Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjust?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby rogerhb » Sun 16 Oct 2005, 23:58:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', 'I')ronic how doomers complain about bankruptcies in the U.S. and then complain about debt.


My objection is to people AND companies/corporations living beyond their means and then expecting a bailout. Also I object to companies plundering pension funds.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', 'A')ren't bankruptcies a good thing, then? And my experience is showing that Americans are starting to learn to save.


They might be learning a little too late.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby GoIllini » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 00:04:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '
')They might be learning a little too late.


Well, I would argue that some of the economic downturn is due just as much to consumers pulling back as it is to "Peak Oil."

ASPO, generally one of the most pessimistic groups studying energy that's somewhat considered still in the mainstream, is pushing its prediction for the peak back to 2011.

I think America's already hit its bottom with our attitude about consumer, trade, and federal debt. The big-deficit neocons are getting run out of Washington. Consumer spending is cutting back. And we're getting China to stop keeping the Yuan low. We've probably got at least three to five years to turn things around before the peak, and better yet, when peak oil hits, we'll have the energy and food needed to pay off the rest.
User avatar
GoIllini
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Sat 05 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 00:29:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'P')fft! I guess we can just ignore the huge debt we piled up with cheap energy. It will be easy to service the cheap debt with expensive debt. :roll:

Ironic how doomers complain about bankruptcies in the U.S. and then complain about debt.

Aren't bankruptcies a good thing, then? And my experience is showing that Americans are starting to learn to save.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e have a end of cheap energy crisis, not an energy crisis. We have an end of readily available energy propblem. We have an end to a readily portable energy problem. We have an end to a high density energy problem. We have a scalability problem. All of this adds up to an economic crisis that has no solution short of a powerdown and a reduction in the standard of living.

Again: Nuclear
Again: Coal.

You complain about massive debts in this country, then conveniently forget that, by your own words, the U.S. has 28% of the world's coal supply. Apparently, when the cost of energy skyrockets, as you claim, American coal is somehow going to be cheap and not be used to pay off the country's trade debts.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e must learn to live within our means, and within the limits of the environment.

The only limit that the environment imposes on nuclear is nature's ability to deal with waste heat. And some of our newer reactors are getting better thermal to electric efficiency, thus reducing some of the waste heat.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy is it that so few get this? All I hear are solutions in isolation.

How will you service the debt?

Again, coal. When $75 Million buys a quad of energy, coal is an excellent deal. I've already got enough bought up to cover the 60 BOE/year I figure I'll need for the next 30 years- and I'm just a college student!

The government has proven in the past that it can get away with windfall energy taxes. Stick a 65% windfall tax on U.S. coal production after peak oil hits, and the government will be out of debt in two years.

Meanwhile, China's in deep trouble. The country:

1) Depends on worldwide demand for electronics, toys, and trinkets. I can assure you those'll be the first to go in any kind of recession.

2) Uses more than twice as much energy per GDP produced than the U.S.

Our "massive" trade debt to China will be enough to keep China plugging along for a year or two after peak oil hits, at most. And assuming we manage to revalue the Yuan sooner, that might get reduced to six to twelve months.

Dire predictions about peak oil are almost always predicated on energy and food getting more expensive. If that happens, America is in great shape, because we've got 25-30% of the world's coal and around 30-40% of the world's sustainable cropland.


I rest my case. From this response to my post, it is quite obvious this person does not get it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy is it that so few get this? All I hear are solutions in isolation.

How will you service the debt?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 00:32:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', 'A')nd my experience is showing that Americans are starting to learn to save.


Is that why the US savings rate is less than zero?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 00:36:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', ' ')Apparently, when the cost of energy skyrockets, as you claim, American coal is somehow going to be cheap and not be used to pay off the country's trade debts.


The sale of a commodity does not pay off debts, only a growth in real GDP by the production of real goods and services does. Coal will not be cheap, either.

Currently, we have a 248 trillion deviratives market in a 45 trillion world GDP.

They call that "financial speculation" and it can disappear with the snap of your fingers.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Ibon » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 01:59:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', ' ') All of this adds up to an economic crisis that has no solution short of a powerdown and a reduction in the standard of living.


Absolutely. I think we all get that. This economic crisis is a catalyst toward transition, but not neccessarily a collapse into and of itself.
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 02:22:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', ' ') All of this adds up to an economic crisis that has no solution short of a powerdown and a reduction in the standard of living.


Absolutely. I think we all get that. This economic crisis is a catalyst toward transition, but not neccessarily a collapse into and of itself.


The US reverting to a third-world existence reeks strongly of a collapse to most people. If you mean utter chaos, Mad Max collapse. It could get that bad someday, but not right away, IMHO.

The potential is there, though. Look at the preview we saw in NO when the lights, water, and food went out. :roll:

What I see is, say, NG gets more expensive. Companies will outsource to countries where NG is cheaper than here to maintain production rather than move to conservation or alternatives. Watch the news. You will see it happen. I also see that the "transition" will be towards more outsourcing, protectionist legislation, and resource wars.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Macsporan » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 02:33:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Currently, we have a 248 trillion deviratives market in a 45 trillion world GDP.

They call that "financial speculation" and it can disappear with the snap of your fingers.


Ah Laisezz-faire Capitalism: the economically responsible alternative.

So much fun it hurts.
Son of the Enlightenment
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 07:09:08

"rogerhb wrote:

They might be learning a little too late.


Well, I would argue that some of the economic downturn is due just as much to consumers pulling back as it is to "Peak Oil."

ASPO, generally one of the most pessimistic groups studying energy that's somewhat considered still in the mainstream, is pushing its prediction for the peak back to 2011.

I think America's already hit its bottom with our attitude about consumer, trade, and federal debt. The big-deficit neocons are getting run out of Washington. Consumer spending is cutting back. And we're getting China to stop keeping the Yuan low. We've probably got at least three to five years to turn things around before the peak, and better yet, when peak oil hits, we'll have the energy and food needed to pay off the rest."



Nice on topic comment!

We've all heard the standard rants on how awful and evil suburbia is. Can we change the subject and look for some silver linings, just for a change of pace?

One positive thing about the exburbs is that businessis have relocated there. ie. all the jobs aren't in the city center. In an expensive energy era, there will have to be some rationalization, but I think key clusters of suburbs might do OK,especially if they are built around large industrial/office parks. This will actually shorten commutes. Everybody can't move back to the city center, they won't fit anyway. Electric or hydrogen bus transit systems have the flexibility required and are inexpensive to implement. Combined with moped and bicycly riding, I think some of the new exburbs could actually thrive.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby DigitalCubano » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 07:36:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', ' ')Currently, we have a 248 trillion deviratives market in a 45 trillion world GDP.


They call that "financial speculation" and it can disappear with the snap of your fingers.


Derivatives are not speculation. Rather, derivatives are probably the antithesis of speculation as they require an abundance of analysis to properly price (i.e. avoid arbitrage). They represent the evolution in the qualitative and quantitative understanding of value in the market.

Blaming the derivatives markets for speculative behavior is like blaming a steak knife for stabbing someone. They are both instruments that can be abused.
User avatar
DigitalCubano
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 19 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby DigitalCubano » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 08:07:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'O')ne positive thing about the exburbs is that businessis have relocated there. ie. all the jobs aren't in the city center. In an expensive energy era, there will have to be some rationalization, but I think key clusters of suburbs might do OK,especially if they are built around large industrial/office parks. This will actually shorten commutes. Everybody can't move back to the city center, they won't fit anyway.


Daryl, I like the cut of your jib! :wink: I think some folks are coming to the same conclusion in some of the worst sprawl centers. The status quo is stressed and so people are starting to look to urban planners for solutions. I think that if you cut away the doomer "noise" in Kunstler's rants, his thoughts apropos suburban reinvention have merit: transform them so that they are more independent. That demands, as you noted, some change in suburb zoning, specifically by introducing a greater mix of industrial and commercial spaces. In other words, allocation of more space for local agriculture and distribution and the reintroduction of the "middle man" as a logistics facilitator between local and national stakeholders and markets to make it all work.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'E')lectric or hydrogen bus transit systems have the flexibility required and are inexpensive to implement. Combined with moped and bicycly riding, I think some of the new exburbs could actually thrive.


Regardless of the ultimate form of this transformation, I think that many doomers shortchange the ability of the average person to change and the value of our accumulated knowledge base. I still think that we will have to "powerdown," especially with regards to transportation. As a result, things will be different, but not necessarily worse.

Oh yeah, I'd be remiss if I didn't throw out a potential silver-lining for you: telecommuting. Can it work?
User avatar
DigitalCubano
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 19 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Macsporan » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 08:10:03

Anyone who does not possess a time machine and who makes money predicting the future is gambling.

Imagine what the world would be like if all that money were available for alternate energy research, railways, or for that matter ending Third World Hunger?

Down with speculators!

Burn the last derivative in the ashes of the last warlord!

(wanders off muttering elderly Marxist slogans)
Son of the Enlightenment
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 09:17:38

I have read that some exburbs have become such large employment centers that there is more rush hour traffic coming out of the city center now to the exburb than there is going into the city. Imagining a resource scarce future, perhaps we could use the space taken up by malls and commercial strips and replace them with dense condominium residential structures, so more people can live nearer the jobs. After all, the malls are basically selling cheap useless junk made in Asia anyway. I agree with Kunstler on that. So we don't buy as much stuff, so what? The consumption economy will shift back to a more balanced economy, with more local distributors, agriculture, small manufacturers making stuff we really need. More bicycle manufacturing, fewer tanning huts. Sounds good to me.

In other words, many suburbs may have the ability to transform themselves into the model 19th century American towns that Kunstler seems to regard as the pinnacle of human civilization.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby mommy22 » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 10:11:20

Not sure if this follows the course of this discussion, but one idea that may happen is perhaps there will be a return of the breadman. Or milkman. When I was young, and our family lived out in the boonies, the breadman came around to our neighborhood and made deliveries. When our family lived in Belgium a few years ago, I had a milkman deliver our milk, eggs, and butter. Perhaps something on that order could come to suberbia, perhaps at a neighborhood park or school, or church and then people could walk to get some of their groceries on a regular basis. Kind of like a bookmobile service for food? And simultaneously, those of us with excess produce to sell, or barter service could sell/advertise there.
I guess I have a hard time visualizing an instant die-off transformation, and I want to believe that communities can sustain and support each other through creativity and hard work and cooperation.
User avatar
mommy22
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 10:42:30

Another positive. I can accept the premise that too many Americans have a problem being anti-authoritarian, selfish and wasteful. But Americans are also very adaptable. We lack stability and traditions. This could end up being a plus because we are able to undergo rapid change more easily than other societies. I think to during the next 50 years Americans are going to have to utilize this ability to the maximum. I forsee a series of energy shocks forcing seismic shifts in the American system toward the European/Japanese model. Under duress, the depth and power of American ingenuity and creativity might be as much of a suprise as anything.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Doly » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 10:53:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'U')nder duress, the depth and power of American ingenuity and creativity might be as much of a suprise as anything.


Maybe. But one of the things the Americans need to learn is that you can't always trust that someone will have the ingenuity and creativity to solve your problems. Some problems are fundamentally unsolvable.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby Ibon » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:28:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DigitalCubano', ' ')I think that many doomers shortchange the ability of the average person to change and the value of our accumulated knowledge base. I still think that we will have to "powerdown," especially with regards to transportation. As a result, things will be different, but not necessarily worse.


This is very true. Here is my morning rant. Many of the doomers, particularly those who have dedicated years or decades to the issues of environmental degradation and rallied for sustainability only found this falling on deaf ears as the status quo continued consuming away. It is very understandable that they have developed a view of the masses as intractable and incapable of shifting, almost as bound to their behavior as many animals are to their behavioral instincts. Doomers claim we are in overshoot and heading for an unavoidable collapse basing this on ecological case studies of animals and past human societies. Their certainty that we are heading the same way has been reinforced because for the past several decades as a result of cheap oil we have indeed acted exactly as the ecological model has predicted. We have overshot and we have brought ourselves to the brink of collapse and like some mindless goats on a small island we continue to eat away our future resources with a mindless abandon.

Here is the fallacy in the doomers certainty of collapse. They confuse the cause and effect of human behavior and cheap oil. It is not our intractable behavior as a species that has brought us to the brink but instead it is the abundant cheap oil that has allowed us to follow mindlessly a course that has lead us to an unsustainable world. Cheap oil built up our technology but made things so easy that it has turned into an addictive drug that has actually held back innovation in both technology and culture for the past decades as it removed the integrity inherent in survival and made us soft like slugs. It has kept us basically stupid I would say for the past 20-30 years. The current liquid fuel crisis in fossil fuels is the first serious bump in the road. If we just go back one year peak oil and energy issues weren't in the press and the pioneers who understood the severity of this issue were still talking about why this isn't headline news. Well here we are a year later and the cause and effect on more expensive energy has suddenly caused the mindless goats to wake up. We are witnessing the momentum growing toward a huge cultural shift. It hasn't yet really taken off but it is rapidly gaining momentum. We will wean ourselves from the addiction of cheap energy and our survival instincts that have seemed so long dormant will awaken out of necessity. It will actually increase our quality of life even though materially we may lose something as it will put meaning back into our existence. Roche should be concerned about dropping sales of Prozac once this crisis hits.

As regards to the neoconservative agenda heading us toward resource wars I don't see this happening. They are losing their appeal by the day and the interdependent global economy and geopolitics will check mate them just as the American public is now waking up to the lies and propaganda. They will be looked back on as an anomaly and another symptom of the cheap oil energy addiction. Neo conservatives are like babies in diapers having a tantrum because their ability to suck on the baby bottle of cheap oil is being taken away from them and they now have to share the sandbox with others. The fear of resource wars is as obsolete as nuclear wars. The emerging energy crisis reveals that there are no long term strategies to win this except a global cooperative effort. Radicals like neoconservatives will have no place at the table and they will not maintain their power base much longer. This is part of the cultural shift that you can see already playing out in Mr. George Bush's current popularity under 40%. This is an indictment of the whole administration he leads or who leads him like a puppet on a string.

We got some tough times ahead but they are incredibly exciting times as well. We are witnessing history in the making as we undergo an unprecedented cultural shift. The weaning of this cheap energy addiction and the hardships this will cause may will put dignity and meaning back into our human existence and therefore give us a greater quality of life even though we may lose many of the conveniences of modern living. This is anything but collapse.
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby holmes » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:49:30

When bodies are piled on top of one another and the only "wilderness" or cropland that is available is central park or some urban "greenway" everything is optimistic, even though the eyes and spirit are blind and decayed. No other way is known or understood. Its all "normal".
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 17:14:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DigitalCubano', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', ' ')Currently, we have a 248 trillion deviratives market in a 45 trillion world GDP.


They call that "financial speculation" and it can disappear with the snap of your fingers.


Derivatives are not speculation. Rather, derivatives are probably the antithesis of speculation as they require an abundance of analysis to properly price (i.e. avoid arbitrage). They represent the evolution in the qualitative and quantitative understanding of value in the market.

Blaming the derivatives markets for speculative behavior is like blaming a steak knife for stabbing someone. They are both instruments that can be abused.


I am not assessing blame, but looking at reality. A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its value from the value of other financial instruments or an underlying asset. It has no intrinsic value. By their very nature they encourage high degrees of speculation. It is the size of the derivatives market based upon “financial speculation” that worries many. We’ve been able to clone hundreds of trillions of dollars of metaphysical wealth from the seeds of debt.

It’s all a mirage.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he job of a derivatives trader is like that of a bookie once removed, taking bets on people making bets.— Linda Davies


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')We view them as time bombs both for the parties that deal in them and the economic system ... In our view ... derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal." — Warren Buffett
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: For Slow Transformationists - How Will the Suburbs Adjus

Unread postby jtmorgan61 » Mon 17 Oct 2005, 17:40:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') have read that some exburbs have become such large employment centers that there is more rush hour traffic coming out of the city center now to the exburb than there is going into the city.


I can verify that this is true. The area I live in (UTC), 25 miles from downtown, has basically become at least a second commercial center if not THE commercial center of san diego due to the fact that a ton of office parks were built here in the 80's.
User avatar
jtmorgan61
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron