Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Diesel or Gasoline?

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Discrepancy between diesel and gasoline

Unread postby aahala » Fri 21 Oct 2005, 15:15:24

What you think may be true. I don't know about those aspects.

I thought the big spread between diesel and gasoline that has only recently
appeared was due to the NG situation. There's some large users who
have duel fuel heating capacity between NG and heating oil(diesel), so the price of NG and heating oil tend to move in the same direction.
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Discrepancy between diesel and gasoline

Unread postby NeoPeasant » Fri 21 Oct 2005, 19:08:58

Some think that they are preferentially refining more gas at the expense of deisel production to avoid gasoline shortages.

Oil Drum Thread
NeoPeasant
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby cornholio » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 00:05:21

I was planning to buy a Volkswagen Diesel Golf this spring (pushing 48mpg highway)... BUT now that diesel is around 3.30/gallon while gasoline is around 2.30/gallon I am not sure what to do. If diesel remains much more expensive the efficiency of diesel is offset by the lower cost of gasoline. Diesel has always been less expensive but this may not remain true if... 1) low sulfer diesel requirements may increase the cost of diesel this year 2) Refineries may try to produce more gasoline at the expense of diesel to keep the more commonly used gasoline prices low 3) Europe will not bail us out by sending diesel (which they use more of) as they have with gasoline : )

?any thoughts about the wisdom of switching to diesel in the US? Thanks...
User avatar
cornholio
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: MO, USA

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby seldom_seen » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 01:12:52

I don't think the price differential between diesal and gas will last forever.

Gasoline imports have started to drop slightly, it will be interesting to see where this graph is a couple months from now:

Image

Furthermore it was noted in th WSJ that the big oil companies are capping prices at the stations to force out the independents. That won't last forever.

I think Adam Smith's invisible hand is keeping prices in check a bit so as not to completely destroy the economy before the christmas mass orgy of consumerism.

I would buy a diesel myself.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 01:46:46

Get the diesel, and learn to make your own fuel for it. A diesel engine can be run on biodiesel. You don't need the oil companies.

Or you could build an electric car out of an old Geo Metro, Honda Civic, Chevy S10, or some sort of 60s/70s vintage sports car cheaper than the cost of a NEW Volkswagen diesel. Something to keep in mind since the waiting list for the VW diesel will be *long*.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby Starvid » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 05:47:27

If you want a car with even better mileage, go for the Volkswagen Lupo. Only problem the car is awfully ugly.
Image



Better then to use the Audi A2 TDI 1.2. It is the same car as the Lupo except prettier and better. And also more expensive.
Image


Both cars use only 3 liters of diesel per 100 kilometers. That is 78,4 mpg. Not bad at all.

If any moderator knows how to shrink the pics, please do. I have no idea how you're supposed to do that.


Mileage converter http://www.eforecourt.com/l_100km_mpg_convert.htm
Last edited by Starvid on Mon 31 Oct 2005, 19:48:59, edited 1 time in total.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby cornholio » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 10:03:42

Unfortunately the Lupo isn't available in the US... Nothing smaller than the Golf or Beetle is sold here : ( by VW.... I think that smaller cars have sold poorly here in the past... But I think that if they sold the smaller efficient cars today (after we have seen 3.00/gallon gas) they would be going like hotcakes...

I'll hold out and get the diesel, i guess... I cant believe that they would preferentially let diesel run so high when it affects trucking/commerce as much as it does...

I'll look into biodiesel... Also I think I heard coal gassification made diesel but not gasoline? That would be a reason to get a diesel...

Electric would be perfect for most everything I do... It really is a small town. Still, I dont know that I have the expertise to build an electric car myself. I can change my battery and oil, but thats about it : (
User avatar
cornholio
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: MO, USA

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby WisJim » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 10:17:16

I'd get the diesel, if you have gas stations handy that sell diesel fuel. Ideally that would be a nearby truck stop.

We have a 1982 diesel Rabbit that my father-in-law bought new, that we are refurbishing. He would get upset when his mileage dropped under 50mpg. One of my sons just found a 1982 diesel Rabbit, and a 1985 diesel Golf, so they are now getting new filters, injection timing checked, etc. With 3 of them we can now justify buying more of the tools we need to set the injection timing, change timing belts, etc.

A reminder to anyone with VW Rabbit/Golf diesels: don't neglect to change the timing belt at the recommended mileage, as a broken belt can allow the valves and pistons to attempt to occupy the same space inside the engine, leading to large repair bills or engine replacement.

As others have mentioned, diesel allows you the option of biodiesel or a veggie oil conversion in the future, too.
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby oiless » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 17:35:39

Diesels run very well on furnace oil. This goes for the older ones I've dealt with, don't know about the heavily emission controlled electronically controlled new cars though...
Used to know a guy that made a very good living pumping out old heating oil tanks, he'd get payed a fortune to pump them out, remove the tanks, and dispose of the oil. He disposed it right into his equipment and diesel trucks. (After separating the water and filtering it of course.)
User avatar
oiless
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Energy Balance for Gasoline and Diesel Negative?

Unread postby Whitecrab » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 00:52:22

Despite the very positive energy returns of oil, is it true that gasoline and diesel have a negative EROI (Energy Returned On energy Invested)? If this report is true, then biofuels and electric vehicle schemes with marginal energy yields will still be large improvements, quite worth doing in the medium term (while fossil fuel is expensive but still available). Particularily so if some of the energy inputs can be electricity from renewables, solar heat, or animal energy.

I've only found this one source - any others for or against this conclusion?

Energy Balance/Life Cycle Inventory for Ethanol, Biodiesel and Petroleum Fuels

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Ethanol versus Gasoline
A United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service Report number 814 titled "Estimating The Net Energy Balance Of Corn Ethanol: An Update " was published in July of 2002. The Conclusion states in part: "Corn ethanol is energy efficient, as indicated by an energy ratio of 1.34; that is, for every Btu dedicated to producing ethanol, there is a 34-percent energy gain." A similar study done in 1995 indicated only a 1.24 energy ratio. The increase is accounted for by an increase in corn yields and greater efficiencies in the ethanol production process. As a result, energy efficiency in the production of ethanol is increasing.

The concept of "input efficiencies for fossil energy sources" was introduced as a component of the study. This was meant to account for the fossil energy used to extract, transport and manufacture the raw material (crude oil) into the final energy product (gasoline). According to the study, gasoline has an energy ratio of 0.805. In other words, for every unit of energy dedicated to the production of gasoline there is a 19.5 percent energy loss.

In summary, the finished liquid fuel energy yield for fossil fuel dedicated to the production of ethanol is 1.34 but only 0.74 for gasoline. In other words the energy yield of ethanol is (1.34/0.74) or 81 percent greater than the comparable yield for gasoline.

Bio-Diesel versus Petroleum Diesel
A similar study was co-sponsored by the United States Department of Energy and the USDA, entitled, "Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus."

The study, published in May 1998, states; "Biodiesel yields 3.2 units of fuel product energy for every unit of fossil energy consumed in its life cycle." The report continues, "By contrast, Petroleum diesel's life cycle yields only 0.83 units of fuel energy per unit of fossil energy consumed." According to this analysis, the energy yield of biodiesel is (3.2/0.83) 280 percent greater than petroleum diesel fuel.

Summary - Energy Balance/Energy Life Cycle Inventory
$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', 'Fuel * Energy yield Net Energy (loss) or gain
Gasoline 0.805 (19.5 percent)
Diesel 0.843 (15.7 percent)
Ethanol 1.34 34 percent
Biodiesel 3.20 220 percent ')

* Life cycle yield in liquid fuel Btus for each Btu of fossil fuel energy consumed.

The positive energy ratio displayed by ethanol and biodiesel is accounted for by the contribution of solar energy collected by the crop from which the fuel is made. This energy is considered "renewable" because a new crop is raised each year. Fossil fuels, on the other hand, originate from fossilized plants and animals stored beneath the earth's surface in a process that took millions of years.

Another consideration discussed in the 2002 net energy report relates to the specific demand for liquid fuels and the relative abundance of energy sources used to make these renewable fuels. The report explains, "Only about 17 percent of the energy used to produce ethanol comes from liquid fuels such as gasoline and diesel fuel. For every 1 Btu of liquid fuel used to produce ethanol, there is a 6.34 Btu gain."


FYI: Pimentel says that US corn ethanol is a 20% energy loss if you market the dry distillers grain, a byproduct - it's 29% loss if you don't. (Source: Pimentel, David . “Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative.” Natural Resources Research. Volume 12 (2003), Issue 2, pp. 127-134)

Edit: But please, lets not turn this into a biofuel thread. My real interest is, is the energy yield of oil-to-gasoline or oil-to-diesel positive or not?
Last edited by Whitecrab on Sun 30 Oct 2005, 01:53:51, edited 3 times in total.
"Our forces are now closer to the center of Baghdad than most American commuters are to their downtown office."
--Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, April 2003
Whitecrab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 299
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Energy Balance for Gasoline and Diesel Negative?

Unread postby nero » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 01:40:58

Of course producing gasoline and diesel from crude requires energy.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Energy Balance for Gasoline and Diesel Negative?

Unread postby pilferage » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 01:43:15

It's not beyond the realm of possibility, especially when considering that because of refining, oil must loose some of it's original energy content and always has a negative energy yield compared to it's crude form. Biofuels are efficiently using some FF input to gain even more energy by way of photosynthesis. Kinda like using FF's in the construction of wind turbines, or building your own hydroelectric system...
However, due to the current methods of BD/ethanol production, I doubt it's scalable. And more importantly, even if it is, I doubt we'll see widespread use... The current suppliers of energy would never let go of this market. :P

It's up to us, the consumer, to embrace these technologies by any means possible! :)
"Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. "
User avatar
pilferage
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun 21 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: ~170ft/lbs@0rpm (on my bike)

Re: Energy Balance for Gasoline and Diesel Negative?

Unread postby coyote » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 02:54:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ccording to the study, gasoline has an energy ratio of 0.805. In other words, for every unit of energy dedicated to the production of gasoline there is a 19.5 percent energy loss.


If you're including the amount of energy in the crude oil used as a feedstock for the gasoline, and then add the energy required for the refinement process, then of course there will be a net energy loss. Anything else would be magic.

This is what CalgaryEng was talking about in a different thread over in the Welcome forum, about EROEI being irrelevant. Of course, EROEI isn't completely irrelevant; the point of EROEI is that if it requires significant amounts of hydrocarbons to create significant amounts of some alternative energy source, then the alternative isn't an energy 'source' at all, just an energy carrier, such as hydrogen. At least, that's how I understand it. But what he said is true: there will always be a net loss when converting a raw energy source into something useful. - Lou.

"Oil is not the problem." - Charlie
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby dooberheim » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 05:31:45

The new VW diesels (Pumpe Duse) are a common rail design (without the fuel rail, but sill super high pressuire injection) that require special synthetic oil which is very hard to get. At a dealer your oil changes will run over $100 each time. The oil must be changed at an approved service center or the engine warranty will be voided. Believe me, with the repair record of new VWs, you WANT that warranty.

Perhaps we will see other manufacturers selling small diesels here in the next couple of years. Ford has a diesel Focus that they sell elsewhere that I'd like to look at.

Also, the Union of Concerned Scientists did a study on diesel versus gasoline, and concluded when the costs and enviromental issues were all weighed, that gasoline came out somewhat better. Here's the link

http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_vehicles/fu ... lemma.html

DK
Carpe Scrotum!
User avatar
dooberheim
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Columbia, MO

Re: Energy Balance for Gasoline and Diesel Negative?

Unread postby mididoctors » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 11:09:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ccording to the study, gasoline has an energy ratio of 0.805. In other words, for every unit of energy dedicated to the production of gasoline there is a 19.5 percent energy loss.


If you're including the amount of energy in the crude oil used as a feedstock for the gasoline, and then add the energy required for the refinement process, then of course there will be a net energy loss. Anything else would be magic.




AT BEST..REPEAT AT BEST THIS IS MISLEADING AND IMO A COMPLETE DOWNRIGHT LIE

what do we mean by 19.5% energy loss?

well we mean that out of the total potential energy in a unit of crude 19.5% of it is required to make the other 80.5% usable

NOTE THE OTHER 80.5% HAS NOT BEEN USED YET!

it does not mean we used more energy to make the gasoline than was in the gasoline

this LCA analysis is a deeply flawed presentation that totally subverts EROEI calculations to give the impression of the opposite truth or more benevolently a different relative truth of endowment vs rate

question: lets see the clouds part and the enlightenment sink in

how much of the potential energy in each unit crude is required to make the 1.34 units of ethanol?

this is a scandal

important Coyote is not a liar the study is... he has just been fooled in the way INTENDED by the presentation

ie coyote..peace

Boris
London
User avatar
mididoctors
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon 30 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: London

Re: Energy Balance for Gasoline and Diesel Negative?

Unread postby aahala » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 11:31:58

Of course you have a loss of energy from crude to its refined products.
The trees in your yard have so much energy, but you can't use that
energy unless you expend more, cutting them down for fire wood.

Don't put a lot of faith in ANY of the percentages. The USDA is a stakeholder in the gasoline/ethanol debate, it's not an unbiased source.
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy Balance for Gasoline and Diesel Negative?

Unread postby mididoctors » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 12:25:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Whitecrab', '
')
Edit: But please, lets not turn this into a biofuel thread. My real interest is, is the energy yield of oil-to-gasoline or oil-to-diesel positive or not?


read my post answer these questions

assume their figures are correct

question 1

how much energy in barrels of crude equivalent does it take to produce 1.34 barrels of ethanol?

question 2

how much energy in barrels of crude equivalent does it take to produce 1.34 barrels of gasoline?

question 3

if more energy is pUt into gasoline diesel production than is in the fuel and total products delivered each day to US market is 13 million barrels approx then at least 13 million barrels worth of energy is spent by some other source to make it as the total oil inputs is 20 million barrels of which 90% is turned into something or other from fuel to plastics

the question remains how come you can turn on your computer and post as pretty much the entire electrical or gas production of the US would have to be used to equate to the energy equation suggested (or misleading gives the impression) by this study?


Boris
London
User avatar
mididoctors
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon 30 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: London
Top

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby Slowpoke » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 15:21:54

Union of Concerned Scientists hmm ? That doesn't sound like a "scientifical" name... also, I'd be interested to know who are their sponsors...

What they overlook is the fact that diesel engines don't need (petro)diesel to operate. I know what you'll say, but the energy value of E100 is a lot lower than that of B100.

Also, isn't it true that sulphur in (petro)diesel has the same role lead has in gasoline ? I don't see a great deal many cars running on leaded nowadays...
User avatar
Slowpoke
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon 24 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby cornholio » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 19:30:17

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/09 ... panese.php

Hopefully 2006 will be a year that the US market opens up to small efficient imports... It may not be necessary to buy a more expensive diesel to get 50 mpg highway...
User avatar
cornholio
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: MO, USA

Re: Gasoline or Diesel in the US?

Unread postby LadyRuby » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 22:35:27

I'd love to see more of these small imports, assuming we can get more SUVs off the road since they will make pancakes out of the smaller cars.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest