Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Robert L Hirsch Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby rogerhb » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 16:54:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bruin', 'S')o who the heck is Robert Hirsch?

He wrote the Hirsch report which was sponsored by the US gov. Heinberg raves about the report (as in he likes it).
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby BabyPeanut » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 16:55:23

The Atlantic Council didn't fund the Hirsch report. How does hosting a copy count as "declaring PO?" The Hirsch does not declare PO is happeing, just how much lead time it would take to escape.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby OilsNotWell » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 17:47:10

The Atlantic Council, if I remember correctly is closely tied to the CIA, as in Woolsey, et al, the recent oil gaming, etc.
User avatar
OilsNotWell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby dinopello » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 23:11:25

I believe Matthew Simmons was or is on the Borad of Directors for ACUS.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby Starvid » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 16:51:19

Excellent!

Peak Oil awareness is now being embraced not only by fringe leftists and enviromentalists, but also by proper national security people.

Hirsch's paper is also linked to by one of my favorite pages Defense and National Interest www.d-n-i.net

Robert Hirsch bio (impressive!) http://www.defense-and-society.org/fcs/hirsch_bio.htm

The Atlantic Council is an not for profit organisation that provide "education" on NATO matters to the public.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Council
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby rogerhb » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 17:03:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'E')xcellent!

Peak Oil awareness is now being embraced not only by fringe leftists and enviromentalists, but also by proper national security people.

Hirsch's paper is also linked to by one of my favorite pages Defense and National Interest www.d-n-i.net

Robert Hirsch bio (impressive!) http://www.defense-and-society.org/fcs/hirsch_bio.htm

The Atlantic Council is an not for profit organisation that provide "education" on NATO matters to the public.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Council


So no chance of a war then?
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby Starvid » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 18:10:46

Huh?

What has that got to do with PO getting broader interest?
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby elroy » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 18:25:56

Among the sponsors on that link are the US army, navy, airforce etcetera. I dunno what to think of that.
Image
User avatar
elroy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Netherlands

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby rogerhb » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 18:27:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'H')uh?

What has that got to do with PO getting broader interest?


Generally, when Nato gets interested its because there is something it needs to know about. Nato is a defence/security organisation and it needs to know about potential threats in the near future. I would have thought that resource wars between nations would be something that would "get PO broader interest".
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby Starvid » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 20:11:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('elroy', 'A')mong the sponsors on that link are the US army, navy, airforce etcetera. I dunno what to think of that.

The US armed forces I have nothing against at all. They are full of nice clever people who just happens to be ordered about by a President with no wits what so ever.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'H')uh?

What has that got to do with PO getting broader interest?


Generally, when Nato gets interested its because there is something it needs to know about. Nato is a defence/security organisation and it needs to know about potential threats in the near future. I would have thought that resource wars between nations would be something that would "get PO broader interest".

The way I see it, people in the security and intelligence communities make a difference. Who in a position of power listens to environmentalists, half who are crazy fanatics? No one does, except to make populistic points in elections. But the military and intelligence people have acces to the ears of governments.
And if we see resource wars (I think Iraq was only partly one) they sure as hell won't be NATO wars. Some of NATO's member states, sure, but not NATO operations.

But energy supply is a security issue. American and NATO soldiers uphold the stability in the Middle East (or at least did until the invasion of Iraq). Anything that changes our security of supply situation (like PO) is clearly at least partly a military issue, and I'll sleep better now that I know those people in command maybe at least will start discussing these vital issues.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby rogerhb » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 20:17:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'A')nd if we see resource wars (I think Iraq was only partly one) they sure as hell won't be NATO wars. Some of NATO's member states, sure, but not NATO operations.


Afghanistan has a NATO op under UN authorisation.

But also, NATO intelligence is generally shared between all NATO members (or if not it bloody well should be).
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby Starvid » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 21:00:06

Not to go OT, but A-stan certainly wasn't a resource war. Sure, there was some bonus with a pipeline, but the invasion was a pure revenge war for the WTC attacks, unlike Iraq which had nothing at all to do with it.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Atlantic Council Declares PO

Postby rogerhb » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 21:11:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'N')ot to go OT, but A-stan certainly wasn't a resource war. Sure, there was some bonus with a pipeline, but the invasion was a pure revenge war for the WTC attacks, unlike Iraq which had nothing at all to do with it.


Welcome to the stone-age resource war:

Hey, those guys have our rocks, we need those rocks!
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC: "Shaping the Peak"

Postby BabyPeanut » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 11:46:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url=http://www.worldoil.com/Magazine/MAGAZINE_DETAIL.asp?ART_ID=2696&MONTH_YEAR=Oct-2005]Shaping the peak of world oil production (link)[/url]
WorldOil.com Vol. 226 No. 10
October 2005

The bell curve has a sharp crest, and you can't see it coming.
Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC

To gain insight into the potential time-varying shape of world oil production peaking, this author examined regions that have already peaked. Unencumbered regions and countries were considered. All had significant peak production and all are past their peak. Their experience shows that the onset of peaking can occur quite suddenly and is not obvious, even a year prior to the event. The peaking of world conventional oil production may or may not follow previous trends, but these observations may be valuable for planning.

more at web site
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

Re: Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC: "Shaping the Peak"

Postby Leanan » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 12:31:05

Interesting. He argues that the peak, when it comes, will be sharp and unexpected, and technology and "drilling harder" won't help.

Not sure that his analysis of small areas will apply to the world peak, though...
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC: "Shaping the Peak"

Postby thorn » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 12:49:54

Take a look at the UK curve, it dropped like a rock. 8O


Image
User avatar
thorn
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue 29 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC: "Shaping the Peak"

Postby Leanan » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 12:56:20

I think that steep decline is typical of underwater oil fields such as the North Sea.

Several oil industry insiders hang out at The Oil Drum, and they said because costs are extremely high for deepwater, it's in the company's interest to pump out the oil as fast as possible. So they do, which produces a high, sharp peak, followed by a steep decline.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC: "Shaping the Peak"

Postby Egon_1 » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 14:36:23

Leanan,

Given market conditions (high demand, high prices, etc.), don't you think that oil will be produced as fast as possible everywhere?
User avatar
Egon_1
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue 22 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: North America

Re: Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC: "Shaping the Peak"

Postby Leanan » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 14:43:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')iven market conditions (high demand, high prices, etc.), don't you think that oil will be produced as fast as possible everywhere?


No, actually, I don't. The classic example: Iran. They don't want to invest in the high-tech equipment needed to increase their production. They see it as a waste of money. Why borrow money or let foreigners own part of your resources, just to produce them faster? Doing it the slower, old-fashioned way means they'll still have oil to sell later, probably for even more money. They don't look at it the way a corporation would. They see it as saving part of a valuable and nonrenewing resource for their children.

IMO, the only thing that would force countries like Iran to produce faster would be lower prices (because they need a certain amount of money to keep their economies running). Well, that and the threat of "regime change."
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Robert L. Hirsch, SAIC: "Shaping the Peak"

Postby Free » Fri 18 Nov 2005, 14:46:11

Why should you increase your production cost per barrel if the price you sell it for stays the same? (Or even goes down if you produce more...) Companies look at profit, not to satisfy a demand.

As far as I understand Leanans info it means that it equates less cost per barrel if you extract deepwater as fast as possible - but that doesn't mean it is like that for all kind of fields?

(Edit: Damn beaten 3 minutes...)
"Democracy means the opportunity to be everyone's slave."
Karl Kraus
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests