by marko » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 10:40:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')hy will joblessness cause prices to drop? This is traditional economic theory, but will it be valid this time around?
I don't see why not. People without jobs have much less money to spend. When you have much less money chasing the same number of goods, you get deflation, or a drop in prices. That will apply to oil as well.
Even if the Fed is pumping money into the economy, by creating money to buy US debt to support government spending, unless we have a radical change in government policy, that money will go to pay for military adventures and handouts to the rich. The rich don't spend most of their money on consumables. They save it or use it to buy big assets. Such a policy might help to keep real estate prices from going through the floor (and to ensure that only the rich can afford foreclosed real estate). And it might provide support for the prices of armored Mercedes and Humvees. But it won't keep the prices of consumables like food and oil from dropping.
Once the Asian central banks' creation of money to buy dollars leads to hyperinflation in Asian countries, forcing the Asian countries to abandon their support of the dollar, however, the dollar will plummet, and the prices for most consumables will soar in dollar terms, because they are imported. Even domestically grown food will rise in price in this scenario, because its price reflects large inputs of imported oil and natural gas. As prices rise here, the Fed will be forced to create more money to pay for the expanding US deficit. Meanwhile, rising interest rates will sharply increase the US government's debt service costs. This will quickly lead to hyperinflation. At that point, the dollar price of oil will be going through the roof. Wages will rise, too, for those lucky enough to have jobs, but not as fast as the prices of consumables.
The dollar will ultimately become worthless, and the government will try to issue a new currency, perhaps a "new dollar" worth a million old dollars. Whatever it is, it will no longer be accepted as payment for oil. It might have to be backed by gold.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', 'I') think the initial phases of the crash are coming soon. In fact, it may have already begun at small degrees as reflected in the stock markets. They have all turned down - and so has oil, gold, and commodities. Since 1996, the movement of most major markets in the US has tracked M3 money supply. There is another factor to money though - the speed at which it can move through the economy. M1 is a good measure of 'mobile' money.
I think the fed is still pumping money, but without the desired effect. M3 continues to grow, but much of that money sits in corporate coffers and big lending institutions. Meanwhile, M1 is declining...
This is an interesting perspective. I hope you are wrong!
The downturns in oil and gold are recent, small, and have followed big rises in both. I don't think it's clear yet that the trend has turned. Stocks have been more or less flat since last winter. (up a little, down a little, up a little, down a little)
If the oil price steadies, this is actually a promising sign for the economy in the short term. It means that we may escape a collapse triggered by oil prices this year (but probably not next year if the economy is still strong then).
As for money supply, there are two big questions: 1) Will the Fed back down and lower the short-term interest rate if the economy shows clear signs of weakness? If so, this will help to prolong the current bubble. I don't understand the Fed's motivations, but I do understand that they are pretty much all Republicans who want to win the 2006 Congressional elections or at least steal those elections without being too obvious about it. So I think that they will try to keep the bubble from bursting. 2) Will Asian countries continue to suppress long-term interest rates by buying T-bills? Here I cannot see any reason why they will not. In fact, I think that they will step up their buying in order to lower long-term rates still further if they see the bubble starting to lose air. I expect to see long-term rates fall below short-term rates before the end of the year, giving new life to the mortgage/housing bubble.
For all of these reasons, I think that a collapse is unlikely before 2007 and perhaps before 2009. However, 2009 looks bad. VERY bad.