Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby winfixer » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 11:42:07

I think much older.

------------
Winfixer 2005
winfixer
 

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby MicroHydro » Sun 27 Nov 2005, 04:21:09

Thank you, thank you, thank you! I have been enlightened a great deal by all of the posters.

I wish to apologize for abandoning my own thread for a few weeks. I have been very busy moving over 10,000km. Finally things are settling down.

I agree with gg3, ideally it is Asimov Foundation time. Unfortunately, Hari Seldon had funding from the Galactic Empire itself. I don't see the NWO funding any sort of civilized refuge. They are preparing for a return to feudalism. CIA director Porter Goss has a 500 acre organic farm. This follows the construction of off the grid compounds by GW Bush and Al Gore. Maybe the elite are strung out on drugs, but the people who should know best are doomers. 8O

I just moved into a 21st century home that has no space heating or cooling, (this is normal in Waikato), there is a grid powered electric water heater. I have a car but it is very small, and I drive less than I used to. So I am still living the oil age lifestyle, but significantly powered down from my former life in North America. Thanks to Genesis Energy, I got to occupy the home on a cold rainy day with no power. Definitely less comfortable than what I have been accustomed to. Did I think powerdown was going to be all fun? WHAT WAS I THINKING!!!
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby Guest » Mon 28 Nov 2005, 01:46:15

Like a previous poster, I am 33. I never heard the term "peak oil" until 2003.

The weird thing is, in high school I had the good fortune to attend a semester-long program in on an organic farm in Vermont. We studied the debate on overpopulation--Julian Simon, etc. The school had a strong emphasis on the environment and sustainability. I did a project on CFCs and the ozone layer. We lived close to the land, and I appreciated the value of that.

Yet, even with those advantages (combined with a healthy skepticism for the American status quo) I never really connected the dots. I knew that American culture was messed up--too much TV, too much praise for the "free market," not enough attention paid to the fact that the much-vaunted market is not truly free because a truly free market is a function of free information (sorely lacking).

I got involved with politics (Howard Dean) after the birth of my daughter, but even with that it took about a year before I caught on to peak oil. I starting digging in and educating myself and changing my lifestyle. I now think that my trust in our political system was utterly misguided. NO ONE in power really wants to make big and necessary changes.

Jimmy Carter looks better and better, the smaller he gets in the rear-view mirror. The truth hurts, and Band-Aids are easy to find on both sides of the aisle.
Guest
 

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby GenghisKen » Sun 04 Dec 2005, 01:06:14

I am 38 left home when I was 15. Rode the rails for two years saw the end of the caboose in that short time. Met up with a traveling Singpainter who taught me a dying trade(all went vinyl letters,computer and no skill). Had no computer or access was only worried about making the money in each town to get to the next town(traveled a wide circuit in the western states Idaho summer arizona winter)Pulling my home behind me, first a camper trailer then one I built myself. Sales was the key as was return customers so that everytime I came back to a town I had the same customers and that they would want touch-up work or more signs and they had a new friend that needed something(most of the towns were too small to support a full time signpainter).
Gasoline I used as paint thinner(it evaporates quickly and doesnt thin the paints permantly, So I could paint in all temps by using dif amounts of thinner which was really handy when weather was colder than usual or hotter than usual). I was living.. I had no internet and had no time to contemplate my "Thinner' running out.
Settled down opened a shop met a wonderful australian woman and moved there(Here). Found PeakOil site (Matts) on accident. Since then been planning on the road again, as I see very little land that can support people permenatly today, and if you think you can just start farming by hand and things will be alright you are kidding yerself just as much as the economists are in their own way.
So to anser Your question... I was busy living(surviving) as from what I have read in this post.. many others were too.

Good Luck All. we gonna need it
User avatar
GenghisKen
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon 21 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 04 Dec 2005, 02:39:27

Micro Hydro--Happy to hear all is well! What an adventure! You must be so relieved to be there and getting settled. Please keep us informed about New Zealand. More and more people seem to want to move there.

Ghenghis --What a life you've led so far --and living such a cool life is the best reason I've heard for being ignorant of the peak oil problem.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Sun 04 Dec 2005, 21:00:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MicroHydro', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lowem', 'T')hey don't teach that stuff in school anyway.


Yikes, that explains a lot. I will turn 50 in December, and it is increasingly clear to me that the sort of university education I had may not even exist anymore.

Old school education in liberal arts was focused on how to reason. The classics were taught, often with Greek or Latin requirements. Belive it or not, even good public high schools in the US were still teaching Latin to university bound students in the 1960s. Skills were developed in reasoned debate - no logical fallacies, ad hominem attacks, arguments from authority, or straw man arguments allowed by the judges.


Um, Microhydro....please tell me you have heard of Political Correctness' Dumbing Down of all education?

It seems astonishing to me that anyone could have gotten through with as much information as you have and not realised that Political Correctness' effect has been to make sure that bright people cannot discriminate against the idiots, because the bright ones are taught at the same rate as what the dumb ones will learn at. Lest anyone think that Polictical Correctness is a recent addition to the Sum Total Of Human Disgraces, it actually started in 1941 with the release of the Norwood Report into British Education (Titled: Curriculum and Examinations In Secondary Schools: The Report of the Committee of the Secondary School Examinations Council Appointed by the President of the Board of Education in 1941).

Lately, of course, Political Correctness has gotten worse and worse, with TV on the one hand throttling off any ability to think about anything that is not presented as images immediately in front of you (other have posted on this topic, too), and the schools "not allowed" to teach (because that's discriminatory), and families being smashed to pieces (once again by Political Correctness), while the Economic Rationalists downsized every research facility there was ("Why must we subsidise intellectual curiosity?" asked Ronald Ray Gun in the early 1980's) plus the promotion of the "New Economy" that was less and less attentive to suppply of anything, while being more and more starry eyed over distractions like the Internet, especially the Dot Con boom.

My own "story"? I've posted here(at the forums) before about it, but I suppose others can handle it again:

I'm 36. I was aware from a fairly early age that there was some vast dis-jointing between what I was being told (ie: in every day in every way things just get better and better) and what I actually experienced: my father becoming unemployed, and staying that way for most of my schooling, then me being unable to find work after leaving the most useless of pretend education. OK, I decided to do something practical: become a boilermaker.

Surely they'd always need them, right?

WRONG. Although they are crying out for trained personell now, Boilermakers especially, they were sacking them as I tried to get an apprenticeship as one. Good move, but it gets better. After being unable to get work as a boilermaker, I retrained as a detail drafter (ie: technical drawing). Just as the Idiotic Economic Rationalists started sacking people in THAT field. Yep, I sure can pick 'em.

What would I liked to have done? Gone to Uni and gotten a Science and Engineering Degree, but that's forever beyond my capacity (economically) to achieve. If the job as the boilermaker had worked out (remember: I didn't even get an APPRENTICESHIP) I would have been more than able to pay-my-way through University.

OK, my interest in Peak -Oil -like ideas? Well, I had always been interested in steam locomotives, and discovered quite early that the lies about steam being replaced by diesel were just that: LIES. Steam could have easliy been made at least three times more efficient, and much less polluting, using technology developed in the 1890's, but no-one wanted to spend the money on that when Oil was less than $2 per barrel. Thus the almost indecently rapid transition to diesel and that at a time when Oil costs were rising, albeit not as spectacularly as they did later on.

The problem is that when everyone is persuaded to use just one source of energy for their transportation needs (ie: oil-based fuels) , then the price for that source of energy must naturally rise. That got me to thinking - if everyone starts using a resource (it doesn't matter what) then, surely not only does the price rise, the darn resource tends to deplete?

Thus at some future indeterminate time, we'd be facing an Oil shortage. OK, what to do about it? Well, I joined various volunteer organisations to try and develop technology (mainly steam) to a point where we'd have a non-oil energy source for transportation. I came quickly to the conclusion that the organisations were not serious, but I stuck it out (this was in the very early 1990's), partly becuase I just liked some of the people, partly because I liked the idea of steam locomotives, and partly because I thought there was a job in it (I have been unemployed for 14 years).

I'm a practical kinda guy, so I built various bits for the steam-powered machines, but the whole effort died thanks to Insurance Costs rising. The organisations stopped all formal work in the mid-to-late 1990's and then became defunct, partly a victim of the East Asian Economic Collapse in 1996-97, when the price of Oil went down to $5.60 per barrel, briefly. After the effort went to a more informal setting, I did (out of my own resources) a study into steam, but it was flawed, simply by not taking into account the Price of Oil and it's impact.

It took me two weeks to type out the 65 pages, re-doing and editing and finally publishing, just as Australian Industry lost all interest in the proposal. Good one, again. (and people wonder why I;m a cynic!)

So where do I fit in? Well, in spite of having almost no resources, I seem to have been active in trying to avert, then ameliorate the effects of Peak Oil for over 15 years. I won't say it's been a flop - it's just an idea that's too early, and the Clueless Executive Officers haven't been hammered sufficiently to realise what they are/were being offered.

LOL, mebbe I should ask for donations to "re-start" the effort from the members here? Ahh, I suppose that I'll get told off for that.

In any case, I formally was told about Peak Oil in 2002-03, and have been an active contributor ever since, to various Peak Oil forums. Up till that point, I hadn't heard of Peak Oil, but when i did, it made perfect sense to me. The typical poster here comes along and bemoans how they "were really depressed" about learning about Peak Oil. To me it was more of a relief, more of a "Gee, that makes sense...finally some intelligence about the internet!" moment than anything else.

What I want to know is: why is it that, given the signs of Oil troubles since the 1970's, why more people haven't been trying to "do something" (even if it's only inform others) since then?

My guess is that Political Correctness and Economic Rationalism/ Freemarket Fundamentalism have so dominated people's minds that the razzle-dazzle of Positive Thinking (In Every Day, In every Way, I Am Getting Better And Better) - also known as Cluelessness - had an unbreakable hold. After all, when things ARE going up, it takes a lot of mental grit and determination to be contrarian and remind oneself to think about the "up times" of the past, and remember they rapidly have turned into down times, almost effortlessly; whereas the up-times are the result of lots of hard work. And cheap energy.

[ramble mode off]

I dunno where I am to be placed then. I had not heard about Peak Oil formally until 2002-03, yet, I was doing things before the 1980's had ended to tackle the issue, even though I didn't know what it was called.

I know, I know, self-praise is no praise, but still, I was asked.
Last edited by ubercynicmeister on Sun 04 Dec 2005, 21:25:47, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 04 Dec 2005, 21:26:31

UBCynicmaster--Self praise is no praise, so allow me to join you. You may be technically unemployed but you've have had more of a job than most people with your efforts in steam. I'd like to know more about this. Could you direct me to some site? I suppose you think it's a much better idea than biodiesel for boats?

My deepest sympathies for the timing issue. People working in economies that are more resource dependant are even more deeply affected by business cycles. Well at least you avoided the dot com collapse, so there's always something to be grateful for. :-D
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Sun 04 Dec 2005, 21:56:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'U')BCynicmaster--Self praise is no praise, so allow me to join you. You may be technically unemployed but you've have had more of a job than most people with your efforts in steam. I'd like to know more about this. Could you direct me to some site? I suppose you think it's a much better idea than biodiesel for boats?

My deepest sympathies for the timing issue. People working in economies that are more resource dependant are even more deeply affected by business cycles. Well at least you avoided the dot com collapse, so there's always something to be grateful for. :-D


Hi Threadbare, I've just edited my post, as I got the guys' name wrong: it was Sir Cyril Norwood, not Norwich.

Sorry about that.

The best site for steam locomotives and all things technical is the following:

The Ultimate Steam Page

Here you will find out how to make steam locomotives at least 3 times (ie: 300% ) more efficient. You'll also find my own name (I shall decline to tell you what it is, as I'm actually highly embarrassed by the accolades) is the list of "steam designers". I've protested to the site organiser that i'd be better off as a "steam researcher", but he has told me to just shut up and sit down and take it like a man.

I have been asked by one Tom Blasigngame to become his Australian Representative for his steam-electric idea, but I am not in sufficient sympathy with that to do so, and I haven't found a polite way of letting Tom know this. The poor fellow has put decades of work into this, and I think that the effort should be rewarded, rather than be given what must seem to him as a back-handed insult by an Ignorant Australian who ought to know better.

Tom's work is referred to at this (above) site.

Steam powered ships: Skinner Engine Co. in the United States (no, I don't know of a URL) developed some brilliant uniflow engines which were extreme in their efficiency. With condensing, one can get the darn things to somewhere between 20% O'all efficiency and 30% o'all efficiency (depending on application & super-heat temperature).

I do apologise if I've confused you with the technical stuff...most people's eyes glaze over when I start to talk about steam (Enthalpy tables of steam from and at 212 degrees F, LOL, what a WONDERFUL way of boring most people rigid.)

Smaller steam powered vessels?

I honestly cannot tell you much, but I do have mates who are into steam launches (I'd like to build one, and - if I ever get the money - I'm gunna do so.) Myself, I've concentrated almost exclusively on steam locomotives, but there's a web-link you can go to if you wish to see about Steam Cars:

Pritchard Power

Biodiesel versus steam? HECK, one could go on for many pages debating the pros versus the cons. I will say this for steam: it can use any fuel, anywhere at any time. Biodiesel still has to be developed into commercial quantities. Steam was developed into commercial quantities and still is: all power generated anywhere relies on evaporated water (steam) at one stage or another - those clouds that form to rain upon the hydro schemes only because of evaporated water, y'know. And all power stations (nuclear, coal-fiored and gas fired) rely on steam to transmit the power of the combustion to turn the blades of a turbine.

Um , I haven't helped, have i?


I'm just about to log off, as I'm the Secretary of the New South Wales School Of Space Science, and I have about 700 faxes to send out from the local Uni. But first I have to get there.
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 04 Dec 2005, 22:21:32

Thanks UberCM. I'll be looking at that--there's something endearing, quaint about old steam engines. They're really kind of beautiful--hardly boring.

Steam, It's HOT. SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS :lol:
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby Guest » Sun 25 Dec 2005, 15:47:48

I was born in 63 and pretty much have always been aware of the incredibly waste around me (from living for a year in Southern California at age 7) but not so articulate about the precise consequences nor that the idea of running out had a specific name.

That I have two ABET-accredited engineering degrees is an aside. I honestly don't think it makes me any more appreciative of the details.
Guest
 

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby MicroHydro » Sun 25 Dec 2005, 17:10:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercynicmeister', 'U')m, Microhydro....please tell me you have heard of Political Correctness' Dumbing Down of all education?


The answer is that I am childless, so I haven't been paying much attention to educational trends. At my publically funded primary school in the southern US, I was put into a program for the gifted in 1964. There were only 3 other students in my tutorial group. This was part of the US response to Sputnik and the Soviet scientific threat - extra funding for gifted education. In my secondary school, the college bound students took 'honors' classes that were taught at a faster pace and in more depth than the ordinary classes. This was still in place when I went off to university in 1973.

I had noticed that generation X, even the university graduates, tended to have shocking knowledge deficits (Example; Cornell University graduate Ann Coulter, aged 45, asking a Canadian broadcaster why Canada helped the US in Vietnam but not in Iraq! A university graduate author and political commentator who didn't even have a clue about the political history of her own lifetime - mind boggling.), but I had assumed this had something to do with video games, cocaine, or MTV.

Yes, it does sound like the educational system was deliberately dumbed down to create the sheeple, passive salarymen and consumers.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby malcomatic_51 » Mon 26 Dec 2005, 15:47:01

MicroHydro,

Personally, I was 37 in 2000, and I am an engineer, so I have no excuses at all. My answer is I think quite typical of technocratic folk. The answer is, I wasn't really thinking about it. I am just old enough to remember the first Oil Crisis in 1973 and also the 1979/80 oil crisis. They've been saying "we've only 30 years oil left" for as long as I can remember. The implication is that we discover more as we use more. This impression was probably picked up from the North Sea oil field discoveries and the inflation of OPEC reserves in the 1980s. I think the reason so few otherwise educated, enquiring people have picked up on PO is simply that the message of "constant years of oil" has made a deep impression. We've always been running out of oil and oil has generally fallen in price, so we've been condioned to ignore danger signals.

A very important point is the attitude of authority. If sovereign authority informed us about PO, then people generally would start to take it seriously. This is because, unfortunately even amongst academics about 90+% of people have to be told what to believe because they don't have the courage or the determination to make their own minds up. Even now there is almost no sovereign patronage granted to PO, so the masses haven't a scooby's about it and if you try to explain it to them you get nowhere. If nobody knows about PO, then it can't be anything to worry about, can it?

Actually, the messages were there for those prepared to read them. Sir David Barran was quite emphatic in saying 30 years ago that the world would run out of capacity about now unless there were major new finds. So, there were those in the know, who were powerful, but were not listened to.

The future will view us as loons for the way we got caught out by an open secret, but that's what will happen. It will happen because of the nature of the human mind. Too few people are inquiring. Too few are capable of holding a contrarian view in the face of mass ignorance. Political leaders of real courage and wisdom just weren't on duty to provide leadership.
User avatar
malcomatic_51
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat 24 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby MicroHydro » Mon 26 Dec 2005, 16:09:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('malcomatic_51', 'T')he future will view us as loons for the way we got caught out by an open secret, but that's what will happen. It will happen because of the nature of the human mind. Too few people are inquiring. Too few are capable of holding a contrarian view in the face of mass ignorance. Political leaders of real courage and wisdom just weren't on duty to provide leadership.


Well said. Still it is staggering. Twelve years of cheap oil 1987-1999 erased the widespread knowledge of PO from the public mind. It is as if a warm fall convinced people that winter would never come.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby oowolf » Tue 27 Dec 2005, 20:45:02

I first heard of Hubbert and his oil depletion theory (it wasn't called peak oil) in Barry Commoner's book 'The Poverty of Power" which came out in the late 70's.
However, it was a chance finding of a book by the somewhat forgotten critic of industrial civilization Ralph Borsodi, called 'Flight from the City' that sent me into the woods. THAT was in 1972.
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby Terran » Tue 27 Dec 2005, 22:16:37

I was 13 years old in 2000, and just entering the world of high school. By then most of the things I've learned was through self educating, school had never taught a fraction of the scientific knowledge, logics, reasons, critical thinking, etc...

Back then I did understand how fossil fuels was a non-renewable resource and it's a matter of time its going to run out. I wasn't too concered, I'd simply thought we have 40 years of oil left, and 250 years worth of coal. Even then I did have some understanding of issues relating to deforestation, overpopulation, air pollution, and the ozone hole. Even that I always had the impression that science and technology will someday solve the problems around the world. I was a science and technology optimist.

Then as time went on I came to the realization through observation that things are not really in place. I hear all about the cut spendings on our education system, then the test results of how the majority of my peers in high school are reading below grade level it's the same with math. My senses grew more cynical about human nature.

Then 2003, I discovered peak oil through LATOC, on accident. After extensive research, then combining the other issues facing society today, I drew my conclusion that the future isn't looking so bright afterall. It just sickens me to see my peers totally oblivious to the things going around them, let alone the majority of them being so information illiterate. Most of them are too busy partying, shopping, playing video games, TV, trying to be "cool." At that time I was sickened by the quality if the education I was taught. Most of the materials taught to me was review, and I simply had no interest in reviewing. Classrooms are mainly about control, and they discourage critical thinking, let alone questioning. It's even harder to face that fact that high school was so easy yet there's still large numbers of my peers who can't even graduate after flunking too many classes. After that experence I really look down on my peers. I really started to think that my generation is just a wasted generation. Now its the 21st century, and many of my peers who I've been in high school with is going to have to face what is in store. I pretty much lost faith in my generation.

I look at mainstream society, they follow the same figures as high school. I find it even more discouraging. Welcome to the 21st century, the information age, yet the paradox of this age is despite all this abundance of information, mainstream society is so information deprived. What a wonderful 21st century reality we live in?

Well here I am, 18 years old about to start the year 2006. I find myself entering the world of college, chasing false hopes. Many said the end of the 20th century was the digital age, the age of computers, and the 21st century is the age of bioenginerring. I say the 21st century is the age of scarity, and false hopes. I find myself majoring in biotechnogy hoping to get a science degree, but what am I thinking? chasing after the false illusion of status in intelligence.

Just speaking from experence, we're headed towards rough times, and my generation isn't ready for whats in store as we edge into a more precarious era of civilization. It's really hard on me, and for the people my age who have their eyes and ears wide open.
User avatar
Terran
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed 07 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Berkeley CA

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby MicroHydro » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 06:22:33

Terran, even in times of population decline, some people thrive. Have you considered a career in geology or mining engineering? The world is going to have to devote increasing fractions of the global economy to resource extraction. There is a severe shortage of exploration geologists and mining engineers.

Biotechnology/Big Pharma has been booming for 40 years due to middle aged/old people with good health insurance. Peak middle class drug money is probably behind us. The only certain biotech growth fields are in antiaging treatments for the wealthy elite and bioweapons.

Yes, your friends might think you are evil if you end up working for BHP Billiton or Rio Tinto. F*** them. Your personal survival is your own business.
Cheers
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby killJOY » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 07:30:12

I've said this elsewhere, so quickly:

I'm 45, though I still [oops, what was I thinking?]

1974: I take "Earth Science" is high school. I want to be a geologist and get paid to climb volcanoes. We learn about global warming and finite resources, and the year 2000 is the cutoff date to do something about them.

1982: OK, so I major in geology for awhile, but keep failing math and chemistry. My farewell to geology is a course called "Geology and Human Affairs." It's really a course in energy. It's a standout course, because I leave thinking: holy shit. We have twenty years to get our act together.

1984: Graduate school in (yuck) English. I've deluded myself into thinking I can become a writer. I'm also trying to come out of the closet, which is the real reason I've gone away to major in English. My life is, quite simply, a mess.

1985: I move to a wooded state, and meet my current partner, a farmer. Twenty years of Reagan, Bush, Clinton and huge vehicles pass. We just shake our heads at the world. the "gay" culture seems just as frivolous as the rest.

2001: Several fanatics from the largest oil-bearing country in the world hijack several planes filled with oil products and crash them (with the tacit approval of the government of the largest oil-consuming country in the world) into several buildings. I think: this is the beginning of the end of the age of oil.

2003: Jay Hanson's dieoff.com crosses my screen. I stumble across an article written by a favorite professor of mine. Oh, yeah. Now I remember. And life has not been the same since.

I'm lucky enough to have a partner, family and friends who listen to me. I teach peak oil/ energy as a writing project to my students at the small U. where I work (so, in a sense, I'm back to my old geological interests). I've written several columns for the local newspaper and have been interviewed on the radio about peak oil. Nothing happened.

So now I'm just holed up, growing food, waiting for the plastic exploding inevitable.*




*Andy Warhol reference
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby Laurasia » Mon 09 Jan 2006, 00:25:30

In the seventies, I was raising my two children and was aware of the long lines at the gasoline stations. However, when cheap oil came back into our lives, I thought the political problems had been fixed and everything would be all right from then on. In the late eighties and the nineties I became quite environmentally aware, and it was from this perspective that I picked up a book by Thom Hartman called "the last hours of ancient sunlight'. This got my attention, but the date I remember 'internalizing' from that book was 2035 for the first signs of oil shocks. So I thought "phew thank goodness, when Al Gore becomes President he'll fix things and we'll get solar panels installed and drive neat Star Trek type cars and live to 150 years." (okay that's an exaggeration! but I was definitely an optimist looking forward to the turning of the Millennium and all the wonders that would follow.) But the Election came, and then the repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol, and then 911. In my disillusionment I had turned to the Internet to get my news (didn't quite trust the networks anymore), and one of the sites I used to read was 'Commondreams". It was there that I read an article that had a link to LATOC. I read that site from top to bottom, ordered the book, then read 'the party's over" and went into a complete tailspin. After about a month of surreality, I decided that I must stop mourning and start warning - which I did- family, both in US and in England, and people at work. Since then I'm trying to do the best I can to prepare and make up for the thirty odd years that I spent in a waking dream. It was a hard lesson to learn, but I'd rather know than still be sleepwalking.

regards,

L.
User avatar
Laurasia
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Toughing it out in suburbia

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby MicroHydro » Mon 09 Jan 2006, 05:26:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Laurasia', 'A')fter about a month of surreality, I decided that I must stop mourning and start warning - which I did- family, both in US and in England, and people at work. Since then I'm trying to do the best I can to prepare and make up for the thirty odd years that I spent in a waking dream. It was a hard lesson to learn, but I'd rather know than still be sleepwalking.

regards,

L.


Good on you! We must live in the world we have, and make the best of it.
Cheers
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Age 26 or older? What were you thinking?

Unread postby RacerJace » Mon 09 Jan 2006, 05:35:45

I had a kind dark humor moment today. As a kid I thought I would most likely die before I saw 30 years old. Well being a Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy fan I just realised the answer is 42. When I turn 42 it will be 2012 and we will have (pobably) just passed the peak of all liquid fossil fuels. Coincidently this is also when the Mayans predicted the end of time. 8O

.
User avatar
RacerJace
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests