Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil is Contrived!

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby Ludi » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 20:20:56

We also fail to remember we don't know the people we are talking to (or about). Case in point:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'K')ing M. Save your breath.

There are two types of people on this board.

People who are very dissatisified with the current structure of society. They think and hope Peak Oil is going to destroy the status quo. They think that is a good thing.


Typical extreme misunderstanding of how many of us feel. The sad thing is, Daryl apparently isn't interested in finding out how the doomers and not-quite-doomers-yet actually feel about things. He'd rather make this truly unkind generalization.

Daryl, why are you here? What are you trying to learn/teach here?
Ludi
 

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby doufus » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 20:35:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', 'T')his does not qualify you as an energy specialist, economist, sociologist,
statistical modeller, petro geologist, energy market analyst or
anything else.

You need all of the latter and more to really understand PO so may I humbly suggest you are not in a "position to know"" all that much at all.



As you believe. I'll stand on my track record. Isn't that what counts? So far, I have been spot on.

Post Peakoil: the Slow Decline?

These predictions were made in DEC 2004.

[/quote]

Uh what predictions? I read the thread and all i saw was your usual
vague, ink blot test of "there will be" statements that do a hand
waving "over there" umm "prediction" that things will get bad.

You know if you're into the crystal ball game then you could make it
easy on the rest of us by being SPECIFIC and tied to DATES.

Like a series of bullet points that operationalise a specific outcome
and date. Otherwise it's just a case of pick your evidence.

Shit, it's happening oil's up. Oh no it dropped. jesus, unemployment
climbed oh but only in that sector. god a well lost production.

You're gazing at clouds man and just pick out the one that looks
more like an elephant than the rest.

You know if you actually COULD predict these things, corporations
would break down you door to offer you zillions or else wire you up
to a machine against your will for the rest of your life.

Yep, you're as rare as a talking fish brother.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby MonteQuest » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 20:45:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', ' ')You know if you're into the crystal ball game then you could make it
easy on the rest of us by being SPECIFIC and tied to DATES.

Like a series of bullet points that operationalise a specific outcome
and date. Otherwise it's just a case of pick your evidence.


Impossible. All you can do is look at trends. As I have continued to always caveat; it all depends upon rate and magnitude and how the monkeys will react.

But our current path is unsustainable. If the wheels fall off is not the question, it is when. Since we don't know the URR and we won't know the rate of oil decline, and we don't know how soon the Central banks will exit the dollar, we can only explore the possibilities and watch the trends that develop and their impacts. The cliff is getting steeper.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby Daryl » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 22:12:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')e also fail to remember we don't know the people we are talking to (or about). Case in point:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'K')ing M. Save your breath.

There are two types of people on this board.

People who are very dissatisified with the current structure of society. They think and hope Peak Oil is going to destroy the status quo. They think that is a good thing.


Typical extreme misunderstanding of how many of us feel. The sad thing is, Daryl apparently isn't interested in finding out how the doomers and not-quite-doomers-yet actually feel about things. He'd rather make this truly unkind generalization.

Daryl, why are you here? What are you trying to learn/teach here?



Well, I think people who advocate going back to bicycle transportation should think about the implications of that view. The process of this society converting back to bicycle transportation necessarily means total chaos and die-off. Hey I like bicycles. The whole idea sounds neat. But I don't want myself or my kids going through the chaos necessary to get from here to there. I don't make value judgements about cars and suburbs. It's what we've got. Deal with it. Now that its fuel is disappearing, we've got to figure out a way to keep everyone from dying. That's what I'm doing here. It is annoying to be constantly flamed by people who advocate a die-off. Oh, I'm sorry, who think the necessity of a die-off is as sure a thing as the 2nd law of freaking-thermodynamics.

I think these are two fundamentally different mind-sets. Are you in-between?
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby Ludi » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 22:32:08

I don't know anyone who "advocates" a die-off, they just see it as inevitable.

I'm in-between. I want to avert a die-off ( a sudden die-off I mean - I do believe we need to reduce our population, but not by killing people, letting them starve, etc) , however, as much as I've studied this, especially agriculture, the less I believe it's probable we will be able to do such a thing. This is because I feel we are at or near peak oil, and I don't see evidence of solutions being implemented in a timely manner.

My natural optimism keeps me a moderate, my (admittedly poor) reasoning ability pushes me toward the doomer camp.
Ludi
 

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby Daryl » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 23:08:53

Well, don't believe this nonsense that the US doesn't have the resources to build electric cars and more power plants. The cost is peanuts and it will be easily accomplished in the crisis environment that higher oil prices will create. Obviously EV's and nuke power plants are not a utopian solution, but we should be happy the technology is available and affordable, otherwise the prospects might be grim. Society will still have serious environmental issues to address and a whole lot of other funky stuff as well. But nuclear electricity generation will buy us alot of time, maybe even enough that we find utopian techno-fix.

In the very long run, I agree with doomers in one sense. The sun will burn out one day. I doubt we're getting off the planet and if you know anything about astronomy, there is no where to go that we can reach or find anyway. Our job as living organisms is to fight to survive as long as we can, not get depressed and give up.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby lakeweb » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 23:41:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'B')ut our current path is unsustainable. If the wheels fall off is not the question, it is when. Since we don't know the URR and we won't know the rate of oil decline, and we don't know how soon the Central banks will exit the dollar...


This assumes the central banks of the world will bail. So far as I know, only one central bank was subverted politically and that was Venezuela. Asia is very dependent on our consumerism. It isn't like Europe can just fill the gap. Indonesia, IMHO, has been on the brink of revolution for some time. It is simplistic to think that the U.S. will fail while the rest of the world tra-la-la's along. Because of the nature of monies, we are all in this together.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')he cliff is getting steeper.


No doubt.

Best, Dan.
User avatar
lakeweb
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun 06 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Arizona
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby doufus » Sat 12 Nov 2005, 23:54:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', ' ')You know if you're into the crystal ball game then you could make it
easy on the rest of us by being SPECIFIC and tied to DATES.

Like a series of bullet points that operationalise a specific outcome
and date. Otherwise it's just a case of pick your evidence.


Impossible. All you can do is look at trends. As I have continued to always caveat; it all depends upon rate and magnitude and how the monkeys will react.

But our current path is unsustainable. If the wheels fall off is not the question, it is when. Since we don't know the URR and we won't know the rate of oil decline, and we don't know how soon the Central banks will exit the dollar, we can only explore the possibilities and watch the trends that develop and their impacts. The cliff is getting steeper.


Oh Jeez. No-one would deny there's a big task ahead. But negative
crystal ball gazing yields nothing. You're really not predicting anything
other than vague assertions and scenarios.

Like I said, if your "predictions" had real credibility and practical
utility you'd be swamped in offers. The truth is that in the kaleidoscope
of contrasting, conflicting and complex trends, you see what you
want to see.

That's all.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby doufus » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:00:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'W')ell, don't believe this nonsense that the US doesn't have the resources to build electric cars and more power plants. The cost is peanuts and it will be easily accomplished in the crisis environment that higher oil prices will create. Obviously EV's and nuke power plants are not a utopian solution, but we should be happy the technology is available and affordable, otherwise the prospects might be grim. Society will still have serious environmental issues to address and a whole lot of other funky stuff as well. But nuclear electricity generation will buy us alot of time, maybe even enough that we find utopian techno-fix.

In the very long run, I agree with doomers in one sense. The sun will burn out one day. I doubt we're getting off the planet and if you know anything about astronomy, there is no where to go that we can reach or find anyway. Our job as living organisms is to fight to survive as long as we can, not get depressed and give up.


Right on brother! As I've said in other posts, if doomers ran the
planet we would never have left the caves. A handful of us and
thousands of carnivores out there? No way. Impossible. Do the
numbers.

Human beings will meet this challenge. We have failings but we also
have amazing capacity when up against the wall.

What other choice do we have? A gun and medievalism?

I doubt it.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby Ebyss » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:04:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'W')ell, don't believe this nonsense that the US doesn't have the resources to build electric cars and more power plants. The cost is peanuts and it will be easily accomplished in the crisis environment that higher oil prices will create.


Then why aren't they doing this now, before this "crisis environment"? Are we to assume that the government knows nothing about Peak Oil, and that we're the only ones who've sussed it? Never mind that Matt Simmons actually advised George W. about energy... you think he managed to leave out the *big secret* that is Peak Oil? Since he's one of the most outspoken Peak Oilers who is actually in the know more than any of us, what are the chances the government don't know the full extent of what's happening? I'll tell you -- NIL.

So what have they done to prevent this crisis/catastrophe/apocalypse (delete as applicable)? What have they actually done? What actions have they taken to prevent this "crisis environment"? What have they done to mitigate the potentially disastrous consequences, given the fact that implementing a nationwide fleet of electric cars and nuclear plants is "peanuts"?

Bottom line : It's not a future thing, it's a now thing. One year, 5 years.. who gives a sh*t? It's going to happen, we all know it... so what is the government doing NOW to deal with it?

I don't see electric cars, I don't see massive efforts to replace oil in our day to day lives. I do see a war, a resource war. And that tells me we're f*cked, because if changing over to electric cars was so freakin' easy, you'd think they'd have done it by now.

We have higher oil prices. We're not at crisis point yet. Why are the government waiting for it to get worse by not impementing the easy changes you speak of? I don't care if they can happen, I care if they will happen. So far they aren't.
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby azreal60 » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:14:41

A few comments, as i think i am starting to see where the frustrated new people who are posting are missing what monte and matt and ludi and others are trying to say.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ell, don't believe this nonsense that the US doesn't have the resources to build electric cars and more power plants. The cost is peanuts and it will be easily accomplished in the crisis environment that higher oil prices will create


Daryl, no where did anyone say we Can't do this. Yes, with about 15 years of Huge investment we could do this. By huge, i mean the resources of an entire nation focused on this one thing. During that time, oil will decline up to 30 percent. (assuming we notice the peak year one and it only declines 2 percent a year on average). The point is, the doomers are disagreeing that that is what we are Going to do. No one on this board who is realistic argues there are not some solutions to avoid everyone dying. To use a Matt example, rome died out from resource depletion. Where there things the romans could have done to save their extremely advanced civilization? Of course. Did they do them? Nope.

Why will we not do what you see as such an obvious thing to do? Because people have tied themselves, litterally to the death, to a vision of how they should act. It's called a culture. Our very culture enshrines consumption. Most of western civilization does the same. Go all over the world, and successful businesspeople are the ones who increase growth. Increasing growth Always means more resource depletion. Are you telling me your going to change an entire culture by posting on a board on the internet? If you can do that, hell, you better change your sig to "jesus".

Now, does this mean you shouldn't try? The only people on this board who would say that are the sarcastic, the fatalistic, or the people who just don't care anymore. Why do you think we have a forum called planning for the future? Or the conservation and effciancy forum. These are places for the individual to work out things they can do to help the situation, from the mundane to the biggest policy planning.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou know if you're into the crystal ball game then you could make it
easy on the rest of us by being SPECIFIC and tied to DATES.


If monte could do that, he would have to change his sig as well. I think it would look something like G-O-D.
Remember, we are talking about numbers on the order of the whole worlds oil supply depletion and then reaction. The amount of factors involved are more than anyone man, even as well written as monte, could possibly predict with any accuracy. The only possible thing you could do with a system that complex is look at generalitys, which is generally what we do.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ven, worst-case scenario if things totally hit the crapper, we can return to a 19th Century level of technology instead of Mad Max/The Postman (Brin's version, not the crappy Hollywood) where every town is run by a petty dictator and the land between is the realm of bandits and murderers.


I don't think anyone on this board is Begging for this type of thing to happen. That's why they call it the worst case senario. But i would say 90 percent of america would consider returning to 19th century level of tech a disaster approaching appocapliptic proportions. Heck, most of the 1st world would. And if that's what your avocating, hell, most of the doomers are saying the same thing. They just don't all that much like the idea, anymore than anyone else who has been snorting oil coke their whole life does. Do you like the idea of laundry day? :-D

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')eople who are very dissatisified with the current structure of society. They think and hope Peak Oil is going to destroy the status quo. They think that is a good thing.

The other people, like you and myself and others, are trying to discuss how society is going to make the adjustment from cheap oil and still be successful. It is going to be a challenge and there are some risks involved, but it is obviously doable.


It's obvious to you that's it doable. But if 90 percent(and that's a generous number) of the rest of the world isn't helping you with the problem because they aren't aware of it till your 3 to 4 years into peak oil, you really think you by yourself are up to that challenge?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f global civilization powers down, billions will die, if not everybody in the nuclear wars that would inevitably break out

That's assuming a heck of alot without a whole lot of facts. In fact, your sounding exactly like a classic doomer. Yes, the death rate would climb if global civilization powers down, but it doesn't have to be a step off a cliff. The only reason it gets that way is people ignoring the problem or saying it's easily solved.

The other way involves a very simple priciple of science. When the food available to a population is greatly reduced, it's numbers decrease. It doesn't happen by war or disease ( we are talking lab animals here) it happens because the animals stop making as many babies. What makes you think humans are so removed from how animals behave that the principle doesn't hold for us as well? By the way, a better explination of what i just said can be found in The story of B by Daniel Quinn. He sounds alot like monte, cept he also writes among the best stories i have ever read.

Ok, my hands are killing me, and so is my head. Even someone who likes to think about this all doesn't like hearing that civilization is about to come crashing down or at least powering down. Specially when i'm looking at my overdue bill pile. :roll:
Azreal60
azreal60
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sat 26 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Madison,Wisconsin
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby perplexd » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:32:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'I')f global civilization powers down, billions will die, if not everybody in the nuclear wars that would inevitably break out.


If the growth model is not abandoned, billions will die anyway.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'T')he people in group one want this to happen. They are under the naive illusion that life will be better afterward.


Absolutely not. Do you know what the word "doom" actually means?
The passing of abundant oil is not shaping up to be a soft landing for those with the fattest asses. - Jan Lundberg
User avatar
perplexd
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Shoreline, Washington
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby perplexd » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:43:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'W')ell, don't believe this nonsense that the US doesn't have the resources to build electric cars and more power plants. The cost is peanuts


We don't have the energy resources to run what we have already. That cost isn't peanuts if it has to be bought from a world already starved for energy. We use oil because it is the best for automobiles. Now you want to tell us that something else is even cheaper? You realize we import 60% of our oil, right? What does that tell you?

I think you need to take a second look at your assumptions. Either we've been making the last 50 years a lot harder on ourselves than we had to, or your alternatives are just not as good as oil period.
The passing of abundant oil is not shaping up to be a soft landing for those with the fattest asses. - Jan Lundberg
User avatar
perplexd
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Shoreline, Washington
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby perplexd » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:47:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', 'H')uman beings will meet this challenge. We have failings but we also have amazing capacity when up against the wall.

What other choice do we have? A gun and medievalism?


You seem to think this amazing century of invention and leisure is the default, whereas all those millenia of suffering and death and pain were deviations from the norm.

You'll have to excuse us doomers for disagreeing with that perspective. The road of medievalism seems to us like it has been quite popular in some form or another, and that this has been a special time, a time that the luckiest of us should cherish well while it lasts.
The passing of abundant oil is not shaping up to be a soft landing for those with the fattest asses. - Jan Lundberg
User avatar
perplexd
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Shoreline, Washington
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby perplexd » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:52:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('azreal60', 'D')o you like the idea of laundry day? :-D


The red beans and rice sure sounds good, and after a long day of washing clothes, it would probably taste like salvation.

That was a great post.
The passing of abundant oil is not shaping up to be a soft landing for those with the fattest asses. - Jan Lundberg
User avatar
perplexd
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Shoreline, Washington
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby doufus » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 01:14:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', '
')
So what have they done to prevent this crisis/catastrophe/apocalypse (delete as applicable)? What have they actually done? What actions have they taken to prevent this "crisis environment"? What have they done to mitigate the potentially disastrous consequences, given the fact that implementing a nationwide fleet of electric cars and nuclear plants is "peanuts"?

Bottom line : It's not a future thing, it's a now thing. One year, 5 years.. who gives a sh*t? It's going to happen, we all know it... so what is the government doing NOW to deal with it?

I don't see electric cars, I don't see massive efforts to replace oil in our day to day lives. I do see a war, a resource war. And that tells me we're f*cked, because if changing over to electric cars was so freakin' easy, you'd think they'd have done it by now.


Well people are actually buying EVs in measurable numbers for the
first time. Maybe the gov't knows what the rest of the world f^&^n
knows about yanks- u use energy with NO regard and the capacity
to cut it down is enormous.

It's called a switch. Turn off your F-n aircons, mansions of lights,
deep fried every f-n thing, 3000 entertainment appliances, 3 TVs,
3 computers, 84 kitchen gizmos, electric can openers (oh fer
F*(* sake!), electric toothbrushes (oh no....), and then there's
that thing you drive that most armies would mount a cannon
on to justify the fuel burn.

Most of all get off yer fat arses and walk or ride. You may have less
diabetes and heart disease that way. You might even be able to
save shitloads of energy in the manufature and distribution of the
drugs and medication you need to keep your obese bodies alive.

You bitch about fuel costs and yet i bet you pay more for orange
juice and a bottle of water.

Grow up. PO isn't the end of civilisation. It's the end of a lifestyle-
yours!
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby MonteQuest » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 01:20:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('azreal60', 'W')hy will we not do what you see as such an obvious thing to do? Because people have tied themselves, litterally to the death, to a vision of how they should act. It's called a culture. Our very culture enshrines consumption. Most of western civilization does the same. Go all over the world, and successful businesspeople are the ones who increase growth. Increasing growth Always means more resource depletion. Are you telling me your going to change an entire culture by posting on a board on the internet? If you can do that, hell, you better change your sig to "jesus".


Yes, we have two driving forces to overcome: cultural direction and asset inertia.

It 's like trying to turn the Titanic on a dime. Can't be done.

Even our own government (the Hirsh Report) says it wil necessitate 10 to 20 years pre-peak preparedness to alleviate massive social/economical upheaval.

So, are these detractors maintaining that peak oil is not coming until 2015 at the very earliest? And that we are going to start tomorrow to mitigate it's impacts?

Not in any Energy Plan I've seen out of the government lately.

Peak oil is tomorrow in planning terms.

As Matt Simmons would say, "We have no plan B."
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby JohnDenver » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 04:49:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'E')ven our own government (the Hirsh Report) says it wil necessitate 10 to 20 years pre-peak preparedness to alleviate massive social/economical upheaval.


From the Hirsch report (P. 2): "The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof."

We should also note that the Hirsch report proposes an entirely business-as-usual solution. As the report states (P. 50):
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ur focus is on large-scale, physical mitigation, as opposed to policy actions, e.g. tax credits, rationing, automobile speed restrictions, etc. We define physical mitigation as 1) implementation of technologies that can substantially reduce the consumption of liquid fuels (improved fuel efficiency) while still delivering comparable service, and 2) the construction and operation of facilities that yield large quantities of liquid fuels.


More specifically, the report recommends (P. 53):
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1'). Fuel efficient transportation
2. Heavy oil/Oil sands
3. Coal liquefaction
4. Enhanced oil recovery
5. Gas-to-liquids


As you can see, this is a pro-automobile, pro-sprawl, pro-GM, pro-Exxon solution. Essentially, the report is saying is that it will take at least 10 years of preparation to maintain business-as-usual, assuming that virtually no serious conservation policies are implemented.

There is another, quicker way. Demand side measures like those proposed in the IEA Report "Saving Oil in a Hurry", which don't take 10 years to scale up:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')mployer trip reduction
Area-wide ridesharing
Public transit improvements
HOV lanes
Park and ride lots
Bike and walk facilities
Parking pricing at work
Parking pricing: non-work
Congestion pricing
Compressed work weak
Telecommuting
Land use planning
Smog/VMT(Vehicle Miles Traveled) tax
Public appeals to reduce consumption without price effects
Public appeals to reduce consumption with price effects
Ban on motor sports events
Ban on driving by car to large scale events
Speed restrictions
Ban on driving every second Sunday
Ban on driving every second Weekend
General ban on Sunday driving
Restriction on use by administrative degree (public authorities set days on which drivers are banned)
Restriction on use by registration number (on each weekday two final registration numbers banned)
Implementation of fuel supply ordinance (rationing)

(Source: Saving Oil in a Hurry: Measures for Rapid Demand Restraint in Transport (pdf), P. 27)
Peak Oil Debunked
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby orz » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 04:54:10

Nice addition JD.

I'm sure someone is going to come in and call these measures fascist, but similar methods have been enacted by the government before. Only question is will they have the gall to do so.
User avatar
orz
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is Contrived!

Postby doufus » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 05:08:31

Yep,

nice contrib JD. But doomers will just say it's impossible to implement,
not enough even if it was and too late in any case.

The only reason doomers stay alive is to bring the rest of us down.

It would be sad if it wasn't so funny.

Reminds me of monty python skits- "You think you had it bad, we lived
in a hole in the ground! That's nothing, we lived at the bottom of a
lake, ate broken glass for breakfast ya da ya da ya da."

Boring but funny.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests