Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Pharmacy / Pharmaceutical Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby JoeCoal » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 00:39:53

Can I interest you in some Crestor and/or some Lunesta?

I think it's pretty DAMN obvious that the industry invents disease..
Good night, and good luck...
JoeCoal
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu 02 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Unread postby Vexed » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 00:46:46

It doesn't surprise me that the drug companies are inventing diseases. Just watch tv. Every other commercial is for some Brave New Drug.

But it is has always been marketing's job to create new problems to sell new products.

Underarm smell? You need deoderant? Red eyes? You need eye drops? Scaley skin? You need special Peruvian Rainforst lotion. Can't get the chicks? You need the right cologne. Can't sleep? You haven't purchased the right sleep aid. Hyper kid? You and the kid both need prescription medicine to calm you. And on and on and on.....

There is an awful lot of money to be made in convincing and keeping people worried and/or sick.

Always has been.
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Jellric » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 01:30:35

Funny how things often don't really get "discovered" until the commercial aspects of that discovery have been worked out.

And when a new drug causes side effects they simply prescribe yet another drug to nip that in the bud. And so on..

Medicine also tends to treat the body as parts rather than as a system.
They find a drug that affects one part of the body positively while minimizing its effects on other parts of the body. They also play a lot of games with statistics to make their products seem better than they really are.

BTW, I would never let them put me on a cholesterol-lowering drug (statins).
Check out the following if you want to learn why:

The Hidden Origin of Statin Drugs:
http://www.consumerhealthdigest.com/statindrugs.htm
User avatar
Jellric
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Southern USA

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Vexed » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 01:41:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')They also play a lot of games with statistics to make their products seem better than they really are.


Medical Research Findings Often Wrong
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby ThunderChunky » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 02:03:38

I agree they are greedy bastards, but modern medicine is not an illusion.
User avatar
ThunderChunky
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Clouseau2 » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 02:20:11

One word: "Halitosis"
User avatar
Clouseau2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Vexed » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 02:45:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ThunderChunky', 'I') agree they are greedy bastards, but modern medicine is not an illusion.

One of my favorite books back in high school was How to Lie with Statistics.

Here, in regards cholesterol lowering statin drugs, is a medical illusion created by lying with statistics:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Interestingly, the Newsweek article devoted only one sentence to the critical question of what has been proven regarding statins. Without further explanation, the article says a large study “showed that cholesterol-lowering drugs reduced the risk of heart attack and stroke by at least one quarter for those at highest risk.” While this is roughly accurate, it appears more impressive than the reality. The one-quarter reduction refers to the difference in the rate of heart attack between the study participants taking statins and those on the placebo.

What makes the statistic misleading is the fact that healthy people--even those with high cholesterol--have a low risk of having a heart attack to begin with. And reducing their odds of having a heart attack by one-fourth simply means that 3% of the statin-treated study participants had a heart attack or stroke, as compared to 4% of the untreated participants (the placebo group). Or put another way: There were 1% fewer statin-treated people had heart attacks."


(Almost) Everything You Need to Know About Statin Drugs

I don't think ALL of modern medicine is an illusion. But I do think some of it is an outright abomination.
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby kevincarter » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 03:29:26

I wouldn't be surprised they even spread some mild diseases like common cold.
kevincarter
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu 04 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Jellric » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 03:43:09

Hospitals are responsible for antiobiotic-resistent "superbugs" and staph infections which are killing many patients.
User avatar
Jellric
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Southern USA

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby ozkrenske » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 05:18:48

Ummmm, Last years nobel prize for medicine went to two Aussie scientists who ignored everything that the drug companies and their 'trials' had been saying for twenty years. They noticed that almost 90% of stomach ulcer patients had a certain bacteria surviving in their stomachs. Their Curiosity got them to ask the question 'Could the bacteria be creating the ulcers'. All the pharmaceautical evidence said was no, the ulcers allow the bacteria to live not the opposite. some research even said the bacteria was in the stomach after beng carried there by blood leaking through the ulcer. Turns out all the Pharma companies were talking Bullshit.

One of the two took a sample of the bacteria and swallowed it, after a few weeks he started to develop ulcers. He then took a series of anti bacterials designed to stay in the stomach for longer than normal. The result was the elimination of the Bacteria and several weeks later the natural repair of the ulcers.

So most of the worlds pharmaceutical companies were profitting for the last fifty years from the non treatment of ulcers with antibiotics. I am still awaiting the striking off of doctors, scientists etc who worked for the companies during the initial research. Investigations into corporate conspiracy should be carried out, with possible further investigations of several hundred thousand murders and wrongful deaths if such conspiracy to hide research is proven.

It's crap like this that get's people to doubt the information and research done by good scientists.
User avatar
ozkrenske
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby JustinFrankl » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 09:14:24

The Nobel Prize may have been awarded to these scientists for their discovery and proof, but the suspicion of Heliobacter pylori being involved as the cause of ulcers was already common enough that gastroenterologists had lab tests for H. pylori antibodies since at least 2003. The lab test was common enough in '03 that it was a preprinted option on diagnostic forms. (I went to the doctor at the time because I suspected I had ulcers, my antibody test was negative, and they put a scope down my throat to see that I, in fact, had no stomach ulcers, that was fun.)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's crap like this that get's people to doubt the information and research done by good scientists.

That, and most people don't understand what "science" is, and the process of continual learning, discovery, and change it goes through. And that most people don't have time to pay attention, either furiously running to stand still, programmed to consume trite products and engage in shallow activities to fill an inner void without ever finding true satisfaction, or deadening the pain and boredom through drugs, alcohol, sex, and religion.

Feeling especially doomerish today.
"We have seen the enemy, and he is us." -- Walt Kelly
JustinFrankl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby bobcousins » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 09:22:15

How is this related to Peak Oil?
It's all downhill from here
User avatar
bobcousins
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Left the cult

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby J-Rod » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 09:49:36

I was thinking the same thing Bob. Not exactly current either. I am sure a mod will move this to open at some point.
Reality is agreed perception. Unfortunately there is also a reality imposed by nature.
http://thisis.peakdoom.com - For all your doom needs!
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby o2ny » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 11:43:51

Maybe the same mod who created the thread? :o
o2ny
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: new york city wacko

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 13:34:48

Yuck, Yuck, Yuck. thanks for pointing that out. I sometimes forget the rules between web sites and that current events here are only oil events. ;-)
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Falconoffury » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 14:02:52

Does the responsibility to the shareholders override the responsibility to the people taking product? If so, it sounds wrong in the case of any health related or food company.

How can anyone trust doctors who profit when they prescribe drugs? They should be making the most money when people are cured and don't need to take anything. It seems like the basic function of health care is flipped backwards because of capitalism.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 14:19:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'H')ow can anyone trust doctors who profit when they prescribe drugs? They should be making the most money when people are cured and don't need to take anything. It seems like the basic function of health care is flipped backwards because of capitalism.


Let me share with you a little story.

I have this friend. Let's call him...Jonny. Jonny has a medical condition that is easily corrected with a simple 3-hour procedure that a second year intern could perform.

Unfortunately, Jonny's specialist is the only one of his kind in the city, and recieves a fairly large subsidy from big pharma to push their latest poison.

So instead of undergoing a simple procedure, Jonny is constantly being pressured to take rediculously expensive drugs ($20,000/yr) that have literally *just* passed clinical trials. These drugs won't actually CURE Jonny's condition, just treat the symptoms. To make matters worse, leaving this condition untreated will result in further medical problems anywhere between 5-10 years down the road.

Of course, Jonny seeks out a second opinion (traveling to distant cities at his own expense), but apparently, if enough ducks fly together, nobody gets sued. No other doctors will offer a contrary opinion, for fear of breaking the impenetrable wall of malpractice lawyers and insurance agents.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Schweinshaxe » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 18:07:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', 'H')ow is this related to Peak Oil?


This is the Open Discussion forum you ignorant moran.

I'm becoming more and more interested interested in anal massage and saline scrotal inflation. I've heard that it can cure everything from the common cold to red hair, large ears and bad teeth. Maybe something for the contemporary Englishman...? :lol:
Was soll das?
User avatar
Schweinshaxe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Schweinland-Pfalz
Top

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Falconoffury » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 19:22:43

Dreamtwister, what you are describing could be called an Axis of Evil.

Even if you take the insurance agents and lawyers out of the picture, health care is still fundamentally flawed because it's a for profit industry. The most money is made when people are kept sick, or made more sick. At least this crap will be gone with the rest of civilization. People can focus back on nutrition and natural sources for medicine.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Drug firms 'inventing diseases'

Unread postby Vexed » Wed 12 Apr 2006, 22:09:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', 'H')ow is this related to Peak Oil?


I sometimes wonder if the only 2-time nobel prize winning scientist Linus Pauling isn't to medicine what Hubbert is to Peak Oil.

They have both been hugely ignored by the professional mainstream, unless it is to have their name dragged through the mud. They both have a near cult-like following. And, most importantly, they both provide fairly sound theories about their areas of study despite an ubelievable amount of negative press trying to discredit it.

In Pauling's case, orthomolecular healing.

In Hubbert's case, the depletion of oil.
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests