Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Energy & Meat Thread (merged)

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

Do you think meat consumption reduction could save oil and delay peak oil problems?

Poll ended at Sat 11 Mar 2006, 01:27:27

Yes, I'm a vegan and if everyone was, the world would be a more peaceful place.
14
No votes
Yes, but I eat meat. It doesn't matter what I do. It's what everyone does that matters.
6
No votes
No, Jevon's Paradox still applies.
9
No votes
No, there are other ways to reduce oil consumption than to deny people an essential food group.
14
No votes
No, I deny the facts presented in this post.
5
No votes
Yes, but the MEAT lobby will never let that happen.
7
No votes
No, it's too late to implement anything to stave off any peak oil effects.
6
No votes
No, it is a cultural possibility for people to stop eating something that has been the centerpiece of their meals.
2
No votes
No, meat will get more expensive as oil gets more expensive and the market will handle it.
18
No votes
 
Total votes : 81

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 13:49:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'I')f a teacher took her grade school kids on a tour of a beef slaughterhouse she would be fired and would probably never teach again. If she took them on a tour of a flour mill or a soybean processing plant it would be a happy day for all.


Undoubtedly. Americans are also capable of becoming incredibly upset by the fact that their neigbor mistreats his dog and simultaneously not even batting an eye as hundreds of thousands of Iraqis being killed. Have you every been to Southwest Minnesota or Eastern Washington? They both use to be functioning ecosystems. Now you can drive for hours and see nothing but mile after mile after mile of GMO corn. Now maybe that wouldn't upset your average grade schooler, but that is just testament to the screwed up morals and warped view of the world they are raised with. That land use to do a lot of important things. There were lots and lots of animals that use to call it home. Now they're all dead, the topsoil is disappearing, the water is all full of pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, fertilizers. It is everybit as tragic as a warehouse full of debeaked chicken.

This whole "Aww isn't it cute. Let's take it home." version of morality is just one more dodge for Americans to feel morally superior while f___ing up the world.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby seldom_seen » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 13:51:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 's')eldom seen, if you refuse to read my posts or the references, I don't think we can communicate. I didn't say humans didn't eat meat, I said the evidence is they were not big game hunters and efficient fishermen like your examples until they became Homo sapiens. Please read the references.

This is from your reference:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y 1.7-1.6 million years ago, the skills of some Homo erectus had increased to the point that they were making more sophisticated stone implements with sharper and straighter edges.


You should read your references too, because this refutes some of your own arguments.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby untothislast » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 14:10:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', '
')
Think what the poor stalks of corn must feel as sharp blades slash through their tender bodies each fall.

Facetious statement. You're already off to a bad start. Have you ever heard of anyone swerving to avoid hitting a carrot in the road? Yet even meat eaters would (you would hope) try to avoid a dog or cat. Why? Because we know for sure that some creatures share some of the same emotional range, and some of the same capacity for contentment or pain, as we do. So, no, in comparative terms,I don't give too much thought for the poor stalks of corn.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'O')r do you only respect the life of mammalian species?


No, I don't eat reptiles, insects or any amphibious creatures either.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'I')s a tiger racist or intolerant, since every meal it eats comes from the death of another animal?


A tiger has no capacity for philosophical reflection over its actions, which are purely governed by instinct. We are governed, to a certain extent by our instincts also, but manage to rise above the worst of them (such as rape, murder - which however are absolutely acceptable if you wish to strictly apply procreative/survivalist imperatives) because we've been fortunate enough to develop moral and ethical codes.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'T')he fact is, all animals live at the expense of the lives of other beings. Plants make do with sunshine. But herbivores eat those plants and humans eat those herbivores. I am always aware of the life I consume which gives me life. I am grateful and I know that some day my body will feed other living things (not to mention the microscopic little critters who are already enjoying turtle soup).

Herbivores eating plants does not equate with keeping, for example, poultry in a shoebox sized container for the duration of their short lives, before hanging them by the feet off conveyor belts, and slicing their heads off with a rotating blade. One is a bucolic idyll - the other is Auschwitz, with feathers.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'C')ertainly none of us is arguing that the commercial processing of animals isn't disgusting. It is just one more symptom in a sick culture.
Absolutely right. We agree.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'B')ut to assume some sort of moral superiority because you choose not to eat meat is misguided. Consider Hinduism, which generally advocates a vegetarian approach. It also led to a bitterly repressive caste system.

Why am I misguided to assume 'moral superiority'? It seems a fair enough assumption to me. I'm not the one killing animals for my own selfish needs. Assuming that the animal probably wants to retain its life, and not die, then you are morally inferior imposing your superiority to deny it that right. As regards Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, or whatever - never underestimate the power of any religious system to lead people into stupid self-justifying behaviours, regardless of anything their creed encompasses.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', '1'). Because there are better sources of meat available. But when there aren't, many humans apparently do turn to cannibalism (The Donner Party, WWII Stalingrad, those rugby players whose plane crashed in the Andes, etc.) In survival situations, I prefer insects, reptiles and small rodents myself.

The point here, is that the flesh of one dead mammal is no different from that of any other. Therefore, meat-eaters should have no qualitative objections to consuming the corpses of the dead.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', '3'). Are you accusing meat eaters of being pedophiles? If so, I am highly offended. You might consider reading the Code of Conduct. No I'm not. And you know I'm not. I'm saying, that if you believe you have the right to impose your will on a weaker being, just because you have the power to employ subjugation, then you provide an argument for anyone who similarly exploits strength/relative weakness situations - whether it be a concentration camp guard or a paedophile. Actually, I could frame the argument that meat eaters - if their food has been derived from any 'reared for slaughter' scenario, are no better - and possibly worse than paedophiles. A child trusts an adult and gets sexually abused; or an animal trusts a human, gets electrocuted - then gets its throat cut. Is one crime any worse than the other?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', '4'). Yes. We should be ashamed. On the other hand, when I was 10, I helped my great aunt catch and kill two chickens for our dinner. There was no shame in that because it was done cleanly and humanely and with gratitude for the gift we received. The slaughterhouses have insulated most of us from what is a natural part of life ... the taking of another life so that we may live (whether it be animal or plant life).

Let's take issue here with the the word 'humane' - generally employed to excuse a fate we dish out on animals, which, to be honest, we wouldn't really like to happen to ourselves. The chicken didn't want to die, so just because you chose not to kick it to death, didn't make its death any less of a personal loss for the chicken itself. If you should find a dead animal and eat it - fine. I've certainly haven't got a problem with that. After all, it's going down your throat - not mine. But killing another sentient creature has no justification - only the one we conveniently make for ourselves - particularly when that creature is unable to defend or make a case for its own survival.

You actually sound like a perfectly sane and reasonable person, so I'm taking no pleasure at all in making my points as strongly as I can - even to the point of possibly causing personal offence. However, if people who similarly saw beyond the accepted practises of their day (and recognised their implicit and corrosive evil effects upon the human soul) hadn't done so, we would still be enduring slavery, child labour, and bear baiting. It's time we mastered our barbarous habits and moved forward.
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby eastbay » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 14:47:21

What a thoughtful exchange... but I can no longer participate because my G5 MAC isn't working properly and shuts down without notice... at some point in the coming hours or days it will no longer fire up...

SPG, I agree with you about nutrient and life depleted cropland. It's a tragedy no doubt. All we can do is minimize our impacts.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby untothislast » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 15:07:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A') vegetarian diet is stupid. It is not going to save the planet, the animals don't care (nor does the holy seer) and you are not going to live forever. It just makes you feel less guilty about being a 1st-worlder in a planet of human misery. So you drive your BMW to Whole-Foods and stock up on slick packaged products (printed with soy ink) and feel good about stealing 3rd-worlders stuff. It is a fashion statement. Truth is--to die really sucks. Animals do it and so do people. If a cow could speak would it tell you it preferred the barrel of a gun or the disemboweling slash of a lion?


A vegetarian diet makes perfect sense, if you respect and recognise that our fellow sentient creatures have every right to share the same space we do, without having their lives terminated for fun or profit. That's why I'm a vegetarian, pure and simple. It's not a fashion stance. My take on life, is that we should try to get by making as little negative impact on the planet as possible. People will always eat meat, of course I recognise that. And there are obviously many instances where it may be unavoidable, or in fact there is no alternative. But the large scale meat production industry is unethical, wasteful, polluting, inefficient and uneconomic - so why are we persisting with it?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') really don't like refrigerated processed raw-food products and plastic tofu tubs. Vegetarian burgers in the freezer section are a joke. Go to a natural food supermarket in a large fashionable city--it is seriously bizarre. Smug fashionable professionals in dark business suits mix with earthen-colored naturally-clothed trustafarians. Some of them look like Afghanie freedom fighters in their baggy cotton pants and sandals. They bring the crap home to their expensive lofts.


I wish I could think of a counter-argument here, but there really isn't one. Well said.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'T')he truth is industrial agricultural is a dirty shitty business. It runs on cheap resources ripped from the green earth and the labor of people on average poorer, smaller, and darker than the Merkin consumer. The owners and forman are at best fundamentalist christians who think they are bringing light to the dark people, or at worst clueless corporate whores who buy their own crap at Whole Foods or Traders Joes. I love that! Trader Joes! I'll bet Jimmy Buffet shops there.


No need to even bother thinking of a counter-argument. Again, well said.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') know some people who do not eat meat, who are prophets and saints. They go into the woods and place themselves in front of logging crews cutting old-growth forests. They have devoted their lives to balance and simplicity. They are kind, thoughtful, intelligent and above all happy people. They are not on a diet.


We need more of them!!
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby oilfreeandhappy » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 15:20:43

I would believe Worldwatch's figures. Their articles are well-researched. In an earlier post I mentioned 7% (without a link). They may have only been looking at the Production side. Thanks for the research...

>Oops! I found something below and I guess that taxmeat website is lying about how much fossil fuels livestock consumes. Well, don't I feel stupid.

http://www.worldwatch.org/features/cons ... 004/07/07/

David Pimentel of Cornell University estimates that the United States devotes about 17 percent of its fossil fuel consumption to the production and consumption of food: 6 percent for crop and livestock production, 6 percent for processing and packaging, and 5 percent for distribution and cooking.
User avatar
oilfreeandhappy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 15:37:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('untothislast', 'F')acetious statement. You're already off to a bad start. Have you ever heard of anyone swerving to avoid hitting a carrot in the road? Yet even meat eaters would (you would hope) try to avoid a dog or cat. Why? Because we know for sure that some creatures share some of the same emotional range, and some of the same capacity for contentment or pain, as we do.


That's the problem. You don't know s__t. You infer, because it looks like you that it has the same experience of life as you do. And you infer that because a plant doesn't look like you that it has a wholely different experience of life. The truth of the matter is that there is lots of evidence that plants have a much more complex experience of the world than anyone gives them credit for.

You are drawing a line between animals and plants that is just as arbitrary as the line between humans and other animals. The truth is that this world is full of pain, and there is no concievable way that you can walk through your day without causing hurt. Even if you were just worried about animals, there's lots of cute furry little critters that had their homes destroyed and their drinking water poisoned to make room for your carrot. The best that you can do is accept that you are causing pain and you will experience pain, and try to make a world where the plants and animals can go on living in as healthy a way as possible, pain and all.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby untothislast » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 17:17:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')
That's the problem. You don't know s__t. You infer, because it looks like you that it has the same experience of life as you do. And you infer that because a plant doesn't look like you that it has a wholely different experience of life. The truth of the matter is that there is lots of evidence that plants have a much more complex experience of the world than anyone gives them credit for.


Where did I ever infer that any respect I might have for other creatures' right to live untroubled lives, is based on any similarity they may have in appearance to humans? And although I don't know any plants that look like humans, I can state quite categorically that whatever their experience of life may be, it won't be one that you, or I, can readily identify with or share in - as say, when I throw a stick for my dog to retrieve. And that's the point. We know for a fact that animals can be happy or sad - and that our actions can help make them happy or sad. It seems perverse to bring pain and suffering into the lives of creatures having most of the same palette of feelings as ourselves. If you don't believe animals have, and express complex emotions, you need to spend more time around them. While they're alive.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'Y')ou are drawing a line between animals and plants that is just as arbitrary as the line between humans and other animals.


Check out the latest findings on the genetic code for chimpanzees, and how much of that code is shared with homo sapiens. The line is thinner than you think, and certainly not arbitrary.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he truth is that this world is full of pain, and there is no concievable way that you can walk through your day without causing hurt. Even if you were just worried about animals, there's lots of cute furry little critters that had their homes destroyed and their drinking water poisoned to make room for your carrot. The best that you can do is accept that you are causing pain and you will experience pain, and try to make a world where the plants and animals can go on living in as healthy a way as possible, pain and all.


This is sincerely thoughtful stuff. Yes, humans are destructive and greedy - that seems to be our role on the planet. Sadly for everything else, we just haven't got enough natural predators on our trail (barring avian flu etc) to give us a dose of humility, and keep us in line. I used to be quite happy drinking soya milk (not for any animal rights reasons, I just hate the taste of dairy milk) then I found out the reason why half the rain forests are currently disappearing, is to grow soya beans. All each of us can really do, is to try to keep ourselves informed, and to try and live lifestyles leaving as little a destructive imprint as possible on the world we share. After all, as a species, we're not likely to be here much longer - so it would be hardly fair to mess it up completely for our inheritors.
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 18:50:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('untothislast', 'I')f you don't believe animals have, and express complex emotions, you need to spend more time around them. While they're alive.


I totaly do believe that. My point is, when I play with my dog, she's a mammal. So she shares a lot of the same facial expression, body language, etc that I would use to convey emotion. It is comparatively easy for me to presume what she's feeling or thinking (though I will never know conclusively.)

If I, instead of a dog, had a pet snake....well, biologically me and a snake are alot further apart. I can make some assumptions about what a snake is experiencing or thinking based on body language, but it's gonna be a lot harder. That doesn't infer that the snake doesn't have a complex and relevant experience of the world. For example, I can identify certain types of nerves that in humans convey pain. If I then find those in a dead snake, I can conclude that the snake was probably able to experience something similar to my pain sensation. Do snakes experience joy, sadness, boredom? Beats me. I don't know how you would know if they did.

Now me and a carrot...ohh boy. Way different. I can move in 20 seconds, further than most plants will move in their entire lives. A carrot doesn't have any of the forms of communication that I as a mammal am familiar with: no speach, no body language. Even our structure is radically different from eachother, so if I cut open a carrot, I don't see any nerves or anything that remind me of my nervous system. So the question then is...can I reasonably conclude that the carrot doesn't have any meaningful ability to experience the world, i.e. that it is not sentient. I'm not sure that you can say that at all. There is increasing evidence that plants have a whole host of biochemical responses to stimuli. I don't think that you can say that, for example, just because a plant doesn't withdraw from pain in the way a dog would, that it is incapable of experiencing pain.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('untothislast', 'Y')es, humans are destructive and greedy - that seems to be our role on the planet.


Well certainly that's part of it. The bigger reality though is that Mother Nature just didn't see fit to equip you with Chlorophyll. Instead she gave you a mouth and teeth and declared that the only way for you to survive was to kill and eat other things. I suppose one way to look at it is that plants provide their own energy and are therefore morally superior to animals. Realistically, I think you are what you are. You are a heterotroph. You have to eat other living things in order to live. You can decide to only eat plants, because you hope that maybe plants aren't sentient and don't mind being eaten. I personally don't see how that makes you any better or any worse morally. I think the truth is more along the lines of the first tenant of Budhism: "All life is suffering". The only way to avoid suffering, or to avoid causing suffering, is not to be alive.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby aldente » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 19:34:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'H')ey. At least my steak is a naturally occuring substance, not some genetically modified science project from Monsanto. Mass producing food is icky and environmentally destructive.


Eventhough I don't share your views when it comes to legitimizing the consumption of meat , on this you are defenitely correct. Monsantos single largests experimental gound is Irak by the way.

'Let them eat....pasta?

Read this:
Irak seed treasure destroyed
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby TheTurtle » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 22:33:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('untothislast', '
')Facetious statement. You're already off to a bad start. Have you ever heard of anyone swerving to avoid hitting a carrot in the road?


Carrots are not know to run out into the path of an automobile, so no I have never heard of such a thing.

As smallpoxgirl suggested earlier, I respect all life, be it plant or animal. Yes, I relate more readily to dogs than I do bacteria or your road-running carrot. I recognize that all living things have value, but I also recognize that all animals live by taking the lives of other living things (be it plant or animal ... the lamb is no more nor less moral than a lion, regardless of their lack of "capacity for philosophical reflection" over their actions.) I do not take other lives lightly and I am grateful for the food I receive so that my life continues. The day will come when I return the favor.

Like you, I am appalled by the commercial meat industry. I am also appalled by manufacturing plants that pump poisons into waterways in the process of making products for our frivolous consumption, just as I am appalled by agro-businesses that pump poisons into their fields to kill off "pests" so that they can grow redder tomatoes.
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby eastbay » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 23:37:12

The only way to avoid suffering, or to avoid causing suffering, is not to be alive.

... quite true. But we can all work at minimizing suffering. Another easy way to minimize suffering, besides not killing animals, is to write and say kinder things to other humans.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby untothislast » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 06:42:27

I'll lay it on the line. Facial, or other human similarities, play absolutely no part in my determination of another life form's entitlement to live an untroubled life. On my scale of reference, I don't see any reason - or explanation - why a human should be considered any more important than, say, an ant. Therefore, I do everything I can to avoid causing, what can only be presumed to be distress or suffering, to any other living creature.

Not being a member of that oddball cult which believes humans can survive on nothing but fresh air (no food; no water - no surprise then they're all dying young), I have to consume something to stay alive - and have therefore made it my personal choice to embrace vegetarianism. At 6ft 2' tall, and 210lbs, you can assume that after 25 years living this way, I'm not exactly wasting away. The reason why 'animals' are so called, is that they are said to possess an 'animus' - or inner self - and can be defined as ;

'A multicellular organism of the kingdom Animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure.'

The key passage here, is the 'pronounced response to stimuli'. If you know an animal has a similar response to pain and suffering as your own, (which is one of the key differences between it and the 'road-running carrot') and possesses the same desire to live and tend to the needs of its young as you do, then what right have you - apart from the one you confer on yourself via total dominance - to take away that right to life, and to inflict physical and emotional pain?

You don't.

And the guiding reason why you shoudn't, should be by the cultivation of that profoundly useful human response, called empathy.
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby aldente » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 18:06:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('untothislast', '
')Not being a member of that oddball cult which believes humans can survive on nothing but fresh air (no food; no water - no surprise then they're all dying young)...


I assume that you refer to what is known in the New Age movement as 'breatherianism'.
It is indeed a direct offense to common sense and probably should therefore not even be discussed on a forum like this. Documentation about 'true breatherians' to use the modern terminology only exists in two cases within the roman-catholic realm, and in both cases these were not examples of 'livestyle choices' as New Age breatherianism propagates:

Theres Neumann (von Konnersreuth)
http://www.catholictreasures.com/cartdescrip/10804.html

and

Nicolaus von der Fluehe (translated by a provided web-service, since not available in English):

Nicolaus von der Fluehe
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:00:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'A')nother easy way to minimize suffering, besides not killing animals, is to write and say kinder things to other humans.


:lol: Ohhh well. Looks like I'm coming back as a cockroach.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby aldente » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 00:45:52

No, you're not comming back as a cockroach. The subject is a slippery slope. Even I (vegetarian since nearly 20 years) eat meat sometimes when the occasion does not allow me to act otherwise.

A former friend of mine (hardcore vegan) became an architect and 'ironically' her first job was to design a slaughterhouse.
Last edited by aldente on Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:43:32, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby Odin » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 00:53:56

The vegetarians will change thier mind about eating mead if they were droped in stone age Europe. If you're a hunter-gatherer in temerate areas you either hunted in the winter or you starved. People who think eating meat is immoral or unnatural don't know jack sh*t about human evolution or . I see no difference between us eating meat and other animals eating meat, to do so is anthropocentric. The fact that vegans have to plan thier meals carefully so they get enough of the right amino acids shows very well how unnatural not eating animal products is.
"Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis." -Starvid

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics only applies in a closed system; Earth is NOT a closed system.
User avatar
Odin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat 28 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby Itch » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 01:39:19

Using words like "dominate," and "subjugate" to describe eating is silly. It does work when describing what is happening to animals in processing plants, since that entire enterprise is not used for eating; it is used to generate profit more than anything. That's why the government has you pay for such monstrosities through subsidization taxes. Using those verbs to describe some mammal having its neck broken on a deadfall is innacurate.

Domination, subjugation, and eating are applications of force used to achieve a certain goal. A valid example of domination and subjugation would be the fact that most people have to surrender a significant amount of time and energy to feudal lords in exchange for tokens that buy low quality food and shelter that varies in security.

Someone who catches a squirrel on a snare is eating, since that application was used for eating purposes.

To say that even that example of eating is domination and subjugation, or self-serving, is an obvious attempt to make people who eat differently feel guilty. A classic propaganda tactic.
User avatar
Itch
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest Waste of Oil=MEAT

Unread postby untothislast » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 05:52:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Odin', 'T')he vegetarians will change thier mind about eating mead if they were droped in stone age Europe. If you're a hunter-gatherer in temerate areas you either hunted in the winter or you starved. People who think eating meat is immoral or unnatural don't know jack sh*t about human evolution or . I see no difference between us eating meat and other animals eating meat, to do so is anthropocentric. The fact that vegans have to plan thier meals carefully so they get enough of the right amino acids shows very well how unnatural not eating animal products is.


Yes, extreme conditions will make people do anything they need to do, to survive. But you're not in that position yet, are you? And neither am I.

Eating meat is not unnatural - but it's certainly immoral. That is, it can certainly sustain us from a dietary point of view, so our bodies are obviously meant toaccommodate it. Is it wrong to take away another creature's life when altenatives exist - and you know for sure that animal would prefer to stay alive? Yes, of course. And until you produce a talking cow that's prepared to vouch otherwise, there is no debate on the matter.

I used to be a vegan - and yes, it was far too hard to keep to. My compromise, eating dairy products, is because the animal isn't killed as part of the process. The cheese, of course, contains a GM rennet alternative.
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron