BTW, this issue of petroeuros is developing...Here's the most recent news item re Russia and petroeuros...(while I don't agree with the strange "devaluation strategy" espoused by the article, as it ignores the whole macroeconomic dollar demand/liquidity issues, it ignores the obvious currency risks issues re oil priced in euros from the US perspective, and ignores the Iranian oil bourse/oil marker issues...

Nonetheless, this article is worthy reading simply for its emphasis on future Russian oil trade & euros):
http://www.europeanbusiness.eu.com/feat ... oeuro.html
December 2005
The petro-euro cometh
Oil has always been bought with dollars, but with two-thirds of Russia’s oil and gas exports going to the EU, the first euro deals are imminent. By Pavel Erochkine
COMMODITY MARKETS ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE booming. Oil prices are rocketing towards record highs. Tight supply and demand are pushing the world into a lengthy commodity boom. At the same time, the era of exclusively dollar-quoted commodity prices may be coming to the end. Contrary to popular myth, oil prices are quoted in US dollars not because the US is the major consumer of oil but for historic reasons. Pricing of oil goes back to the 1920s when the US and Mexico were the two main producers and exporters of oil and most oil contracts had to be in US dollars.
The dollar’s status as the global currency would be threatened, but allowing the euro into the oil trading system may be an elegant way for the US to devalue the dollar further.
Oil pricing has always had something artificial about it. At that time the so-called “basing-point system” was used, where the bas- ing point was calculated on the basis of the price of crude oil quoted in the Gulf of Mexico plus transportation costs, irrespective of the point of origin, from the Gulf of Mexico to the point of delivery. So, even if oil was shipped from Iran to a European country, the buyer had to pay the quoted price of oil plus the cost of transport from the Gulf of Mexico to Europe. Moreover, “market” prices themselves were kept largely immune from competitive forces by large Ameri- can oil companies, the so-called Seven Sisters.
This system survived the emergence of Venezuela as a major oil exporter in the late 1920s and was only changed in 1945. By that time the Middle East became a significant exporter, and England as well as other European countries thought it was unfair for them to pay extra, phantom, transport costs from the Gulf of Mexico for Middle-Eastern oil.
In the 1940s the US decided to start limiting its oil production in order to conserve it for future use. Thus, the US voluntarily agreed to a new system in which buyers of Middle-Eastern oil would pay market price for oil in the Gulf of Mex- ico plus actual transport costs. This arrangement made Middle-Eastern oil competitive and also allowed London to gradually become a major oil-trading centre.
KEY FACTS
- Oil is historically traded in dollars because the first oil came from the US and Mexico
-
Russia is likely to be the first oil exporter to trade in euros with the EU. However, this market has no existing price benchmarks.
{that is percisely why we should watch the Iranian oil bourse...which I think the Russians/Putin is welcoming...}
IT WOULD BE NATURAL FOR EUROPE-BASED EXCHANGES to start making oil contracts in both euros and dollars. The US dollar remains the only currency for settlement of oil contracts on world markets, which makes the EU and Russia dependent on the dollar. However, many central banks in OPEC and non-OPEC countries are switching their reserves from the dollar to other currencies. In 1975, the dollar accounted for 76% of official reserves held by IMF countries. By 2005 it has fallen to below 65%. The main alternative to the dollar is the euro and the next logical step would be for oil exporting countries to start quoting prices in euros.
Russia is likely to be the first major oil-exporting country to start trading oil in euros. The EU is Russia’s neighbour and main trading partner. Two-thirds of Russia’s oil and gas exports go to the EU.
{Actually I think its about 80 or 81% - a bit more than 2/3rds...} This step does not need to be taken by the state. It would only take one, or several, of Russia’s vertically integrated oil companies to start trading with their European counterparts in euros to set the ball rolling.
The main problem is the complete absence of past precedents and appropriate price benchmarks. {Here again, this is what makes the Iranian oil bourse critically important}
If this happens, the dollar’s status as the unchallengeable global currency would be threatened. History suggests that the US may find such arrangements in its own interests. President Nixon set the precedent by unpegging the dollar from the fluctuating gold standard, thus allowing its value to fall. Devaluation of the dollar helped to reduce oil prices and helped the US to adjust.
{that is a serious mis-reading of petrodollar recycling during the 1970s...}
HIGH OIL PRICES ARE STARTING TO HURT THE AMERICAN economy quite seriously again. It has taken several hits already. But the problems are much more fundamental than that: the US current account deficit has reached 6%, the budget deficit is not being dealt with, the saving rate is low, the housing market is in a classic bubble and the demographic situation is becoming ever more challenging.
Allowing the euro into the oil trading system may be an elegant way for the US policy makers to devalue the dollar further to ease the adjustment costs. This is not an unlikely scenario. American unilateralism in foreign affairs has always been accompanied in its policy towards exchange rates and history tends to repeat itself.
PHOTO GETTY