similarly to platinum, palladium has traded quietly, following sister metal and taking some cues from the rest of the complex. Prices have not strayed far from 375, ranging between 370 and 380, and a failure to move higher may weigh on the metal in the near term given persistent speculative length.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby rwwff » Sun 07 May 2006, 00:53:41

Question for zee traders.... Should a long term gold accumulator continue purchasing at $650+ or do the Anti-Frenzy Alarm bells kick in and say, 'at this point in time, this is silly.'
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby carbuster » Sun 07 May 2006, 13:24:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'Q')uestion for zee traders.... Should a long term gold accumulator continue purchasing at $650+ or do the Anti-Frenzy Alarm bells kick in and say, 'at this point in time, this is silly.'


Well, if you invest long-term, I wouldn't worry about potential correction. Just spread your purchases to avoid buying on local peak. I started buying gold at 470 USD. From today's price level, I feel I spent way too much time watching the charts trying to identify the dips - it makes little difference whether you earned 200 or 180 per ounce ;-)
User avatar
carbuster
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon 07 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Mechler » Tue 09 May 2006, 08:11:42

CNNMoney attributed yesterday's dip in oil prices to a mystery letter from the Iranian President to the US President. The letter was supposed to offer new ideas on easing tensions between the countries. Well, here's the latest on that letter:

Iran letter blasts Bush, democracy

NEW YORK (AP) -- Iran's president declared in a letter to President Bush that democracy had failed worldwide and lamented "an ever-increasing global hatred" of the U.S. government.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/05/ ... index.html

I assume that the traders will take notice of this. A bullish sign for today's commodity markets?
"It is certain that free societies would have no easy time in a future dark age. The rapid return to universal penury will be accomplished by violence and cruelties of a kind now forgotten." - Roberto Vacca, The Coming Dark Age
Mechler
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu 02 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Denver, USA

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 10 May 2006, 02:42:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('carbuster', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'Q')uestion for zee traders.... Should a long term gold accumulator continue purchasing at $650+ or do the Anti-Frenzy Alarm bells kick in and say, 'at this point in time, this is silly.'


Well, if you invest long-term, I wouldn't worry about potential correction. Just spread your purchases to avoid buying on local peak. I started buying gold at 470 USD. From today's price level, I feel I spent way too much time watching the charts trying to identify the dips - it makes little difference whether you earned 200 or 180 per ounce ;-)


I think to be totally objective you have to purge external references like historical prices and just accept that the price is what it is. At every given price there is a fifty-fifty percent chance it will go higher or lower.

You can look at historical prices and then compare the price of gold to silver to oil to other metals or commodities, but really that is just regression analysis and tells you a lot about where prices have been, but little about where they are going.

From here ($650) you can employ a trailing stop loss. That is set your stop loss at $599 or wherever you like, but then I would use at least a 3:1 stop loss to take profit rule, so if you're willing to accept a $50 stop loss, your take profit should be at least $150 higher.

Or alternatively, you can take your original investment, say 10 ounces at $300 = $3000, and now reduce your gold holding from $6500 back to $3000 and reinvest that $3500 in another asset, which protects you from inflation, but has not performed as well. Say, natural gas, which has not done very well since December. You will lower your Sharpe Ratio and diversify your investment, which should overtime give you higher returns with less variance than any single asset.

If you can take 5 correlated assets and allocate the same fixed dollar amount or percentage to each asset in your portfolio. Then as one becomes overbought, you sell 50% of that asset and invest in either a) the worst performing asset in your basket, or b) leave that money on the sidelines until your original asset comes back into the buy zone or even better oversold territory. This automatically balances your investment portfolio. It keeps you in the game, so you do not miss moves higher, but it forces you to take profit and reinvest into poorer performing assets that you chose as part of your portfolio (hopefully for good reasons) in the first place. Just a suggestion.

Computer problems here, so unable to access my Reuters this morning. More updates later.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 10 May 2006, 07:59:40

Here's the line-up for 2006. Forecasters see an active Atlantic Hurricane season.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ame that hurricane
Any tropical storm with sustained winds of 39 miles per hour gets a name, a tradition put in place by the National Hurricane Center in 1953. A storm becomes a hurricane when its winds hit 74 mph. Initially, only women’s names were used. Men’s names joined the roster in 1979. The task of assembling a list of names now rests with the World Meteorological Organization. Here’s their line-up for the 2006 Atlantic, Caribbean Hurricane season:

• Alberto
• Beryl
• Chris
• Debby
• Ernesto
• Florence
• Gordon • Helene
• Isaac
• Joyce
• Kirk
• Leslie
• Michael
• Nadine • Oscar
• Patty
• Rafael
• Sandy
• Tony
• Valerie
• William

[url=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={15F98987-A344-46FF-9E39-63A456DF95D1}&siteid=mktw&dist=nbi]Oil sector braces for hurricane season[/url]


Market comments compliments of DRKW
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')arket comment

Gold: Positive performances across the board yesterday led by gold and supported by ongoing USD weakness and a renewal of concerns over Iran. Opening around 680, gold marked time until further comments out of China about gold reserves started to drive prices higher. The break of resistance at 686 brought a swift $10 move to 697 where some consolidation was seen. However, the 700 handle came up briefly before the end of the day and gold eased only fractionally into the close at 699.70. Remaining firm overnight despite USD weakness pushing JPY stronger, gold posted highs of 704.50 this morning after trading limit up on TOCOM. News that South Deep production will fall to 50% of planned capacity and the main shaft will be closed for 9-12 months after last week’s accident will only bolster the current positive outlook. 700 is a key level and might bring about a pause in the rally, but 722-25 looks to be the next upside target with 686 now support.

Silver: Still lagging new highs gold and platinum, silver nevertheless
managed to rally 90c yesterday from 13.65 to 14.55 between the early low and the late high. Following the dip in Asian time, silver took up gold’s lead and on breaking above 14.00, moved swiftly to 14.25 and 14.55, posting a larger gain than gold on the day. Resistance remains at 14.75 and may come under pressure if gold continues to make headway above 700.

Platinum: Like gold and copper, platinum set new multi-year/record highs early yesterday at 1,203. In the run up to Platinum Week in London next week and new fundamental updates, platinum maintained the positive run and moved onwards from here to close on the highs at 1,235, new all time highs, and has continued further this morning to reach 1,260. Overstretched but uptrending markets seem to prevail for the moment.

Palladium: Last but not least, palladium shook itself over 380 resistance on strength throughout the complex and in base and made a bid for 400 which would be the highest level since Jan02. However 390 was the limit yesterday and 400 may have to wait until the precious metals move higher again, perhaps it will not be so long a wait


The US dollar remains under pressure. $1.2800 against the euro, $1.8625 against Sterling and 110.50 yen to the dollar. Think just a matter of time before we break $1.3000 and the 110 with Sterling also pulled along for the ride on the back of dollar weakness. Another bullish factor in the Commodity Story. Had to buy some euros yesterday/today. Ouch. These type of levels hurt! Also, will be in London next week. Will not be making any discretionary purchases that is for sure! ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 10 May 2006, 08:24:26

Because I had the last two days off to celebrate Russia's Victory Day I almost forgot today was Wednesday. Here are the Reuters forecasts for today's inventory numbers:

Crude f/c -0.6 mio bbls to 346.7 mio bbls
Distillates f/c -0.3 mio bbls to 114.5 mio bbls
Gasoline f/c +1.2 mio bbls to 202.7 mio bbls
Refinery Runs f/c +0.9% to 88.8%


and tomorrow's numbers:

Nat Gas f/c +50 to +110 bcf



The EIA monthly oil supply & demand reports showed

World Oil Demand in May 85.3 mbpd vs. 83.7 in 2005
US Oil Demand in May 20.79 mbpd vs. 20.66 in 2005
US Gasoline Demand in Q2'06 9.26 mbpd vs. 9.26 in 2005
US Distillate Demand in Q2'06 4.09 mbpd vs. 4.06 in 2005
US Crude Inventory at end of Q2'06 332 mio bbls vs. 329 in 2005
and at end of Q3'06 305 mio bbls vs. 307 in 2005

So that world oil demand number gives room for a pause given the risk of supply shocks on the back of ongoing production outages in Nigeria (real) and the threat of supply interuptions from Iran (still hypothetical at this point), although the situation in the USA does not look critical at this point unless those forecasted hurricanes take out some choice oil & gas assets and do some more underwater damage to offloading facilities again this summer/fall. Still, we are heading into the summer driving season starting with very high numbers, so the market is pricing in eventual disruptions from one quarter or another.

In any case, rumors on the NYMEX that Bush government may look to suspend quality improvements to unleaded gasoline which may include relaxing MTBE fuel additive bans in favor of ethanol blends and/or dropping import duties on ethanol. This would likely narrow the price gap between HU and the RBOB contracts in the future months up to the end of the summer driving season.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 10 May 2006, 10:43:21

Larger than expected builds in the crude and the unleaded have put the crude under pressure. Basically, no bullish news in the inventory numbers, so hard to sustain any upwards price action given that the daily and weekly charts are heavy in any case. Look for a re-test to sub-$70 in the Brent and sub$69 in the WTI here now.


Quite remarkable developments in Russia as you can read by these comments by Putin and Kudrin. Would see it as mainly rouble friendly, but the rouble was already under pressure to revalue, so this is just another match on the fire.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')OSCOW, May 10 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin set out an assertive economic agenda on Wednesday, calling for the rouble to be made convertible ahead of time and backing gas monopoly Gazprom's <GAZP.MM> international ambitions.
But, in his seventh annual keynote address, Putin served notice that Russia would only join the World Trade Organisation -- an event which would seal the country's transformation from communism to capitalism -- on its own terms.
The world's No.2 oil exporter has hoarded much of the windfall from record oil prices, enabling Putin to instruct his government to make the rouble fully convertible six months ahead of schedule.
"Today, I propose speeding up the abolition of remaining restrictions and completing this work before July 1 of this year," Putin told Russia's establishment in a one-hour speech delivered in the Kremlin.
If that schedule holds, Russia will have bounced back from devaluation and default in just eight years, and in time to host its first Group of Eight summit in St Petersburg in mid-July.
The rouble <RUBUTSTN=MCX> rose after Putin's speech to new six-year highs just shy of 27 to the U.S. dollar, although traders said much of that reflected the greenback's weakness against the euro.

NO TIME LIKE THE PRESENT
Removal of capital controls would make rouble-denominated Russian debt more attractive to foreign investors by removing a requirement to lodge an interest-free reserve payment at the central bank.
It would also make Russia prey to speculative capital flows, although with Moscow running huge budget and current account surpluses now may be as good a time as any, analysts said.
"Given the strength of the current account surplus and evidence of net capital inflows, this is obviously positive for the rouble," said Tim Ash, emerging markets economist at Bear Stearns in London.
Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin said the government would be able to meet the deadline, and promoted the rouble as a reserve currency for Russia's trading partners.
"I expect that some countries, with whom we have trade relations, will convert part of their forex reserves -- probably a small one at the first stage -- into roubles," Kudrin told reporters after Putin's speech.
"This will be an absolutely reliable investment
."

DEEDS, NOT WORDS
Putin's speech made no direct mention of the G8 summit, nor of Russia's increasingly fraught relations with Washington after U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney accused Moscow of "blackmail" against energy consuming countries.
But he threw his weight behind the push by gas exporter Gazprom -- now the world's third-largest company by market capitalisation -- to acquire gas distribution assets in Europe and seek alternative markets.
"We cannot stop at this," Putin said. "We need to ... move into new markets ... and to fulfil our obligations to our traditional partners."
In another indirect swipe at Washington, Putin said Russia would join the World Trade Organisation "only on the conditions that take into account (its) economic interests".
Russia has been negotiating to join the WTO for over 10 years and is the largest economy outside the 149-member grouping.
It must strike bilateral agreements with existing members before striking a comprehensive final entry deal and talks with the United States have stalled.
Putin did answer U.S. concerns about rampant video, music and software piracy -- but was silent on Washington's demand for foreign banks to be allowed to open branches in Russia rather than subsidiaries. Russia fears that its weak banking system could be wiped out by foreign rivals if it yields on that point.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Chaparral » Wed 10 May 2006, 13:13:11

Bearish news for pump gas, yet from this morning's low of 20160 it has now rocketed up to 21450 as gold,silver and crude just putter around. It's been a morning of getting stopped out. In the absence of any international surprises, I guess the funds are just piling on to play their usual game of musical chairs??
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 10 May 2006, 13:26:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chaparral', 'B')earish news for pump gas, yet from this morning's low of 20160 it has now rocketed up to 21450 as gold,silver and crude just putter around. It's been a morning of getting stopped out. In the absence of any international surprises, I guess the funds are just piling on to play their usual game of musical chairs??


Floor broker on NYMEX also could not explain the action in unleaded (HU) today, but think it goes back to earlier comment about relaxing standards for MTBE unleaded (HU) gasoline. RBOB (ethanol enhanced) was/is at 2.34? HU (unleaded) was at 2.01, so I would expect them to meet in the middle at 2.16-17 as standards collapse and they become perfect substitutes for one another? Just my idea. Still searching. There was a large drawdown in RFG today (-2.3 mio bbls) so this may offset any builds in unleaded inventories? Keep you posted as I know? Thanks.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Typhoon » Wed 10 May 2006, 13:38:10

The strong rally in HU today has been due to gasoline demand. The four-week average is below year-ago levels, but demand for this week alone was convincingly higher. This outweighed the inventory build, which was largely expected.
User avatar
Typhoon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Chaparral » Wed 10 May 2006, 17:57:17

Interesting chart action. HUM6 rallied to 20900 and puttered around there and then jumped to 21400 and dithered a little before finally shooting up to reach 21700 whereabouts. It kind of looks like about three "tsunamis" piled on top of each other as the big longs came out to play.

I guess this weekly demand spike along with the ethanol prices and those two refinery glitches were enough to bring them out. Ok now hurry up and take profits already :twisted:
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 11 May 2006, 05:15:44

Yesterday was no less than buy the rumor, sell the fact, then buy the next rumor. Fear & greed. Ouch! And higher we went after that brief initial dip following the inventory data. To be honest, I missed it. No hits, no runs, no errors, but no signing bonuses either! ; - )

Found this interesting. I think you can draw the lines between emerging markets and commodites yourself?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')lobal Equity Strategy
What keeps me awake at night?
For the record nothing keeps me awake at night. But when it comes to our overweight position in emerging markets I do get a little worried. US mutual fund investors have never been keener on emerging markets, and this scares the willies out of me. However, for the time being we are prepared to 'ride our winners' as I preach in my behavioural meetings. But the focus must be on cheap EMs.

► Emerging market equities have enjoyed a significant outperformance of the developed markets in recent years. Since 2003 the MSCI developed market index is up an impressive 87%. However, set beside the MSCI emerging markets universe performance of 225%, this look paltry.

► In my work on behavioural finance and contrarian strategies I regularly argue that one should invest in the things that make you feel absolutely dreadful. Matt Lieberman's work has shown that physical pain and social pain are felt by the same part of the brain, so doing the opposite of everyone else tends to feel like having your arm broken on a regular basis.

► So what is it that bothers me so much about our position in emerging markets? For starters they are trading not far off parity with the developed markets on measures like price to book. Using a broader variety of valuation measures, since 1995 emerging markets have traded at a 30% discount relative to the developed markets. Today they stand at less than half their usual discount.

► The really bad news is that US mutual fund investors don't seem to be able to get enough of emerging markets (EM). The inflow recently reached a 7 standard deviation event! Some three times greater than the inflow bubble in 1993. Joe Six-pack is a superb contrarian indicator. He ends up chasing performance and hence buying high and selling low. For instance, when Joe is buying massive amounts of EM, the returns over the following three years are on average 1.7% p.a., whereas when he is selling EMs, the returns over the subsequent three years are 15% p.a.

► The good news is that our cheap basket of emerging markets has relatively low beta with the developed markets (-0.2), whilst EMs as an asset class continue to have a very high beta (2). So our basket may be more independent of developments in the major markets than aggregate emerging markets have tended to be.

Global Equity Strategy , What keeps me awake at night?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 11 May 2006, 06:24:02

It's a brave new world. My goal is to have one electronic platform with access to all the various exchange traded products. Now OTC FX trading. Oh my, gosh. Too good to be true. Let's see how it ends, but the CME is picking up bits & bobs and turning itself into quite the central clearer. That with the ICE now offering NYMEX shadow contracts, and the CME offering NYMEX contracts, should mean lower transaction costs and lower margins due to cross margining instead of having capital tied-up at various exchanges. It is also very democratic. The average investor now has access to the same proprietary technology and information as the most capital intensive investment bank barely a decade ago, and at a fraction of the cost.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') CME and Reuters to Create FXMarketSpace – The World's First
Centrally-Cleared, Global FX Marketplace

CME is proud to announce that it has partnered with Reuters to create FXMarketSpace, the world’s first global FX marketplace to offer anonymous, cleared trading of OTC FX instruments through a central counterparty.

Through this joint venture, CME and Reuters will pool their expertise in data dissemination, distribution, trade matching and central counterparty clearing services to provide you, our valued customers, with broadened access to the $2 trillion a day FX market.

Broad Access, Credit Efficiencies
As FX has emerged as an asset class in its own right, as non-bank financial institutions are playing an increasingly important role in global FX markets, and with the continued growth of electronic and algorithmic trading, FX customers are looking for broader access to the FX market. FXMarketSpace’s trading model will provide a host of advantages to market participants:

Broad global distribution through Reuters market leading desktop community in FX,
CME clearing firms and selected independent software vendors;
Trading anonymity;
Transparent and competitive prices on the CME Globex® electronic trading platform;
Central counterparty services through CME Clearing; and,
Straight-through processing, increased operational efficiencies and lower costs.

We believe these advantages will ultimately provide customers with deep liquidity, credit-efficient trading, reduced costs and open, transparent access to the marketplace. Ultimately, FXMarketSpace will help global FX markets to operate more efficiently and grow even faster.

Proven Track Record in Meeting the Needs of the FX Market
CME and Reuters have long-standing reputations for meeting and exceeding the ever-changing needs of the FX market. FXMarketSpace is the latest way in which these two leading organizations in the FX futures and spot markets – and in global financial services – can deliver value to our customers.

CME plus Reuters FX MarketSpace
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron